research-article

Analytics for software development

Authors:

Raymond P.L. Buse,

Thomas ZimmermannAuthors Info & Claims

FoSER '10: Proceedings of the FSE/SDP workshop on Future of software engineering research

Pages 77 - 80

https://doi.org/10.1145/1882362.1882379

Published: 07 November 2010 Publication History

Abstract

Despite large volumes of data and many types of metrics, software projects continue to be difficult to predict and risky to conduct. In this paper we propose software analytics which holds out the promise of helping the managers of software projects turn their plentiful information resources, produced readily by current tools, into insights they can act on. We discuss how analytics works, why it's a good fit for software engineering, and the research problems that must be overcome in order to realize its promise.

References

[1]

T. Addison and S. Vallabh. Controlling software project risks: an empirical study of methods used by experienced project managers. In SAICSIT '02, pages 128--140, 2002.

Digital Library

[2]

V. R. Basili, F. Shull, and F. Lanubile. Building knowledge through families of experiments. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 25:456--473, 1999.

Digital Library

[3]

J. T. Biehl, M. Czerwinski, G. Smith, and G. G. Robertson. Fastdash: a visual dashboard for fostering awareness in software teams. In CHI '07, pages 1313--1322, 2007.

Digital Library

[4]

C. Bird, N. Nagappan, P. Devanbu, H. Gall, and B. Murphy. Does distributed development a effect software quality?: an empirical case study of windows vista. Commun. ACM, 52(8):85--93, 2009.

Digital Library

[5]

B. Boehm. Software Cost Estimation with Cocomo II. Addison Wesley, Boston, MA, 2000.

Digital Library

[6]

B. Boehm and R. Ross. Theory-w software project management principles and examples. IEEE TSE, 15(7):902--916, jul 1989.

Digital Library

[7]

R. P. L. Buse and W. R. Weimer. A metric for software readability. In International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis, pages 121--130, 2008.

Digital Library

[8]

I. D. Coman, A. Sillitti, and G. Succi. A case-study on using an automated in-process software engineering measurement and analysis system in an industrial environment. In ICSE '09, pages 89--99, 2009.

Digital Library

[9]

T. Davenport, J. Harris, and R. Morison. Analytics at Work. Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation, Boston, MA, 2010.

[10]

G. Gousios and D. Spinellis. Alitheia core: An extensible software quality monitoring platform. In ICSE '09, pages 579--582, 2009.

Digital Library

[11]

IBM Corporation. Jazz. http://www.ibm.com/software/rational/jazz/.

[12]

P. Johnson, H. Kou, M. Paulding, Q. Zhang, A. Kagawa, and T. Yamashita. Improving software development management through software project telemetry. IEEE Software, 22(4):76--85, july-aug. 2005.

Digital Library

[13]

A. Kaushik. Web Analytics 2.0. Wiley Publishing, 2010.

[14]

A. J. Ko, R. DeLine, and G. Venolia. Information needs in collocated software development teams. In ICSE'07: Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Engineering, pages 344--353, 2007.

Digital Library

[15]

S. Komi-Sirvi, P. Parviainen, and J. Ronkainen. Measurement automation: Methodological background and practical solutions-a multiple case study. In IEEE International Symposium on Software Metrics, page 306, 2001.

Digital Library

[16]

T. J. McCabe. A complexity measure. IEEE Trans. Software Eng., 2(4):308--320, 1976.

Digital Library

[17]

A. Mockus, P. Zhang, and P. L. Li. Predictors of customer perceived software quality. In ICSE '05, 225--233, 2005.

Digital Library

[18]

I. Myrtveit, E. Stensrud, and M. Shepperd. Reliability and validity in comparative studies of software prediction models. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng., 31(5):380--391, 2005.

Digital Library

[19]

National Institute of Standards and Technology. The economic impacts of inadequate infrastructure for software testing. Technical Report 02-3, Research Triangle Institute, May 2002.

[20]

J. Sillito, G. C. Murphy, and K. De Volder. Questions programmers ask during software evolution tasks. In SIGSOFT '06/FSE-14, pages 23--34, 2006.

Digital Library

[21]

A. Sillitti, A. Janes, G. Succi, and T. Vernazza. Collecting, integrating and analyzing software metrics and personal software process data. In EUROMICRO, page 336, 2003.

Digital Library

[22]

S. Sinofsky. Steven sinofsky's microsoft techtalk / pm at microsoft. http://blogs.msdn.com/b/techtalk/archive/ 2005/12/16/504872.aspx, Dec. 2005.

[23]

L. Strigini. Limiting the dangers of intuitive decision making. IEEE Software, 13:101--103, 1996.

Digital Library

[24]

C. Treude and M.-A. Storey. Awareness 2.0: staying aware of projects, developers and tasks using dashboards and feeds. In ICSE '10, pages 365--374, 2010.

Digital Library

[25]

J. D. Valett and F. E. McGarry. A summary of software measurement experiences in the software engineering laboratory. Journal of Systems and Software, 9(2):137--148, 1989.

Digital Library

[26]

L. Wallace, M. Keil, and A. Rai. Understanding software project risk: a cluster analysis. Inf. Manage., 42(1):115--125, 2004.

Digital Library

[27]

T. Zimmermann, N. Nagappan, H. Gall, E. Giger, and B. Murphy. Cross-project defect prediction. In Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering, August 2009.

