Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/192161.192213acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessiggraphConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free access

Generalization of Lambert's reflectance model

Published: 24 July 1994 Publication History

Abstract

Lambert's model for body reflection is widely used in computer graphics. It is used extensively by rendering techniques such as radiosity and ray tracing. For several real-world objects, however, Lambert's model can prove to be a very inaccurate approximation to the body reflectance. While the brightness of a Lambertian surface is independent of viewing direction, that of a rough surface increases as the viewing direction approaches the light source direction. In this paper, a comprehensive model is developed that predicts body reflectance from rough surfaces. The surface is modeled as a collection of Lambertian facets. It is shown that such a surface is inherently non-Lambertian due to the foreshortening of the surface facets. Further, the model accounts for complex geometric and radiometric phenomena such as masking, shadowing, and interreflections between facets. Several experiments have been conducted on samples of rough diffuse surfaces, such as, plaster, sand, clay, and cloth. All these surface demonstrate significant deviation from Lambertian behavior. The reflectance measurements obtained are in strong agreement with the reflectance predicted by the model.

Supplementary Material

PS File (p239-oren.ps)

References

[1]
P. Beckmann. Shadowing of random rough surfaces. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, AP-13:384-388, 1965.
[2]
P. Beckmann and A. Spizzichino. The Scattering of Electro-magnetic Waves from Rough Surfaces. Pergamon, New York, 1963.
[3]
J. F. Blinn. Models of light reflection for computer synthe-sized pictures. ACM Computer Graphics (SIGGRAPH 77), 19(10):542-547, 1977.
[4]
D. Buhl, W. J. Welch, and D. G. Rea. Reradiation and thermal emission from illuminated craters on the lunar surface. Journal of Geophysical Research, 73(16):5281-5295, August 1968.
[5]
B. Cabral, N. Max, and R. Springmeyer. Bidirectional re-flection functions from surface bump maps. ACM Computer Graphics (SIGGRAPH 87), 21(4):273-281, 1987.
[6]
S. Chandrasekhar. Radiative Transfer. Dover Publications, 1960.
[7]
M. F. Cohen and D. P. Greenberg. The hemi-cube, a radiosity solution for complex environments. ACM Computer Graphics (SIGGRAPH 85), 19(3):31-40, 1985.
[8]
R. L. Cook and K. E. Torrance. A reflection model for com-puter graphics. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 1(1):7-24, 1982.
[9]
D. Forsyth and A. Zisserman. Mutual illumination. Proc. Conf. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 466- 473, 1989.
[10]
R. Hall. Illumination and Color in Computer Generated Im-agery. Springer-Verlag, 1989.
[11]
P. Hanrahan and W. Krueger. Reflection from layered surfaces due to subsurface scattering. Computer Graphics Proceedings (SIGGRAPH 93), pages 165-174, 1993.
[12]
B. W. Hapke, R. M. Nelson, and W. D. Smythe. The opposition effect of the moon: The contribution of coherent backscatter. Science, 260(23):509-511, April 1993.
[13]
B. W. Hapke and Huge van Horn. Photometric studies of complex surfaces, with applications to the moon. Journal of Geophysical Research, 68(15):4545-4570, August 1963.
[14]
X. D. He, K. E. Torrance, F. X. Sillion, and D. P. Greenberg. A comprehensive physical model for light reflection. ACM Computer Graphics (SIGGRAPH 91), 25(4):175-186, 1991.
[15]
R. G. Hering and T. F. Smith. Apparent radiation proper-ties of a rough surface. AIAA Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics, 23:337-361, 1970.
[16]
M. Jakob. Heat Transfer. Wiley, 1957.
[17]
J. T. Kajiya. Anisotropic reflection model. ACM Computer Graphics (SIGGRAPH 91), 25(4):175-186, 1991.
[18]
J. J. Koenderink and A. J. van Doorn. Geometrical modes as a general method to treat diffuse interreflections in radiometry. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 73(6):843-850, 1983.
[19]
Y. Kuga and A. Ishimaru. Retroreflectance from a dense dis-tribution of spherical particles. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 1(8):831-835, August 1984.
[20]
J. H. Lambert. Photometria sive de mensure de gratibus lumi-nis, colorum umbrae. Eberhard Klett, 1760.
[21]
M. Minnaert. The reciprocity principle in lunar photometry. Astrophysical Journal, 93:403-410, 1941.
[22]
S. K. Nayar, K. Ikeuchi, and T. Kanade. Shape from in-terreflections. International Journal of Computer Vision, 6:3:173-195, 1991.
[23]
F. E. Nicodemus, J. C. Richmond, and J. J. Hsia. Geometrical Considerations and Nomenclature for Reflectance. National Bureau of Standards, October 1977. Monograph No. 160.
[24]
P. Oetking. Photometric studies of diffusely reflecting surfaces with application to the brightness of the moon. Journal of Geophysical Research, 71(10):2505-2513, May 1966.
[25]
E. Opik. Photometric measures of the moon and the moon the earth-shine. Publications de L'Observatorie Astronomical de L'Universite de Tartu, 26(1):1-68, 1924.
[26]
N. S. Orlova. Photometric relief of the lunar surface. Astron. Z, 33(1):93-100, 1956.
[27]
P. Poulin and A. Fournier. A model for anisotropic reflection. ACM Computer Graphics (SIGGRAPH 90), 24(4):273-282, 1990.
[28]
T. Shibata, W. Frei, and M. Sutton. Digital correction of solar illumination and viewing angle artifacts in remotely sensed images. Machine Processing of Remotely Sensed Data Sym-posium, pages 169-177, 1981.
[29]
R. Siegel and J. R. Howell. Thermal Radiation Heat Transfer. Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, third edition, 1972.
[30]
B. G. Smith. Lunar surface roughness: Shadowing and thermal emission. Journal of Geophysical Research, 72(16):4059-4067, August 1967.
[31]
K. Torrance and E. Sparrow. Theory for off-specular reflec-tion from rough surfaces. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 57:1105-1114, September 1967.
[32]
L. Tsang and A. Ishimaru. Backscattering enhancement of random discrete scatterers. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 1(8):836-839, August 1984.
[33]
S. Upstill. The RenderMan Companion. Addison Wesley, 1989.
[34]
R. J. Wagner. Shadowing of randomly rough surfaces. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 41(1):138-147, June 1966.
[35]
H.W. Westin, J.R. Arvo, and K.E. Torrance. Predicting re-flectance functions from complex surfaces. ACM Computer Graphics (SIGGRAPH 92), 26(2):255-264, 1992.
[36]
T. Whitted. An improved illumination model for shaded dis-play. Communications of the ACM, 23(6):343-349, 1980.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)金属表面偏振双向反射分布函数建模与逆向绘制Acta Optica Sinica10.3788/AOS24105144:22(2224001)Online publication date: 2024
  • (2024)The temporal variability of Io’s hotspotsFrontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences10.3389/fspas.2024.136947211Online publication date: 20-May-2024
  • (2024)Development of Mid-Infrared Fiber Lasers and Applications to Precision Measurement中赤外ファイバレーザの開発および精密計測への応用Journal of the Japan Society for Precision Engineering10.2493/jjspe.90.32590:4(325-329)Online publication date: 5-Apr-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
SIGGRAPH '94: Proceedings of the 21st annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques
July 1994
512 pages
ISBN:0897916670
DOI:10.1145/192161
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 24 July 1994

