Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/1639642.1639692acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesassetsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Evaluation of software tools with deaf children

Published: 25 October 2009 Publication History

Abstract

Evaluating software applications with deaf or hard of hearing children requires methods and procedures tuned to them. Indeed, they are unusual users with special communication needs. This paper proposes a list of guidelines for organizing effective evaluations of interactive tools with deaf children. The novelty of this work is that such guidelines are not based on theoretical thinking. Instead, they are built on data collected through questionnaires proposed to experts working with deaf children. The questionnaire's data are reinforced by my experience which was gained during usability tests with deaf children. In future work, the effectiveness of these guidelines will be checked during the evaluation of an e-learning tool for Italian deaf children.

References

[1]
Mayhew, J.D. 1999 The Usability Engineering Lifecycle: A Practitioner's Handbook for User Interface Design. Academic Press.
[2]
Buckleitner, W. 1999. The State of Children's Software Evaluation. Yesterday, Today, and in the 21st Century. Information Technology in Childhood Education Annual, 1999 (1), 211--220.
[3]
Carr, A.A. 1997. User-design in the Creation of Human Learning Systems. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45 (3), 5--22.
[4]
Druin, A. 2002. The Role of Children in the Design of New Technology. Behaviour and Information Tech., 21 (1), 1--25.
[5]
Paul, P.V. 1998. Literacy and deafness: the Development of Reading, Writing, and Literate Thought. Allyn&Bacon
[6]
Ericsson, K. and Simon, H. 1980. Verbal Reports as Data. Psychological Review, 87 (3), (Mar. 2003), 215--251.
[7]
Greig, A.D. and Taylor, J. 1999. Doing Research with Children. Sage Publications Ltd
[8]
Arfé, B., Gennari, R. and Mich, O. Evaluation of LODE Temporal Reasoning Tool with Hearing and Deaf Children. Accepted to: AAAI 2009 Symp. on MCES, Virginia, USA.
[9]
Petrie, H., Hamilton, F., King, N. and Pavan, P. 2006. Remote Usability Evaluations with Disabled People. In Proc. of CHI 2006. (Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 2006). AK Peters Ltd
[10]
Debevc, M., Povalej, P., Verlic, M. and Stjepanovic, Z. 2007. Exploring Usability and Accessibility of an E-Learning System for Improving Computer Literacy. In Proc. of ICTA.
[11]
LODE. http://www.inf.unibz.it/~gennari/index.php?page=lode

Cited By

View all
  • (2017)Tools and Methods Applied in Interactive Systems to Evaluate the User Experience With Deaf/Hard of Hearing ChildrenProceedings of the 5th International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality10.1145/3144826.3145365(1-8)Online publication date: 18-Oct-2017
  • (2015)Development of a Remote Therapy Tool for Childhood Apraxia of SpeechACM Transactions on Accessible Computing10.1145/27768957:3(1-23)Online publication date: 14-Nov-2015
  • (2014)Early Interaction Experiences of Deaf Children and Teachers with the OLPC Educational LaptopUniversal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Universal Access to Information and Knowledge10.1007/978-3-319-07440-5_24(254-264)Online publication date: 2014
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Evaluation of software tools with deaf children

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    Assets '09: Proceedings of the 11th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility
    October 2009
    290 pages
    ISBN:9781605585581
    DOI:10.1145/1639642

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 25 October 2009

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. deaf children
    2. guidelines for testing
    3. unusual users

    Qualifiers

    • Poster

    Conference

    ASSETS09
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 436 of 1,556 submissions, 28%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)4
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 12 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2017)Tools and Methods Applied in Interactive Systems to Evaluate the User Experience With Deaf/Hard of Hearing ChildrenProceedings of the 5th International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality10.1145/3144826.3145365(1-8)Online publication date: 18-Oct-2017
    • (2015)Development of a Remote Therapy Tool for Childhood Apraxia of SpeechACM Transactions on Accessible Computing10.1145/27768957:3(1-23)Online publication date: 14-Nov-2015
    • (2014)Early Interaction Experiences of Deaf Children and Teachers with the OLPC Educational LaptopUniversal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Universal Access to Information and Knowledge10.1007/978-3-319-07440-5_24(254-264)Online publication date: 2014
    • (2013)Architecture of an automated therapy tool for childhood apraxia of speechProceedings of the 15th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility10.1145/2513383.2513450(1-8)Online publication date: 21-Oct-2013
    • (2013)How to Design Games for Deaf Children: Evidence-Based Guidelines2nd International Workshop on Evidence-based Technology Enhanced Learning10.1007/978-3-319-00554-6_11(83-92)Online publication date: 2013

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media