Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/1969773.1969791acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesautomotiveuiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Evaluating informative auditory and tactile cues for in-vehicle information systems

Published: 11 November 2010 Publication History

Abstract

As in-vehicle information systems are increasingly able to obtain and deliver information, driver distraction becomes a larger concern. In this paper we propose that informative interruption cues (IIC) can be an effective means to support drivers' attention management. As a first step, we investigated the design and presentation modality of IIC that conveyed not only the arrival but also the priority level of a message. Both sound and vibration cues were created for four different priority levels and tested in 5 task conditions that simulated possible perceptional and cognitive load in real driving situations. Results showed that the cues were quickly learned, reliably detected, and quickly and accurately identified. Vibration was found to be a promising alternative for sound to deliver IIC, as vibration cues were identified more accurately and interfered less with driving. Sound cues also had advantages in terms of shorter response time and more (reported) physical comfort.

References

[1]
G. Arrabito, T. Mondor, and K. Kent. Judging the urgency of non-verbal auditory alarms: A case study. Ergonomics, 47(8): 821--840, 2004.
[2]
L. Brown, S. Brewster, and H. Purchase. Multidimensional tactons for non-visual information presentation in mobile devices. In Proceedings of the 8th Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, pages 231--238, 2006.
[3]
Y. Cao, A. Mahr, S. Castronovo, M. Theune, C. Stahl, and C. Müller. Local danger warnings for drivers: The effect of modality and level of assistance on driver reaction. In International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI'10), pages 134--148. ACM, 2010.
[4]
J. Edworthy, S. Loxley, and I. Dennis. Improving auditory warning design: Relationship between warning sound parameters and perceived urgency. Human Factors, 33(2): 205--231, 1991.
[5]
S. Hameed, T. Ferris, S. Jayaraman, and N. Sarter. Using informative peripheral visual and tactile cues to support task and interruption management. Human Factors, 51(2): 126, 2009.
[6]
C. Ho, M. Nikolic, M. Waters, and N. Sarter. Not now! Supporting interruption management by indicating the modality and urgency of pending tasks. Human Factors, 46(3): 399--409, 2004.
[7]
C. Ho, N. Reed, and C. Spence. Multisensory in-car warning signals for collision avoidance. Human Factors, 49(6): 1107--1114, 2007.
[8]
C. Ho and N. Sarter. Supporting synchronous distributed communication and coordination through multimodal information exchange. In Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting Proceedings, volume 48, pages 426--430. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 2004.
[9]
W. Horrey and C. Wickens. Driving and side task performance: The effects of display clutter, separation, and modality. Human Factors, 46(4): 611--624, 2004.
[10]
A. Jamson, S. Westerman, G. Hockey, and O. Carsten. Speech-based e-mail and driver behavior: Effects of an in-vehicle message system interface. Human Factors, 46(4): 625, 2004.
[11]
C. Kaufmann, R. Risser, A. Geven, and R. Sefelin. Effects of simultaneous multi-modal warnings and traffic information on driver behaviour. In Proceedings of European Conference on Human Centred Design for Intelligent Transport Systems, pages 33--42, 2008.
[12]
J. Lee, J. Hoffman, and E. Hayes. Collision warning design to mitigate driver distraction. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 65--72. ACM, 2004.
[13]
T. Leinmüller, R. Schmidt, B. Böddeker, R. Berg, and T. Suzuki. A global trend for car 2 x communication. In Proceedings of FISITA 2008 World Automotive Congress, 2008.
[14]
D. Marshall, J. Lee, and P. Austria. Alerts for in-vehicle information systems: Annoyance, urgency, and appropriateness. Human Factors, 49(1): 145--157, 2007.
[15]
T. Mondor and G. Finley. The perceived urgency of auditory warning alarms used in the hospital operating room is inappropriate. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, 50(3): 221--228, 2003.
[16]
V. Neale, T. Dingus, S. Klauer, J. Sudweeks, and M. Goodman. An overview of the 100-car naturalistic study and findings. Technical Report 05--0400, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration of the United States, 2005.
[17]
N. Sarter. The need for multisensory interfaces in support of effective attention allocation in highly dynamic event-driven domains: the case of cockpit automation. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 10(3): 231--245, 2000.
[18]
N. Sarter. Graded and multimodal interruption cueing in support of preattentive reference and attention management. In Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting Proceedings, volume 49, pages 478--481. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 2005.
[19]
B. Seppelt and C. Wickens. In-vehicle tasks: Effects of modality, driving relevance, and redundancy. Technical Report AHFD-03-16 & GM-03-2, Aviation Human Factors Division at University of Illinois & General Motors Corporation, 2003.
[20]
C. Smith, B. Clegg, E. Heggestad, and P. Hopp-Levine. Interruption management: A comparison of auditory and tactile cues for both alerting and orienting. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 67(9): 777--786, 2009.
[21]
C. Spence and C. Ho. Multisensory warning signals for event perception and safe driving. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 9(6): 523--554, 2008.
[22]
K. Suzuki and H. Jansson. An analysis of driver's steering behaviour during auditory or haptic warnings for the designing of lane departure warning system. Review of Automotive Engineering (JSAE), 24(1): 65--70, 2003.
[23]
J. Van Erp and H. Van Veen. Vibrotactile in-vehicle navigation system. Transportation Research Part F: Psychology and Behaviour, 7: 247--256, 2004.
[24]
C. Wickens. Multiple resources and performance prediction. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 3(2): 159--177, 2002.
[25]
C. Wickens, S. Dixon, and B. Seppelt. Auditory preemption versus multiple resources: Who wins in interruption management. In Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting Proceedings, volume 49, pages 463--467. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 2005.
[26]
D. Woods. The alarm problem and directed attention in dynamic fault management. Ergonomics, 38(11): 2371--2393, 1995.

