Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/1457515.1409117acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagessiggraph-asiaConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Staggered projections for frictional contact in multibody systems

Published: 01 December 2008 Publication History

Abstract

We present a new discrete velocity-level formulation of frictional contact dynamics that reduces to a pair of coupled projections and introduce a simple fixed-point property of this coupled system. This allows us to construct a novel algorithm for accurate frictional contact resolution based on a simple staggered sequence of projections. The algorithm accelerates performance using warm starts to leverage the potentially high temporal coherence between contact states and provides users with direct control over frictional accuracy. Applying this algorithm to rigid and deformable systems, we obtain robust and accurate simulations of frictional contact behavior not previously possible, at rates suitable for interactive haptic simulations, as well as large-scale animations. By construction, the proposed algorithm guarantees exact, velocity-level contact constraint enforcement and obtains long-term stable and robust integration. Examples are given to illustrate the performance, plausibility and accuracy of the obtained solutions.

Supplementary Material

MOV File (a164-kaufman-mp4_hi.mov)

References

[1]
Anitescu, M., and Hart, G. D. 2004. A fixed-point iteration approach for multibody dynamics with contact and small friction. Mathematical Programming 101, 1, 3--32.
[2]
Anitescu, M., and Potra, F. R. 1997. Formulating dynamic multirigid-body contact problems with friction as solvable linear complementarity problems. ASME Nonlinear Dynamics 14, 231--247.
[3]
Baraff, D., and Witkin, A. P. 1992. Dynamics simulation of non-penetrating flexible bodies. In Computer Graphics (SIGGRAPH 92), 303--308.
[4]
Baraff, D. 1989. Analytical methods for dynamic simulation of non-penetrating rigid bodies. In Computer Graphics (SIGGRAPH 89), 223--232.
[5]
Baraff, D. 1991. Coping with friction for non-penetrating rigid body simulation. In Computer Graphics (SIGGRAPH 91), 31--41.
[6]
Baraff, D. 1993. Issues in computing contact forces for non-penetrating rigid bodies. Algorithmica 10, 2--4, 292--352.
[7]
Baraff, D. 1994. Fast contact force computation for nonpenetrating rigid bodies. In Proc. ACM SIGGRAPH 94, 23--34.
[8]
Barbič, J., and James, D. L. 2005. Real-time subspace integration for St. Venant-Kirchhoff deformable models. ACM Trans. Graph. (SIGGRAPH 05) 24, 3, 982--990.
[9]
Bauschke, H. 2000. Projection algorithms: results and open problems. In Inherently Parallel Algorithms in Feasibility and Optimization and their Applications, 11--22.
[10]
Boyd, S., and Vandenberghe, L. 2004. Convex Optimization. Cambridge.
[11]
Bridson, R., Fedkiw, R. P., and Anderson, J. 2002. Robust treatment of collisions, contact, and friction for cloth animation. ACM Trans. Graph. (SIGGRAPH 02) 21, 3, 594--603.
[12]
Brogliato, B. 1999. Nonsmooth Mechanics. Springer--Verlag.
[13]
Cirak, F., and West, M. 2005. Decomposition contact response (DCR) for explicit finite element dynamics. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 64, 8, 1078--1110.
[14]
Duriez, C., Dubois, F., Andriot, C., and Kheddar, A. 2006. Realistic haptic rendering of interacting deformable objects in virtual environments. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.
[15]
Erdmann, M. E. 1994. On a representation of friction in configuration space. The International Journal of Robotics Research 13, 3, 240--271.
[16]
Erleben, K. 2007. Velocity-based shock propagation for multibody dynamics animation. ACM Trans. Graph. 26, 2.
[17]
Ferris, M. C., and Munson, T. S. 1998. Complementarity problems in GAMS and the PATH solver. Mathematical Programming Technical Report 98--12.
[18]
Fichera, G. 1964. Problemi elastostatici con vincoli unilaterali: il problema di Signorini con ambique condizioni al contorno. Mem. Ace. Naz. Lincei 8, 7, 91--14.
[19]
Gibson, S. F., and Mirtich, B. 1997. A survey of de-formable models in computer graphics. Technical Report TR-97-19, MERL.
[20]
Goldfarb, D., and Idnani, G. 1983. A numerically stable dual method for solving strictly convex quadratic programs. Mathematical Programming 27, 1--33.
[21]
Guendelman, E., Bridson, R., and Fedkiw, R. 2003. Non-convex rigid bodies with stacking. ACM Trans. Graph. (SIGGRAPH 03) 22, 3, 871--878.
[22]
Hahn, J. K. 1988. Realistic animation of rigid bodies. In Computer Graphics (SIGGRAPH 88), 299--308.
[23]
Harmon, D., Vouga, E., Tamstorf, R., and Grinspun, E. 2008. Robust treatment of simultaneous collisions. ACM Trans. Graph. (SIGGRAPH 08) 27, 3.
[24]
Hauser, K. K., Shen, C., and O'Brien, J. F. 2003. Interactive deformation using modal analysis with constraints. In Graphics Interface, 247--255.
[25]
Hertz, H. 1882. On the contact of elastic solids. J. Reine und. Angewandte Mathmatik 92, 156, 156--171.
[26]
Irving, G., Schroeder, C., and Fedkiw, R. 2007. Volume conserving finite element simulations of deformable models. ACM Trans. Graph. (SIGGRAPH 07) 26, 3.
[27]
James, D. L., and Pai, D. K. 2004. BD-Tree: Output-sensitive collision detection for reduced deformable models. ACM Trans. Graph. (SIGGRAPH 04) 23, 3, 393--398.
[28]
Johnson, K. L. 1985. Contact Mechanics. Cambridge.
[29]
