Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/1132516.1132519acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesstocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Gowers uniformity, influence of variables, and PCPs

Published: 21 May 2006 Publication History

Abstract

We return to the study of the relation of query complexity and soundness in probabilistically checkable proofs.We present a PCP verifier for languages that are Unique-Games-Hard and such that the verifier makes q queries, has almost perfect completeness, and has soundness error at most 2q/2q+ε, for arbitrarily small ε>0. For values of q of the form 2t-1, the soundness error is (q+1)/2q+ε.Charikar et al. show that there is a constant c such that for every language that has a verifier of query complexity q, and a ratio of soundness error to completeness smaller than cq/2q is decidable in polynomial time. Up to the value of the multiplicative constant and to the validity of the Unique Games Conjecture, our result is therefore tight.As a corollary, we show that approximating the Maximum Independent Set problem in graphs of degree Δ within a factor better than Δ/(log Δ)c is Unique-Games-Hard for a certain constant c>0.Our main technical results are (i) a connection between the Gowers uniformity of a Boolean function and the influence of its variables and (ii) the proof that "Gowers uniform" functions pass the "hypergraph linearity test" approximately with the same probability of a random function. The connection between Gowers uniformity and influence might have other applications.

References

[1]
Yonatan Aumann, Johan Håstad, Michael O. Rabin, and Madhu Sudan. Linear-consistency testing. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 4(62):589--607, 2001.
[2]
Noga Alon, Tali Kaufman, Michael Krivelevich, Simon Litsyn, and Dana Ron. Testing low-degree polynomials over GF(2). In Proceedings of RANDOM-APPROX, pages 188--199, 2003.
[3]
S. Arora, C. Lund, R. Motwani, M. Sudan, and M. Szegedy. Proof verification and hardness of approximation problems. Journal of the ACM, 45(3):501--555, 1998. Preliminary version in Proc. of FOCS'92.
[4]
Sanjeev Arora. How NP got a new definition: a survey of probabilistically checkable proofs. In Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians, pages 637--648, 2002. Volume 3.
[5]
S. Arora and S. Safra. Probabilistic checking of proofs: A new characterization of NP. Journal of the ACM, 45(1):70--122, 1998. Preliminary version in Proc. of FOCS'92.
[6]
M. Bellare, D. Coppersmith, J. Håstad, M. Kiwi, and M. Sudan. Linearity testing over characteristic two. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 42(6):1781--1795, 1996.
[7]
M. Bellare, O. Goldreich, and M. Sudan. Free bits, PCP's and non-approximability - towards tight results. SIAM Journal on Computing, 27(3):804--915, 1998. Preliminary version in Proc. of FOCS'95.
[8]
M. Blum, M. Luby, and R. Rubinfeld. Self-testing/correcting with applications to numerical problems. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 47(3):549--595, 1993. Preliminary version in Proc. of STOC'90.
[9]
Shuchi Chawla, Robert Krauthgamer, Ravi Kumar, Yuval Rabani, and D.Sivakumar. On the hardness of approximating multicut and sparsest-cut. In Proceedings of the 20th IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity, 2005.
[10]
Irit Dinur and Shmuel Safra. On the hardness of approximating minimum vertex-cover. Annals of Mathematics, 162(1):439--486, 2005.
[11]
Lars Engebretsen and Jonas Holmerin. More efficient queries in PCPs for NP and improved approximation hardness of maximum CSP. pages 194--205, 2005.
[12]
Uriel Feige. Approximation thresholds for combinatorial optimization problems. In Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians, pages 649--658, 2002. Volume 3.
[13]
Timothy Gowers. A new proof of Szemèredi's theorem for progressions of length four. Geometric and Functional Analysis, 8(3):529--551, 1998.
[14]
Timothy Gowers. A new proof of Szemèredi's theorem. Geometric and Functional Analysis, 11(3):465--588, 2001.
[15]
Ben Green and Terence Tao. The primes contain arbitrarily long arithmetic progressions. To appear in Annals of Mathematics. math.NT/0404188, 2004.
[16]
Ben Green and Terence Tao. An inverse theorem for the Gowers U3 norm. math.NT/0503014, 2005.
[17]
J. Håstad. Clique is hard to approximate within n1?ε. Acta Mathematica, 182:105--142, 1999.
[18]
Johan Håstad. Some optimal inapproximability results. Journal of the ACM, 48(4):798--859, 2001.
[19]
Gustav Hast. Approximating Max kCSP - outperforming a random assignment with almost a linear factor. pages 956--968, 2005.
[20]
Bernard Host and Bryna Kra. Nonconventional ergodic averages and nilmanifolds. Annals of Mathematics, 161(1):397--488, 2005.
[21]
Johan Håstad and Avi Wigderson. Simple analysis of graph tests for linearity and PCP. Random Structures and Algorithms, 22(2):139--160, 2003.
[22]
Charanjit S. Jutla, Anindya C. Patthak, Atri Rudra, and David Zuckerman. Testing low-degree polynomials over prime fields. In Proceedings of the 45th IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pages 423--432, 2004.
[23]
J. Kahn, G. Kalai, and N. Linial The influence of variables on boolean functions. In Proceedings of the 29th IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pp. 68--80, 1988.
[24]
Subhash Khot. On the power of unique 2-prover 1-round games. In Proceedings of the 34th ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pages 767--775, 2002.
[25]
Subhash Khot, Guy Kindler, Elchanan Mossel, and Ryan O'Donnell. Optimal inapproximability results for MAX-CUT and other two-variable CSPs? In Proceedings of the 45th IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pages 146--154, 2004.
[26]
Subhash Khot and Oded Regev. Vertex cover might be hard to approximate to within 2 ?- ε. In Proceedings of the 18th IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity, 2003.
[27]
Tali Kaufman and Dana Ron. Testing polynomials over general fields. In Proceedings of the 45th IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pages 413--422, 2004.
[28]
Bryna Kra. The Green-Tao theorem on arithmetic progressions in the primes: an ergodic point of view. Bulletin of the AMS. To appear.
[29]
Subhash Khot and Nisheeth Vishnoi. The unique games conjecture, integrality gap for cut problems and the embeddability of negative type metrics into 1. In Proceedings of the 46th IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pages 53--62, 2005.
[30]
Alex Samorodnitsky. Hypergraph linearity and quadraticity tests for boolean functions. Manuscript, 2005.
[31]
Alex Samorodnitsky and Luca Trevisan. A PCP characterization of NP with optimal amortized query complexity. In Proceedings of the 32nd ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pages 191--199, 2000.
[32]
Luca Trevisan. Parallel approximation algorithms by positive linear programming. Algorithmica, 21(1):72--88, 1998. Preliminary version in Proc. of ESA'96.
[33]
Luca Trevisan. Non-approximability results for optimization problems on bounded degree instances. In Proceedings of the 33rd ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pages 453--461, 2001.
[34]
Luca Trevisan. Inapproximability of combinatorial optimization problems. Technical Report TR04-065, Electronic Colloquium on Computational Complexity, 2004.
[35]
Vijay Vazirani. Approximation Algorithms. Springer, 2001.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Estimation of function's supports under arithmetic constraintsAnalysis Mathematica10.1007/s10476-024-00058-1Online publication date: 29-Oct-2024
  • (2018)Approximate local decoding of cubic reed-muller codes beyond the list decoding radiusProceedings of the Twenty-Ninth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms10.5555/3174304.3175313(663-679)Online publication date: 7-Jan-2018
  • (2018)More efficient queries in PCPs for NP and improved approximation hardness of maximum CSPRandom Structures & Algorithms10.5555/1458645.145864733:4(497-514)Online publication date: 27-Dec-2018
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Gowers uniformity, influence of variables, and PCPs

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    STOC '06: Proceedings of the thirty-eighth annual ACM symposium on Theory of Computing
    May 2006
    786 pages
    ISBN:1595931341
    DOI:10.1145/1132516
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 21 May 2006

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. influence of variables
    2. linearity test
    3. probabilistically checkable proofs

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Conference

    STOC06
    Sponsor:
    STOC06: Symposium on Theory of Computing
    May 21 - 23, 2006
    WA, Seattle, USA

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 1,469 of 4,586 submissions, 32%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)7
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
    Reflects downloads up to 12 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Estimation of function's supports under arithmetic constraintsAnalysis Mathematica10.1007/s10476-024-00058-1Online publication date: 29-Oct-2024
    • (2018)Approximate local decoding of cubic reed-muller codes beyond the list decoding radiusProceedings of the Twenty-Ninth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms10.5555/3174304.3175313(663-679)Online publication date: 7-Jan-2018
    • (2018)More efficient queries in PCPs for NP and improved approximation hardness of maximum CSPRandom Structures & Algorithms10.5555/1458645.145864733:4(497-514)Online publication date: 27-Dec-2018
    • (2016)A Self-Tester for Linear Functions over the Integers with an Elementary Proof of CorrectnessTheory of Computing Systems10.1007/s00224-015-9639-z59:1(99-111)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2016
    • (2013)Optimal Approximation Algorithms for Reoptimization of Constraint Satisfaction ProblemsAmerican Journal of Operations Research10.4236/ajor.2013.3202503:02(279-288)Online publication date: 2013
    • (2013)Explicit Optimal Hardness via Gaussian Stability ResultsACM Transactions on Computation Theory10.1145/25057665:4(1-26)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2013
    • (2013)Majority is stablestProceedings of the forty-fifth annual ACM symposium on Theory of Computing10.1145/2488608.2488668(477-486)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2013
    • (2013)Approximation resistance on satisfiable instances for predicates with few accepting inputsProceedings of the forty-fifth annual ACM symposium on Theory of Computing10.1145/2488608.2488666(457-466)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2013
    • (2013)Towards an optimal query efficient PCP?Proceedings of the 4th conference on Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science10.1145/2422436.2422458(173-186)Online publication date: 9-Jan-2013
    • (2013)Noise correlation bounds for uniform low degree functionsArkiv för Matematik10.1007/s11512-011-0145-551:1(29-52)Online publication date: Apr-2013
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media