Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
research-article

An other-race effect for face recognition algorithms

Published: 02 February 2011 Publication History

Abstract

Psychological research indicates that humans recognize faces of their own race more accurately than faces of other races. This “other-race effect” occurs for algorithms tested in a recent international competition for state-of-the-art face recognition algorithms. We report results for a Western algorithm made by fusing eight algorithms from Western countries and an East Asian algorithm made by fusing five algorithms from East Asian countries. At the low false accept rates required for most security applications, the Western algorithm recognized Caucasian faces more accurately than East Asian faces and the East Asian algorithm recognized East Asian faces more accurately than Caucasian faces. Next, using a test that spanned all false alarm rates, we compared the algorithms with humans of Caucasian and East Asian descent matching face identity in an identical stimulus set. In this case, both algorithms performed better on the Caucasian faces—the “majority” race in the database. The Caucasian face advantage, however, was far larger for the Western algorithm than for the East Asian algorithm. Humans showed the standard other-race effect for these faces, but showed more stable performance than the algorithms over changes in the race of the test faces. State-of-the-art face recognition algorithms, like humans, struggle with “other-race face” recognition.

References

[1]
Beveridge, J. R., Givens, G. H., Phillips, P. J., Draper, B. A., and Lui, Y. M. 2008. Focus on quality, predicting FRVT 2006 performance. In Proceeding of the 8th International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition. IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA.
[2]
Bothwell, R. K., Brigham, J. C., and Malpass, R. S. 1989. Cross-racial identification. Pers. Social Psychol. Bull. 15, 19--25.
[3]
Bryatt, G. and Rhodes, G. 1998. Recognition of own-race and other-race caricatures: Implications for models of face recognition. Vision Res. 38, 2455--2468.
[4]
Furl, N., Phillips, P. J., and O'Toole, A. J. 2002. Face recognition algorithms and the other-race effect: Computational mechanisms for a developmental contact hypothesis. Cognitve Sci. 26, 797--815.
[5]
Givens, G. H., Beveridge, J. R., Draper, B. A., Grother, P. J., and Phillips, P. J. 2004. How features of the human face affect recognition: A statistical comparison of three face recognition algorithms. In Proceedings of the Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR ‘04). IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA, 381--388.
[6]
Gross, R., Baker, S., Matthews, I., and Kanade, T. 2005. Face recognition across pose and illumination. In Handbook of Face Recognition, S. Z. Li and A. K. Jain Eds., Springer, Berlin, 193--216.
[7]
Grother, P. 2004. Face recognition vendor test 2002: Supplemental report. Tech. rep. NISTIR 7083, National Institute of Standards and Technology. http://www.frvt.org.
[8]
Kelly, D. J., Quinn, P. C., Slater, A. M., Lee, K., Ge, L., and Pascalis, O. 2007. The other-race effect develops during infancy: Evidence of perceptual narrowing. Psychol. Sci. 18, 1084--1089.
[9]
Kuhl, P. K., Williams, K. H., and Lacerdo, F. 1992. Linguistic experience alters phonetic perception in infants by 6 months of age. Science 225, 606--608.
[10]
Levin, D. 1996. Classifying faces by race: The structure of face categories. J. Exp. Psychol. 22, 1364--1382.
[11]
Levin, D. 2000. Race as a visual feature: using visual search and perceptual discrimination tasks to understand face categories and the cross-race recognition deficit. J. Exp. Psychol. 129, 559--574.
[12]
Macmillan, N. A. and Creelman, C. D. 1991. Detection Theory: A User's Guide. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
[13]
Malpass, R. S. and Kravitz, J. 1969. Recognition for faces of own and other race faces. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 13, 330--334.
[14]
Meissner, C. A. and Brigham, J. C. 2001. Thirty years of investigating the own-race bias in memory for faces: A meta-analytic review. Psychol. Public Policy Law 7, 3--35.
[15]
Moon, H. and Phillips, P. J. 2001. Computational and performance aspects of PCA-based face-recognition algorithms. Perception 30, 303--321.
[16]
Nelson, C. A. 2001. The development and neural bases of face recognition. Infant Child Dev. 10, 3--18.
[17]
O'Toole, A. J., Deffenbacher, K. A., Valentin, D., and Abdi, H. 1994. Structural aspects of face recognition and the other-race effect. Memory & Cognition 22, 2, 208--224.
[18]
O'Toole, A. J., Phillips, P. J., Jiang, F., Ayyad, J., P_enard, N., and Abdi, H. 2007. Face recognition algorithms surpass humans matching faces across changes in illumination. IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. Machine Intell. 29, 1642--1646.
[19]
O'Toole, A. J., Phillips, P. J., and Narvekar, A. 2008. Humans versus algorithms: Comparisons from the FRVT 2006. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition. IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA.
[20]
Phillips, P. J., Flynn, P. J., Scruggs, T., Bowyer, K. W., Chang, J., Hoffman, K., Marques, J., Min, J., and Worek, W. 2005. Overview of the face recognition grand challenge. In Proceedings of the Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA, 947--954.
[21]
Phillips, P. J., Grother, P. J., Micheals, R. J., Blackburn, D. M., Tabassi, E., and Bone, J. M. 2003. Face recognition vendor test 2002: Evaluation report. Tech. rep. NISTIR 6965, National Institute of Standards and Technology. http://www.frvt.org.
[22]
Phillips, P. J., Moon, H., Rizvi, S., and Rauss, P. 2000. The FERET evaluation methodology for face-recognition algorithms. IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. Machine Intell. 22, 1090--1104.
[23]
Phillips, P. J., Scruggs, W., OToole, A. J., Flynn, P. J., Bowyer, K. W., Schott, C. L., and Sharpe, M. 2010. FRVT 2006 and ICE 2006 large scale results. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 32, 831--846.
[24]
Pollack, I. and Norman, D. 1964. A non-parametric analysis of recognition experiments. Psychonomic Sci. 1, 125--126.
[25]
Sangrigoli, S., Pallier, C., Argenti, A. M., Ventureyra, V. A. G., and de Schonen, S. 2005. Reversibility of the other-race effect in face recognition during childhood. Psychol. Sci. 16, 440--444.
[26]
Shapiro, P. N. and Penrod, S. D. 1986. Meta-analysis of face identification studies. Psychol. Bull. 100, 139--156.
[27]
Slone, A. E., Brigham, J. C., and Meissner, C. A. 2000. Social and cognitive factors affecting the own-race bias in whites. Basic Appl. Social Psychol. 22, 71--84.
[28]
Tang, X. and Wang, X. 2003. Face sketch synthesis and recognition. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Computer Vision. IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA, 687--694.
[29]
Tang, X. and Wang, X. 2004. Face sketch recognition. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol. 50--57.
[30]
Walker, P. M. and Tanaka, J. W. 2003. An encoding advantage for own-race versus other-race faces. Perception 32, 1117--1125.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Automated face recognition assists with low‐prevalence face identity mismatches but can bias usersBritish Journal of Psychology10.1111/bjop.12745Online publication date: 15-Nov-2024
  • (2024)Who Wore It Best? And Who Paid Less? Effects of Privacy-Preserving Techniques Across Demographics2024 IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision Workshops (WACVW)10.1109/WACVW60836.2024.00126(1160-1169)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2024
  • (2024)Hue-Tiful Privacy: Impact of Color Correction on Privacy Preserving TechniquesSoutheastCon 202410.1109/SoutheastCon52093.2024.10500179(1346-1352)Online publication date: 15-Mar-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. An other-race effect for face recognition algorithms

