Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/1276318.1276358acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicailConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

The legal crisis of next generation robots: on safety intelligence

Published: 04 June 2007 Publication History

Abstract

Robot intelligence architecture has advanced from action intelligence to autonomous intelligence, whereby robots can adapt to complex environments and interact with humans. This technology, considered central to next generation robots (NGRs), will become increasingly visible in many human service scenarios in the next two decades. Accordingly, there is an emerging need to predict and address intertwined technological and legal issues that will arise once NGRs become more commonplace. Safety issues will be of particular interest from a legal viewpoint. As robots become more capable of autonomous behavior, regulations associated with industrial robots will no longer be effective. In this paper we will discuss issues associated with autonomous robot behavior regulations associated with the concept of safety intelligence (SI). We believe the SI concept (one of several robot sociability problems) is crucial to the development of "robot law" that will accompany the establishment of a society in which humans and robots co-exist.

References

[1]
N. Tajika. The future astro boy. ASCOM, 2001 (in Japanese).
[2]
C. Breazeal (2004). Social interactions in HRI: The robot view. IEEE Transactions on Man, Cybernetics and Systems-Part C, 34(2):181, 2003.
[3]
Y. Anzai. Next generation robots as real world-oriented media. Journal of Robotics Society of Japan, 16(1):15--18, 1998 (in Japanese).
[4]
Japan Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry Robot Policy Council. Robot policy middle report, May 2005 (in Japanese).
[5]
M. Asada and Y. Kuniyoshi. Robot intelligence. Iwanami, 2006 (in Japanese).
[6]
Robotics Society of Japan Research Committee on Human Friendly Robots. Technical targets of human friendly robots. Journal of Robotics Society of Japan, 16(3):288--294, 1998 (in Japanese).
[7]
Japan Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry Next Generation Robot Vision Seminar. Toward 2025 Human-Robot Co-Existence Society Report, Apr. 2004 (in Japanese).
[8]
Robotics Industry Development Council. Founders' statement. http://www.f-robot.com/tokku/tokku.html.
[9]
Japan Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry Robot Policy Council. Robot Policy Council Report, May 2006 (in Japanese).
[10]
Y. Ishida, A. Neudorfer, K. Futsuhara, and T. Fujita. Importance of inherent safety in human machine interface environment. Report of the Human Interface Society (Japan) Interface Symposium, 2002 (in Japanese).
[11]
T. Ojima, S. Hashimoto, and K. Yabuno. The book of Wabot 2. Chuokoron-Shinsha, 2003 (in Japanese).
[12]
H. A. Simon. The sciences of the artificial (3rd ed.). MIT Press, 1996.
[13]
D. Lyons. Open texture and the possibility of legal interpretation. Law and Philosophy, 18(3):297--309, 1999.
[14]
I. Asimov. I, Robot. Doubleday, 1950.
[15]
J. A. Fodor. (1987). Modules, frames, fridgeons, sleeping dogs and the music of the spheres. In Z. Pylyshyn (ed.), The robot's dilemma: The frame problem in artificial intelligence. Ablex Publishers, 1987.
[16]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Textualist
[17]
S. Hirose. A robot dialog. Journal of Japan Robotics Society, 7(4):121--126, 1989 (in Japanese).
[18]
R. A. Brooks. Flesh and machines: How robots will change us. Eurasian Publishing, 2003.
[19]
T. Kurogawa. Nonverbal Interface. Ohmsha, 1994 (in Japanese).
[20]
S. Sugano and K. Shibuya. Anthropomorphic robots for nonverbal communication. Journal of the Robotics Society of Japan, 15(7): 975--978, 1997 (in Japanese).
[21]
H. Aldsersey-Williams. Zoomorphic: New animal architecture. Laurence King Press, 2003.
[22]
"Japanese robots will change the world" (unsigned editorial). Yazhou Zhoukan: 14--23, March 25, 2002 (in Chinese).
[23]
S. Tachi. How to construct future society: Tele-remote controlled robots. Meme No. 4, Fuji Research Institute Corporation, Apr. 2003 (in Japanese).

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
ICAIL '07: Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
June 2007
302 pages
ISBN:9781595936806
DOI:10.1145/1276318
  • Conference Chair:
  • Anne Gardner,
  • Program Chair:
  • Radboud Winkels
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

  • International Association for Artificial Intelligence and Law

In-Cooperation

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 04 June 2007

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. human-robot co-existence society
  2. robot intelligence
  3. robot law
  4. safety engineering
  5. safety intelligence

Qualifiers

  • Article

Conference

ICAIL07
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 69 of 169 submissions, 41%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)6
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 21 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)Responsabilidad en inteligencia artificial: Señoría, mi cliente robot se declara inocenteAIS: Ars Iuris Salmanticensis10.14201/AIS2021911972329:1(197-232)Online publication date: 30-Jun-2021
  • (2018)Urban robotics: Towards responsible innovations for our citiesRobotics and Autonomous Systems10.1016/j.robot.2017.03.007100(278-286)Online publication date: Feb-2018
  • (2018)Legal regulations and public policies for next-generation robots in JapanAI & Society10.1007/s00146-015-0628-131:4(483-500)Online publication date: 26-Dec-2018
  • (2016)Who Should Decide How Machines Make Morally Laden Decisions?Science and Engineering Ethics10.1007/s11948-016-9833-723:4(951-967)Online publication date: 30-Nov-2016
  • (2015)Intersection of “Tokku” Special Zone, Robots, and the Law: A Case Study on Legal Impacts to Humanoid RobotsInternational Journal of Social Robotics10.1007/s12369-015-0287-x7:5(841-857)Online publication date: 13-Feb-2015
  • (2012)PrefaceAdvanced Robotics10.1163/016918610X52715824:13(1785-1789)Online publication date: 2-Apr-2012
  • (2011)The Robot DustCartIEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine10.1109/MRA.2010.94015318:1(59-67)Online publication date: Mar-2011
  • (2011)STB: Child-Dependent Sociable Trash BoxInternational Journal of Social Robotics10.1007/s12369-011-0114-y3:4(359-370)Online publication date: 6-Oct-2011
  • (2011)The legal challenges of networked roboticsProceedings of the 25th IVR Congress conference on AI Approaches to the Complexity of Legal Systems: models and ethical challenges for legal systems, legal language and legal ontologies, argumentation and software agents10.1007/978-3-642-35731-2_4(61-72)Online publication date: 15-Aug-2011
  • (2010)How safe are service robots in urban environments? Bullying a robot19th International Symposium in Robot and Human Interactive Communication10.1109/ROMAN.2010.5654677(1-7)Online publication date: Sep-2010
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media