Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/1953355.1953376acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesisecConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

An efficient XML to OWL converter

Published: 24 February 2011 Publication History

Abstract

XML has become the de-facto standard of data exchange format in E-businesses. Although XML can support syntactic inter-operability, problems arise when data sources represented as XML documents are needed to be integrated. The reason is that XML lacks support for efficient sharing of conceptualization. The Web Ontology Language (OWL) can play an important role here as it can enable semantic inter-operability, and it supports the representation of domain knowledge using classes, properties and instances for applications. In many applications it is required to convert huge XML documents automatically to OWL ontologies, which is receiving a lot of attention. There are some existing converters for this job. Unfortunately they have serious shortcomings, e. g., they do not address the handling of characteristics like internal references, (transitive) import(s), include etc. which are commonly used in XML Schemas. To alleviate these drawbacks, we propose a new framework for mapping XML to OWL automatically. We illustrate our technique on examples to show the efficacy of our approach. We also provide the performance measures of our approach on some standard datasets. We also check the correctness of the conversion process.

References

[1]
Resource description framework (RDF): Concepts and abstract syntax. In Techincal report, W3C recommendation, 2002. http://www/w3/org/TR/2002/WD-rdf-concepts-20021108/.
[2]
F. Baader and W. Nutt. Basic description logics. In Description Logic Handbook, pages 43--95, 2003.
[3]
S. Battle. Round-tripping between XML and RDF. In International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC), Hiroshima, Japan, 2004. Springer.
[4]
S. Bechhofer, F. van Harmelen, J. Hendler, I. Horrocks, D. L. McGuinness, P. F. Patel-Schneider, and L. A. Stein. OWL Web Ontology Language Reference. W3C Recommendation, 2003.
[5]
H. Bohring and S. Auer. Mapping XML to OWL ontologies. In Leipziger Informatik-Tage, LNI, volume 72, pages 147--156. GI, 2005.
[6]
N. K. Cicekli and I. Cicekli. Formalizing the specification and execution of workflows using the Event Calculus. Information Sciences, 176(15):2227--2267, 2006.
[7]
D. Draper, P. Fankhauser, M. F. Fernández, A. Malhotra, K. H. Rose, M. Rys, J. Siméon, and P. Wadler. XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 formal semantics. World Wide Web Consortium, Recommendation REC-xquery-semantics-20070123, January 2007.
[8]
M. Ferdinand, C. Zirpins, and D. Trastour. Lifting XML schema to OWL. Web Engineering, pages 354--358, 2004.
[9]
R. García, F. Perdrix, and R. Gil. Ontological infrastructure for a semantic newspaper. In Semantic Web Annotations for Multimedia Workshop, SWAMM 2006, 15th World Wide Web Conference, 2006.
[10]
M. Grunninger and J. Lee. Ontology: Applications and Design. Commun. ACM, 45(2), 2002.
[11]
H.-J. Happel and S. Seedorf. Applications of ontologies in software engineering. In International Workshop on Semantic Web Enabled Software Engineering (SWESE'06), November 2006.
[12]
I. Horrocks, P. F. Patel-schneider, and F. V. Harmelen. From SHIQ and RDF to OWL: The making of a web ontology language. Journal of Web Semantics, 1:2003, 2003.
[13]
H. Kaiya and M. Saeki. Using domain ontology as domain knowledge for requirements elicitation. In Proc. of 14th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE'06), pages 189--198. IEEE CS, 2006.
[14]
S. Melnik. Bridging the Gap between XML and RDF. available at http://infolab.stanford.edu/melnik/rdf/fusion.html.
[15]
M. J. O'Connor and A. K. Das. SQWRL: A query language for OWL. In R. Hoekstra and P. F. Patel-Schneider, editors, OWLED, volume 529 of CEUR Workshop Proceedings. CEUR-WS.org, 2008.
[16]
T. Rodrigues, P. Rosa, and J. Cardoso. Moving from syntactic to semantic organizations using JXML2OWL. Computers in Industry, 59(8):808--819, 2008.
[17]
S. Roy, K. P. Sawant, and A. Ghose. Ontology Modeling of UBL Process Diagrams using OWL. In 6th IEEE International Conference on Next Generation Web Services Practices (NWeSP).
[18]
M. Schmidt-Schauß and G. Smolka. Attributive concept descriptions with complements. Artificial Intelligence, 48(1):1--26, 1991.
[19]
E. Sirin, B. Parsia, B. C. Grau, A. Kalyanpur, and Y. Katz. Pellet: A practical OWL-DL reasoner. Journal of Web Semantics, 5(2):51--53, 2007.
[20]
G. Vienna. WEESA - Web Engineering for Semantic Web Applications. available at http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/725648.html.
[21]
W3C Recommendation. Resource Description Framework (RDF): Concepts and Abstract Syntax, 2004. available at http://www.w3.org/RDF/.
[22]
W3C Recommendation. Universal Business Language v2.0, 2006. available at http://docs.oasis-open.org/ubl/cs-UBL-2.0/UBL-2.0.html.
[23]
The XML data model, 1997. available at http://www3.org/XML/Datamodel.html.

