Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/1957656.1957818acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshriConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Touched by a robot: an investigation of subjective responses to robot-initiated touch

Published: 06 March 2011 Publication History

Abstract

By initiating physical contact with people, robots can be more useful. For example, a robotic caregiver might make contact to provide physical assistance or facilitate communication. So as to better understand how people respond to robot-initiated touch, we conducted a 2x2 between-subjects experiment with 56 people in which a robotic nurse autonomously touched and wiped the subject's forearm. Our independent variables were whether or not the robot verbally warned the person before contact, and whether the robot verbally indicated that the touch was intended to clean the person's skin (instrumental touch) or to provide comfort (affective touch). On average, regardless of the treatment, participants had a generally positive subjective response. However, with instrumental touch people responded significantly more favorably. Since the physical behavior of the robot was the same for all trials, our results demonstrate that the perceived intent of the robot can significantly influence a person's subjective response to robot-initiated touch. Our results suggest that roboticists should consider this factor in addition to the mechanics of physical interaction. Unexpectedly, we found that participants tended to respond more favorably without a verbal warning. Although inconclusive, our results suggest that verbal warnings prior to contact should be carefully designed, if used at all.

Supplementary Material

JPG File (104h.jpg)
MP4 File (104h.mp4)

References

[1]
C. Bethel et al. Psychophysiological experimental design for use in human-robot interaction studies. In CTS 2007.
[2]
T. Bickmore et al. Empathic Touch by Relational Agents. Transactions on Affective Computing, 2010.
[3]
M. Bradley and P. Lang. Measuring emotion: the self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. J Behav Ther Exp Psy, 25(1):49--59, 1994.
[4]
W. Caris-Verhallen et al. Non-verbal behaviour in nurse-elderly patient communication. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 29(4):808--818, 1999.
[5]
H. Cramer et al. The effects of robot touch and proactive behaviour on perceptions of human-robot interactions. In HRI 2009.
[6]
S. Haddadin et al. Safety analysis for a human-friendly manipulator. Int J Soc Robot: Special Issue on Towards Safety in HRI, 2:235--252, 2010.
[7]
E. T. Hall. The Hidden Dimension. Anchor Books, 1966.
[8]
C. Kidd et al. A sociable robot to encourage social interaction among the elderly. In ICRA.
[9]
C. H. King et al. Towards an assistive robot that autonomously performs bed baths for patient hygiene. In IROS 2010.
[10]
C. H. King et al. Tactile feedback induces reduced grasping force in robot-assisted surgery. IEEE T. Haptics, 2:103--110, 2009.
[11]
H. Koga et al. Development of oral rehabilitation robot for massage therapy. In Int. Special Topic Conf. Info. Tech. App. Biomed., 2007.
[12]
P. Lang et al. International affective picture system (IAPS): Technical manual and affective ratings. NIMH Center for the Study of Emotion and Attention, 1997.
[13]
K. McCann and H. McKenna. An examination of touch between nurses and elderly patients in a continuing care setting in Northern Ireland. Journal of advanced nursing, 18(5):838--846, 1993.
[14]
I. Morrison et al. The skin as a social organ. Exp Brain Res, 204(3):305--14, 2010.
[15]
T. Mukai et al. Development of a Nursing-Care Assistant Robot RIBA That Can Lift a Human in Its Arms. In IROS 2010.
[16]
M. Saerbeck and C. Bartneck. Perception of affect elicited by robot motion. In HRI 2010.
[17]
M. Shiomi et al. Interactive humanoid robots for a science museum. In HRI 2006.
[18]
Y. Tsumaki et al. Development of a skincare robot. In IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Auto., 2008.
[19]
D. Watson et al. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Lee Anna Clark, page 6, 1988.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)AdaptiX - A Transitional XR Framework for Development and Evaluation of Shared Control Applications in Assistive RoboticsProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36602438:EICS(1-28)Online publication date: 17-Jun-2024
  • (2024)Power in Human-Robot InteractionProceedings of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3610977.3634949(269-282)Online publication date: 11-Mar-2024
  • (2024)Overcoming Hand and Arm Occlusion in Human-to-Robot Handovers: Predicting Safe Poses with a Multimodal DNN Regression Model2024 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)10.1109/ICRA57147.2024.10610777(13390-13396)Online publication date: 13-May-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Touched by a robot: an investigation of subjective responses to robot-initiated touch

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

        Information & Contributors

        Information

        Published In

        cover image ACM Conferences
        HRI '11: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Human-robot interaction
        March 2011
        526 pages
        ISBN:9781450305617
        DOI:10.1145/1957656
        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Sponsors

        In-Cooperation

        • RA: IEEE Robotics and Automation Society
        • Human Factors & Ergonomics Soc: Human Factors & Ergonomics Soc
        • The Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI)
        • IEEE Systems, Man and Cybernetics Society

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        Published: 06 March 2011

        Permissions

        Request permissions for this article.

        Check for updates

        Author Tags

        1. haptics
        2. healthcare
        3. human-robot interaction

        Qualifiers

        • Research-article

        Conference

        HRI'11
        Sponsor:

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate 268 of 1,124 submissions, 24%

        Contributors

        Other Metrics

        Bibliometrics & Citations

        Bibliometrics

        Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)81
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5
        Reflects downloads up to 21 Nov 2024

        Other Metrics

        Citations

        Cited By

        View all
        • (2024)AdaptiX - A Transitional XR Framework for Development and Evaluation of Shared Control Applications in Assistive RoboticsProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36602438:EICS(1-28)Online publication date: 17-Jun-2024
        • (2024)Power in Human-Robot InteractionProceedings of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3610977.3634949(269-282)Online publication date: 11-Mar-2024
        • (2024)Overcoming Hand and Arm Occlusion in Human-to-Robot Handovers: Predicting Safe Poses with a Multimodal DNN Regression Model2024 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)10.1109/ICRA57147.2024.10610777(13390-13396)Online publication date: 13-May-2024
        • (2024)WARABI Hand: Five-fingered Robotic Hand with Flexible Skin and Force Sensors for Social Interaction2024 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)10.1109/ICRA57147.2024.10610697(18120-18126)Online publication date: 13-May-2024
        • (2024)Transformation of Relaxation Time: Proposal of Touch Care Using Tapping RobotHuman-Computer Interaction10.1007/978-3-031-60412-6_6(75-90)Online publication date: 29-Jun-2024
        • (2023)Human Factors Considerations for Quantifiable Human States in Physical Human–Robot Interaction: A Literature ReviewSensors10.3390/s2317738123:17(7381)Online publication date: 24-Aug-2023
        • (2023)Pleasant Stroke Touch on Human Back by a Human and a RobotSensors10.3390/s2303113623:3(1136)Online publication date: 19-Jan-2023
        • (2023)Investigation for Comfortable Robot Interaction Design of "Gentle Stroke with Speech"Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction10.1145/3623809.3623940(401-403)Online publication date: 4-Dec-2023
        • (2023)First-Hand Impressions: Charting and Predicting User Impressions of Robot HandsACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/358059212:3(1-25)Online publication date: 18-Jan-2023
        • (2023)Embodied Expressive Gestures in Telerobots: A Tale of Two UsersACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/357090812:2(1-20)Online publication date: 15-Mar-2023
        • Show More Cited By

        View Options

        Login options

        View options

        PDF

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        Media

        Figures

        Other

        Tables

        Share

        Share

        Share this Publication link

        Share on social media