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Transactions on Applied Perception
    ACM Transactions on Applied Perception  Volume 8, Issue 2
    January 2011
    125 pages
    ISSN:1544-3558
    EISSN:1544-3965
    DOI:10.1145/1870076
    Issue’s Table of Contents
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 02 February 2011
    Accepted: 01 July 2010
    Revised: 01 June 2010
    Received: 01 March 2010
    Published in TAP Volume 8, Issue 2

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Face recognition
    2. human--machine comparisons

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)237
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)25
    Reflects downloads up to 13 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Automated face recognition assists with low‐prevalence face identity mismatches but can bias usersBritish Journal of Psychology10.1111/bjop.12745Online publication date: 15-Nov-2024
    • (2024)Who Wore It Best? And Who Paid Less? Effects of Privacy-Preserving Techniques Across Demographics2024 IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision Workshops (WACVW)10.1109/WACVW60836.2024.00126(1160-1169)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2024
    • (2024)Hue-Tiful Privacy: Impact of Color Correction on Privacy Preserving TechniquesSoutheastCon 202410.1109/SoutheastCon52093.2024.10500179(1346-1352)Online publication date: 15-Mar-2024
    • (2024)Designing Cross-Race Tests for Forensic Facial Examiners, Super-recognizers, and Face Recognition Algorithms2024 IEEE 18th International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition (FG)10.1109/FG59268.2024.10581916(1-8)Online publication date: 27-May-2024
    • (2024)Digital assessment of nonverbal behaviors forecasts first onset of depressionPsychological Medicine10.1017/S0033291724002010(1-12)Online publication date: 4-Oct-2024
    • (2024)Comparative analysis of features extraction techniques for black face age estimationAI & Society10.1007/s00146-022-01407-039:4(1769-1783)Online publication date: 1-Aug-2024
    • (2023)The Influence of the Other-Race Effect on Susceptibility to Face Morphing AttacksACM Transactions on Applied Perception10.1145/361811321:1(1-13)Online publication date: 4-Sep-2023
    • (2023)Inclusive Portraits: Race-Aware Human-in-the-Loop TechnologyProceedings of the 3rd ACM Conference on Equity and Access in Algorithms, Mechanisms, and Optimization10.1145/3617694.3623235(1-11)Online publication date: 30-Oct-2023
    • (2023)A Deep Dive into Dataset Imbalance and Bias in Face IdentificationProceedings of the 2023 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society10.1145/3600211.3604691(229-247)Online publication date: 8-Aug-2023
    • (2023)In-Group Bias in Deep Learning-Based Face Recognition Models Due to Ethnicity and AgeIEEE Transactions on Technology and Society10.1109/TTS.2023.32410104:1(54-67)Online publication date: Mar-2023
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    Full Access

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media