Jourdan, F., Alart, P., and Jean, M. 1998. A Gauss-Seidel like algorithm to solve frictional contact problems. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 155, 31--47.
[30]
Kaufman, D. M., Edmunds, T., and Pai, D. K. 2005. Fast frictional dynamics for rigid bodies. ACM Trans. Graph. (SIGGRAPH 05) 24, 3, 946--956.
[31]
Kikuchi, N., and Oden, J. 1988. Contact Problems in Elasticity: A study of variational inequalities and finite element methods. SIAM Studies in Applied and Numerical Mathematics.
[32]
Klarbring, A. 1986. A mathematical programming approach to three-domensional contact problems with friction. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 58, 175--200.
[33]
Lö tstedt, P. 1984. Numerical simulation of time-dependent contact friction problems in rigid body mechanics. SIAM Journal of Scientific Statistical Computing 5, 2, 370--393.
[34]
Milenkovic, V. J., and Schmidl, H. 2001. Optimization-based animation. In Proc. ACM SIGGRAPH 01, 37--46.
[35]
Mirtich, B., and Canny, J. F. 1995. Impulse-based dynamic simulation of rigid bodies. In Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics.
[36]
Moore, M., and Wilhelms, J. 1988. Collision detection and response for computer animation. In Computer Graphics (SIGGRAPH 88), 289--298.
[37]
Moreau, J. J. 1966. Quadratic programming in mechanics: Onesided constraints. Journal SIAM Control 4, 1, 153--158.
[38]
Moreau, J. J. 1973. On unilateral constraints, friction and plasticity. New Variational Techniques in Mathematical Physics, 172--322.
[39]
Murty, K., and Kabadi, S. 1987. Some NP-complete problems in quadratic and nonlinear programming. Mathematical Programing 39, 117--129.
[40]
Murty, K. G. 1988. Linear Complementarity, Linear and Nonlinear Programming. Helderman Verlag.
[41]
Nealen, A., Mller, M., Keiser, R., Boxerman, E., and Carlson, M. 2005. Physically based deformable models in computer graphics. In Eurographics 2005.
[42]
Otaduy, M. A., Germann, D., Redon, S., and Gross, M. 2007. Adaptive deformations with fast tight bounds. In Proc. of the ACM SIGGRAPH/Eurographics Symposium on Computer Animation.
[43]
Painlevé, P. 1895. Sur le lois du frottement de glissemment. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 121, 112--115.
[44]
Pauly, M., Pai, D. K., and Guibas, L. 2004. Quasi-rigid objects in contact. In ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on Computer Animation, ACM/Eurographics.
[45]
Raghupathi, L., and Faure, F. 2006. QP-Collide: A new approach to collision treatment. In journées du groupe de travail Animation et Simulation (GTAS), 91--101.
[46]
Redon, S., Kheddar, A., and Coquillart, S. 2002. Gauss' least constraints principle and rigid body simulations. In IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.
[47]
Schittkowski, K. 2005. QL: A Fortran code for convex quadratic programming - user's guide, Version 2.11. Report, Department of Mathematics, University of Bayreuth.
[48]
Shabana, A. 2005. Dynamics of Multibody Systems, 3rd ed. Cambridge.
[49]
Signorini, S. 1933. Sopra akune questioni di elastostatica. Atti della Societa Italiana per il Progresso della Scienze.
[50]
Smith, R. 2006. Open Dynamics Engine, V0.5, user guide.
[51]
Song, P., and Kumar, V. 2003. Distributed compliant model for efficient dynamic simulation of systems with frictional contacts. In The 2003 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences.
[52]
Spillmann, J., Becker, M., and Teschner, M. 2007. Non-iterative computation of contact forces for deformable objects. Journal of WSCG 15, 13.
[53]
Stewart, D., and Trinkle, J. C. 1996. An implicit time-stepping scheme for rigid body dynamics with inelastic collisions and Coulomb friction. International Journal Numerical Methods Engineering 39, 2673--2691.
[54]
Stewart, D. E. 2000. Rigid-body dynamics with friction and impact. SIAM Rev. 42, 1, 3--39.
[55]
Stewart, D. E. 2001. Finite-dimensional contact mechanics. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 359, 2467--2482.
[56]
Terzopoulos, D., and Witkin, A. 1988. Physically based models with rigid and deformable components. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 8, 6, 41--51.
[57]
Trinkle, J. C., Pang, J. S., Sudarsky, S., and Lo, G. 1995. On dynamic multi-rigid-body contact problems with Coulomb friction. Tech. rep., Texas A&M University, Department of Computer Science.
[58]
Wasfy, T. M., and Noor, A. K. 2003. Computational strategies for flexible multibody systems. Applied Mechanics Reviews 56, 6 (November), 553--613.
[59]
Wriggers, P. 2002. Computational Contact Mechanics. John Wiley and Sons, Ltd.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)GIPC: Fast and stable Gauss-Newton optimization of IPC barrier energyACM Transactions on Graphics10.1145/3643028Online publication date: 27-Jan-2024
  • (2024)Robust and Artefact‐Free Deformable Contact with Smooth Surface RepresentationsComputer Graphics Forum10.1111/cgf.15187Online publication date: 17-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Contact Models in Robotics: A Comparative AnalysisIEEE Transactions on Robotics10.1109/TRO.2024.343420840(3716-3733)Online publication date: 2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
SIGGRAPH Asia '08: ACM SIGGRAPH Asia 2008 papers
December 2008
581 pages
ISBN:9781450318310
DOI:10.1145/1457515
  • Editor:
  • John C. Hart
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 December 2008

