Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
article

Discrimination and identification of finger joint-angle position using active motion

Published: 01 July 2007 Publication History

Abstract

The authors report six experiments on the human ability to discriminate and identify finger joint-angle positions using active motion. The PIP (proximal interphalangeal) joint of the index finger was examined in Exps. 1--3 and the MCP (metacarpophalangeal) joint in Exps. 4--6. In Exp. 1, the just noticeable difference (JND) of PIP joint-angle position was measured when the MCP joint was either fully extended or halfway bent. In Exp. 2, the JND of PIP joint-angle position as a function of PIP joint-angle reference position was measured when the PIP joint was almost fully extended, halfway bent, or almost fully flexed. In Exp. 3, the information transfer of PIP joint-angle position was estimated with the MCP joint in a fully extended position. In Exps. 4--6, the JND and the information transfer of MCP joint-angle position were studied with a similar experimental design. The results show that the JNDs of the PIP joint-angle position were roughly constant (2.5°−2.7°) independent of the PIP joint-angle reference position or the MCP joint-angle position used (Exps. 1 and 2). The JNDs of the MCP joint-angle position, however, increased with the flexion of both the PIP and MCP joints and ranged from 1.7° to 2.7° (Exps. 4 and 5). The information transfer of the PIP and MCP joint-angle position were similar, indicating 3--4 perfectly identifiable joint-angle positions for both joints (Exps. 3 and 6). The results provide the basic data needed for estimating, for example, the resolution of fingertip position during active free motion. They are compared to the results from previous studies on joint position, length, and thickness perception.

References

[1]
Biggs, J., Horch, K., and Clark, F. J. 1999. Extrinsic muscles of the hand signal fingertip location more precisely than they signal the angles of individual finger joints. Experimental Brain Research 125, 221--230.
[2]
Braida, L. D. and Durlach, N. I. 1970. Intensity perception II. Resolution in one-interval paradigms. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 51, 2, 483--502.
[3]
Choi, S. and Tan, H. Z. 2005. Perceived instability of virtual haptic texture. II. Effect of collision detection algorithm. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 14, 4, 463--481.
[4]
Clark, F. J. 1992. How accurately can we perceive the position of our limbs? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15, 4, 725--726.
[5]
Clark, F. J. and Horch, K. W. 1986. Kinesthesia. In Handbook of Perception and Human Performance: Sensory Processes and Perception, K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, and J. P. Thomas, Eds., Vol. 1. Wiley, New York. 13/11--13/62.
[6]
Clark, F. J., Horch, K. W., Bach, S. M., and Larson, G. F. 1979. Contribution of cutaneous and joint receptors to static knee-position sense in man. J. Neurophysiol. 42, 877--888.
[7]
Clark, F. J., Burgess, R. C., and Chapin, J. W. 1986. Proprioception with the proximal interphalangeal joint of the index finger: Evidence for a movement sense without a static-position sense. Brain 109, 1195--1208.
[8]
Clark, F. J., Burgess, R. C., Chapin, J. W., and Lipscomb, W. T. 1985. Role of intramuscular receptors in the awareness of limb position. Journal of Neurophysiology 54, 6, 1529--1540.
[9]
Clark, F. J., Larwood, K. J., Davis, M. E., and Deffenbacher, K. A. 1995. A metric for assessing acuity in positioning joints and limbs. Experimental Brain Research 107, 73--79.
[10]
De Domenico, G. and McCloskey, D. I. 1987. Accuracy of voluntary movements at the thumb and elbow joints. Experimental Brain Research 65, 471--478.
[11]
Durlach, N. I. and Braida, L. D. 1969. Intensity perception I. Preliminary theory of intensity resolution. J. Acoustical Society of America 46, 2, 372--383.
[12]
Durlach, N. I., Delhorne, L. A., Wong, A., Ko, W. Y., Rabinowitz, W. M., and Hollerbach, J. 1989a. Manual discrimination and identification of length by the finger-span method. Perception & Psychophysics 46, 1, 29--38.
[13]
Durlach, N. I., Tan, H. Z., MacMillan, N. A., Rabinowitz, W. M., and Braida, L. D. 1989b. Resolution in one dimension with random variations in background dimensions. Perception & Psychophysics 46, 3, 293--296.
[14]
Erickson, R. P. 1974. Parallel “population” neural coding in feature extraction. In The neurosciences, 3rd Study Program, F. O. Schmitt and F. G. Worden, Eds.), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
[15]
Ferrell, W. R. and Milne, S. E. 1989. Factors affecting the accuracy of position matching at the proximal interphalangeal joint in human subjects. Journal of Physiology 411, 575--583.
[16]
Ferrell, W. R. and Smith, A. 1988. Position sense at the proximal interphalangeal joint of the human index finger. Journal of Physiology 399, 49--61.
[17]
Garner, W. R. 1962. Uncertainty and Structure as Psychological Concepts. Wiley, New York.
[18]
Hall, L. A. and McCloskey, D. I. 1983. Detections of movements imposed on finger, elbow and shoulder joints. Journal of Physiology 335, 519--533.
[19]
Ho, C. and Srinivasan, M. A. 1997. Human Haptic Discrimination of Thickness. Touch Lab Report 6, RLE TR-608, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA (http://touchlab.mit.edu/publications/1997_009.pdf).
[20]
Houtsma, A. J. M. 1983. Extimation of mutual information from limited experimental data. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 74, 1626--1629.
[21]
Horch, K. W., Clark, F. J., and Burgess, P. R. 1975. Awareness of knee joint angle under static conditions. Journal of Neurophysiology 38, 1436--1447.
[22]
John, K. T., Goodwin, A. W., and Darian-Smith, I. 1989. Tactile discrimination of thickness. Experimental Brain Research 78, 62--68.
[23]
Laidlaw, R. W. and Hamilton, M. A. 1937. A study of thresholds in appreciation of passive movement among normal control subjects. Bulletin of the Neurological Institute of New York 6, 268--273.
[24]
Macmillan, N. A. and Creelman, C. D. 2004. Detection Theory: A User's Guide, 2nd ed. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.
[25]
Miller, G. A. 1954. Note on the bias of information estimates. In Information Theory in Psychology, H. Quastler Ed. 95--100.
[26]
Monster, A. W., Herman, R., and Altland, N. R. 1973. Effect of the peripheral and central “sensory” component in the calibration of position. In New Developments in Electromyography and Clinical Neurophysiology, J. E. Desmedt Ed., Vol. 3. Karger, Basel.
[27]
Paillard, J. and Brouchon, M. 1968. Active and passive movements in the calibration of position sense. In The Neuropsychology of Spatially Oriented Behavior, S. J. Freedman Ed. Dorsey, Homewood, Il.
[28]
Pang, X. D., Tan, H. Z., and Durlach, N. I. 1991. Manual discrimination of force using active finger motion. Perception & Psychophysics 49, 6, 531--540.
[29]
Tan, H. Z. 1997. Identification of sphere size using the PHANToM&trademark;: Towards a set of building blocks for rendering haptic environment. In Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, vol. 61. 197--203.
[30]
Tan, H. Z., Srinivasan, M. A., Eberman, B., and Cheng, B. 1994. Human factors for the design of force-reflecting haptic interfaces. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, Vol. 55--1. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Chicago, IL. 353--359.
[31]
Tan, H. Z., Durlach, N. I., Beauregard, G. L., and Srinivasan, M. A. 1995. Manual discrimination of compliance using active pinch grasp: The roles of force and work cues. Perception and Psychophysics 57, 4, 495--510.
[32]
van Beers, R. J., Sittig, A. C., and Denier van der Gon, J. J. 1998. The precision of proprioceptive position sense. Experimental Brain Research 122, 4, 367--377.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)EStatiG: Wearable Haptic Feedback with Multi-Phalanx Electrostatic Brake for Enhanced Object Perception in VRProceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/36785678:3(1-29)Online publication date: 9-Sep-2024
  • (2022)Proprioceptive sensitivity to imposed finger deflectionsJournal of Neurophysiology10.1152/jn.00513.2021127:2(412-420)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2022
  • (2022)Perceived Depth and Roughness of Virtual Buttons With TouchscreensIEEE Transactions on Haptics10.1109/TOH.2021.312660915:2(315-327)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2022
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Transactions on Applied Perception
ACM Transactions on Applied Perception  Volume 4, Issue 2
July 2007
110 pages
ISSN:1544-3558
EISSN:1544-3965
DOI:10.1145/1265957
Issue’s Table of Contents

