Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
research-article

Evaluating the STANDUP Pun Generating Software with Children with Cerebral Palsy

Published: 01 February 2009 Publication History

Abstract

The interactive STANDUP software was developed to provide children who use augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) with a “language playground.” The software provides appropriate functionality for users with physical, speech, and language impairments to generate and tell novel punning riddles at different levels of complexity. STANDUP was evaluated with nine children with cerebral palsy during an eight-week study. Results show that the participants were able to generate and tell novel jokes with minimal or no support. The use of STANDUP impacted favorably on general AAC use. The study results also suggested that STANDUP could potentially have a positive effect on social and pragmatic skills. Further research to investigate the impact of STANDUP on communication skills is proposed. Suggestions for future software development include providing users with opportunities to complete jokes and to integrate online dictionaries when new vocabulary is encountered.

References

[1]
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. 2005. Roles and responsibilities of speech-language pathologists with respect to alternative communication: Position statement. Asha Supplement 25, 1--2.
[2]
Bernstein, D. K. 1986. The development of humor: Implications for assessment and intervention. Topics Lang. Disorders 1, 47--58.
[3]
Beukelman, D. R. and Mirenda, P. 2005. Augmentative and Alternative Communication: Management of Severe Communication Disorders in Children and Adults, 3rd ed. Paul H. Brookes Publishing, Baltimore, MD.
[4]
Binsted, K., Pain, H., and Ritchie, G. 1997. Children’s evaluation of computer-generated punning riddles. Pragmatics Cogn. 5, 2, 309--358.
[5]
Blachowicz, C., Fisher, P., and Ogle, D. 2006. Vocabulary: Questions from the classroom. Reading Res. Quart. 41, 4, 524--539.
[6]
Bruner, J. S. 1961. The act of discovery. Harvard Edu. Rev. 4, 21--32.
[7]
Cairns, H. S., Waltzman, D., and Schlisselberg, G. 2004. Detecting The ambiguity of sentences: Relationship to early reading skill. Commun. Disorders Quart. 25, 2, 68--78.
[8]
Crystal, D. 1988. Language Play. Penguin Books, London.
[9]
Department for Education and Skills (DfES). 2005. 2020 Vision: Report of the Teaching and Learning in 2020 Review. Department for Education and Skills, London.
[10]
Donahue, M. and Bryan, T. 1984. Communicative skills and peer relations of learning disabled adolescents. Topics Lang. Disorders 4, 10--21.
[11]
Ferm, U., Ahlsen, E., and Bjorck-Akesson, E. 2005. Conversational topics between a child with complex communication needs and her caregiver at mealtime. Augment. Alternat. Commun. 21, 19--41.
[12]
Frederickson, N., Frith, U., and Reason, R. 1997. Phonological Assessment Battery: Standardized Edition. Nfer-Nelson, Windsor.
[13]
Freud, S. 1991. Jokes and Their Relation to the Unconscious (original publication 1905 Ed.). Penguin Library, London.
[14]
King-DeBaun, P. (1997). Computer fun and adapted play: Strategies for cognitively or chronologically young children with disabilities Part 1 and 2. In Proceedings of Technology and Persons with Disabilities Conference.
[15]
Klein, A. J. 1985. Humor comprehension and humor appreciation of cognitively orientated humor: A study of kindergarten children. Child Study J. 15, 4, 223--235.
[16]
Lefort, B. 1992. Structure of verbal jokes and comprehension in young children. Humor 5, 1-2, 149--163.
[17]
Light, J. 1988. Interaction involving individuals using augmentative and alternative communication systems: State of the art and future directions. Augment. Alternat. Commun. 4, 66--82.
[18]
Light, J., Collier, B., and Parnes, P. 1985. Communicative interaction between young nonspeaking physically disabled children and their primary caregivers: Part I---Discourse patterns. Augment. Alternat. Commun. 1, 2, 74--83.
[19]
Light, J. and Kelford-Smith, A. 1993. Home literacy experiences of preschoolers who use AAC systems and of their nondisabled peers. Augment. Alternat. Commun. 9, 2.
[20]
Light, J., Page, R., Curran, J., and Pitkin, L. 2007. Children’s ideas for the design of assistive technologies for young children with complex communication needs. Augment. Alternat. Commun. 23, 4, 274--287.
[21]
Manurung, R., Ritchie, G., Pain, H., Waller, A., Black, R., and O’Mara, D. 2008a. Adding phonetic similarity data to a lexical database. Lang. Resources Eval. 42, 3, 319--324.
[22]
Manurung, R., Ritchie, G., Pain, H., Waller, A., O’Mara, D., and Black, R. 2008b. The construction of a pun generator for language skills development. Appl. Artif. Intell. 22, 9, 841--869.
[23]
Mercer, N. and Littleton, K. 2007. Dialogue and the Development of Children’s Thinking. Routledge, London.
