Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/1816123.1816180acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesjcdlConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Merging metadata: a sociotechnical study of crosswalking and interoperability

Published: 21 June 2010 Publication History

Abstract

Digital library interoperability relies on the use of a common metadata format. However, implementing a common metadata format among multiple digital libraries is not always a straightforward exercise. This paper reviews some of the metadata issues that arose during the merger of two digital libraries, the Internet Public Library and the Librarian's Internet Index. As part of the merger, each library's metadata was crosswalked to Dublin Core. This required considerable work. A sociotechnical analysis suggests that the metadata for each library had been shaped in complex ways over time by local factors, and that this complexity negatively impacted the efficiency of the crosswalk. Some implications of this finding for digital library interoperability are discussed.

References

[1]
Arms, C., & Arms, W. (2004). Mixed content and mixed metadata: Information discovery in a messy world. In: Hillman, D., & Westbrooks, E. (eds.), Metadata in Practice, Chicago: American Library Association, 223--237.
[2]
Barton, J., Currier, S., & Hey, J. (2003). Building Quality Assurance into Metadata Creation. Dublin Core 2003, 28th Sept -- 2nd Oct, Seattle, Washington, USA.
[3]
Beall, J. (2004). Metadata and data quality problems in the digital library. Journal of Digital Information 6(3).
[4]
Bearman, D., & Trant., J. (2005). Social Terminology Enhancement through Vernacular Engagement. D-Lib Magazine 11(9), September 2005. http://www.dlib.org/dlib/ september05/bearman/09bearman.html
[5]
Bijker, W. (1995). Of bicycles, bakelites, and bulbs. Toward a theory of sociotechnical change. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
[6]
Blomberg, J., Suchman, L., & Trigg, R. H. (1996). Reflections on a work-oriented design project. Human-Computer Interaction 11, pp. 237--265.
[7]
Bruce, T., & Hillmann, D. (2004). The continuum of metadata quality. In: Hillman, D., & Westbrooks, E. (eds.) Metadata in Practice. Chicago: American Library Assoc.
[8]
Crystal, A. (2003). Interface design for metadata creation. CHI '03 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems, pp. 1038--1039. Fort Lauderdale, FL: ACM Press.
[9]
Crystal, A., & Greenberg, J. (2005). Usability of a metadata creation application for resource authors. Library & Information Science Research 27 (2005), 177--189.
[10]
Geisler, G., Giersch, S., McArthur, D., & McClelland, M. (2002). Creating virtual collections in Digital Libraries: Benefits and implementation issues. JCDL 2002, Portland OR, USA, July 13--17, 2002. pp. 210--218.
[11]
Giddens, A. (1986). The Constitution of Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
[12]
Gilliland, A. (2008). Setting the stage. In: Baca, M., (Ed.), Introduction to metadata, 3rd ed. Los Angeles, CA: Getty Research Institute.
[13]
Greenberg, J., Crystal, A., Robertson, W., & Leadem, E. (2003) Iterative design of metadata creation tools for resource authors. 2003 Dublin Core Conference 'Supporting Communities of Discourse and Practice,' Seattle, WA, USA.
[14]
Janes, J., Carter, D., Lagace, A., McLennen, M., Ryan, S., & Simcox, S. (1999). The Internet Public Library handbook. New York, NY: Neal-Schuman.
[15]
Kastens, K.A., DeFelice, B., Devaul, H., DiLeonardo, C., Ginger, K., Larsen, S., Mogk, D., & Tahirkheli, A. (2005). Questions & challenges arising in building the collection of a digital library for education: Lessons from five years of DLESE. D-Lib Magazine 11(11). http://www.dlib.org/dlib/november05/kastens/11kastens.html
[16]
Khoo, M., Devaul, H., & Sumner, T. (2002). Functional Requirements for Groupware to Support Community-Led Collections Building. 6th European Conference on Digital Libraries, Rome, September 16--18, 2002, pp. 190--203.
[17]
Khoo, M. (2005). The Tacit Dimensions of User Behavior: The Case of the Digital Water Education Library. JCDL 2005, pp. 213--222.
[18]
Khoo, M., Lin, X., & Park, J. (2009). A User-Friendly Metadata Quality Control Tool for the Internet Public Library. JCDL 2009, pp. 407--408.
[19]
Kling, R. (2000). Learning About Information Technologies and Social Change: The Contribution of Social Informatics. The Information Society 16(3), 217--232.
[20]
Lagoze, C., Krafft, D., Cornwell, T., Dushay, N., Eckstrom, D., & Saylor, J. (2006). Metadata aggregation and 'automated digital libraries': a retrospective on the NSDL experience. JCDL 2006, pp. 230--239.
[21]
Liddy, E., Allen, E., Harwell, S., Corieri, S., Yilmazel, O., Ozgencil, N., Diekema, A., McCracken, N., Silverstein, J., & Sutton, S. (2002). Automatic metadata generation and evaluation. SIGIR 2002, pp. 401--402.
[22]
Marshall, C. (1998). Making metadata. A study of metadata creation for a mixed physical-digital collection.
[23]
Moen, W. E., Miksa, S. D., Eklund, A., Polyakov, S., & Snyder, G. (2006). Learning from artifacts: metadata utilization analysis. JCDL '06, Chapel Hill, NC, USA, June 11 -- 15, 2006. ACM, New York, NY, 270--271.
[24]
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge creating company. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
[25]
Park, J.R. (2009). Metadata quality in digital repositories: A survey of the current state of the art. Cataloging and Classification Quarterly, 47, 213--228.
[26]
Polanyi, M. (1967). The tacit dimension. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
[27]
Shreeves, S., Knutson, E., Stvilia, B., Palmer, C., Twidale, M., & Cole, T. (2005). Is 'Quality' Metadata 'Shareable' Metadata? The Implications of Local Metadata Practices for Federated Collections. in ACRL Twelfth National Conference, (Minneapolis, 2005), ALA. Pp. 223--237.
[28]
Stvilia, B., Gasser, L., Twidale, M., Shreeves, S., Cole, T. (2004). Metadata quality for Federated Collections. In: Procs of the International Conference on Information Quality -- ICIQ 2004. (pp. 111--125). Cambridge, MA: MITIQ.
[29]
Trigg, R. H., Blomberg, J., & Suchman, L. (1999). Moving document collections online: The evolution of a shared repository. In S. Bodker, M. Kyng, & K. Schmidt (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 331--350). Copenhagen, Denmark: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
[30]
Van House, N., Bishop, A., & Buttenfield, B. (2003). Digital libraries as sociotechnical systems. In: Bishop, A., van House, N., & Buttenfield, B. (Eds.), Digital library use: social practice in design and evaluation. MIT Press.
[31]
Ward, J. (2003). A quantitative analysis of unqualified Dublin Core metadata element set usage within data providers registered with the open archives initiative. JCDL 2003, May 27--31, 2003, Houston, Texas pp. 315--317.
[32]
Wenger, E. Communities of Practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.
[33]
Wilson, A. (2007). Toward releasing the metadata bottleneck: a baseline evaluation of contributor-supplied metadata. Library Resources and Technical Services, vol. 51, No. 1. (January 2007), pp. 16--28.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Sociotechnical Factors Affecting Interoperability of Digital HumanitiesProceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology10.1002/pra2.102261:1(218-231)Online publication date: 15-Oct-2024
  • (2023) Person‐Oriented Ontologies Analysis for Digital Humanities Collections from a Metadata Crosswalk Perspective Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology10.1002/pra2.78660:1(255-266)Online publication date: 22-Oct-2023
  • (2017)"They're all going out to something weird"Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing10.1145/2998181.2998325(995-1008)Online publication date: 25-Feb-2017
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
JCDL '10: Proceedings of the 10th annual joint conference on Digital libraries
June 2010
424 pages
ISBN:9781450300858
DOI:10.1145/1816123
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

