Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/1287624.1287716acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesfseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Composition and tradeoff of non-functional attributes in software systems: research directions

Published: 07 September 2007 Publication History

Abstract

The domain of our work is focused on the study of the quality attributes of component-based systems and service-based systems. The qualities of a component-based system depend on those ones of the single components. The objective of our work is to support the selection of (COTS and in-house) components under the satisfactionof the quality attributes. First, we have introduced an optimization model, that supports the component selection activity. The selection criterion is based on cost minimization of the whole system subject to constraints on reliability and delivery time of the whole system. In addition, for each in-house developed component it suggests the amount of testing to perform in order to achieve the required level of reliability. In order to automatize the selection activity we have introduced CODER (Cost Optimization under DElivery and Reliability constraints), a framework that allows to annotate UML diagrams with cost, reliability and delivery time information and that automatically generates and solves the optimization model. In order to improve the formulation of our model we are working on the reliability expression. We express the reliability of the whole system as function of the reliability of the single components by assuming independence among components. We have relaxed this assumption and we have introduced a path-based reliability model for a Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA) that embeds the "errorpropagation" property. Currently, we are working to introduce a framework that automatizes the process of selection of (COTS and in-house) components in all the phases of a component-based development process. In particular, we have introduced a framework thatsupports the selection of COTS components in the requirements phase. The framework lays on a tool that builds and solves an optimization model, whose solution provides the optimal COTS component selection. The selection criterion is based on cost minimization of the whole system while assuring a certain degree of satisfaction of the system requirements.

References

[1]
Alves, C., Franch, X., Carvallo, J.P., Finkelstein, A. "Using Goals and Quality Models to Support the Matching Analysis During COTS Selection", Proc. of ICCBSS 2005.
[2]
W. Abdelmoez et al."Error Propagation in Software Architectures", Proc. of METRICS, 2004.
[3]
Bertolino, A., Strigini, L. "On the use of testability measures for dependability assessment", IEEE Trans. on Software Engineering, 22(2):97--108, February 1996.
[4]
Cortellessa, V., Crnkovic I., Marinelli, F., Potena, P. "Driving the selection of COTS components on the basis of system requirements", Submitted to ASE 2007.
[5]
Cortellessa, V., Marinelli, F., Potena, P. "Automated Selection of Software Components Based on Cost/Reliability Tradeoff", Proc. of EWSA 2006, LNCS 4344, 66--81, 2006.
[6]
Cortellessa, V., Marinelli, F., Potena, P. "An optimization framework for "build-or-buy" decisions in software architecture", Computers and Operations Research, Elsevier Science, to appear.
[7]
Cortellessa, V., Potena, P. "Error propagation analysis in composition of software services", Proc. of Software Composition workshop (ETAPS 2007), 2007.
[8]
Gokhale, S.S., Wong, W.E, Horgan, J.R., Trivedi, K.S. "An analytical approach to architecture-based software performance and reliability prediction", Performance Evaluation, vol. 58 (2004), 391--412.
[9]
Goseva-Popstojanova, K., Trivedi, K.S, "Architecture based-approach to reliability assessment of software systems", Performance Evaluation, vol. 45 (2001), 179--204.
[10]
ITU. ITU-T Recommendation Z.120 Message Sequence Charts (MSC99), Technical report, ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector, 1996.
[11]
Kokash, N., "A Service Selection Model to Improve Composition Reliability", Proc. of of International Workshop on AI for Service Composition, in conjunction with ECAIÇS06, August 2006, to appear.
[12]
Mahmood, S., Lai, R. "Analyzing Component Based System Specification" Proc. of AWRE 2006, Adelaide, Australia, 2006.
[13]
Trivedi, K. "Probability and Statistics with Reliability, Queuing, and Computer Science Applications", J. Wiley and S., 2001.
[14]
Voas, J. M., Miller, K. W. "Software testability: The new verification", IEEE Software, pages 17--28, 1995.

Cited By

View all
  • (2018)Making well-informed software design decisionsProceedings of the 40th International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceeedings10.1145/3183440.3194961(262-263)Online publication date: 27-May-2018
  • (2018)Choosing Component Origins for Software Intensive SystemsIEEE Transactions on Software Engineering10.1109/TSE.2017.267790944:3(237-261)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2018
  • (2016)Supporting Strategic Decision-Making for Selection of Software AssetsSoftware Business10.1007/978-3-319-40515-5_1(1-15)Online publication date: 7-Jun-2016
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
ESEC-FSE '07: Proceedings of the the 6th joint meeting of the European software engineering conference and the ACM SIGSOFT symposium on The foundations of software engineering
September 2007
638 pages
ISBN:9781595938114
DOI:10.1145/1287624
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 07 September 2007

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. component-based software engineering
  2. reliability
  3. software quality

Qualifiers

  • Article

Conference

ESEC/FSE07
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 112 of 543 submissions, 21%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)3
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 20 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2018)Making well-informed software design decisionsProceedings of the 40th International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceeedings10.1145/3183440.3194961(262-263)Online publication date: 27-May-2018
  • (2018)Choosing Component Origins for Software Intensive SystemsIEEE Transactions on Software Engineering10.1109/TSE.2017.267790944:3(237-261)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2018
  • (2016)Supporting Strategic Decision-Making for Selection of Software AssetsSoftware Business10.1007/978-3-319-40515-5_1(1-15)Online publication date: 7-Jun-2016
  • (2013)Software Architecture Optimization MethodsIEEE Transactions on Software Engineering10.1109/TSE.2012.6439:5(658-683)Online publication date: 1-May-2013
  • (2012)A System-Level Modeling Methodology for Performance-Driven Component Selection in Multicore ArchitecturesIEEE Systems Journal10.1109/JSYST.2011.21736146:2(317-328)Online publication date: Jun-2012
  • (2011)A statistical model for system components selection2011 IEEE International Systems Conference10.1109/SYSCON.2011.5929037(1-6)Online publication date: Apr-2011
  • (2008)Component selection strategies based on system requirements' dependencies on component attributes2008 2nd Annual IEEE Systems Conference10.1109/SYSTEMS.2008.4519027(1-5)Online publication date: Apr-2008

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media