Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
research-article

Approximation algorithms for the sex-equal stable marriage problem

Published: 08 December 2010 Publication History

Abstract

The stable marriage problem is a classical matching problem introduced by Gale and Shapley. It is known that for any instance, there exists a solution, and there is a polynomial time algorithm to find one. However, the matching obtained by this algorithm is man-optimal, that is, the matching is favorable for men but unfavorable for women, (or, if we exchange the roles of men and women, the resulting matching is woman-optimal). The sex-equal stable marriage problem, posed by Gusfield and Irving, seeks a stable matching “fair” for both genders. Specifically it seeks a stable matching with the property that the sum of the men's scores is as close as possible to that of the women's. This problem is known to be strongly NP-hard.
In this paper, we give a polynomial time algorithm for finding a near optimal solution for the sex-equal stable marriage problem. Furthermore, we consider the problem of optimizing an additional criterion: among stable matchings that are near optimal in terms of the sex-equality, find a minimum egalitarian stable matching. We show that this problem is strongly NP-hard, and give a polynomial time algorithm whose approximation ratio is less than two.

References

[1]
Bonsma, P. S. 2007. Most balanced minimum cuts and partially ordered knapsack. In Proceedings of the 6th Cologne-Twente Workshop on Graphs and Combinatorial Optimization. 17--21.
[2]
Charikar, M., and Wirth, A. 2004. Maximizing quadratic programs: extending Grothendieck's inequality. In Proceedings of the 45th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science. 54--60.
[3]
Feder, T. 1992. A new fixed point approach for stable networks and stable marriages. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 45, 233--284.
[4]
Feder, T. 1994. Network flow and 2-satisfiability. Algorithmica 11, 291--319.
[5]
Gale, D., and Shapley, L. S. 1962. College admissions and the stability of marriage. Amer. Math. Monthly 69, 9--15.
[6]
Gusfield, D. 1987. Three fast algorithms for four problems in stable marriage. SIAM J. Comput. 16, 1, 111--128.
[7]
Gusfield, D., and Irving, R. W. 1989. The Stable Marriage Problem: Structure and Algorithms. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
[8]
Gusfield, D., Irving, R. W., Leather, P., and Saks, M. 1987. Every finite distributive lattice is a set of stable matchings for a small instance. J. Combin. Theory A44, 304--309.
[9]
Halldórsson, M. M., Irving, R. W., Iwama, K., Manlove, D. F., Miyazaki, S., Morita, Y., and Scott, S. 2003. Approximability results for stable marriage problems with ties. Theoret. Comput. Sci. 306, 431--447.
[10]
Irving, R. W., and Leather, P. 1986. The complexity of counting stable marriages. SIAM J. Comput. 15, 3, 655--667.
[11]
Irving, R. W., Leather, P., and Gusfield, D. 1987. An efficient algorithm for the ‘optimal’ stable marriage. J. ACM 34, 3, 532--543.
[12]
Johnson, D. S., and Niemi, K. A. 1983. On knapsacks, partitions, and a new dynamic programming technique for trees. Math. Oper. Res. 8, 1, 1--14.
[13]
Kato, A. 1993. Complexity of the sex-equal stable marriage problem. Japan J. Indust. Appl. Math. 10, 1--19.
[14]
Kolliopoulos, S. G., and Steiner, G. 2007. Partially ordered knapsack and applications to scheduling. Discrete Appl. Math. 155, 8, 889--897.
[15]
Nesterov, Y. 1998. Semidefinite relaxation and nonconvex quadratic optimization. Optimiz. Meth. Softw. 9, 141--160.
[16]
Romero-Medina, A. 2001. ‘Sex-equal’ stable matchings. Theor. Decis. 50, 197--212.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)k-Best Egalitarian Stable Marriages for Task AssignmentProceedings of the VLDB Endowment10.14778/3611479.361152216:11(3240-3252)Online publication date: 24-Aug-2023
  • (2023)Contemporary challenges and AI solutions in port operations: applying Gale–Shapley algorithm to find best matchesJournal of Shipping and Trade10.1186/s41072-023-00155-88:1Online publication date: 15-Sep-2023
  • (2022)On Treewidth and Stable Marriage: Parameterized Algorithms and Hardness Results (Complete Characterization)SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics10.1137/19M130491X36:1(596-681)Online publication date: 9-Mar-2022
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Transactions on Algorithms
ACM Transactions on Algorithms  Volume 7, Issue 1
November 2010
282 pages
ISSN:1549-6325
EISSN:1549-6333
DOI:10.1145/1868237
Issue’s Table of Contents
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 08 December 2010
Accepted: 01 January 2009
Revised: 01 December 2008
Received: 01 November 2007
Published in TALG Volume 7, Issue 1

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Approximation algorithms
  2. the sex-equal stable marriage problem
  3. the stable marriage problem

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed

Funding Sources

  • KAKENHI

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)28
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
Reflects downloads up to 20 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)k-Best Egalitarian Stable Marriages for Task AssignmentProceedings of the VLDB Endowment10.14778/3611479.361152216:11(3240-3252)Online publication date: 24-Aug-2023
  • (2023)Contemporary challenges and AI solutions in port operations: applying Gale–Shapley algorithm to find best matchesJournal of Shipping and Trade10.1186/s41072-023-00155-88:1Online publication date: 15-Sep-2023
  • (2022)On Treewidth and Stable Marriage: Parameterized Algorithms and Hardness Results (Complete Characterization)SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics10.1137/19M130491X36:1(596-681)Online publication date: 9-Mar-2022
  • (2022)Submodular reassignment problem for reallocating agents to tasks with synergy effectsDiscrete Optimization10.1016/j.disopt.2021.10063144:P1Online publication date: 1-May-2022
  • (2022)Behavioral Stable Marriage ProblemsDistributed Artificial Intelligence10.1007/978-3-030-94662-3_10(150-170)Online publication date: 11-Jan-2022
  • (2020)User Satisfaction Aware Maximum Utility Task Assignment in Mobile CrowdsensingComputer Networks10.1016/j.comnet.2020.107156(107156)Online publication date: Feb-2020
  • (2019)Equitable stable matchings in quadratic timeProceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems10.5555/3454287.3454329(457-467)Online publication date: 8-Dec-2019
  • (2019)Two-Sided Fairness for Repeated Matchings in Two-Sided MarketsProceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining10.1145/3292500.3330793(3082-3092)Online publication date: 25-Jul-2019
  • (2019)A shortlist-based bidirectional local search for the stable marriage problemJournal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence10.1080/0952813X.2019.163565532:1(147-163)Online publication date: 3-Jul-2019
  • (2019)A Searching for Strongly Egalitarian and Sex-Equal Stable MatchingsProceedings of the 13th International Conference on Ubiquitous Information Management and Communication (IMCOM) 201910.1007/978-3-030-19063-7_87(1100-1111)Online publication date: 23-May-2019
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Full Access

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media