research-article

Managing technical debt in software-reliant systems

Authors:

Philippe Kruchten,

Alan MacCormack,

Raghvinder Sangwan,

Carolyn Seaman,

Kevin Sullivan,

Nico ZazworkaAuthors Info & Claims

FoSER '10: Proceedings of the FSE/SDP workshop on Future of software engineering research

Pages 47 - 52

https://doi.org/10.1145/1882362.1882373

Published: 07 November 2010 Publication History

Abstract

Delivering increasingly complex software-reliant systems demands better ways to manage the long-term effects of short-term expedients. The technical debt metaphor is gaining significant traction in the agile development community as a way to understand and communicate such issues. The idea is that developers sometimes accept compromises in a system in one dimension (e.g., modularity) to meet an urgent demand in some other dimension (e.g., a deadline), and that such compromises incur a "debt": on which "interest" has to be paid and which the "principal" should be repaid at some point for the long-term health of the project. We argue that the software engineering research community has an opportunity to study and improve this concept. We can offer software engineers a foundation for managing such trade-offs based on models of their economic impacts. Therefore, we propose managing technical debt as a part of the future research agenda for the software engineering field.

References

[1]

Biffl, S., Aurum, A., Boehm, B., Erdogmus, H. and Grunbacher, P. 2005. Value-Based Software Engineering. Springer, Berlin.

Digital Library

[2]

Brown, N., Nord, R., Ozkaya, I. 2010 Enabling Agility through Architecture, Crosstalk Nov/Dec 2010.

[3]

Cohn, M. 2006 Agile Estimation and Planning, Prentice Hall.

Digital Library

[4]

Cunningham, W. 1992. The WyCash Portfolio Management System. OOPSLA' 92 Experience Report.

Digital Library

[5]

Denne, M., & Cleland-Huang, J. 2004. Software by Numbers: Low-Risk, High-Return Development. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall.

[6]

Erdogmus, H., Morisio, M., and Torchiano, M. 2005. On the Effectiveness of the Test-First Approach to Programming. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 31, 3 (Mar. 2005), 226--237.

Digital Library

[7]

Fowler, M. Technical Debt Quadrant. Bliki {Blog} 2009. {cited 2010 June 14}; Available from: http://www.martinfowler.com/bliki/TechnicalDebtQuadrant.html.

[8]

Fowler, M. 1999. Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code. Addison-Wesley Professional.

Digital Library

[9]

Gaudin, O. 2009. Evaluate your technical debt with Sonar. {cited 2010 June 14}; Available from: http://www.sonarsource.org/evaluate-your-technical-debt-with-sonar/

[10]

Highsmith, J. 2009. Agile Project Management 2nd ed. Addison Wesley.

[11]

Hinsman C., Sangal, N., Stafford, J. 2009. Achieving Agility Through Architecture Visibility, in LNCS 5581/2009, Architectures for Adaptive Software Systems, pp.116--129.

Digital Library

[12]

Kamiya, T.; Kusumoto, S. & Inoue, K. 2002. CCFinder: A Multilinguistic Token-Based Code Clone Detection System for Large Scale Source Code. IEEE TSE, 2002, 28.

Digital Library

[13]

Kim, M. and Notkin, D. 2009. Discovering and representing systematic code changes. In Proc. ICSE 31.

Digital Library

[14]

Leffingwell, D. 2007. Scaling Software Agility, Boston: Addison-Wesley.

Digital Library

[15]

Lehman, M.M. and Belady, L.A. (eds) 1985. Program evolution: processes of software change. Academic Press Professional, Inc.

Digital Library

[16]

Martin, Robert C. 2008. Clean Code: A Handbook of Agile Software Craftsmanship. Addison Wesley.

Digital Library

[17]

Mens, T. 2008. Introduction and Roadmap: History and Challenges of Software Evolution in T. Mens, S. Demeyer eds. Software Evolution, Springer, 2008, pp. 1--11.

[18]

McConnell, S. 2007. Technical Debt. 10x Software Development {cited 2010 June 14}; http://blogs.construx.com/blogs/stevemcc/archive/2007/11/01/technical-debt-2.aspx.

[19]

Parnas, D.L. 1994. Software Aging, Proc. ICSE 16.

Digital Library

[20]

Rothman, J. An Incremental Technique to Pay Off Testing Technical Debt. {Weekly Column} 2006 {cited 2010 February 9}; Available from: http://www.stickyminds.com/sitewide.asp Function=edetail&ObjectType=COL&ObjectId=11011&tth=DYN&tt=siteemail&iDyn=2.

[21]

Sutherland, J. 2005. Future of Scrum: Parallel Pipelining of Sprints in Complex Projects. Proceedings of the Agile 2005, pp. 90--102.

