Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/2016911.2016919acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicerConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Research design: necessary bricolage

Published: 08 August 2011 Publication History

Abstract

In this paper we suggest that in order to advance, the field of computer science education needs to craft its own research methods, to augment the borrowing of "traditional" methods such as semi-structured interviews and surveys from other research traditions. Two example instruments used in our recent research are discussed. We adopt the metaphor of "bricolage" to characterise not only what researchers do, but to argue that this may be a necessary step towards developing theory.

References

[1]
Barker, L., Garvin-Doxas, K. and Jackson, M. (2002). Defensive climate in the computer science classroom. In Proceedings of the 33rd SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education (SIGCSE '02).
[2]
Bruner, J. (1987). Life as narrative. Social Research 54(1).
[3]
Cole, M. (1998). Cultural Psychology: A Once and Future Discipline, Harvard University Press.
[4]
Collins, H. (2001). What is tacit knowledge? In Schatzky, T., Knorr Cetina, K., and von Savigny, E. (Eds.) The practice turn in contemporary theory. Routledge.
[5]
Denzin, N. and Lincoln, Y. (2008). Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials, 3e. Sage.
[6]
Do, A., Rupert, A., and Wolford, G. (2008). Evaluations of pleasurable experiences: The peak-end rule. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 15(1):96--98.
[7]
Eckerdal, A., Thuné, M., and Berglund, A. (2005). What does it take to learn 'programming thinking'?. In Proceedings of the first international workshop on Computing education research (ICER '05).
[8]
Fensham, P. J. (2004). Defining an Identity: The Evolution of Science Education as a Field of Research. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
[9]
Fincher, S. and Petre, M. (2004). Computer science education research. Routledge-Falmer.
[10]
Gaver, B., Dunne, T., and Pacenti, E. (1999). Design: Cultural probes. interactions 6(1): 21--29.
[11]
Goody, J. (1977). The domestication of the savage mind. Cambridge University Press.
[12]
Harper, D. (1987). Working knowledge: Skill and community in a small shop.
[13]
Harper, D. (2002). Talking about pictures: A case for photo elicitation. Visual studies 17(1):13--26.
[14]
Kerth, N. L. (2001). Project retrospectives : a handbook for team reviews. New York: Dorset House.
[15]
Klein, G. (1999). Sources of power. MIT Press.
[16]
Labov, W. & Waletzky, J. (1967). Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. In J. Helm (Ed.), Essays on the verbal and visual arts: Proceedings of the 1996 Annual spring Meeting of the American Ethnological Society (pp12--44). Univeristy of Washington Press.
[17]
Levine, R. (1997). A geography of time. Basic Books.
[18]
Levine, L., Safer, M., and Lench, H. (2006). Remembering and misremembering emotions. In Sanna, L. and Chang, E. (Eds.) Judgments over time: The interplay of thoughts, feelings, and behaviors. Oxford University Pres.
[19]
Mishler, E. (1991). Research Interviewing: Context and Narrative. Harvard University Press.
[20]
Pink, S. (2007). Doing visual ethnography: Images, media, and representation in research. Sage.
[21]
Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. Doubleday.
[22]
Rogoff, B. (2003). The Cultural Nature of Human Development, Oxford University Press.
[23]
Rogoff, B. and Lave, J. (1984). Everyday cognition: its development in social context. Harvard University Press.
[24]
Rose, Mike. (2004). The Mind at Work. Viking Adult.
[25]
Scott, J. (1999). Seeing like a state. Yale University Press.
[26]
Sternberg, R. and Horvath, J. (1999). Tacit knowledge in professional practice: Researcher and practitioner perspectives. Lawrence Erlbaum.
[27]
Tenenberg, J. and McCartney, R. (2010). Why discipline matters in computing education scholarship. ACM Transactions on Compututing Educaction 9(4): 18:1--18:7.
[28]
Tulving, E. (2003). Episodic Memory: From Mind to Brain. Annual Review of Psychology. 53:1--25.
[29]
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in Society, Harvard University Press.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Tracing Participation Beyond Computing Careers: How Women Reflect on Their Experiences in Computing ProgramsACM Transactions on Computing Education10.1145/358256423:2(1-23)Online publication date: 17-Apr-2023
  • (2023)Drawing a Computer Scientst: Assessing the Images of the Computer Scientist Among K-8 Teachers2023 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)10.1109/FIE58773.2023.10343383(1-6)Online publication date: 18-Oct-2023
  • (2022)How Code Takes Shape: Studying a Student’s Program EvolutionCognition and Instruction10.1080/07370008.2022.204433040:2(266-303)Online publication date: 18-Mar-2022
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Research design: necessary bricolage
          Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

