Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
research-article
Free access

Overcoming the J-shaped distribution of product reviews

Published: 01 October 2009 Publication History

Abstract

Introduction
While product review systems that collect and disseminate opinions about products from recent buyers (Table 1) are valuable forms of word-of-mouth communication, evidence suggests that they are overwhelmingly positive. Kadet notes that most products receive almost five stars. Chevalier and Mayzlin also show that book reviews on Amazon and Barnes & Noble are overwhelmingly positive. Is this because all products are simply outstanding? However, a graphical representation of product reviews reveals a J-shaped distribution (Figure 1) with mostly 5-star ratings, some 1-star ratings, and hardly any ratings in between. What explains this J-shaped distribution? If products are indeed outstanding, why do we also see many 1-star ratings? Why aren't there any product ratings in between? Is it because there are no "average" products? Or, is it because there are biases in product review systems? If so, how can we overcome them?
The J-shaped distribution also creates some fundamental statistical problems. Conventional wisdom assumes that the average of the product ratings is a sufficient proxy of product quality and product sales. Many studies used the average of product ratings to predict sales. However, these studies showed inconsistent results: some found product reviews to influence product sales, while others did not. The average is statistically meaningful only when it is based on a unimodal distribution, or when it is based on a symmetric bimodal distribution. However, since product review systems have an asymmetric bimodal (J-shaped) distribution, the average is a poor proxy of product quality.
This report aims to first demonstrate the existence of a J-shaped distribution, second to identify the sources of bias that cause the J-shaped distribution, third to propose ways to overcome these biases, and finally to show that overcoming these biases helps product review systems better predict future product sales.
We tested the distribution of product ratings for three product categories (books, DVDs, videos) with data from Amazon collected between February--July 2005: 78%, 73%, and 72% of the product ratings for books, DVDs, and videos are greater or equal to four stars (Figure 1), confirming our proposition that product reviews are overwhelmingly positive.
Figure 1 (left graph) shows a J-shaped distribution of all products. This contradicts the law of "large numbers" that would imply a normal distribution. Figure 1 (middle graph) shows the distribution of three randomly-selected products in each category with over 2,000 reviews. The results show that these reviews still have a J-shaped distribution, implying that the J-shaped distribution is not due to a "small number" problem. Figure 1 (right graph) shows that even products with a median average review (around 3-stars) follow the same pattern.

References

[1]
Admati, A. R. and Pfleiderer, P. Broadcasting opinions with an overconfident sender. International Economic Review 45, 2, (2004), 467--498.
[2]
Chatterjee, P. Online reviews: Do consumers use them. Advances in Consumer Research 28, 1, (2001), 129--133.
[3]
Chevalier, J. and Goolsbee, A. Measuring prices and price competition online: Amazon and Barnes and Noble. Quantitative Marketing and Economics 1, 2, (2003), 203--222.
[4]
Chevalier, J. and Mayzlin, D. The effect of word of mouth on sales: Online book reviews. J. of Marketing Research 43, 3, (2006).
[5]
Clemons, E. K., Gao, G., and Hitt, L. M. When online reviews meet hyper differentiation: A study of craft beer industry. J. of Management Information Systems 23, 2, (2006), 149--171.
[6]
Dellarocas, C. The digitization of word-of-mouth: Promise and challenges of online reputation mechanisms. Management Science 49, 10, (2003), 1407--1424.
[7]
Dellarocas, C., Awad, N., and Zhang, X. Exploring the value of online reviews to organizations: Implications for revenue forecasting and planning. Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Information Systems, 2004, Washington, D.C.
[8]
Godes, D. and Mayzlin, D. Using online conversations to study word of mouth communication. Marketing Science 23, 4, (2004), 545--560.
[9]
Kadet, A. Rah-Rah ratings. SmartMoney Magazine, (Feb. 23, 2007) 116.
[10]
Li, X. and Hitt, L. M. Self selection and information role of online product reviews. Workshop on Information Systems and Economics, 2004, Washington, DC.
[11]
Liu, Y. Word-of-mouth for movies: Its dynamics and impact on box office revenue. J. of Marketing 70, 3, (2006) 74--89.
[12]
Reichheld, F. The one number you need to grow. Harvard Business Review 81, 12, (2003), 46--54.

Cited By

View all
  • (2025)Customer satisfaction scores: New models to estimate the number of fake reviewsTourism Management10.1016/j.tourman.2024.105030106(105030)Online publication date: Feb-2025
  • (2024)Effects of Variance in Service Quality Ratings on Overall Scores of Users:サービス品質評価の不均一性が利用客の総合評価に及ぼす効果Japan Marketing Review10.7222/marketingreview.2024.0065:1(47-54)Online publication date: 19-Mar-2024
  • (2024)TeleHelp Ukraine: A distributed international telemedicine response to the ongoing warJournal of Global Health10.7189/jogh.14.0415814Online publication date: 25-Oct-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Overcoming the J-shaped distribution of product reviews

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image Communications of the ACM
      Communications of the ACM  Volume 52, Issue 10
      A View of Parallel Computing
      October 2009
      134 pages
      ISSN:0001-0782
      EISSN:1557-7317
      DOI:10.1145/1562764
      Issue’s Table of Contents
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 01 October 2009
      Published in CACM Volume 52, Issue 10

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article
      • Popular
      • Refereed

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)735
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)112
      Reflects downloads up to 22 Nov 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2025)Customer satisfaction scores: New models to estimate the number of fake reviewsTourism Management10.1016/j.tourman.2024.105030106(105030)Online publication date: Feb-2025
      • (2024)Effects of Variance in Service Quality Ratings on Overall Scores of Users:サービス品質評価の不均一性が利用客の総合評価に及ぼす効果Japan Marketing Review10.7222/marketingreview.2024.0065:1(47-54)Online publication date: 19-Mar-2024
      • (2024)TeleHelp Ukraine: A distributed international telemedicine response to the ongoing warJournal of Global Health10.7189/jogh.14.0415814Online publication date: 25-Oct-2024
      • (2024)Consumer Awareness and Perception of Online ServicesSmart and Sustainable Interactive Marketing10.4018/979-8-3693-1339-8.ch011(178-197)Online publication date: 8-Mar-2024
      • (2024)User Sentiment Analysis Based on Securities Application ElementsBehavioral Sciences10.3390/bs1409081414:9(814)Online publication date: 13-Sep-2024
      • (2024)One Size Fits All? Informational Accessibility and Inclusivity in Online PlatformsSSRN Electronic Journal10.2139/ssrn.4844630Online publication date: 2024
      • (2024)Call Me Maybe: Does Customer Feedback Seeking Impact Nonsolicited Customers?Marketing Science10.1287/mksc.2023.0324Online publication date: 20-Sep-2024
      • (2024)Punished for Success? A Natural Experiment of Displaying Clinical Hospital Quality on Review PlatformsInformation Systems Research10.1287/isre.2021.0630Online publication date: 4-Apr-2024
      • (2024)Does Help Help? An Empirical Analysis of Social Desirability Bias in RatingsInformation Systems Research10.1287/isre.2020.040635:3(1052-1073)Online publication date: 1-Sep-2024
      • (2024)How are PreLaunch online movie reviews related to box office revenues?The Annals of Applied Statistics10.1214/23-AOAS185418:2Online publication date: 1-Jun-2024
      • Show More Cited By

      View Options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Magazine Site

      View this article on the magazine site (external)

      Magazine Site

      Login options

      Full Access

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media