Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/1555619.1555638acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdesristConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The constitutive and the instrumental in social design

Published: 07 May 2009 Publication History

Abstract

Simon's <u>The Sciences of the Artificial</u> is rightly influential as a founding text in design research in the information systems field (IS). Simon's contributions in the same volume to what he calls social planning and human design - practices associated with the development of societal scale artifacts that foster a "humane society" - are much less visible in IS design research. I develop and expand on some of Simon's insights here using social design projects such as IT-based civic networks as my context, drawing on a civic network development project called the Urban-net that I have tracked since its inception in 1996. I define some distinctive features of such projects and advance an institutionalist conception of actors (designers) and action. Despite noting that "nothing is more fundamental in setting our research agenda and informing our research methods than our view of the nature of the human beings whose behavior we are studying" (Simon 1985; emphasis added), and despite his recognition that social planning projects often are quite different from other types of technical projects in the demands they make on actors, Simon's (1996) discussion is not moved by a sufficiently nuanced view of the designer. Apropos, and drawing on a sociological institutionalist view of social actors and action, I outline a model of two inter-related design activities: constitutive design - targeting design of the normative or institutional foundation and governance mechanisms - and instrumental design, where designers specify the system to be built within the agreed-upon normative constraints. I conclude with a brief account of the Urban-net case.

References

[1]
Bardhan, P., and Ray, I. Introduction, in The contested commons: Conversations between economists and anthropologists, P. Bardhan and I. Ray (eds.), New York, NY: Wiley-Blackwell, 2008, pp. 1--24.
[2]
Berger, P. L. and Luckmann, T. The social construction of reality, 1967, Garden City, NJ: Anchor.
[3]
Berman, M. All that is solid melts into air: The experience of modernity, New York, NY: Simon and Schuster, 1982.
[4]
Bijker, W. Do not despair: There is life after constructivism, Science, technology, and human values, 18(1), 1993, pp. 113--138.
[5]
Boland R. J. The in-formation of Information Systems, in R. J. Boland, Jr. and R. A. Hirschheim (eds.), Critical issues in IS Research, 1987, New York, NY: Wiley, pp. 363--379.
[6]
Boland, R. J. Design in the punctuation of management action. In Managing as designing, R. J. Boland Jr., and F. Collopy (eds.), Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2004, pp. 106--112.
[7]
Buchanan, R. Wicked problems in design thinking, in V. Margolin and R. Buchanan (eds.), The idea of design, 1995, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 3--20.
[8]
Burns, T. Micropolitics: Mechanisms of Institutional Change, Administrative Science Quarterly (6:3), 1961, pp. 257--281.
[9]
Carpenter, B. Architectural Principles of the Internet, Internet Architecture Board, June 1996, RFC1958.
[10]
Clemens, E. S and Cook, J. M. Politics and insitutionalism: Explaining durability and change. Annual review of Sociology (25), 1999, pp. 441--466.
[11]
DiMaggio, P. Culture and cognition, Annual Review of Sociology (23), 1997, pp. 263--287.
[12]
DiMaggio, P. J., and Powell, W. W. Introduction, in The new institutionalism in organizational analysis, W. W. Powell and P. DiMaggio (eds.), University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 1991, pp. 1--38.
[13]
Dryzek, J. S. The informal logic of institutional design, in The theory of institutional design, R. E. Goodin (ed.), University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 1991, pp. 1--38.
[14]
Feldman, M. and Pentland, B. Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Administrative Science Quarterly (48), 2003, pp 94--118
[15]
Galaskiewicz, J. Making corporate actors accountable: Institution-building in Minneapolis-St. Paul, in The new institutionalism in organizational analysis, W. W. Powell and P. DiMaggio (eds.), Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1996, pp. 293--310.
[16]
Geertz, C. The interpretation of cultures, 1973, New York, NY: Basic Books.
[17]
Goodin, R. E. Institutions and their design, in The theory of institutional design, R. E. Goodin (ed.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1996, pp. 1--53.
[18]
Hargadon, A. B and Douglas, Y. 2001 When innovations meet institutions: Edison and the design of the electric light. Administrative Science Quarterly (46), pp. 476--501
[19]
Hauben: Participatory Democracy From the 1960s and SDS into the Future On-line (accessed December 27, 2008 at http://www.opencollector.org/history/homebrew/index.html
[20]
Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., and Ram, S. Design science in information systems research, MIS Quarterly (28:1), 2004, pp. 75--105.
[21]
Illich, I. Tools for conviviality, 1973, New York, NY: Fontana.
[22]
Jepperson, R. L. Institutions, institutional effects, and institutionalism, in The new institutionalism in organizational analysis, W. W. Powell and P. DiMaggio (eds.), Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
[23]
Klein, H. K. and Hirscheim, R. Social Change and the future of IS Development, in R. J. Boland, Jr. and R. A. Hirschheim (eds.), Critical issues in IS Research, 1987, New York, NY: Wiley, pp. 275--305
[24]
Krugman, P. Development, geography, and economic theory, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1995.
[25]
Langlois, R. N. (1986). Rationality, institutions, and explanation. In R. N. Langlois (ed.), Economics as process: Essays in the new institutional economics, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1986, pp. 225--255.
[26]
March, J. G. A primer on decision making: How decisions happen, New York, NY: Free Press, 1994.
[27]
March, J. G. Democratic governance, New York, NY: Free Press, 1995.
[28]
March, J. G., and Olsen, J. P. The logic of appropriateness, ARENA Working Paper, Center for European Studies, University of Oslo, n.d.
[29]
March, J. G. and Olsen, J. P. Rediscovering institutions: The organizational basis of politics, New York, NY: Free Press, 1989.
[30]
McAdam, D., and Scott, W. R. Organizations and movements, in Social movements and organization theory, G. F. Davis, D. McAdam, W. R. Scott., and M. N. Zald (eds.), Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, 2005, pp. 4--40.
[31]
McGarty, T. P. Alternative networking infrastructures: Pricing, policy and competition, in B. Kahin (ed.), Building information infrastructures, 1992, New York, NY: McGraw Hill, pp. 231--256.
[32]
Mundkur, A. Let's fix the plumbing: IT and Bureaucratic reform: A case from India. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Syracuse University, 2006.
[33]
North, D. C. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
[34]
Olsen, J. P. Coping with conflict at constitutional moments. Industrial and Corporate Change 12(4), 2003, pp 815--842
[35]
Offe, C. Designing institutions in east European transitions, in The theory of institutional design, R. E. Goodin (ed.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1996, pp. 199--226.
[36]
Ostrom, E. A behavioral approach to the rational choice theory of collective action, American Political Science Review (92:1), 1998, pp. 1--22.
[37]
Rawls, J. Kantian constructivism in moral theory, The Journal of Philosophy (77:9), 1980, pp. 515--572.
[38]
Scott, W. R. Institutions and organizations; toward a theoretical synthesis, in W. R. Scott and J. W. Myer (eds.), Institutional environments and organizations: Structural complexity and individualism. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1994, pp 55--80
[39]
Selznick, P. The moral commonwealth: Social theory and the promise of community. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, 1992.
[40]
Shin, D. H. The development of broadband public networks: Two case studies. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York, 2004.
[41]
Simon, H. A. From substantive to procedural rationality, in Spiro J. Latsis (ed.), Method and appraisal in economics, Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press, 1976.
[42]
Simon H. A. Rationality as process and as product of thought, American Economic Review (68:2), 1978.
[43]
Simon, H. A. Human nature in politics: The dialogue of psychology with political science, American Political Science Review (79:2), 1985, pp. 293--304.
[44]
Simon, H. A. The sciences of the artificial, 3rd edition, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1996.
[45]
Suddaby, R., and Greenwood, R. Rhetorical strategies of legitimacy, Administrative Science Quarterly (50), 2005, pp. 35--67.
[46]
Swidler, A. Culture in action: Symbols and strategies, American Sociological Review (51), 1986, pp. 273--286.
[47]
Tolbert, P., and Zucker, L. Institutional sources of change in organizational structure: The diffusion of civil service reform, 1880--1953, Administrative Science Quarterly (28), 1996, pp. 22--39.
[48]
Tribe, L. H. Technology assessment and the fourth discontinuity: The limits of instrumental rationality, Southern California Law Review (46), 1973, pp. 617--660.
[49]
M. Venkatesh., and Shin, D. H. Extending social constructivism with institutional theory, in P. Van den Besselaar, G. de Michelis, J. Preece, and C. Simone (eds.), Communities and Technologies 2005, Berlin, Germany: Springer Dordrecht, 2005, pp. 55--75.
[50]
Walls, J., Widmeyer, G. R., and El-Sawy, O. A. Building an information systems design theory for vigilant EIS, Information Systems Research (3:1), 1992, pp. 36--59.
[51]
Weber, M. Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology (Vol. 2), University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, 1978.
[52]
Weill, P., and Woodham, R. Don't just lead, govern: Implementing effective IT governance. Working paper, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2002.
[53]
Wendt, A. Driving with the rearview mirror: On the rational science of institutional design, International Organization (55:4), 2001, pp. 1019--1049.
[54]
Whitt, R. S. A horizontal leap forward: formulating a new public policy framework based on the network layers model in M. N. Cooper (ed.), Open architecture as communications policy: Preserving internet freedom in the broadband era, 2004, Palo Alto CA: Stanford University Law School.
[55]
Winner, L. Social constructivism: Opening the black box and finding it empty. Science as Culture 3(16), 1993, pp 427--452.

