research-article

SEURAT: integrated rationale management

Authors:

Janet E. Burge,

David C. BrownAuthors Info & Claims

ICSE '08: Proceedings of the 30th international conference on Software engineering

Pages 835 - 838

https://doi.org/10.1145/1368088.1368215

Published: 10 May 2008 Publication History

Get Access

Abstract

A completed software product is the end result of many decisions that must be made throughout the development lifecycle. Unfortunately, the rationale for these decisions is usually not captured and is therefore lost. The Software Using RATionale (SEURAT) system integrates with the Eclipse Interactive Development Environment to support rationale capture and use. In addition to presenting the rationale to the developer/maintainer as needed, SEURAT also supports requirements traceability and impact assessment.

References

[1]

Burge, J., Brown, D.C. 2004. An Integrated Approach for Software Design Checking Using Rationale, In Proc. of Design Computing and Cognition ''04, J. Gero (Ed.), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands, 557--576

Google Scholar

[2]

Burge, J.E. 2005. Software Engineering Using design RATionale, Ph.D. Thesis, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, http://www.wpi.edu/Pubs/ETD/Available/etd-050205-085625/

Google Scholar

[3]

Burge, J.E. and Brown, D. C. 2007. Software Engineering Using RATionale. Journal of Systems and Software. In press.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[4]

CMMI Product Team, (2006). CMMI for Development. Version 1.2, CMU/SEI-2006-TR-008

Google Scholar

[5]

Dick, J. Design traceability, IEEE Software, November/December 2005, 14--16.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[6]

Dutoit, A., McCall, R., Mistrik, I. and Paech, B. (Eds.) Rationale Management in Software Engineering, Springer-Verlang, Berlin, 2006

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[7]

Dutoit, A., McCall, R., Mistrik, I. and Paech, B. 2006. Rationale Management in Software Engineering: Concepts and Techniques. In Rationale Management in Software Engineering, Dutoit AH, McCall R, Mistrik I, Paech B (Eds.) Springer, Germany, 1--48

Google Scholar

[8]

Filman, R.E. 1998. Achieving ilities, In Proc. of the Workshop on Compositional Software Architectures (Monterey, CA, USA, 1998)

Google Scholar

[9]

Lee, J. 1997. Design rationale systems: understanding the issues. IEEE Expert: Intelligent Systems and Their Applications, 12, 3 (May. 1997), 78--85.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[10]

Lougher, R., Rodden, T., 1993. Group support for the recording and sharing of maintenance rationale, Software Engineering Journal, November, 295--306.

Google Scholar

[11]

Moran, T. and Carroll, J. (Eds) 1996. Design Rationale Concepts, Techniques, and Use, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[12]

Ramesh, B., Dhar, V., 1994. Representing and maintaining process knowledge for large scale systems development, IEEE Expert, 9, 4, 54--60.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[13]

Zaychik, V., Regli, W.C., 2003. Capturing communication and context in the software project lifecycle, Research in Engineering Design, 14, 2, 75--88

Crossref

Google Scholar

Cited By

View all

Kleebaum APaech BJohanssen JBruegge B(2021)Continuous Rationale Visualization2021 Working Conference on Software Visualization (VISSOFT)10.1109/VISSOFT52517.2021.00013(33-43)Online publication date: Sep-2021
https://doi.org/10.1109/VISSOFT52517.2021.00013
Vierhauser MCleland-Huang JBurge JGrünbacher PSteghöfer JNiu N(2019)The interplay of design and runtime traceability for non-functional requirementsProceedings of the 10th International Workshop on Software and Systems Traceability10.1109/SST.2019.00010(3-10)Online publication date: 27-May-2019
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/SST.2019.00010
Lima MAhmed IConte TNascimento EOliveira EGadelha B(2019)Land of Lost Knowledge: An Initial Investigation into Projects Lost Knowledge2019 ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM)10.1109/ESEM.2019.8870171(1-6)Online publication date: Sep-2019
https://doi.org/10.1109/ESEM.2019.8870171
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

SEURAT: integrated rationale management
1. Software and its engineering
  1. Software notations and tools
    1. Development frameworks and environments

Recommendations

Software Engineering Using RATionale

Many decisions have to be made when developing a software system and a successful outcome depends on how well thought out these decisions were. One way that the decisions made, and alternatives considered, can be captured is in the rationale for the ...
Decision knowledge triggers in continuous software engineering
RCoSE '18: Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Rapid Continuous Software Engineering

Decision knowledge encompasses decisions and related information such as the problems the decisions address, their rationale, or alternatives. The management of decision knowledge is considered important for software development, however, it is often ...
Toward improved traceability of non-functional requirements
TEFSE '05: Proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on Traceability in emerging forms of software engineering

This position paper examines current practices and challenges for tracing non-functional requirements (NFRs). Anecdotal evidence suggests that many organizations do not effectively trace NFRs and that functional changes are often implemented with very ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

ICSE '08: Proceedings of the 30th international conference on Software engineering

May 2008

558 pages

ISBN:9781605580791

DOI:10.1145/1368088

General Chair:
Wilhelm Schäfer
University of Paderborn
,
Program Chairs:
Matthew B. Dwyer
University of Nebraska
,
Volker Gruhn
University of Leipzig

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 10 May 2008

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Conference

ICSE '08

Sponsor:

ICSE '08: International Conference on Software Engineering

May 10 - 18, 2008

Leipzig, Germany

Acceptance Rates

ICSE '08 Paper Acceptance Rate 56 of 370 submissions, 15%;

Overall Acceptance Rate 276 of 1,856 submissions, 15%

Upcoming Conference

ICSE 2025

2025 IEEE/ACM 46th International Conference on Software Engineering

April 26 - May 3, 2025

Ottawa , ON , Canada

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

13
Total Citations
View Citations
477
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)4
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

Reflects downloads up to 24 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

Kleebaum APaech BJohanssen JBruegge B(2021)Continuous Rationale Visualization2021 Working Conference on Software Visualization (VISSOFT)10.1109/VISSOFT52517.2021.00013(33-43)Online publication date: Sep-2021
https://doi.org/10.1109/VISSOFT52517.2021.00013
Vierhauser MCleland-Huang JBurge JGrünbacher PSteghöfer JNiu N(2019)The interplay of design and runtime traceability for non-functional requirementsProceedings of the 10th International Workshop on Software and Systems Traceability10.1109/SST.2019.00010(3-10)Online publication date: 27-May-2019
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/SST.2019.00010
Lima MAhmed IConte TNascimento EOliveira EGadelha B(2019)Land of Lost Knowledge: An Initial Investigation into Projects Lost Knowledge2019 ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM)10.1109/ESEM.2019.8870171(1-6)Online publication date: Sep-2019
https://doi.org/10.1109/ESEM.2019.8870171
Soria Avan der Hoek ADittrich YFagerholm FHoda RSocha DSteinmacher I(2019)Collecting design knowledge through voice notesProceedings of the 12th International Workshop on Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering10.1109/CHASE.2019.00015(33-36)Online publication date: 27-May-2019
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/CHASE.2019.00015
Capilla RJansen ATang AAvgeriou PBabar M(2016)10 years of software architecture knowledge managementJournal of Systems and Software10.1016/j.jss.2015.08.054116:C(191-205)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2016
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.jss.2015.08.054
Alexeeva ZPerez-Palacin DMirandola R(2016)Design Decision Documentation: A Literature OverviewSoftware Architecture10.1007/978-3-319-48992-6_6(84-101)Online publication date: 3-Nov-2016
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48992-6_6
Wang HJohnson ABracewell R(2012)The retrieval of structured design rationale for the re-use of design knowledge with an integrated representationAdvanced Engineering Informatics10.1016/j.aei.2012.02.00326:2(251-266)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2012
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.aei.2012.02.003
De Silva LBalasubramaniam D(2011)A model for specifying rationale using an architecture description languageProceedings of the 5th European conference on Software architecture10.5555/2041790.2041833(319-327)Online publication date: 13-Sep-2011
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/2041790.2041833
de Silva LBalasubramaniam D(2011)A Model for Specifying Rationale Using an Architecture Description LanguageSoftware Architecture10.1007/978-3-642-23798-0_34(319-327)Online publication date: 2011
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23798-0_34
Ouerdane WDimopoulos YLiapis KMoraitis P(2011)Towards Automating Decision Aiding Through ArgumentationJournal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis10.1002/mcda.48618:5-6(289-309)Online publication date: 20-Nov-2011
https://doi.org/10.1002/mcda.486
Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Cited By

Index Terms

Recommendations

Software Engineering Using RATionale

Decision knowledge triggers in continuous software engineering

Toward improved traceability of non-functional requirements