Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/1329125.1329398acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesaamasConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A formal model for situated semantic alignment

Published: 14 May 2007 Publication History

Abstract

Ontology matching is currently a key technology to achieve the semantic alignment of ontological entities used by knowledge-based applications, and therefore to enable their interoperability in distributed environments such as multi-agent systems. Most ontology matching mechanisms, however, assume matching prior integration and rely on semantics that has been coded a priori in concept hierarchies or external sources. In this paper, we present a formal model for a semantic alignment procedure that incrementally aligns differing conceptualisations of two or more agents relative to their respective perception of the environment or domain they are acting in. It hence makes the situation in which the alignment occurs explicit in the model. We resort to Channel Theory to carry out the formalisation.

References

[1]
J. Barwise and J. Seligman. Information Flow: The Logic of Distributed Systems. Cambridge University Press, 1997.
[2]
G. Ghidini and F. Giunchiglia. Local models semantics, or contextual reasoning = locality + compatibility. Artificial Intelligence, 127(2):221--259, 2001.
[3]
F. Giunchiglia and P. Shvaiko. Semantic matching. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 18(3):265--280, 2004.
[4]
Y. Kalfoglou and M. Schorlemmer. IF-Map: An ontology-mapping method based on information-flow theory. In Journal on Data Semantics I, LNCS 2800, 2003.
[5]
Y. Kalfoglou and M. Schorlemmer. Ontology mapping: The sate of the art. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 18(1):1--31, 2003.
[6]
R. E. Kent. Semantic integration in the Information Flow Framework. In Semantic Interoperability and Integration, Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings 04391, 2005.
[7]
D. Lenat. CyC: A large-scale investment in knowledge infrastructure. Communications of the ACM, 38(11), 1995.
[8]
V. López, M. Sabou, and E. Motta. PowerMap: Mapping the real Semantic Web on the fly. Proceedings of the ISWC'06, 2006.
[9]
F. McNeill. Dynamic Ontology Refinement. PhD thesis, School of Informatics, The University of Edinburgh, 2006.
[10]
M. Schorlemmer and Y. Kalfoglou. Progressive ontology alignment for meaning coordination: An information-theoretic foundation. In 4th Int. Joint Conf. on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 2005.
[11]
P. Shvaiko and J. Euzenat. A survey of schema-based matching approaches. In Journal on Data Semantics IV, LNCS 3730, 2005.
[12]
L. Steels. The Origins of Ontologies and Communication Conventions in Multi-Agent Systems. In Journal of Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 1(2), 169--194, 1998.
[13]
J. van Diggelen et al. ANEMONE: An Effective Minimal Ontology Negotiation Environment In 5th Int. Joint Conf. on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 2006

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
AAMAS '07: Proceedings of the 6th international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems
May 2007
1585 pages
ISBN:9788190426275
DOI:10.1145/1329125
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

  • IFAAMAS

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 14 May 2007

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. channel refinement
  2. distributed logic
  3. semantic alignment

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

Conference

AAMAS07
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 1,155 of 5,036 submissions, 23%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)1
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 16 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2020)A logical consideration on fraudulent email communicationArtificial Life and Robotics10.1007/s10015-020-00597-4Online publication date: 26-Mar-2020
  • (2017)Working framework of semantic interoperability for CRIS with heterogeneous data sourcesJournal of Documentation10.1108/JD-07-2016-009173:3(481-499)Online publication date: 8-May-2017
  • (2008)Institutionalising ontology-based semantic integrationApplied Ontology10.5555/2351515.23515163:3(131-150)Online publication date: 1-Aug-2008
  • (2008)Institutionalising ontology-based semantic integrationApplied Ontology10.5555/1454283.14542843:3(131-150)Online publication date: 1-Aug-2008
  • (2008)I-SSAProceedings of the OTM 2008 Confederated International Conferences, CoopIS, DOA, GADA, IS, and ODBASE 2008. Part I on On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems:10.1007/978-3-540-88871-0_31(445-455)Online publication date: 9-Nov-2008
  • (2008)Parallelizing Record Linkage for Disclosure Risk AssessmentProceedings of the UNESCO Chair in data privacy international conference on Privacy in Statistical Databases10.1007/978-3-540-87471-3_16(190-202)Online publication date: 24-Sep-2008

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media