          Information & Contributors

          Information

          Published In

          cover image ACM Conferences
          ICER '11: Proceedings of the seventh international workshop on Computing education research
          August 2011
          156 pages
          ISBN:9781450308298
          DOI:10.1145/2016911
          • General Chair:
          • Kate Sanders,
          • Program Chairs:
          • Michael E. Caspersen,
          • Alison Clear,
          • Kate Sanders
          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Sponsors

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          Published: 08 August 2011

          Permissions

          Request permissions for this article.

          Check for updates

          Author Tags

          1. bricolage
          2. research design
          3. research methods

          Qualifiers

          • Research-article

          Conference

          ICER '11
          Sponsor:
          ICER '11: International Computing Education Research Workshop
          August 8 - 9, 2011
          Rhode Island, Providence, USA

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate 189 of 803 submissions, 24%

          Upcoming Conference

          ICER 2025
          ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research
          August 3 - 6, 2025
          Charlottesville , VA , USA

          Contributors

          Other Metrics

          Bibliometrics & Citations

          Bibliometrics

          Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)3
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
          Reflects downloads up to 19 Nov 2024

          Other Metrics

          Citations

          Cited By

          View all
          • (2023)Tracing Participation Beyond Computing Careers: How Women Reflect on Their Experiences in Computing ProgramsACM Transactions on Computing Education10.1145/358256423:2(1-23)Online publication date: 17-Apr-2023
          • (2023)Drawing a Computer Scientst: Assessing the Images of the Computer Scientist Among K-8 Teachers2023 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)10.1109/FIE58773.2023.10343383(1-6)Online publication date: 18-Oct-2023
          • (2022)How Code Takes Shape: Studying a Student’s Program EvolutionCognition and Instruction10.1080/07370008.2022.204433040:2(266-303)Online publication date: 18-Mar-2022
          • (2021)A Quantitative Analysis of Study Habits Among Lower- and Higher-Performing Students in CS1Proceedings of the 26th ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3430665.3456350(366-372)Online publication date: 26-Jun-2021
          • (2021)Confronting Inequities in Computer Science Education: A Case for Critical TheoryProceedings of the 52nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education10.1145/3408877.3432453(425-430)Online publication date: 3-Mar-2021
          • (2020)Understanding Students' Computational Perspectives and Figured Worlds of ComputingProceedings of the 2020 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research10.1145/3372782.3407103(326-327)Online publication date: 10-Aug-2020
          • (2020)COVID-19: an opportunity to review existing grounded theories in event studiesJournal of Convention & Event Tourism10.1080/15470148.2020.177665722:1(3-35)Online publication date: 12-Jun-2020
          • (2020)Exploring college students’ conceptions of learning computer science: a draw-a-picture technique studyComputer Science Education10.1080/08993408.2020.178315531:1(60-82)Online publication date: 28-Jun-2020
          • (2019)Behaviors of Higher and Lower Performing Students in CS1Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education10.1145/3304221.3319740(196-202)Online publication date: 2-Jul-2019
          • (2018)Errors and Complications in SQL Query FormulationACM Transactions on Computing Education10.1145/323171218:3(1-29)Online publication date: 9-Aug-2018
          • Show More Cited By

          View Options

          Login options

          View options

          PDF

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          Media

          Figures

          Other

          Tables

          Share

          Share

          Share this Publication link

          Share on social media