Cited By

View all
  • (2012)Social design's implications for the IS fieldProceedings of the 2012 iConference10.1145/2132176.2132221(346-353)Online publication date: 7-Feb-2012
  • (2011)Collective Construction of Meaning and System for an Inclusive Social NetworkInternational Journal of Information Systems and Social Change10.4018/jissc.20110701022:3(16-35)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2011

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
DESRIST '09: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology
May 2009
288 pages
ISBN:9781605584089
DOI:10.1145/1555619
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

  • Business & Information Systems Engineering (BISE)
  • Drexel University
  • Georgia State University
  • Pennsylvania State University
  • Claremont Graduate University
  • Temple University
  • Computer Aid, Inc. (CAI)
  • Case Western Reserve Univ.: Case Western Reserve University

In-Cooperation

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 07 May 2009

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. collective action
  2. constitutive and instrumental design
  3. social design
  4. social dilemmas

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

DESRIST '09
Sponsor:
  • Case Western Reserve Univ.

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 16 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2012)Social design's implications for the IS fieldProceedings of the 2012 iConference10.1145/2132176.2132221(346-353)Online publication date: 7-Feb-2012
  • (2011)Collective Construction of Meaning and System for an Inclusive Social NetworkInternational Journal of Information Systems and Social Change10.4018/jissc.20110701022:3(16-35)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2011

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media