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 July 2007
Published in TAP Volume 4, Issue 2

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. JND
  2. Joint position
  3. discrimination
  4. haptic perception
  5. identification
  6. kinesthesis

Qualifiers

  • Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)46
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 16 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)EStatiG: Wearable Haptic Feedback with Multi-Phalanx Electrostatic Brake for Enhanced Object Perception in VRProceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/36785678:3(1-29)Online publication date: 9-Sep-2024
  • (2022)Proprioceptive sensitivity to imposed finger deflectionsJournal of Neurophysiology10.1152/jn.00513.2021127:2(412-420)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2022
  • (2022)Perceived Depth and Roughness of Virtual Buttons With TouchscreensIEEE Transactions on Haptics10.1109/TOH.2021.312660915:2(315-327)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2022
  • (2021)Visual-inertial hand motion tracking with robustness against occlusion, interference, and contactScience Robotics10.1126/scirobotics.abe13156:58Online publication date: 29-Sep-2021
  • (2021)Generating Kinesthetic Feedback Using Self Contact and Velocity Scaling2021 IEEE World Haptics Conference (WHC)10.1109/WHC49131.2021.9517174(619-624)Online publication date: 6-Jul-2021
  • (2020)Methodology for Maximizing Information Transmission of Haptic Devices: A SurveyProceedings of the IEEE10.1109/JPROC.2020.2992561108:6(945-965)Online publication date: Jun-2020
  • (2020)Hand Guidance Using Grasping Metaphor and Wearable Haptics2020 IEEE Haptics Symposium (HAPTICS)10.1109/HAPTICS45997.2020.ras.HAP20.3.3eea0b25(961-967)Online publication date: Mar-2020
  • (2019)An engineering perspective on the quality of the automotive push-buttons’ haptic feedback in optimal and suboptimal interactionsJournal of Engineering Design10.1080/09544828.2019.1656802(1-32)Online publication date: 26-Aug-2019
  • (2019)Finger Posture and Finger Load are Perceived IndependentlyScientific Reports10.1038/s41598-019-51131-x9:1Online publication date: 21-Oct-2019
  • (2018)Algorithm for improving psychophysical threshold estimates by detecting sustained inattention in experiments using PESTAttention, Perception, & Psychophysics10.3758/s13414-018-1521-z80:6(1629-1645)Online publication date: 10-May-2018
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Full Access

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media