Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/1531674.1531730acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgroupConference Proceedingsconference-collections
extended-abstract

Open innovation and the solver community

Published: 10 May 2009 Publication History

Abstract

This paper introduces a doctoral research on open innovation solver's behavior and group factors inducing it. The research is now finishing its first year and exploratory strategies are developed close to open innovation online communities, to prepare a systematic methodological approach.
Research seeks to understand how solver's patterns of communication and group behavior influence their participation in an open innovation community, through collaborative IT platforms - and how it weights on their innovation production. A second question is about critical factors that influence solvers' participation, due to the present global economical crisis. By designing a model of the solver's group of belonging characteristics and reflecting that on a collaborative platform's functionalities, the project intends to present some propositions to ease participation in crowdsourcing innovation processes - through an online platform being designed and developed at University of Minho.

References

[1]
Ahonen, M. and Lietsala, K. 2007. Managing service ideas and suggestions - information systems in innovation brokering, Innovation in Services, Conference Proceedings. Berkeley, CA: Tekes.
[2]
Becker, M. and Zirpoli, F. 2007. Organizing open innovation: the role of competences, modularity, and performance integration, Ac. Manag. Proceedings, 2007, http://program.aomonline.org/2007/submission.asp?mode=ShowSession&SessionID=1841, {25.1.2009}
[3]
Bercovitz, J. E. L. and Feldman, M. P. 2007. Fishing upstream: firm innovation strategy and university research alliances, Res. Policy, 36 2007, 930--948.
[4]
Berends, H., Vanhaverbeke, W. and Kirschbaum, R. 2007. Knowledge management challenges in new business development: case study observations, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 24, 2007, 314--328.
[5]
Cardoso, M., Carvalho, J. and Ramos, I. 2008. Open innovation communities& or should it be "networks"? in M. Lytras, E. Damiani and P. Ordoññez de Pablos, Web 2.0: The business model, New York: Springer.
[6]
Chesbrough, H. and Schwartz, K. 2007. Innovating business models with co- development partnerships, Research Technology Management, January -- February 2007, 55--59
[7]
Chesbrough, H. W. and Appleyard, M. M. 2007. Open innovation and strategy, California Management Review, 50 (1), Fall 2007, 57--76.
[8]
Chesbrough, H. W. 2003. The era of open innovation, MIT Sloan Management Review, Spring 2003, 35--41.
[9]
Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W. and West, J. 2006. Open innovation: researching a new paradigm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[10]
Gassmann, O. and Enkel, E. 2004. Towards a theory of open innovation: three core process archetypes, http://de.scientificcommons.org/2287, {26.4.2008}
[11]
Gassmann, O. and Enkel, E. 2005. Management mechanisms of network layers in MNE, http://www.scientificcommons.org/836, {26.4.2008}
[12]
Howe, J. 2006. The rise of crowdsourcing, Wired Magazine, 14 (06).
[13]
Huang, J. C., Newell, S. and Galliers, R. D. 2002. Inter-organizational communities of practice. A research paper submitted to the 3rd Conference on Organizational Knowledge, Learning, and Capabilities, 5-6 April, 2002, Athens.
[14]
Koc, T. and Ceylan, C. 2007. Factors impacting the innovative capacity in large-scale companies, Technovation, 27, 105--114, www.elsevier.com/locate/technovation, {24.1.2008}.
[15]
Lettl, C. 2007. User involvement competence for radical innovation, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 24, 2007, 53--75, Jet-M, www.elsevier.com/locate/jengtecman, {24.1.2008}
[16]
Morgan, T. 2003. Business rules and information systems: aligning IT with business goals. S.l.: Team-Fly/ Addison Wesley.
[17]
OECD. 2008. Open innovation in global networks, http://browse.oecdbookshop.org/oecd/pdfs/browseit/9208071E.PDF, {4.2.2009}
[18]
Phelps, B. 2007. Electronic information systems and organizational boundaries, Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 19 (I-17), 17--29.
[19]
Torro, M. 2007. Global intellectual capital brokering. Facilitating the emergence of innovations through network mediation, Espoo 2007 - VTT Publications 631, 30.
[20]
Wenger, E. 1998. Communities of Practice. Learning as a social system, Systems Thinker, http://www.co-i-l.com/coil/knowledge-garden/cop/lss.shtml, {22.7.2008}.
[21]
Yin, R. 2003. Case study research: Designs and methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
[22]
Von Hippel, E. 2005. Democratizing innovation, Cambridge: MIT Press.
[23]
Rohrbeck, R.2008. Creating an open innovation ecosystem. The case of Deutsche Telekom, Singapore, http://www.rene-rohrbeck.de/documents/Rohrbeck_(2009)_Talk_Creating-an-Open-Innovation-Ecosystem.pdf, {8.3.2009}.
[24]
Teddlie, C. and Fen Yu 2007. Mixed methods sampling. A typology with examples, Journal of Mixed Methods Research, I (1), 77--100.
[25]
Flyvberg, B. 2006. Five misunderstandings about case-study research, Qualitative Inquiry, 12 (2), 219--245.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
GROUP '09: Proceedings of the 2009 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work
May 2009
412 pages
ISBN:9781605585000
DOI:10.1145/1531674
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 10 May 2009

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. crisis
  2. crowdsourcing innovation
  3. online communities
  4. solvers

Qualifiers

  • Extended-abstract

Conference

GROUP09
Sponsor:
GROUP09: ACM 2009 International Conference on Supporting Group Work
May 10 - 13, 2009
Florida, Sanibel Island, USA

Acceptance Rates

GROUP '09 Paper Acceptance Rate 40 of 110 submissions, 36%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 125 of 405 submissions, 31%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 16 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media