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)Research on improving driver's situational awareness in automatic driving by vibration informationProceedings of the Tenth International Symposium of Chinese CHI10.1145/3565698.3565776(117-128)Online publication date: 22-Oct-2022
  • (2021)User-Friendliness of Different Pitches of Auditory Cues in Autonomous Vehicle ScenariosCross-Cultural Design. Applications in Cultural Heritage, Tourism, Autonomous Vehicles, and Intelligent Agents10.1007/978-3-030-77080-8_20(240-252)Online publication date: 3-Jul-2021
  • (2019)Adaptive Auditory Alerts for Smart In-Vehicle InterfacesProceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting10.1177/107118131963140463:1(1545-1549)Online publication date: 20-Nov-2019
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Evaluating informative auditory and tactile cues for in-vehicle information systems

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      AutomotiveUI '10: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications
      November 2010
      160 pages
      ISBN:9781450304375
      DOI:10.1145/1969773
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Sponsors

      • Carnegie Mellon University: Carnegie Mellon University

      In-Cooperation

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 11 November 2010

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. in-vehicle information systems
      2. interruption management
      3. multimodal interfaces

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Funding Sources

      • EC Artemis project on Human-Centric Design of Embedded Systems (SmarcoS)

      Conference

      AutomotiveUI '10
      Sponsor:
      • Carnegie Mellon University

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate 248 of 566 submissions, 44%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)42
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)6
      Reflects downloads up to 02 Oct 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2022)Research on improving driver's situational awareness in automatic driving by vibration informationProceedings of the Tenth International Symposium of Chinese CHI10.1145/3565698.3565776(117-128)Online publication date: 22-Oct-2022
      • (2021)User-Friendliness of Different Pitches of Auditory Cues in Autonomous Vehicle ScenariosCross-Cultural Design. Applications in Cultural Heritage, Tourism, Autonomous Vehicles, and Intelligent Agents10.1007/978-3-030-77080-8_20(240-252)Online publication date: 3-Jul-2021
      • (2019)Adaptive Auditory Alerts for Smart In-Vehicle InterfacesProceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting10.1177/107118131963140463:1(1545-1549)Online publication date: 20-Nov-2019
      • (2018)DARAProceedings of the 10th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/3240167.3240186(1-12)Online publication date: 29-Sep-2018
      • (2018)Mobile Screen Size Limits Multimodal SynergyProceedings of the 36th European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics10.1145/3232078.3232101(1-4)Online publication date: 5-Sep-2018
      • (2017)A INTERAÇÃO SONORA COM SISTEMAS EMBARCADOS EM VEÍCULOSBlucher Design Proceedings10.5151/16ergodesign-0220(2108-2119)Online publication date: Aug-2017
      • (2017)Exploring How Drivers Perceive Spatial Earcons in Automated VehiclesProceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/31309011:3(1-24)Online publication date: 11-Sep-2017
      • (2017)Using EEG to Understand why Behavior to Auditory In-vehicle Notifications Differs Across Test EnvironmentsProceedings of the 9th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications10.1145/3122986.3123017(123-133)Online publication date: 24-Sep-2017
      • (2017)Research in Driver–Vehicle Interaction: Indian ScenarioErgonomics in Caring for People10.1007/978-981-10-4980-4_43(353-361)Online publication date: 6-Oct-2017
      • (2017) 26-3: Invited Paper : Increasing Automotive Safety and Comfort Through Haptics, Auditory and Visual Feedback SID Symposium Digest of Technical Papers10.1002/sdtp.1162848:1(370-373)Online publication date: 2-Jun-2017
      • Show More Cited By

      View Options

      Get Access

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media