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)Metrics-Based Comparison of OWL and XML for Representing and Querying Cognitive Radio CapabilitiesApplied Sciences10.3390/app12231194612:23(11946)Online publication date: 23-Nov-2022
  • (2020)XMLSchema2ShExSemantic Web10.3233/SW-18032911:2(235-253)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2020
  • (2019)Transforming XML schemas into OWL ontologies using formal concept analysisSoftware and Systems Modeling (SoSyM)10.1007/s10270-017-0651-418:3(2093-2110)Online publication date: 18-Jul-2019
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
ISEC '11: Proceedings of the 4th India Software Engineering Conference
February 2011
229 pages
ISBN:9781450305594
DOI:10.1145/1953355
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

  • Computer Society of India: Computer Society of India

In-Cooperation

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 24 February 2011

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. OWL
  2. XML documents
  3. XML schemas
  4. knowledge-based software engineering
  5. mapping

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

ISEC '11
Sponsor:
  • Computer Society of India
ISEC '11: Indian Software Engineering Conference
February 24 - 27, 2011
Kerala, Thiruvananthapuram, India

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 76 of 315 submissions, 24%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)5
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 20 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)Metrics-Based Comparison of OWL and XML for Representing and Querying Cognitive Radio CapabilitiesApplied Sciences10.3390/app12231194612:23(11946)Online publication date: 23-Nov-2022
  • (2020)XMLSchema2ShExSemantic Web10.3233/SW-18032911:2(235-253)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2020
  • (2019)Transforming XML schemas into OWL ontologies using formal concept analysisSoftware and Systems Modeling (SoSyM)10.1007/s10270-017-0651-418:3(2093-2110)Online publication date: 18-Jul-2019
  • (2019)S-RDF: A New RDF Serialization Format for Better Storage Without Losing Human ReadabilityOn the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM 2019 Conferences10.1007/978-3-030-33246-4_16(246-264)Online publication date: 11-Oct-2019
  • (2015)Transforming XML documents to OWL ontologies: A surveyJournal of Information Science10.1177/016555151456597241:2(242-259)Online publication date: 10-Feb-2015
  • (2014)A Method of Automatic Generation of Documents from WSDL to OWL-SApplied Mechanics and Materials10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.668-669.1202668-669(1202-1207)Online publication date: Oct-2014
  • (2013)Generating topic maps from XML/XSD documentsProceedings of the 6th ACM India Computing Convention10.1145/2522548.2523130(1-8)Online publication date: 22-Aug-2013
  • (2013)Semantic Patent Information Retrieval and Management with OWLAdvances in Information Systems and Technologies10.1007/978-3-642-36981-0_4(33-42)Online publication date: 2013
  • (2013)Semantic Integration Framework Based on Domain Ontology ConstructionProceedings of the International Conference on Information Engineering and Applications (IEA) 201210.1007/978-1-4471-4853-1_50(391-399)Online publication date: 29-Mar-2013
  • (2012)A knowledge-based formalization of UBL processes using hybrid programsProceedings of the 5th ACM COMPUTE Conference: Intelligent & scalable system technologies10.1145/2459118.2459131(1-8)Online publication date: 23-Jan-2012
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media