[24]
Miller, G. A., Beckwith, R., Fellbaum, C., Gross, D., Miller, K., and Tengi, R. 1993. Five papers on Wordnet. Int. J. Lexicography 3, 4.
[25]
Moar, E., Waller, A., and Black, R. 2008. Asking children to design AAC devices. In Proceedings of the ISAAC 13th Biennial Conference of the International Society for Augmentative and Alternative Communication (ISAAC) (DVD).
[26]
Murphy, J. and Cameron, L. 2002. Talking Mats and Learning Disability. AAC Research Unit, Department of Psychology, University of Stirling, Stirling.
[27]
Musselwhite, C. and Burkhart, J. 2002. Social scripts: Co-Planned sequenced scripts for AAC users. In Proceedings of the Technology and Persons with Disabilities Conference.
[28]
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. 2000. Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
[29]
Nippold, M. A. 1985. Comprehension of figurative language in youth. Topics Lang. Disorders 5, 1--20.
[30]
Semel, E., Wiig, E. H., and Secord, W. A. 1995. Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals®, 3rd ed. (Celf® -3). Harcourt Assessment, TX.
[31]
Shade, R. 1991. Verbal humor in gifted students and students in the general population: A comparison of spontaneous mirth and comprehension. J. Edu. Gifted 14, 2, 134--150.
[32]
Smith, M. 2005. Literacy and Augmentative and Alternative Communication. Elsevier Academic Press, Amsterdam, London.
[33]
Spector, C. C. 1990. Linguistic humor comprehension of normal and language impaired adolescents. J. Speech Hearing Disorders 55, 533--541.
[34]
Spector, C. C. 1992. Remediating humor comprehension deficits in language-impaired students. Lang. Speech Hearing Serv. Schools 23, 20--27.
[35]
Spector, C. C. 1996. Children’s comprehension of idioms in the context of humor. Lang. Speech Hearing Serv. Schools 27, 307--313.
[36]
Taylor, J. M. and Mazlack, L. J. 2004. Computationally recognizing wordplay in jokes. In Proceedings of the Cognitive Science Society Conference.
[37]
Verburg, G. 2000. Ends and beginnings. Commun. Together 17, 3, 15--21.
[38]
von Tetzchner, S. and Martinsen, H. 2000. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 2nd ed. Whurr, London.
[39]
Vygotsky, L. S. 1978. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
[40]
Waller, A. 2006. Communication access to conversational narrative. Topics Lang. Disorders 26, 3, 221--239.
[41]
Waller, A., Dennis, F., Brodie, J., and Cairns, A. Y. 1997. Evaluating the use of Talksbac, a predictive communication device for non-fluent aphasic adults. Int. J. Lang. Commun. Disorders 33, 45--70.
[42]
Waller, A., O’Mara, D., Manurung, R., Pain, H., and Ritchie, G. 2005. Facilitating user feedback in the design of a novel joke generation system for people with severe communication impairment. In Proceedings of HCII (CD), G. Salvendy, Ed. Lawrence Erlbaum, NJ. (vol. 5).
[43]
Waller, A., O’Mara, D. A., Tait, L., Booth, L., Brophy-Arnott, B., and Hood, H. E. 2001. Using written stories to support the use of narrative in conversational interactions: Case study. Augment. Alternat. Commun. 17, 221--232.
[44]
Yuill, N. 1998. Reading and riddling: The role of riddle appreciation in understanding and improving poor text comprehension in children. Cahiers De Psychologie Cognitive 17, 2, 313--342.
[45]
Yuill, N. 2009. Visiting joke city: How can talking about jokes foster metalinguistic awareness in poor comprehenders? In Reading Comprehension Strategies: Theories, Interventions and Technologies, D. McNamara, Ed. LEA.
[46]
Yuill, N. and Easton, K. 1993. The role of linguistic ambiguity in understanding and improving children’s text comprehension: University of Sussex.
[47]
Zipke, M. 2008. Teaching metalinguistic awareness and reading comprehension with riddles. The Reading Teacher 62, 2, 128--137.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Breaking Badge: Augmenting Communication with Wearable AAC Smartbadges and DisplaysProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642327(1-25)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
  • (2024)An Automated Approach for Generating Conceptual RiddlesAdvances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining10.1007/978-981-97-2266-2_13(160-172)Online publication date: 7-May-2024
  • (2024)An AAC Application for Generating Japanese Response Phrases Using GPT-4Computers Helping People with Special Needs10.1007/978-3-031-62849-8_18(144-152)Online publication date: 8-Jul-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing
ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing  Volume 1, Issue 3
February 2009
100 pages
ISSN:1936-7228
EISSN:1936-7236
DOI:10.1145/1497302
Issue’s Table of Contents
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 February 2009
Accepted: 01 December 2008
Received: 01 December 2008
Published in TACCESS Volume 1, Issue 3

