review-article

Reviewing the SIGCSE reviewing process

Authors:

Amruth Kumar,

Patricia A. Joseph,

Michael Goldweber,

Paul J. WagnerAuthors Info & Claims

ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, Volume 40, Issue 2

Pages 84 - 89

https://doi.org/10.1145/1383602.1383641

Published: 01 June 2008 Publication History

Get Access

Abstract

The ACM Special Interest Group in Computer Science Education (SIGCSE) has long used a double-blind reviewing process for both its annual symposium and ITiCSE conference. However, it is healthy for a community to review its policies and practices periodically to ensure that they continue to meet the needs and objectives of the community. Toward this end, this paper suggests a set of general goals for the SIGCSE reviewing process, identifies a number of important issues, and presents suggestions for resolving these issues.

References

[1]

Tung, A. K. H. Impact of Double Blind Reviewing on SIGMOD Publication: A More Detail Analysis. SIGMOD Record 35, 3 (September 2006), 6--7.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[2]

Snodgrass, R. Single Versus Double-Blind Reviewing: An Analysis of the Literature. SIGMOD Record 35, 3 (September 2006), 8--21.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[3]

Madden, S and Dewitt, D. Impact of Double Blind Reviewing on SIGMOD Publication Rates. SIGMOD Record 35, 2 (June 2006), 29--32.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[4]

Chairs' Message from ISCA 2005 Conference, http://www.cs.wisc.edu/~markhill/ISCA2005PCchair_msg.pdf

Google Scholar

[5]

Walker, H. M, Ma, W. and Mboya, D. Variability of Referees' Ratings of Conference Papers. SIGCSE Bulletin inroads 35, 3 (September 2006), 178--182.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[6]

Ben-Ari, M. How to Get a Good Review. SIGCSE Bulletin inroads 32, 2 (June 2000), 4--6.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[7]

CRP (Conference Review Package) software; http://crp.sourceforge.net

Google Scholar

[8]

Valentine, D. W. CS Educational Research: A Meta-analysis of SIGCSE Technical Symposium Proceedings. Proceedings of the 35th Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. New York: ACM Press, 2004, 255--259

Digital Library

Google Scholar

Cited By

View all

Petre MSanders KMcCartney RAhmadzadeh MConnolly CHamouda SHarrington BLumbroso JMaguire JMalmi LMcGill MVahrenhold JRößling GKrogstie BGiannakos MSindre GLuxton-Reilly ADivitini M(2020)Mapping the Landscape of Peer Review in Computing Education ResearchProceedings of the Working Group Reports on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education10.1145/3437800.3439207(173-209)Online publication date: 17-Jun-2020
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3437800.3439207
Schulzrinne H(2009)Double-blind reviewingACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review10.1145/1517480.151749239:2(56-59)Online publication date: 31-Mar-2009
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/1517480.1517492

Index Terms

Reviewing the SIGCSE reviewing process
1. Social and professional topics
  1. Professional topics

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

ACM SIGCSE Bulletin Volume 40, Issue 2

June 2008

146 pages

ISSN:0097-8418

DOI:10.1145/1383602

Issue’s Table of Contents

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 June 2008

Published in SIGCSE Volume 40, Issue 2

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Review-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

2
Total Citations
View Citations
157
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)3
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

Reflects downloads up to 26 Sep 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

Petre MSanders KMcCartney RAhmadzadeh MConnolly CHamouda SHarrington BLumbroso JMaguire JMalmi LMcGill MVahrenhold JRößling GKrogstie BGiannakos MSindre GLuxton-Reilly ADivitini M(2020)Mapping the Landscape of Peer Review in Computing Education ResearchProceedings of the Working Group Reports on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education10.1145/3437800.3439207(173-209)Online publication date: 17-Jun-2020
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3437800.3439207
Schulzrinne H(2009)Double-blind reviewingACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review10.1145/1517480.151749239:2(56-59)Online publication date: 31-Mar-2009
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/1517480.1517492

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Cited By

Index Terms

Recommendations

SIGCSE '02: Proceedings of the 33rd SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education

SIGCSE '05: Proceedings of the 36th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education

SIGCSE '06: Proceedings of the 37th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education