Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/1456520.1456529acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesccsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Design rules for interoperable domains: controlling content dilution and content sharing

Published: 27 October 2008 Publication History

Abstract

In this paper we argue that improved interoperability between DRM systems is likely to benefit to all the actors in the content value chain. Moreover, we describe a domain-based approach to DRM interoperability. We discuss in some detail configuration aspects of such interoperable domains, and how they affect certain social aspects such as marriage and divorce. We conclude that interoperable domains offer a much needed flexibility, allowing users to more easily move between vertical silos and offering content owners a more flexible environment for selling content.

References

[1]
S. H. Bae and P. Choi. Firm's optimal digital rights management (DRM) strategies: The effects of public copy protection and DRM compatibility. Technical Report 1013188, Social Science Research Network, September 2007.
[2]
A. E. Bell. The dynamic digital disk. IEEE Spectrum, 36(10):28--35, October 1999.
[3]
O. Bremer and W. Buhse. Standardization in DRM - Trends and recommendations. In Digital Rights Management - Technological, Economic, Legal and Political Aspects, volume 2770 of LNCS, pages 334--343, 2003.
[4]
E. V. Buskirk. Microsoft pulling support for MSN music DRM. Wired Blog Network, April 2008.
[5]
S. Cheng and A. Rambhia. DRM and standardization - Can DRM be standardized? In Digital Rights Management - Technological, Economic, Legal and Political Aspects, volume 2770 of LNCS, 2003.
[6]
Coral Consortium. {online} http://www.coral-interop.org.
[7]
B. Cooper and P. Montague. Translation of rights expressions. In Proceedings of the 4th Australasian Information Security Workshop, pages 137--144, January 2006.
[8]
K. Coyle. Rights expression languages. Technical report, Library of Congress, February 2004.
[9]
Loi no. 2006--961 relative au droit d'auteur et aux droits voisins dans la societe de l'information (DADVSI). Journal Officiel no. 178, August 2006.
[10]
Digital Living Network Alliance. {online} http://www.dlna.org.
[11]
Digital Transmission Content Protection. {online} http://www.dtcp.com.
[12]
N. Dufft, A. Stiehler, D. Vodeley, and T. Wichmann. Digital music usage and DRM. Technical report, European Project INDICARE, May 2005.
[13]
Faultline. Phone DRM: The most expensive royalty operation ever. The Register, April 2005.
[14]
D. Geer. Digital rights technology sparks interoperability concerns. Computer, 37(12):20--22, December 2004.
[15]
Hamachi. {online} http://www.hamachi.cc.
[16]
High-Definition Audio-Video Network Alliance. {online} http://www.hanaalliance.org.
[17]
B. Hyde. The first sale doctrine and digital phonorecords. Technical report, Duke Law & Technology Review, May 2001.
[18]
iTunes. {online} http://www.itunes.com.
[19]
P. A. Jamkhedkar, G. L. Heileman, and I. Martinez-Ortiz. The problem with rights expression languages. In Proceedings of the ACM DRM Workshop, pages 59--67, October 2006.
[20]
T. Kalker, K. Carey, J. Lacy, and M. Rosner. The Coral DRM interoperability framework. In Proceedings of the 4th IEEE Consumer Communications and Networking Conference, pages 930--934, January 2007.
[21]
R. H. Koenen, J. Lacy, M. MacKay, and S. Mitchell. The long march to interoperable digital rights management. Proceedings of the IEEE, 92(6):883--897, June 2004.
[22]
D. W. Kravitz and T. S. Messerges. Achieving media portability through local content translation and end-to-end rights management. In Proceedings of the ACM DRM Workshop, pages 27--36, November 2005.
[23]
B. A. LaMacchia. Key challenges in DRM: An industry perspective. In Proceedings of the ACM DRM Workshop, volume 2696 of LNCS, pages 51--60, November 2002.
[24]
R. Lawler. AACS cracked again: WinDVD key found. EnGadget, February 2007.
[25]
LEK Consulting. The cost of movie piracy. Technical report, Motion Picture Association, May 2006.
[26]
C. Z. Liu, E. Gal-Or, C. F. Kemerer, and M. D. Smith. Winners take some: The impact of conversion technologies on network effects in digital good markets. Technical Report 980726, Social Science Research Network, April 2007.
[27]
Microsoft Technet. Performing proximity detection. {online} http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa390657.aspx.
[28]
D. K. Mulligan, J. Han, and A. J. Burstein. How DRM-based content delivery systems disrupt expectations of "personal use". In Proceedings of the ACM DRM Workshop, pages 77--89, October 2003.
[29]
NIST. Advanced encryption standard. {online} http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/fips/fips197/fips--197.pdf.
[30]
S. Oster. MPAA statement on motion picture industry losses due to piracy among college students, January 2008.
[31]
A. Patrizio. Why the DVD hack was a cinch. Wired, November 1999.
[32]
B. C. Popescu, B. Crispo, A. S. Tanenbaum, and F. L. A. J. Kamperman. A DRM security architecture for home networks. In Proceedings of the ACM DRM Workshop, pages 1--10, October 2004.
[33]
J. Prados, E. Rodriguez, and J. Delgado. Interoperability between different rights expression languages and protection mechanisms. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on automated Production of Cross Media Content for Multi-Channel Distribution, pages 145--152, December 2005.
[34]
R. Safavi-Naini, N. P. Sheppard, and T. Uehara. Import/export in digital rights management. In Proceedings of the ACM DRM Workshop, pages 99--110, October 2004.
[35]
A. U. Schmidt, O. Tafreschi, and R. Wolf. Interoperability challenges for DRM systems. In Proceedings of the International Workshop for Technology, Economy, Social and Legal Aspects of Virtual Goods, May 2004.
[36]
T. Senoh, T. Ueno, and T. Kogure. DRM renewability and interoperability. In Proceedings of the First IEEE Consumer Communications and Networking Conference, pages 424--429, January 2004.
[37]
C. Serrao, V. Torres, J. Delgado, and M. Dias. Interoperability mechanisms for registration and authentication on different open DRM platforms. International Journal on Computer Science and Network Security, 6(12):291--303, December 2006.
[38]
N. P. Sheppard. On implementing MPEG-21 intellectual property management and protection. In Proceedings of the ACM DRM Workshop, pages 10--22, October 2007.
[39]
S. E. Siwek. The true cost of motion picture piracy to the U.S. economy. Technical report, Institute for Policy Innovation, September 2006.
[40]
G. Taban, A. A. Cardenas, and V. D. Gligor. Towards a secure and interoperable DRM architecture. In Proceedings of the ACM DRM Workshop, pages 69--78, October 2006.
[41]
X. Wang. MPEG-21 rights expression language: Enabling interoperable digital rights management. IEEE Multimedia, 11(4):84--87, October 2004.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
DRM '08: Proceedings of the 8th ACM workshop on Digital rights management
October 2008
102 pages
ISBN:9781605582900
DOI:10.1145/1456520
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 27 October 2008

