Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/1993636.1993726acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesstocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Free access

Every property of hyperfinite graphs is testable

Published: 06 June 2011 Publication History

Abstract

A property testing algorithm for a property Π in the bounded degree graph model[7] is an algorithm that, given access to the adjacency list representation of a graph G=(V,E) with maximum degree at most d, accepts G with probability at least 2/3 if G has property Π, and rejects G with probability at least 2/3, if it differs on more than ε dn edges from every d-degree bounded graph with property Π. A property is testable, if for every ε,d and n, there is a property testing algorithm Aε,n,d that makes at most q(ε,d) queries to an input graph of n vertices, that is, a non-uniform algorithm that makes a number of queries that is independent of the graph size.
A k-disc around a vertex v of a graph G=(V,E) is the subgraph induced by all vertices of distance at most k from v. We show that the structure of a planar graph on large enough number of vertices, n, and with constant maximum degree d, is determined, up to the modification (insertion or deletion) of at most ε d n edges, by the frequency of k-discs for certain k=k(ε,d) that is independent of the size of the graph. We can replace planar graphs by any hyperfinite class of graphs, which includes, for example, every graph class that does not contain a set of forbidden minors.
We use this result to obtain new results and improve upon existing results in the area of property testing. In particular, we prove that graph isomorphism is testable for every class of hyperfinite graphs, every graph property is testable for every class of hyperfinite graphs, every hyperfinite graph property is testable in the bounded degree graph model, A large class of graph parameters is approximable for hyperfinite graphs.
Our results also give a partial explanation of the success of motifs in the analysis of complex networks.

Supplementary Material

JPG File (stoc_11a_3.jpg)
MP4 File (stoc_11a_3.mp4)

References

[1]
N. Alon, E. Fischer, I. Newman, A. Shapira. A combinatorial characterization of the testable graph properties: it's all about regularity. Proc 38th STOC pp. 251--260, 2006.
[2]
I. Benjamini, O. Schramm, and A. Shapira. Every minor-closed property of sparse graphs is testable. Proc 40th STOC, pp. 393--402, 2008.
[3]
C. Borgs, J. T. Chayes, L. Lovász, V. T. Sós, B. Szegedy, Katalin Vesztergombi: Graph limits and parameter testing. STOC 2006: 261--270
[4]
A. Czumaj, A. Shapira, and C. Sohler. Testing hereditary properties of nonexpanding bounded-degree graphs. SICOMP, 38(6): 2499--2510, April 2009.
[5]
G. Elek. L<sup>2</sup>-spectral invariants and convergent sequences of finite graphs. Journal of Functional Analysis, vol. 254, no. 10, pp. 2667--2689, 2008.
[6]
O. Goldreich, S. Goldwasser, D. Ron. Property Testing and its Connection to Learning and Approximation. J. ACM, 45(4): 653--750, 1998.
[7]
O. Goldreich and D. Ron. Property testing in bounded degree graphs. Algorithmica, 32(2): 302--343, 2002.
[8]
A. Hassidim, J. A. Kelner, H. N. Nguyen, and K. Onak. Local graph partitions for approximation and testing. Proc 50th FOCS, pp. 22--31, 2009.
[9]
R. Lipton and R. Tarjan. Applications of a Planar Separator Theorem. SIAM Journal on Computing, 9(3):615--627, 1980.
[10]
R. Milo, S. Shen-Orr, S. Itzkovitz, N. Kashtan, D. Chklovskii, U. Alon Network Motifs: Simple Building Blocks of Complex Networks. Science, Vol. 298. no. 5594, pp. 824 - 827, 2002.
[11]
G. Miller. Isomorphism of graphs which are pairwise k-separable. Information and Control, 56(1--2): 21--33, 1983.
[12]
H. Nguyen and K. Onak. Constant-Time Approximation Algorithms via Local Improvements. Proc 49th FOCS, pp. 327--336, 2008.
[13]
K. Onak. New Sublinear Methods in the Struggle Against Classical Problems. PhD Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2010.
[14]
. Rubinfeld and M. Sudan, Robust characterization of polynomials with applications toprogram testing. SIAM Journal of Computing, 25 (1996), 252--271(first appeared as a technical report, Cornell University, 1993).

Cited By

View all
  • (2019)Generalized Shogi, Chess, and Xiangqi are Constant-Time TestableIEICE Transactions on Fundamentals of Electronics, Communications and Computer Sciences10.1587/transfun.E102.A.1126E102.A:9(1126-1133)Online publication date: 1-Sep-2019
  • (2019)Stability and invariant random subgroupsDuke Mathematical Journal10.1215/00127094-2019-0024168:12Online publication date: 1-Sep-2019
  • (2019)Hyperfiniteness of Real-World NetworksThe Review of Socionetwork Strategies10.1007/s12626-019-00051-3Online publication date: 5-Sep-2019
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
STOC '11: Proceedings of the forty-third annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing
June 2011
840 pages
ISBN:9781450306911
DOI:10.1145/1993636
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 06 June 2011

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tag

  1. property testing

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

STOC'11
Sponsor:
STOC'11: Symposium on Theory of Computing
June 6 - 8, 2011
California, San Jose, USA

Acceptance Rates

STOC '11 Paper Acceptance Rate 84 of 304 submissions, 28%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 1,469 of 4,586 submissions, 32%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)64
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)9
Reflects downloads up to 25 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2019)Generalized Shogi, Chess, and Xiangqi are Constant-Time TestableIEICE Transactions on Fundamentals of Electronics, Communications and Computer Sciences10.1587/transfun.E102.A.1126E102.A:9(1126-1133)Online publication date: 1-Sep-2019
  • (2019)Stability and invariant random subgroupsDuke Mathematical Journal10.1215/00127094-2019-0024168:12Online publication date: 1-Sep-2019
  • (2019)Hyperfiniteness of Real-World NetworksThe Review of Socionetwork Strategies10.1007/s12626-019-00051-3Online publication date: 5-Sep-2019
  • (2018)De-anonymization of Heterogeneous Random Graphs in Quasilinear TimeAlgorithmica10.1007/s00453-017-0395-080:11(3397-3427)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2018
  • (2016)Finding Large Matchings in Semi-Streaming2016 IEEE 16th International Conference on Data Mining Workshops (ICDMW)10.1109/ICDMW.2016.0092(608-614)Online publication date: Dec-2016
  • (2016)Constant-Time Algorithms for Complex Networks2016 3rd Asia-Pacific World Congress on Computer Science and Engineering (APWC on CSE)10.1109/APWC-on-CSE.2016.014(10-17)Online publication date: Dec-2016
  • (2015)A Quasi-Polynomial Time Partition Oracle for Graphs with an Excluded MinorACM Transactions on Algorithms10.1145/262950811:3(1-13)Online publication date: 13-Jan-2015
  • (2015)Sublinear DTD ValidityLanguage and Automata Theory and Applications10.1007/978-3-319-15579-1_58(739-751)Online publication date: 24-Feb-2015
  • (2013)Constant-Time Approximation Algorithms for the Optimum Branching Problem on Sparse GraphsInternational Journal of Networking and Computing10.15803/ijnc.3.2_2053:2(205-216)Online publication date: 2013
  • (2013)Testing subdivision-freenessProceedings of the forty-fifth annual ACM symposium on Theory of Computing10.1145/2488608.2488663(437-446)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2013
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media