In-Cooperation

  • IEEE CS

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 21 June 2010

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Dublin core
  2. crosswalk
  3. interoperability
  4. metadata
  5. operations
  6. organizational knowledge
  7. organizations
  8. sociotechnical

Qualifiers

  • Short-paper

Conference

JCDL10
Sponsor:
JCDL10: Joint Conference on Digital Libraries
June 21 - 25, 2010
Queensland, Gold Coast, Australia

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 415 of 1,482 submissions, 28%

Upcoming Conference

JCDL '24
The 2024 ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries
December 16 - 20, 2024
Hong Kong , China

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)14
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 20 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Sociotechnical Factors Affecting Interoperability of Digital HumanitiesProceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology10.1002/pra2.102261:1(218-231)Online publication date: 15-Oct-2024
  • (2023) Person‐Oriented Ontologies Analysis for Digital Humanities Collections from a Metadata Crosswalk Perspective Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology10.1002/pra2.78660:1(255-266)Online publication date: 22-Oct-2023
  • (2017)"They're all going out to something weird"Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing10.1145/2998181.2998325(995-1008)Online publication date: 25-Feb-2017
  • (2017)Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social ComputingundefinedOnline publication date: 25-Feb-2017
  • (2015)A DDC visual interface for metadata explorationProceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications10.5555/2907896.2907912(158-169)Online publication date: 1-Sep-2015
  • (2015)The activity of human metadata creation and the semantic webInternational Journal of Metadata, Semantics and Ontologies10.1504/IJMSO.2015.06827610:1(64-74)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2015
  • (2012)Towards digital repository interoperabilityProceedings of the Second international conference on Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries10.1007/978-3-642-33290-6_49(439-444)Online publication date: 23-Sep-2012
  • (2012)What would 'google' do? users' mental models of a digital library search engineProceedings of the Second international conference on Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries10.1007/978-3-642-33290-6_1(1-12)Online publication date: 23-Sep-2012
  • (2011)An organizational model for digital library evaluationProceedings of the 15th international conference on Theory and practice of digital libraries: research and advanced technology for digital libraries10.5555/2042536.2042580(329-340)Online publication date: 26-Sep-2011
  • (2011)What do you call it?Proceedings of the 11th annual international ACM/IEEE joint conference on Digital libraries10.1145/1998076.1998086(53-56)Online publication date: 13-Jun-2011
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media