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. contact
  2. deformation
  3. friction
  4. multibody dynamics

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

Conference

SIGGRAPH '08
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

SIGGRAPH Asia '08 Paper Acceptance Rate 59 of 320 submissions, 18%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 178 of 869 submissions, 20%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)29
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
Reflects downloads up to 22 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)GIPC: Fast and stable Gauss-Newton optimization of IPC barrier energyACM Transactions on Graphics10.1145/3643028Online publication date: 27-Jan-2024
  • (2024)Robust and Artefact‐Free Deformable Contact with Smooth Surface RepresentationsComputer Graphics Forum10.1111/cgf.15187Online publication date: 17-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Contact Models in Robotics: A Comparative AnalysisIEEE Transactions on Robotics10.1109/TRO.2024.343420840(3716-3733)Online publication date: 2024
  • (2024)Cosserat-Rod-Based Dynamic Modeling of Soft Slender Robot Interacting With EnvironmentIEEE Transactions on Robotics10.1109/TRO.2024.338639340(2811-2830)Online publication date: 2024
  • (2022)Simulating deformable objects for computer animation: A numerical perspectiveJournal of Computational Dynamics10.3934/jcd.20210219:2(47)Online publication date: 2022
  • (2022)ElastoMonolithACM Transactions on Graphics10.1145/3550454.355547441:6(1-19)Online publication date: 30-Nov-2022
  • (2022)A unified newton barrier method for multibody dynamicsACM Transactions on Graphics10.1145/3528223.353007641:4(1-14)Online publication date: Jul-2022
  • (2022)Affine body dynamicsACM Transactions on Graphics10.1145/3528223.353006441:4(1-14)Online publication date: Jul-2022
  • (2021)FrictionalMonolithACM Transactions on Graphics10.1145/3478513.348053940:6(1-20)Online publication date: 10-Dec-2021
  • (2021)Differentiable Simulation for Physical System IdentificationIEEE Robotics and Automation Letters10.1109/LRA.2021.30623236:2(3413-3420)Online publication date: Apr-2021
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media