Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/1409540.1409587acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicecConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Relationship preserving auction for repeated e-procurement

Published: 19 August 2008 Publication History

Abstract

While e-procurement auction has helped firms to achieve lower procurement costs, auction mechanisms that prevail at present in procurement markets need to address an important issue that concerns the ability to maintain long term relationships with the partners, especially in repeated e-procurement settings. In this paper, we propose a Relationship Preserving Auction (RPA) mechanism that augments the conventional auction mechanism with a bidder relationship scoring model. Our proposed mechanism gives increased chances of winning to the bidders who have bidden at relatively competitive price but had comparatively less wins so far. Keeping these bidders in the auction over time will lead to more competitive bidding prices and eventually reduce the auctioneer's total procurement cost in repeated auctions. From simulation experiments, we show how RPA works under different bidders' behavior. We show that RPA is able to obtain lower procurement cost compared to conventional procurement auctions when bidders bid opportunistically and renege readily to other markets.

References

[1]
Beasley, J. D. 2008. Operational Research note, http://people.brunel.ac.uk/~mastjjb/jeb/or/contents.html
[2]
Beil, D. R., and Wein, L. M. 2003. An inverse optimization-based auction mechanism to support a multiattribute RFQ process. Management Science. 49(11), 1529--1545.
[3]
Bichler M., Kaukal M., and Segev A. 1999. Multi-Attribute auctions for electronic procurement. In Proceedings of the First IBM IAC Workshop on Internet Based Negotiation Technologies, Yorktown Heights, NY, 154--165.
[4]
Burnes, B., and New, S. 1997. Collaboration in customer-supplier relationships: strategy, operations and the function of rhetoric. International Journal of Purchasing & Materials Management, Fall, 10--17.
[5]
Clemons, E. K., Sashidhar, P. D. and Michael, C. R. 1993. The impact of information technology on the organization of economic activity: the "Move to the middle" hypothesis. Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 10 No. 2, 9--35.
[6]
Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., and Rhodes, E. 1978. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 2 No. 6, 429--444.
[7]
Cohn, L. 2000. B2B: the hottest net bet yet? Business Week, January 17, 36--37.
[8]
Cousins, P. 1999. Supply base rationalisation: myth or reality? European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 5, 143--155.
[9]
Daly, S. P. and Nath, P. 2005. Reserve auctions for relationship marketers. Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 34, 157--166.
[10]
Everest Research. 2007. Procurement outsourcing annual report 2007. ID: ERI-2007-1-R-0154.
[11]
Forker, L. and Stannock, P. 2000. Cooperation versus competition: do buyers and suppliers see eye-to-eye? European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, Vol. 6, 31--40.
[12]
Grey, W., Olavson, T., and Shi, D. 2005. The role of e-marketplaces in relationship based supply chain: A survey. IBM Systems Journal, Vol.44, No.1, 109--123.
[13]
Hao, S. 2000. A study of basic bidding strategy in clearing pricing auctions. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 15, No. 3, 975--980.
[14]
Harstad, R. M., Kagel, J. H. and Levin, D. 1990. Equilibrium bid functions for auctions with an uncertain number of bidders. Economic Letters, Vol. 33, 35--40.
[15]
Hohner, G., Rich, J., Ng, E., Reid, G., Davenport, A. J., Kalagnanam, J. R., Lee, H. S., and An, C. 2003. Combinatorial and quantity discount procurement auction benefit Mars, Incorporated and its suppliers. Interfaces, Vol. 33, No. 1, 23--35.
[16]
Jap, S. D. 2002. Online reserve auction: Issues, themes, and prospects for the future. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol.30, No.4, 506--525.
[17]
Jap, S. D. 2003. An exploratory study of the introduction of online reverse auction. Journal of Marketing, Vol. 6, 96--107.
[18]
Kaplan, S., and Sawhney, M. 1999. B2B E-Commerce Hubs: Towards a Taxonomy of Business Models. htp://www.informationweek.com.
[19]
Krause, D. R., Scannell, T. V., and Calantone, R. J. 2000. A structural analysis of the effectiveness of buying firm's strategies fro improve supplier performance. Decision Sciences, Vol. 31, No. 1, 33--56.
[20]
Lee, J, S. and Szymanski B. K., 2006. Auctions as a dynamic pricing mechanism for e-services. Service Enterprise Integration, Cheng Hsu (ed.), Kluwer, New York.
[21]
McAfee, P. R., and McMillan, J. 1987. Auctions with a stochastic number of bidders. Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 43, 1--19.
[22]
McMillan, J. 1994. Selling Spectrum Rights. Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 8, 145--162.
[23]
Rassenti, S. J., Smith, V. L., and Bulfin, R. L. 1982. A combinatorial auction mechanism for airport time slot allocation. The Bell Journal of Economics, Vol. 13, Issue. 2, 402--417.
[24]
Sheffi, Y. 2004. Combinatorial auctions in the procurement of transportation services. Interfaces, Vol. 34, No. 4, 245--252.
[25]
Smart, A., and Harrison, A. 2003. Online reverse auctions and their role in buyer supplier relationships. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, Vol. 9, 257--268.
[26]
Talluri, S., and Ragatz, G. L. 2004. Multiattribute reverse auctions in B2B exchanges: A framework for design and implementation. Journal of Supply Chain Management, Vol. 40 No. 1, 52--60.
[27]
Vickrey, W. 1961. Counter speculation, auction and competitive sealed tenders. Journal of Finance, Vol. 16, 8--37.
[28]
Webber, C. A. 1996. A data envelopment analysis approach to measuring vendor performance. Supply Chain Management, Vol.1. No. 1, 28--39.
[29]
Weber, C. A., and Desai, A. 1996. Determination of paths to vendor market efficiency using parallel coordinates representation: A negotiation tools for buyers. European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 90 No. 1, 142--155.

Cited By

View all
  • (2013)Relationship preserving multi-attribute reverse auctionComputers and Industrial Engineering10.1016/j.cie.2013.07.00766:2(418-430)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2013
  • (2012)Bidder behaviors in repeated B2B procurement auctionsProceedings of the 14th Annual International Conference on Electronic Commerce10.1145/2346536.2346563(145-152)Online publication date: 7-Aug-2012

Index Terms

  1. Relationship preserving auction for repeated e-procurement

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICEC '08: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Electronic commerce
      August 2008
      355 pages
      ISBN:9781605580753
      DOI:10.1145/1409540
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      In-Cooperation

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 19 August 2008

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. auction
      2. e-procurement
      3. supplier relationship

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Funding Sources

      Conference

      ICEC08
      ICEC08: 10th International Conference on E-Commerce
      August 19 - 22, 2008
      Innsbruck, Austria

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate 150 of 244 submissions, 61%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
      Reflects downloads up to 24 Nov 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2013)Relationship preserving multi-attribute reverse auctionComputers and Industrial Engineering10.1016/j.cie.2013.07.00766:2(418-430)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2013
      • (2012)Bidder behaviors in repeated B2B procurement auctionsProceedings of the 14th Annual International Conference on Electronic Commerce10.1145/2346536.2346563(145-152)Online publication date: 7-Aug-2012

      View Options

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media