Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
article
Free access

Performance comparison of routing protocols under dynamic and static file transfer connections

Published: 02 October 1992 Publication History

Abstract

We compare the performance of two recently proposed distance-vector algorithms (Merlin-Segall and Extended Bellman-Ford) with a link-state algorithm (SPF), under varying file transfer workload. (Unlike the traditional distance-vector algorithms, these new distance-vector algorithms do not suffer from long-lived loops.) Our comparison is done using a recently developed network simulator. MaRS. We consider both dynamic and static file transfer connections, and both uniform and hotspot distributions of source-sink pairs. Our conclusion is that Extended Bellman-Ford performs as well as SPF in terms of delay and throughput. This suggests that distance-vector algorithms are appropriate for very large wide-area networks, since their space requirements are less than that of link-state algorithms.

References

[1]
[1] C. Alaettino¿lu, K. Dussa-Zieger. I. Matta, and A. U. Shankar. MaRS (Maryland Routing Simulator) - Version 1.0 User's Manual. Technical Report UMIACS-TR-91-80. CS-TR-2687. Department of Computer Science, University of Maryland, College Park. MD 20742. June 1991.
[2]
[2] D. Bertsekas and R. Gallaher. Data Networks, pages 297-333. Prentice-Hall. Inc., 1987.
[3]
[3] C. Cheng. R. Riley. S. P. R. Kumar. and J. J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves. A Loop-free Bellman-Ford Routing Protocol Without Bouncing Effect. In Proc. ACM SIGCOMM'89, pages 224-237. September 1989.
[4]
[4] Wushow Chou. Arnold Bragg. and Arne Nilsson. The Need for Adaptive Routing in the Chaotic and Unbalanced Traffic. IEEE Transactions on Communications. 1981.
[5]
[5] E. Dijkstra. A Note on Two Problems in Connection with Graphs. Numer. Math., 1:269-271. 1959.
[6]
[6] E. Dijkstra and C. Scholten. Termination Detection for Diffusing Computations. Information Processing Letters, 11(1):1-4, 1980.
[7]
[7] A. Ephremides. P. Varaiya. and J. Walrand. A Simple Dynamic Routing Problem. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control. 25(4):690-693, August 1980.
[8]
[8] A. Ephremides and S. Verdu. Control and Optimization Methods in Communication Network Problems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control. 34(9):930-942. September 1989.
[9]
[9] L. Ford and D. Fulkerson. Flows in Networks, pages 297-333. Prentice-Hall. Inc., 1962.
[10]
[10] R. Gallager. A Minimum Delay Routing Algorithm Using Distributed Computation. IEEE Transactions on Communications. COM-25:73-84, Jan 1977.
[11]
[11] J. J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves. A Unified Approach to Loop Free Routing Using Distance Vectors or Link States. In Proc. ACM SIGCOMM '89, pages 212-223, September 1989.
[12]
[12] S. A. Heimlich. Traffic Characterization of the NSFNET National Backbone. In Proc. USENIX '90. pages 207-227, Washington. D.C. January 1990.
[13]
[13] P. A. Humblet and S. R. Soloway. Algorithms for Data Communication Networks-Part 1. Technical report. Codex Corp. 1986.
[14]
[14] P. A. Humblet., S. R. Soloway. and B. Steinka. Algorithms for Data Communication Networks-Part 2. Technical report. Codex Corp. 1986.
[15]
[15] J. M. Jaffe and F. R. Moss. A Responsive Distributed Routing Algorithm for Computer Networks. IEEE Transactions on Communications, COM-30(7):1758-1762. July 1982.
[16]
[16] Dale Johnson. NSFnet. Report. In Proc. of the Nineteenth Internet Engineering Task Force, pages 377-382, University of Colorado, National Center for Atmospheric Research, December 1990.
[17]
[17] A. Khanna and J. Zinky. A Revised ARPANET Routing Metric. In Proc. ACM SIGCOMM '89. pages 45-56, September 1989.
[18]
[18] L. Kleinrock. Queueing Systems. Volume II: Computer Applications. John Wiley and Sons. Inc., 1976.
[19]
[19] J. M. McQuillan. I. Richer. and E. C. Rosen. The New Routing Algorithm for the ARPANET. IEEE Transactions on Communications. COM-28(5):711-719. May 1980.
[20]
[20] P. M. Merlin and A. Segall. A Failsafe Distributed Routing Protocol. IEEE Transactions on Communications, COM-27(9):1280-1287, September 1979.
[21]
[21] B. P. Mohanty, C. G. Cassandras. and D. Towsley. Performance Comparison of Routing Algorithms in Packet Switched Networks. In Proc. IEEE Globecom '90. San Diego, California. 1990.
[22]
[22] D. J. Nelson. K. Sayood, and H. Chang. An Extended Least-Hop Distributed Routing Algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 38(4):520-528. April 1990.
[23]
[23] B. Rajagopalan and M. Faiman. A New Responsive Distributed Shortest-Path Routing Algorithm. In Proc. ACM SIGCOMM '89, pages 237-246. September 1989.
[24]
[24] A. Segal. Advances in Verifiable Fail-Safe Routing Procedures. IEEE Transactions on Communications . COM-29(4):491-497, April 1981.
[25]
[25] A. Udaya Shankar. Cengiz Alaettino¿lu. Ibrahim Matta. and Klauclia Dussa-Zieger. Performance Comparison of Routing Protocols using MaRS: Distance-Vector versus Link-State. In Proc. ACM SIGMETRICS and PERFORMANCE, pages 181-192. Newport, Rhode Island. June 1992.
[26]
[26] W. T. Tsai, C. Ramamoorthy, W. K. Tsai, and O. Nishiguchi. An Adaptive Hierarchical Routing Protocol. IEEE Transactions on Computers. 38:1059-1075. August 1989.
[27]
[27] Z. Wang and J. Crowcroft. Shortest Path First with Emergency Exits. In Proc. ACM SIGCOMM '90. pages 166-176. September 1990.
[28]
[28] W. Zaumen and J. J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves. Dynamics of Distributed Shortest-path Routing Algorithms. In Proc. ACM SIGCMM '91, September 1991.

Cited By

View all
  • (2018)AntNetJournal of Artificial Intelligence Research10.5555/1622797.16228069:1(317-365)Online publication date: 17-Dec-2018
  • (2006)Ant colonies for adaptive routing in packet-switched communications networksParallel Problem Solving from Nature — PPSN V10.1007/BFb0056909(673-682)Online publication date: 3-Jun-2006
  • (2005)Multiple path routing algorithm for IP networksComputer Communications10.1016/j.comcom.2004.11.01428:7(829-836)Online publication date: 1-May-2005

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review
ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review  Volume 22, Issue 5
Oct. 1992
87 pages
ISSN:0146-4833
DOI:10.1145/141809
  • Editor:
  • David Oran
Issue’s Table of Contents

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 02 October 1992
Published in SIGCOMM-CCR Volume 22, Issue 5

Check for updates

Qualifiers

  • Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)60
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)9
Reflects downloads up to 30 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2018)AntNetJournal of Artificial Intelligence Research10.5555/1622797.16228069:1(317-365)Online publication date: 17-Dec-2018
  • (2006)Ant colonies for adaptive routing in packet-switched communications networksParallel Problem Solving from Nature — PPSN V10.1007/BFb0056909(673-682)Online publication date: 3-Jun-2006
  • (2005)Multiple path routing algorithm for IP networksComputer Communications10.1016/j.comcom.2004.11.01428:7(829-836)Online publication date: 1-May-2005

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media