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. content dilution
  2. content sharing
  3. digital rights management
  4. domain model
  5. interoperability

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

CCS08
Sponsor:

Upcoming Conference

CCS '25

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)1
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 23 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2020)Can Smart Contracts Learn from Digital Rights Management?IEEE Technology and Society Magazine10.1109/MTS.2020.296751539:1(69-75)Online publication date: Mar-2020
  • (2018)An approach to the formal analysis of license interoperabilityComputers and Electrical Engineering10.1016/j.compeleceng.2012.07.00338:6(1670-1686)Online publication date: 27-Dec-2018
  • (2010)An analysis of interoperability between licensesProceedings of the tenth annual ACM workshop on Digital rights management10.1145/1866870.1866884(61-72)Online publication date: 4-Oct-2010
  • (2010)A generic data model with a decomposition operation for DRM interoperability2010 IEEE International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Information Security10.1109/WCINS.2010.5541856(630-634)Online publication date: Jun-2010
  • (2010)On logical domains for flexible content protection systems2010 Digest of Technical Papers International Conference on Consumer Electronics (ICCE)10.1109/ICCE.2010.5418714(323-324)Online publication date: Jan-2010
  • (2009)An implementation experience of domain management in marlinProceedings of the nineth ACM workshop on Digital rights management10.1145/1655048.1655054(29-38)Online publication date: 9-Nov-2009

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media