Digital Library

Cited By

Rique TPerkusich MDantas EAlbuquerque DGorgônio KAlmeida HPerkusich A(2023)On Adopting Software Analytics for Managerial Decision-Making: A Practitioner’s PerspectiveIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2023.329482311(73145-73163)Online publication date: 2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3294823
Rique TDantas EPerkusich MGorgonio KAlmeida HPerkusich A(2022)Empirically Derived Use Cases for Software Analytics2022 International Conference on Software, Telecommunications and Computer Networks (SoftCOM)10.23919/SoftCOM55329.2022.9911514(1-6)Online publication date: 22-Sep-2022
https://doi.org/10.23919/SoftCOM55329.2022.9911514
Rique TDantas EPerkusich MGorgônio KAlmeida HPerkusich A(2022)Use Cases for Software Development Analytics: A Case StudyProceedings of the XXXVI Brazilian Symposium on Software Engineering10.1145/3555228.3555239(388-397)Online publication date: 5-Oct-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3555228.3555239
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Analytics for software development
1. Social and professional topics
  1. Professional topics
    1. Management of computing and information systems
      1. Project and people management
2. Software and its engineering
  1. Software creation and management
    1. Software development process management
  2. Software notations and tools
    1. Software configuration management and version control systems

Recommendations

Critical Decisions in Software Development: Updating the State of the Practice

This article focuses on how to choose the "right" software development process, how to structure global software design chains, how to manage the interaction of project structure and software design, and how to balance innovation and efficiency in a ...
Big data analytics in Cloud computing: an overview
Abstract
Big Data and Cloud Computing as two mainstream technologies, are at the center of concern in the IT field. Every day a huge amount of data is produced from different sources. This data is so big in size that traditional processing tools are unable ...
Software Performance Analytics in the Cloud
ICPE '17: Proceedings of the 8th ACM/SPEC on International Conference on Performance Engineering

The emergence of large-scale software deployments in the cloud has led to several challenges: (1) measuring software performance in the data center, and (2) optimizing software for resource management. This tutorial addresses the two challenges by ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

FoSER '10: Proceedings of the FSE/SDP workshop on Future of software engineering research

November 2010

460 pages

ISBN:9781450304276

DOI:10.1145/1882362

General Chair:
Gruia-Catalin Roman
Washington University in St. Louis, USA
,
Program Chair:
Kevin Sullivan
University of Virginia, USA

Copyright © 2010 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

SIGSOFT: ACM Special Interest Group on Software Engineering

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 07 November 2010

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Conference

SIGSOFT/FSE'10

Sponsor:

SIGSOFT

SIGSOFT/FSE'10: 18th ACM SIGSOFT Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering

November 7 - 8, 2010

New Mexico, Santa Fe, USA

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

39
Total Citations
View Citations
834
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)10
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

Reflects downloads up to 21 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Rique TPerkusich MDantas EAlbuquerque DGorgônio KAlmeida HPerkusich A(2023)On Adopting Software Analytics for Managerial Decision-Making: A Practitioner’s PerspectiveIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2023.329482311(73145-73163)Online publication date: 2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3294823
Rique TDantas EPerkusich MGorgonio KAlmeida HPerkusich A(2022)Empirically Derived Use Cases for Software Analytics2022 International Conference on Software, Telecommunications and Computer Networks (SoftCOM)10.23919/SoftCOM55329.2022.9911514(1-6)Online publication date: 22-Sep-2022
https://doi.org/10.23919/SoftCOM55329.2022.9911514
Rique TDantas EPerkusich MGorgônio KAlmeida HPerkusich A(2022)Use Cases for Software Development Analytics: A Case StudyProceedings of the XXXVI Brazilian Symposium on Software Engineering10.1145/3555228.3555239(388-397)Online publication date: 5-Oct-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3555228.3555239
Sangwan RNegahban ANord ROzkaya I(2022)Optimization of Software Release Planning Considering Architectural Dependencies, Cost, and ValueIEEE Transactions on Software Engineering10.1109/TSE.2020.302001348:4(1369-1384)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2022
https://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2020.3020013
Restrepo-Tamayo LGasca-Hurtado G(2022)Human Aspects in Software Development: A Systematic Mapping StudyCollaboration Technologies and Social Computing10.1007/978-3-031-20218-6_1(1-22)Online publication date: 23-Oct-2022
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20218-6_1
Kunaefi AAritsugi M(2021)Extracting Arguments Based on User Decisions in App ReviewsIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2021.30670009(45078-45094)Online publication date: 2021
https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3067000
Madakam SRevulagadda R(2021)Software Engineering Analytics—The Need of Post COVID-19 Business: An Academic ReviewComputational Management10.1007/978-3-030-72929-5_11(231-251)Online publication date: 30-May-2021
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72929-5_11
Harty JLo DMariani LMesbah A(2020)Improving app quality despite flawed mobile analyticsProceedings of the IEEE/ACM 7th International Conference on Mobile Software Engineering and Systems10.1145/3387905.3388603(21-22)Online publication date: 13-Jul-2020
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3387905.3388603
Harty J(2020)How Can Software Testing be Improved by Analytics to Deliver Better Apps?2020 IEEE International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation Workshops (ICSTW)10.1109/ICSTW50294.2020.00072(408-410)Online publication date: Oct-2020
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSTW50294.2020.00072
Harty J(2020)How Can Software Testing be Improved by Analytics to Deliver Better Apps?2020 IEEE 13th International Conference on Software Testing, Validation and Verification (ICST)10.1109/ICST46399.2020.00052(418-420)Online publication date: Oct-2020
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICST46399.2020.00052
Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents