Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/1458583.1458595acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Tag-geotag correlation in social networks

Published: 30 October 2008 Publication History

Abstract

This paper presents an analysis of the correlation of annotated information unit (textual) tags and geographical identification metadata geotags. Despite the increased usage of geotagging in collaborative tagging systems, most current research focuses on textual tagging alone in solving the tag search problem. This may result in difficulties to search for precise and relevant information within the given tag space. For example, inconsistencies like polysemy, synonyms, and word inflections with plural forms complicate the tag search problem. Therefore, more work needs to be done to include geotag information with existing tagging information for analysis. In this paper, to make geotagging possible to be used in analysis with tagging, we prove that there is a strong correlation between tagging and geotagging information. Our approach uses tag similarity and geographical distribution similarity to determine inter-relationships among tags and geotags. From our initial experiments, we show that the power law is established between tag similarity and geographical distribution similarity: this means that tag similarity and geographical distribution similarity has a strong correlation and the correlation can be used to find more relevant tags in the tag space. The power law confirms that there is an increased relationship between tagging and geotagging and the increased relationship is scalable in size of tags and geotags. Also, using both geotagging and tagging information instead of only tagging, we show that the uncertainty between derived and actual similarities among tags is reduced.

References

[1]
Arthur, D and Vassilvitskii, S. k-means++: The Advantages of Careful Seeing. In Proceedings of the Eighteenth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, January 7-9, 2007). SODA 2007. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, PA. 1027--1035. DOI=http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1283383.1283494
[2]
Brooks, C. H. and Montanez, N. Improved Annotation of the Blogosphere via autotagging and hierarchical clustering. In Proceedings of the 15th international conference on World Wide Web (Edinburgh, Scotland, UK, May 23-26, 2006). WWW '06. ACM Press, New York, NY, 625--632. DOI=http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1135777.1135869
[3]
Belelman, G., Keller, P., and Smadja, F. Automated Tag Clustering: Improving search and exploration in the tag space. In Proceedings of Collaborative Web Tagging Workshop at WWW (Edinburgh, Scotland, UK, May 23-26, 2006).
[4]
del.icio.us. http://del.icio.us/
[5]
Flickr. http://www.flickr.com/
[6]
Golder, S. and Huberman, B. 2006. The structure of collaborative tagging systems. Journal of Information Science, 198--208.
[7]
Heyman, P. and Garcia-Molina, H. 2006. Collaborative Creation of Communal Hierarchical Taxonomies in Social Tagging System. Technical Report, Stanford University.
[8]
Kennedy, L., Naaman, M., Ahern, S., Nair, R., and Rattenbury, T. 2007. How Flickr Helps us Make Sense of the World: Context and Contents in Community-Contribute Media Collections. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Multimedia (Augsburg, Bavaria, Germany, September 23-28, 2007). MM'07. ACM Press, NY, 631--640. DOI=http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1291233.1291384
[9]
Lee, K. J. What goes around comes around: an analysis of del.icio.us as social space. In Proceedings of the 2006 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (Banff, Alberta, Canada, November 4-8, 2006). CSCW'06. ACM Press, NY, 191--194. DOI=http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1180875.1180905
[10]
Lee, S., Won, D. and McLeod, D. 2008. Discovering Relationships among Tags and Geotags. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (Seattle, Washington, USA, March 30- April 2, 2008). ICWSM 2008.
[11]
Lin, D. An Information-Theoretic Definition of Similarity. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Machine Learning (Madison, Wisconsin, USA, July 24-27, 1998). ICML 1988. Morgan Kaufmann, 296--304.
[12]
Marlow, C., Naaman, M., Boyd, D., and Davis, M. HT06, tagging paper, taxonomy, Flickr, academic article, to read. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia (Odense, Denmark, August 22-25, 2006). HYPERTEXT 2006. ACM Press, New York, NY, USA, 31--40. DOI=http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1149941.1149949
[13]
Newman, M. E. J. 2005. Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipf's law. Contemporary Physics. 323--351. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00107510500052444.
[14]
Pantel, P. and Lin, D. Discovering word sense from text, Proceedings of the Eighth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, July 23-26, 2002). KDD 2002. ACM Press, New York, NY, USA, 613--619. DOI=http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/775047.775138
[15]
Sarndal, C. A comparative study of association measures. 1974. Psychometrika. Vol. 39. 165--187
[16]
Schmitz, P. Inducing Ontology from Flickr Tags. In Proceedings of Collaborative Web Tagging Workshop at WWW2006 (Edinburgh, Scotland, UK, May 23-26, 2006
[17]
Shannon, C. E. 1948. A Mathematical Theory of Communication. Bell System Technical Journal. Vol. 27. 379--423, 623--656.
[18]
Technorati. http://www.technorati.com

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)MVDF-RSC: Multi-view data fusion via robust spectral clustering for geo-tagged image taggingExpert Systems with Applications10.1016/j.eswa.2021.114657173(114657)Online publication date: Jul-2021
  • (2020)Extracting Representative Images of Tourist Attractions from Flickr by Combining an Improved Cluster Method and Multiple Deep Learning ModelsISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information10.3390/ijgi90200819:2(81)Online publication date: 31-Jan-2020
  • (2020)Image Annotation based on Multi-view Robust Spectral ClusteringJournal of Visual Communication and Image Representation10.1016/j.jvcir.2020.103003(103003)Online publication date: Dec-2020
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Tag-geotag correlation in social networks

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    SSM '08: Proceedings of the 2008 ACM workshop on Search in social media
    October 2008
    106 pages
    ISBN:9781605582580
    DOI:10.1145/1458583
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 30 October 2008

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. clustering
    2. geotagging
    3. power law for correlation among tagging and geotagging
    4. tagging

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    CIKM08
    CIKM08: Conference on Information and Knowledge Management
    October 30, 2008
    California, Napa Valley, USA

    Upcoming Conference

    CIKM '25

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)9
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
    Reflects downloads up to 18 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2021)MVDF-RSC: Multi-view data fusion via robust spectral clustering for geo-tagged image taggingExpert Systems with Applications10.1016/j.eswa.2021.114657173(114657)Online publication date: Jul-2021
    • (2020)Extracting Representative Images of Tourist Attractions from Flickr by Combining an Improved Cluster Method and Multiple Deep Learning ModelsISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information10.3390/ijgi90200819:2(81)Online publication date: 31-Jan-2020
    • (2020)Image Annotation based on Multi-view Robust Spectral ClusteringJournal of Visual Communication and Image Representation10.1016/j.jvcir.2020.103003(103003)Online publication date: Dec-2020
    • (2016)Parallel k-Means++ for Multiple Shared-Memory Architectures2016 45th International Conference on Parallel Processing (ICPP)10.1109/ICPP.2016.18(93-102)Online publication date: Aug-2016
    • (2016)Analyzing Flickr metadata to extract location-based information and semantically organize its photo contentNeurocomputing10.1016/j.neucom.2014.12.104172(114-133)Online publication date: Jan-2016
    • (2015)A multi-scale approach to exploring urban places in geotagged photographsComputers, Environment and Urban Systems10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2013.11.00653(96-109)Online publication date: Sep-2015
    • (2012)From Tags to Trends: A First Glance at Social Media Content DynamicsArtificial Intelligence Applications and Innovations10.1007/978-3-642-33412-2_44(431-441)Online publication date: 2012
    • (2011)Exploration and comparison of geographic information sources using distance statisticsProceedings of the 19th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems10.1145/2093973.2094017(329-338)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2011
    • (2011)Placing User-Generated Photo Metadata on a MapProceedings of the 2011 Sixth International Workshop on Semantic Media Adaptation and Personalization10.1109/SMAP.2011.16(79-84)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2011
    • (2011)Estimating Twitter User Location Using Social Interactions--A Content Based Approach2011 IEEE Third Int'l Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust and 2011 IEEE Third Int'l Conference on Social Computing10.1109/PASSAT/SocialCom.2011.120(838-843)Online publication date: Oct-2011
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media