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. BRDF
  2. Lambert's model
  3. moon reflectance
  4. reflection models
  5. rough surfaces

Qualifiers

  • Article

Conference

SIGGRAPH94
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

SIGGRAPH '94 Paper Acceptance Rate 57 of 242 submissions, 24%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 1,822 of 8,601 submissions, 21%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)665
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)83
Reflects downloads up to 22 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)金属表面偏振双向反射分布函数建模与逆向绘制Acta Optica Sinica10.3788/AOS24105144:22(2224001)Online publication date: 2024
  • (2024)The temporal variability of Io’s hotspotsFrontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences10.3389/fspas.2024.136947211Online publication date: 20-May-2024
  • (2024)Development of Mid-Infrared Fiber Lasers and Applications to Precision Measurement中赤外ファイバレーザの開発および精密計測への応用Journal of the Japan Society for Precision Engineering10.2493/jjspe.90.32590:4(325-329)Online publication date: 5-Apr-2024
  • (2024)Virtually measuring layered material appearanceJournal of the Optical Society of America A10.1364/JOSAA.51460441:5(959)Online publication date: 25-Apr-2024
  • (2024)ChromaFlash: Snapshot Hyperspectral Imaging Using Rolling Shutter CamerasProceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/36785828:3(1-31)Online publication date: 9-Sep-2024
  • (2024)A Fully-correlated Anisotropic Micrograin BSDF ModelACM Transactions on Graphics10.1145/365822443:4(1-14)Online publication date: 19-Jul-2024
  • (2024)Importance Sampling BRDF DerivativesACM Transactions on Graphics10.1145/3648611Online publication date: 21-Feb-2024
  • (2024)Deep SVBRDF Acquisition and Modelling: A SurveyComputer Graphics Forum10.1111/cgf.1519943:6Online publication date: 16-Sep-2024
  • (2024)VMF Diffuse: A unified rough diffuse BRDFComputer Graphics Forum10.1111/cgf.1514943:4Online publication date: 24-Jul-2024
  • (2024)Tinto: Multisensor Benchmark for 3-D Hyperspectral Point Cloud Segmentation in the GeosciencesIEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing10.1109/TGRS.2023.334029362(1-15)Online publication date: 2024
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media