Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/1854153.1854182acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessbcciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

On evaluating the signal reliability of self-checking arithmetic circuits

Published: 06 September 2010 Publication History

Abstract

Fault-tolerant design approaches have been studied as a possible solution for the expected reduction in the reliability of nanoscale integrated circuits. The increase in functional reliability, obtained with fault-tolerant design techniques, comes at a price, i.e., hardware or temporal redundancy. The resulting overhead can be justified in mission critical applications but for consumer electronics, one of the drivers of nanoscale circuits, other criteria, e.g., signal reliability and time penalty, must be considered when evaluating the use of fault-tolerant designs. To study the impact of fault-tolerant designs in the behavior of combinational circuits, some fault-tolerant adders were evaluated, based on the Probabilistic Binomial Reliability model, targeting signal reliability and time penalty. The results obtained show the compromises associated with redundant designs.

References

[1]
M.C. Vasconcelos, D.T. Franco, L.A. Naviner, and J.-F. Naviner. Relevant metrics for evaluation of concurrent error detection schemes. Microelectronics Reliability, 48(8--9):1601--1603, 2008. 19th European Symposium on Reliability of Electron Devices, Failure Physics and Analysis (ESREF 2008).
[2]
M.C. Vasconcelos, D.T. Franco, L.A. Naviner, and J.-F. Naviner. Reliability analysis of combinational circuits based on a probabilistic binomial model. IEEE Northeast Workshop on Circuits and Systems, 2008. NEWCAS-TAISA 2008, pages 310--313, June 2008.
[3]
D.T. Franco, J.-F. Naviner, and L.A. Naviner. Yield and reliability issues in nanoelectronic technologies. Annales des telecommunications, 61(11--12):1422--1457, Nov.-Dec. 2006.
[4]
International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors. 2009 edition, executive summary. ITRS Website, May 2010. http://www.itrs.net/Links/2009ITRS/2009Chapters_2009Tables/2009_ExecSum.pdf.
[5]
P. Lala and A. Walker. On-line error detectable carry-free adder design. Defect and Fault Tolerance in VLSI Systems, 2001. Proceedings. 2001 IEEE International Symposium on, pages 66--71, 2001.
[6]
N. Miskov-Zivanov and D. Marculescu. Circuit reliability analysis using symbolic techniques. Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems, IEEE Transactions on, 25(12):2638--2649, Dec. 2006.
[7]
M. Nicolaidis. Design for soft error mitigation. Device and Materials Reliability, IEEE Transactions on, 5(3):405--418, Sept. 2005.
[8]
N. Seifert, P. Slankard, M. Kirsch, B. Narasimham, V. Zia, C. Brookreson, A. Vo, S. Mitra, B. Gill, and J. Maiz.
[9]
Radiation-induced soft error rates of advanced cmos bulk devices. Reliability Physics Symposium Proceedings, 2006. 44th Annual, IEEE International, pages 217--225, March 2006.
[10]
M. Spica and T. Mak. Do we need anything more than single bit error correction (ecc)? Memory Technology, Design and Testing, 2004. Records of the 2004 International Workshop on, pages 111--116, Aug. 2004.

Cited By

View all
  • (2013)Evaluation of fault-tolerant composite field AES S-boxes under multiple transient faults2013 IEEE 11th International New Circuits and Systems Conference (NEWCAS)10.1109/NEWCAS.2013.6573610(1-4)Online publication date: Jun-2013

Index Terms

  1. On evaluating the signal reliability of self-checking arithmetic circuits

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SBCCI '10: Proceedings of the 23rd symposium on Integrated circuits and system design
      September 2010
      228 pages
      ISBN:9781450301527
      DOI:10.1145/1854153
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Sponsors

      In-Cooperation

      • SBMicro
      • IEEE ICAS
      • IEEE Circuits and Systems Society
      • SBC

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 06 September 2010

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. CED
      2. MTBF
      3. TMR
      4. fault masking
      5. fault tolerance

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Conference

      SBCCI '10
      Sponsor:

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate 133 of 347 submissions, 38%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
      Reflects downloads up to 26 Sep 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2013)Evaluation of fault-tolerant composite field AES S-boxes under multiple transient faults2013 IEEE 11th International New Circuits and Systems Conference (NEWCAS)10.1109/NEWCAS.2013.6573610(1-4)Online publication date: Jun-2013

      View Options

      Get Access

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media