Digital Library

Cited By

Kanita N(2024)Modèles explicatifs de la production de la dette technique dans les contextes Agile et DevOps : une revue de la littérature basée sur la méthode BIBGTSystèmes d'information & management10.3917/sim.234.0007Volume 28:4(7-41)Online publication date: 30-Apr-2024
https://doi.org/10.3917/sim.234.0007
de Souza Santos Rde Lima LBaldassarre MSpínola R(2024)Preliminary Insights on Industry Practices for Addressing Fairness DebtProceedings of the 18th ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement10.1145/3674805.3695406(566-571)Online publication date: 24-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3674805.3695406
Fungprasertkul SBahsoon RKazman R(2024)Technical Debt Monitoring Decision Making with Skin in the GameACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology10.1145/366480533:7(1-27)Online publication date: 26-Aug-2024
https://doi.org/10.1145/3664805
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Managing technical debt in software-reliant systems
1. Social and professional topics
  1. Professional topics
    1. Management of computing and information systems
      1. Project and people management
2. Software and its engineering
  1. Software creation and management

Recommendations

Technical debt in software development: from metaphor to theory report on the third international workshop on managing technical debt

The technical debt metaphor is gaining significant traction in the software development community as a way to understand and communicate issues of intrinsic quality, value, and cost. This is a report on a third workshop on managing technical debt, which ...
Second international workshop on managing technical debt (MTD 2011)
ICSE '11: Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Software Engineering

The technical debt metaphor is gaining significant traction in the software development community as a way to understand and communicate issues of intrinsic quality, value, and cost. The idea is that developers sometimes accept compromises in a system ...
Five Reasons for Including Technical Debt in the Software Engineering Curriculum
ECSAW '15: Proceedings of the 2015 European Conference on Software Architecture Workshops

Technical Debt is a useful metaphor to explain some of the difficulties of software evolution. The concept of Technical Debt is gaining importance from a scientific perspective, as the number of related papers, special issues, and international events ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

FoSER '10: Proceedings of the FSE/SDP workshop on Future of software engineering research

November 2010

460 pages

ISBN:9781450304276

DOI:10.1145/1882362

General Chair:
Gruia-Catalin Roman
Washington University in St. Louis, USA
,
Program Chair:
Kevin Sullivan
University of Virginia, USA

Copyright © 2010 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

SIGSOFT: ACM Special Interest Group on Software Engineering

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 07 November 2010

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Conference

SIGSOFT/FSE'10

Sponsor:

SIGSOFT

SIGSOFT/FSE'10: 18th ACM SIGSOFT Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering

November 7 - 8, 2010

New Mexico, Santa Fe, USA

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

291
Total Citations
View Citations
3,444
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)225
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)30

Reflects downloads up to 25 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Kanita N(2024)Modèles explicatifs de la production de la dette technique dans les contextes Agile et DevOps : une revue de la littérature basée sur la méthode BIBGTSystèmes d'information & management10.3917/sim.234.0007Volume 28:4(7-41)Online publication date: 30-Apr-2024
https://doi.org/10.3917/sim.234.0007
de Souza Santos Rde Lima LBaldassarre MSpínola R(2024)Preliminary Insights on Industry Practices for Addressing Fairness DebtProceedings of the 18th ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement10.1145/3674805.3695406(566-571)Online publication date: 24-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3674805.3695406
Fungprasertkul SBahsoon RKazman R(2024)Technical Debt Monitoring Decision Making with Skin in the GameACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology10.1145/366480533:7(1-27)Online publication date: 26-Aug-2024
https://doi.org/10.1145/3664805
Riquet NDevroey XVanderose BCodabux ZGalster MSpinola R(2024)Debt Stories: Capturing Social and Technical Debt in the IndustryProceedings of the 7th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Technical Debt10.1145/3644384.3644473(40-44)Online publication date: 14-Apr-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3644384.3644473
OBrien DBiswas SImtiaz SAbdalkareem RShihab ERajan HRoychoudhury APaiva AAbreu RStorey M(2024)Are Prompt Engineering and TODO Comments Friends or Foes? An Evaluation on GitHub CopilotProceedings of the IEEE/ACM 46th International Conference on Software Engineering10.1145/3597503.3639176(1-13)Online publication date: 20-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3597503.3639176
Ma YLuo SShang YZhang YLi Z(2024)Enhancing source code classification effectiveness via prompt learning incorporating knowledge featuresScientific Reports10.1038/s41598-024-69402-714:1Online publication date: 30-Aug-2024
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-69402-7
Levén WBroman HBesker TTorkar R(2024)The broken windows theory applies to technical debtEmpirical Software Engineering10.1007/s10664-024-10456-629:4Online publication date: 24-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s10664-024-10456-6
Siavvas MTsoukalas DMarantos CPapadopoulos LLamprakos CMatei OStrydis CSiddiqi MChrobocinski PFilus KDomańska JAvgeriou PAmpatzoglou ASoudris DChatzigeorgiou AGelenbe EKehagias DTzovaras D(2024)SDK4ED: a platform for building energy efficient, dependable, and maintainable embedded softwareAutomated Software Engineering10.1007/s10515-024-00450-z31:2Online publication date: 11-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s10515-024-00450-z
Slupczynski AAlexander PLichter H(2024)Defining and Evaluating Prudence and Recklessness of Enterprise Architecture DebtEnterprise Information Systems10.1007/978-3-031-64755-0_12(237-261)Online publication date: 26-Jul-2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-64755-0_12
Sousa ARocha LBritto R(2023)Architectural Technical Debt - A Systematic Mapping StudyProceedings of the XXXVII Brazilian Symposium on Software Engineering10.1145/3613372.3613399(196-205)Online publication date: 25-Sep-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613372.3613399
Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents