Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/1250790.1250818acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesstocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Balanced max 2-sat might not be the hardest

Published: 11 June 2007 Publication History

Abstract

We show that, assuming the Unique Games Conjecture, it is NP-hard to approximate MAX2SAT within αLLZ-+ε, where 0.9401 < αLLZ- < 0.9402 is the believed approximation ratio of the algorithm of Lewin, Livnat and Zwick [28].
This result is surprising considering the fact that balanced instances of MAX2SAT, i.e., instances where each variable occurs positively and negatively equally often, can be approximated within 0.9439. In particular, instances in which roughly 68% of the literals are unnegated variables and 32% are negated appear less amenable to approximation than instances where the ratio is 50% - 50%.

References

[1]
F. Alizadeh. Interior point methods in semidefinite programming with applications to combinatorial optimization. SIAM Journal on Optimization, 5:13--51, 1995.
[2]
S. Arora, E. Chlamtac, and M. Charikar. New Approximation Guarantee for Chromatic Number. In STOC 2006, pages 205--214, 2006.
[3]
S. Arora, C. Lund, R. Motwani, M. Sudan, and M. Szegedy. Proof Verification and the Hardness of Approximation Problems. Journal of the ACM, 45(3):501--555, 1998.
[4]
S. Arora and S. Safra. Probabilistic Checking of Proofs: A New Characterization of NP. Journal of the ACM, 45(1):70--122, 1998.
[5]
P. Austrin. Balanced Max 2-Sat might not be the hardest. Technical report, Electronic Colloquium on Computational Complexity Report TR06-088, 2006.
[6]
A. Blum and D. Karger. An Õ(n3/14)-coloring algorithm for 3-colorable graphs. Information Processing Letters, 61(1):49--53, 1997.
[7]
M. Charikar, K. Makarychev, and Y. Makarychev. Approximation Algorithm for the Max k-CSP Problem, 2006.
[8]
M. Charikar, K. Makarychev, and Y. Makarychev. Near-optimal algorithms for unique games. In STOC 2006, pages 205--214, 2006.
[9]
M. Charikar and A. Wirth. Maximizing Quadratic Programs: Extending Grothendieck's Inequality. In FOCS 2004, pages 54--60, 2004.
[10]
S. Chawla, R. Krauthgamer, R. Kumar, Y. Rabani, and D. Sivakumar. On the hardness of approximating multicut and sparsest-cut. In 20th Annual IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity, pages 144--153, June 2005.
[11]
P. Crescenzi, R. Silvestri, and L. Trevisan. On Weighted vs Unweighted Versions of Combinatorial Optimization Problems. Information and Computation, 167(1):10--26, 2001.
[12]
I. Dinur, E. Mossel, and O. Regev. Conditional hardness for approximate coloring. In STOC 2006, pages 344--353, 2006.
[13]
U. Feige. A threshold of ln n for approximating set cover. Journal of the ACM, 45(4):634--652, 1998.
[14]
U. Feige and M. Goemans. Aproximating the Value of Two Prover Proof Systems, With Applications to MAX 2SAT and MAX DICUT. In ISTCS 1995, pages 182--189, 1995.
[15]
U. Feige and J. Kilian. Zero Knowledge and the Chromatic Number. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 57(2):187--199, 1998.
[16]
M.X. Goemans and D.P. Williamson. Improved Approximation Algorithms for Maximum Cut and Satisfiability Problems Using Semidefinite Programming. Journal of the ACM, 42:1115--1145, 1995.
[17]
E. Halperin, R. Nathaniel, and U. Zwick. Coloring k-colorable graphs using smaller palettes. In SODA 2001, pages 319--326, 2001.
[18]
G. Hast. Approximating Max kCSP -- Outperforming a Random Assignment with Almost a Linear Factor. In ICALP 2005, pages 956--968, 2005.
[19]
J. Håstad. Clique is hard to approximate within n1-ε. Acta Mathematica, 48(4):105--142, 1999.
[20]
J. Håstad. Some optimal inapproximability results. Journal of the ACM, 48(4):798--859, 2001.
[21]
J. Håstad. On the approximation resistance of a random predicate. Manuscript, 2006.
[22]
D.R. Karger, R. Motwani, and M. Sudan. Approximate graph coloring by semidefinite programming. Journal of the ACM, 45(2):246--265, 1998.
[23]
S. Khot. On the power of unique 2-prover 1-round games. In STOC 2002, pages 767--775, 2002.
[24]
S. Khot, G. Kindler, E. Mossel, and R. O'Donnell. Optimal Inapproximability Results for Max-Cut and Other 2-Variable CSPs? In FOCS 2004, pages 146--154. IEEE Computer Society, 2004.
[25]
S. Khot and R. O'Donnell. SDP gaps and UGC-hardness for MAXCUTGAIN. In FOCS, pages 217--226. IEEE Computer Society, 2006.
[26]
S. Khot and O. Regev. Vertex Cover Might be Hard to Approximate to within 2-ε. In IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity, pages 379--. IEEE Computer Society, 2003.
[27]
S. Khot and N.K. Vishnoi. The Unique Games Conjecture, Integrality Gap for Cut Problems and Embeddability of Negative Type Metrics into l1. In FOCS 2005, pages 53--62, 2005.
[28]
M. Lewin, D. Livnat, and U. Zwick. Improved rounding techniques for the MAX 2-SAT and MAX DI-CUT problems. In IPCO 2002, volume 2337 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 67--82, 2002.
[29]
S. Matuura and T. Matsui. 0.863-approximation algorithm for max dicut. In RANDOM-APPROX, pages 138--146, 2001.
[30]
S. Matuura and T. Matsui. 0.935-Approximation Randomized Algorithm for MAX 2SAT and Its Derandomization. Technical Report METR 2001-03, Department of Mathematical Engineering and Information Physics, the University of Tokyo, Japan, 2001.
[31]
E. Mossel, R. O'Donnell, and K. Oleszkiewicz. Noise stability of functions with low influences: invariance and optimality. Preprint, 2005.
[32]
A. Samorodnitsky and L. Trevisan. Gowers uniformity, influence of variables, and PCPs. In STOC 2006, pages 11--20, 2006.
[33]
U. Zwick. Personal communication, 2005.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Separating MAX 2-AND, MAX DI-CUT and MAX CUT2023 IEEE 64th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS)10.1109/FOCS57990.2023.00023(234-252)Online publication date: 6-Nov-2023
  • (2022)On regularity of Max-CSPs and Min-CSPsInformation Processing Letters10.1016/j.ipl.2022.106244(106244)Online publication date: Jan-2022
  • (2021)On the mysteries of MAX NAE-SATProceedings of the Thirty-Second Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms10.5555/3458064.3458094(484-503)Online publication date: 10-Jan-2021
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Balanced max 2-sat might not be the hardest

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    STOC '07: Proceedings of the thirty-ninth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing
    June 2007
    734 pages
    ISBN:9781595936318
    DOI:10.1145/1250790
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 11 June 2007

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Max 2-Sat
    2. inapproximability
    3. unique games conjecture

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Conference

    STOC07
    Sponsor:
    STOC07: Symposium on Theory of Computing
    June 11 - 13, 2007
    California, San Diego, USA

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 1,469 of 4,586 submissions, 32%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)17
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
    Reflects downloads up to 18 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2023)Separating MAX 2-AND, MAX DI-CUT and MAX CUT2023 IEEE 64th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS)10.1109/FOCS57990.2023.00023(234-252)Online publication date: 6-Nov-2023
    • (2022)On regularity of Max-CSPs and Min-CSPsInformation Processing Letters10.1016/j.ipl.2022.106244(106244)Online publication date: Jan-2022
    • (2021)On the mysteries of MAX NAE-SATProceedings of the Thirty-Second Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms10.5555/3458064.3458094(484-503)Online publication date: 10-Jan-2021
    • (2021)Optimal inapproximability with universal factor graphsProceedings of the Thirty-Second Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms10.5555/3458064.3458091(434-453)Online publication date: 10-Jan-2021
    • (2021) Biased random k ‐SAT Random Structures & Algorithms10.1002/rsa.2099659:2(238-266)Online publication date: 16-Feb-2021
    • (2016)Improved approximating $2$-CatSP for $\sigma\geq 0.50$ with an unbalanced rounding matrixJournal of Industrial and Management Optimization10.3934/jimo.2016.12.124912:4(1249-1265)Online publication date: Jan-2016
    • (2016)Better Balance by Being BiasedACM Transactions on Algorithms10.1145/290705213:1(1-27)Online publication date: 10-Oct-2016
    • (2016)Simple Approximation Algorithms for Balanced MAX 2SATLATIN 2016: Theoretical Informatics10.1007/978-3-662-49529-2_49(659-671)Online publication date: 22-Mar-2016
    • (2013)Better balance by being biasedProceedings of the twenty-fourth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithms10.5555/2627817.2627838(277-294)Online publication date: 6-Jan-2013
    • (2013)Optimal Approximation Algorithms for Reoptimization of Constraint Satisfaction ProblemsAmerican Journal of Operations Research10.4236/ajor.2013.3202503:02(279-288)Online publication date: 2013
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media