Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/2043932.2043980acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesrecsysConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Interactive multi-party critiquing for group recommendation

Published: 23 October 2011 Publication History

Abstract

Group recommender systems (RS) are used to support groups in making common decisions when considering a set of alternatives. Current approaches generate group recommendations based on the users' individual preferences models. We believe that members of a group can reach an agreement more effectively by exchanging proposals suggested by a conventional RS. We propose to use a critiquing RS that has been shown to be effective in single-user recommendation. In the group recommendation context, critiquing allows each user to get new recommendations similar to the proposals made by the other group members and to communicate the rationale behind their own counterproposals. We describe a mobile application implementing the proposed approach and its evaluation in a live user experiment.

References

[1]
S. R. de M. Queiroz and F. de A. T. de Carvalho. Making collaborative group recommendations based on modal symbolic data. In Advances in Artificial Intelligence - SBIA 2004, 17th Brazilian Symposium on Artificial Intelligence, Sao Luis, Maranhao, Brazil, September 29 - October 1, 2004, Proceedings, pages 307--316, 2004.
[2]
A. Jameson and B. Smyth. Recommendation to groups. In P. Brusilovsky, A. Kobsa, and W. Nejdl, editors, The Adaptive Web, volume 4321 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 596--627. Springer, 2007.
[3]
J. Masthoff. Group recommender systems: Combining individual models. In F. Ricci, L. Rokach, B. Shapira, and P. B. Kantor, editors, Recommender Systems Handbook, pages 677--702. Springer, 2011.
[4]
K. McCarthy, M. Salamó, L. Coyle, L. McGinty, B. Smyth, and P. Nixon. Cats: A synchronous approach to collaborative group recommendation. In Proceedings of the Nineteenth International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference, pages 86--91, Melbourne Beach, Florida, USA, 2006.
[5]
L. McGinty and J. Reilly. On the evolution of critiquing recommenders. In F. Ricci, L. Rokach, B. Shapira, and P. B. Kantor, editors, Recommender Systems Handbook, pages 419--453. Springer, 2011.
[6]
C. Plua and A. Jameson. Collaborative preference elicitation in a group travel recommender system. In Proceedings of the AH 2002 Workshop on Recommendation and Personalization in eCommerce, pages 148--154, Malaga, Spain, 2002.
[7]
P. Viappiani, B. Faltings, and P. Pu. Preference-based search using example-critiquing with suggestions. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 27:265--503, 2006.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)A Pilot Study on Multi-Party Conversation Strategies for Group RecommendationsProceedings of the 6th ACM Conference on Conversational User Interfaces10.1145/3640794.3665569(1-7)Online publication date: 8-Jul-2024
  • (2024)CHARM: a Group Decision Making Support ChatbotCompanion Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces10.1145/3640544.3645220(7-10)Online publication date: 18-Mar-2024
  • (2024)Anticipating Eating Preferences in Group Decision MakingAdjunct Proceedings of the 32nd ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization10.1145/3631700.3664894(329-336)Online publication date: 27-Jun-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Interactive multi-party critiquing for group recommendation

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      RecSys '11: Proceedings of the fifth ACM conference on Recommender systems
      October 2011
      414 pages
      ISBN:9781450306836
      DOI:10.1145/2043932
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Sponsors

      In-Cooperation

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 23 October 2011

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. critiquing
      2. decision making
      3. group recommender system

      Qualifiers

      • Poster

      Conference

      RecSys '11
      Sponsor:
      RecSys '11: Fifth ACM Conference on Recommender Systems
      October 23 - 27, 2011
      Illinois, Chicago, USA

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate 254 of 1,295 submissions, 20%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)10
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
      Reflects downloads up to 18 Nov 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2024)A Pilot Study on Multi-Party Conversation Strategies for Group RecommendationsProceedings of the 6th ACM Conference on Conversational User Interfaces10.1145/3640794.3665569(1-7)Online publication date: 8-Jul-2024
      • (2024)CHARM: a Group Decision Making Support ChatbotCompanion Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces10.1145/3640544.3645220(7-10)Online publication date: 18-Mar-2024
      • (2024)Anticipating Eating Preferences in Group Decision MakingAdjunct Proceedings of the 32nd ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization10.1145/3631700.3664894(329-336)Online publication date: 27-Jun-2024
      • (2024)Supporting Group Decision-Making: Insights from a Focus Group StudyProceedings of the 32nd ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization10.1145/3627043.3659538(301-306)Online publication date: 22-Jun-2024
      • (2024)Are heterogeinity and conflicting preferences no longer a problem? Personality-based dynamic clustering for group recommender systemsExpert Systems with Applications10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124812255(124812)Online publication date: Dec-2024
      • (2023)CHARM: A Group Recommender ChatBotAdjunct Proceedings of the 31st ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization10.1145/3563359.3597388(275-282)Online publication date: 26-Jun-2023
      • (2023)GMAP 2023: 2nd Workshop on Group Modeling, Adaptation and PersonalizationAdjunct Proceedings of the 31st ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization10.1145/3563359.3595628(249-252)Online publication date: 26-Jun-2023
      • (2022)A Systematic Review of Interaction Design Strategies for Group Recommendation SystemsProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35551616:CSCW2(1-51)Online publication date: 11-Nov-2022
      • (2022)Single User Group RecommendationsAdjunct Proceedings of the 30th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization10.1145/3511047.3537663(308-313)Online publication date: 4-Jul-2022
      • (2022)Supporting Group Decision-Making Processes based on Group DynamicsProceedings of the 30th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization10.1145/3503252.3534358(346-350)Online publication date: 4-Jul-2022
      • Show More Cited By

      View Options

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media