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Alternative and augmentative communication
  2. computational humor
  3. speech generation devices

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed

Funding Sources

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)30
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
Reflects downloads up to 14 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Breaking Badge: Augmenting Communication with Wearable AAC Smartbadges and DisplaysProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642327(1-25)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
  • (2024)An Automated Approach for Generating Conceptual RiddlesAdvances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining10.1007/978-981-97-2266-2_13(160-172)Online publication date: 7-May-2024
  • (2024)An AAC Application for Generating Japanese Response Phrases Using GPT-4Computers Helping People with Special Needs10.1007/978-3-031-62849-8_18(144-152)Online publication date: 8-Jul-2024
  • (2023)Watch Your Language: Using Smartwatches to Support CommunicationProceedings of the 25th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility10.1145/3597638.3608379(1-21)Online publication date: 22-Oct-2023
  • (2022)State of the Art in AAC: A Systematic Review and TaxonomyProceedings of the 24th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility10.1145/3517428.3544810(1-22)Online publication date: 23-Oct-2022
  • (2022)Identity-Focused Practice in Augmentative and Alternative Communication Services: A Framework to Support the Intersecting Identities of Individuals With Severe DisabilitiesAmerican Journal of Speech-Language Pathology10.1044/2022_AJSLP-21-0039731:5(1933-1948)Online publication date: 7-Sep-2022
  • (2022)Automatic Riddle Generation for Learning ResourcesArtificial Intelligence in Education. Posters and Late Breaking Results, Workshops and Tutorials, Industry and Innovation Tracks, Practitioners’ and Doctoral Consortium10.1007/978-3-031-11647-6_66(343-347)Online publication date: 27-Jul-2022
  • (2021)Establishing ContextACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/344620528:2(1-30)Online publication date: 17-Apr-2021
  • (2021)Design and evaluation of ECO: an augmentative and alternative communication toolUniversal Access in the Information Society10.1007/s10209-021-00819-x21:4(827-849)Online publication date: 20-May-2021
  • (2020)Who Are You Asking?: Qualitative Methods for Involving AAC Users as Primary Research ParticipantsProceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3313831.3376883(1-13)Online publication date: 21-Apr-2020
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Full Access

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media