Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/1869692.1869700acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Spatial scene similarity assessment on Hadoop

Published: 02 November 2010 Publication History

Abstract

Spatial Scene Similarity Assessment (SSSA) is an essential problem in spatial analysis, spatial query, and map generalization, etc. In SSSA, spatial scene similarity needs to be compared between query spatial scene and each candidate spatial scene. The computational complexity of spatial scene comparison often cannot be resolved by sequential computing model. In this paper, we analyze the computational complexity of SSSA and develop a parallel processing method and associated algorithms for SSSA based on Hadoop. The COOT (Cell Object Overlay Times) is proposed as a data locality strategy. The experiment results demonstrate that MapReduce on Hadoop significantly improve SSSA in computing performance and data processing capability.

References

[1]
Goldstone, R. L., D. L. Medin, and D. Gentner, Relational similarity and the nonindependence of features in similarity judgments. Cognitive Psychology, 1991. 23(2): p. 222--262.
[2]
Bruns, H. T. and M. J. Egenhofer. Similarity of spatial scenes. in 7th International Symposium on Spatial Data Handling (SDH 96). 1997. Delft, Netherlands.
[3]
Rodriguez, M. A., Assessing semantic similarity among spatial entity classes, in The Graduate School University of Maine2000, University of Maine: Maine, USA. p. 164.
[4]
Clementini, E. and P. Di Felice, A Global Framework for Qualitative Shape Description. GeoInformatica, 1997. 1(1): p. 11--27.
[5]
Guo, D., Research on the key Technology of Geographic Spatial Analysis Based on Similarity, in Institute of Remote Sensing Applicaitons2009, Graduate University Chinese Academy of Sciences: Beijing. p. 150.
[6]
Dean, J. and S. Ghemawat, MapReduce: simplified data processing on large clusters. Communications of the Acm, 2008. 51(1): p. 107--113.
[7]
Wang, S., et al. GISolve: A grid-based problem solving environment for computationally intensive geographic information analysis. in 3rd International Workshop on Challenges of Large Applications in Distributed Environments,. 2005. Res. Triangle Park, NC, United states: IEEE.
[8]
Cary, A., et al., Experiences on Processing Spatial Data with MapReduce, in Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Scientific and Statistical Database Management2009, Springer-Verlag: New Orleans, LA, USA. p. 302--319.
[9]
Zhang, S. B., et al., Spatial Queries Evaluation with MapReduce. 2009 Eighth International Conference on Grid and Cooperative Computing, Proceedings2009, Los Alamitos: IEEE. 287--292.
[10]
Kerr, N. T., Alternative Approaches to Parallel GIS Processing, in Arizona State University2009, Arizona State University: Phoneix. p. 145.
[11]
Chen, Q., L. Wang, and Z. Shang, MRGIS: A MapReduce-Enabled High Performance Workflow System for GIS, in 4th IEEE International Conference on eScience2008, IEEE: Indianapolis, USA.
[12]
Golpayegani, N., M. Halem, and Ieee, Cloud Computing for Satellite Data Processing on High End Compute Clusters. Cloud: 2009 Ieee International Conference on Cloud Computing2009, New York: IEEE. 88--92.
[13]
Egenhofer, M. J. and K. K. Altaha. Reasoning About Gradual Changes of Topological Relationships. in Theories and Methods of Spatio-Temporal Reasoning. 1992. Pisa, Italy: Springer-Verlag.
[14]
Frank, A. U., Qualitative spatial reasoning about distances and directions in geographic space. Journal of Visual Languages & Computing, 1992. 3(4): p. 343--371.
[15]
Frank, A. U., Qualitative spatial reasoning: cardinal directions as an example. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 1996. 10(3): p. 269--290.
[16]
Goyal, R. and M. Egenhofer, Similarity of Cardinal Directions, in Advances in Spatial and Temporal Databases, C. Jensen, et al., Editors. 2001, Springer Berlin/Heidelberg. p. 36--55.
[17]
Hernández, D., E. Clementini, and P. Di Felice, Qualitative distances, in Spatial Information Theory A Theoretical Basis for GIS1995. p. 45--57.
[18]
Gotts, N. M., J. M. Gooday, and A. G. Cohn, A Connection Based Approach to Commonsense Topological Description and Reasoning. The Monist, 1996. 79(1): p. 51--75.
[19]
Ankoudinov, G. I., I. G. Ankoudinov, and A. I. Strizhachenko, Multi-Variant Assignment Generation and Assessment Techniques, in Innovative Techniques in Instruction Technology, E-learning, E-assessment, and Education, M. Iskander, Editor 2008, Springer Netherlands. p. 166--170.
[20]
Barron, F. H., Selecting a best multiattribute alternative with partial information about attribute weights. Acta Psychologica, 1992. 80(1--3): p. 91--103.
[21]
White, T., Hadoop: The Definitive Guide. Vol. 1. 2009, Sebastopol: O'Reilly Media. 526.

Cited By

View all
  • (2016)An Effective NoSQL-Based Vector Map Tile Management ApproachISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information10.3390/ijgi51102155:11(215)Online publication date: 12-Nov-2016
  • (2013)Adaptive Ant Colony Algorithm Researching in Cloud Computing Routing Resource SchedulingThe 19th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management10.1007/978-3-642-38391-5_11(101-108)Online publication date: 14-Jun-2013

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
HPDGIS '10: Proceedings of the ACM SIGSPATIAL International Workshop on High Performance and Distributed Geographic Information Systems
November 2010
47 pages
ISBN:9781450304320
DOI:10.1145/1869692
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 02 November 2010

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Hadoop
  2. MapReduce
  3. spatial relation
  4. spatial scene
  5. spatial scene similarity assessment

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

GIS '10
Sponsor:

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 13 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2016)An Effective NoSQL-Based Vector Map Tile Management ApproachISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information10.3390/ijgi51102155:11(215)Online publication date: 12-Nov-2016
  • (2013)Adaptive Ant Colony Algorithm Researching in Cloud Computing Routing Resource SchedulingThe 19th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management10.1007/978-3-642-38391-5_11(101-108)Online publication date: 14-Jun-2013

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media