Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/1190095.1190107acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesvaluetoolsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Worst case burstiness increase due to arbitrary aggregate multiplexing

Published: 11 October 2006 Publication History

Abstract

As a means of supporting quality of service guarantees, aggregate multiplexing has attracted a lot of attention in the networking community, since it requires less complexity than flow-based scheduling. However, contrary to what happens in the case of flow-based multiplexing, few results are available for aggregate-based multiplexing.In this paper, we consider a server multiplexer fed by several flows and analyze the impact caused by traffic aggregation on the flows at the output of the server. No restriction is imposed on the server multiplexer other than the fact that it must operate in a work-conserving fashion.We characterize of the best arrival curves that constrain the number of bits that leave the server, in any time interval, for each individual flow. These curves can be used to obtain the delays suffered by packets in complex scenarios where multiplexers are interconnected, as well as to determine the maximum size of the buffers in the different servers.Previous results provide tight delay bounds for networks where servers are of the FIFO type. Here, we provide tight bounds for any work-conserving scheduling policy, so that our results can be applied to heterogeneous networks where the servers (routers) can use different work-conserving scheduling policies such as First-In First-Out (FIFO), Earliest Deadline First (EDF), Strict Priority (SP), Guaranteed Rate scheduling (GR), etc.

References

[1]
B. Braden, D. Clark, and S. Shenker, "Integrated services in the internet architecture: an overview," June 1994, rFC 1633, IETF.]]
[2]
S. Blake, D. Black, M. Carlson, E. Davies, Z. Wang, and W. Weiss., "An architecture for differentiated services," December 1998, rFC 2475, IETF.]]
[3]
J.-Y. Le Boudec and P. Thiran, Network Calculus. Springer Verlag Lecture Notes in Computer Science volume 2050 (available online at http://icawww.epfl.ch), July 2001.]]
[4]
R. Cruz, "Quality of service guarantees in virtual circuit switched networks," IEEE JSAC, pp. 1048--1056, August 1995.]]
[5]
M. Fidler, V. Sander, and W. Klimala, "Traffic shaping in aggregate-based networks: implementation and analysis." Computer Communications, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 274--286, 2005.]]
[6]
L. Lenzini, E. Mingozzi, and G. Stea, "Delay bounds for FIFO aggregates: a case study." Computer Communications, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 287--299, 2005.]]
[7]
Y. Ying, R. Mazumdar, C. Rosenberg, and F. Guillemin, "The burstiness behavior of regulated flows in networks." in NETWORKING, 2005, pp. 918--929.]]
[8]
C. Chang, Performance Guarantees in Communication Networks. New York: Springer-Verlag, 2000.]]
[9]
J.-Y. Le Boudec, "Some properties of variable length packet shapers," in Proc ACM Sigmetrics / Performance '01, 2001.]]
[10]
C. Chang, "On deterministic traffic regulation and service guarantee: A systematic approach by filtering," IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 44, pp. 1096--1107, August 1998.]]
[11]
Y. Jiang, "Delay bounds for a network of guaranteed rate servers with FIFO aggregation." Computer Networks, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 683--694, 2002.]]
[12]
V. Cholvi, J. Echagüe, and J. L. Boudec, "Worst case burstiness increase due to FIFO multiplexing," Performance Evaluation, vol. 49, pp. 491--506, September 2002.]]
[13]
E. C. Rosen, A. Viswanathan, and R. Callon, "Multiprotocol label switching architecture," Internet Engineering Task Force, RFC 3031, January 2001. {Online}. Available: http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3031.txt]]
[14]
L. Lenzini, L. Martorini, E. Mingozzi, and G. Stea, "Tight end-to-end delay bounds in FIFO multiplexing sink-tree networks." Performance Evaluation, vol. 63, no. 9--10, pp. 956--987, 2006.]]
[15]
R. L. Cruz, "SCED+ : Efficient management of quality of service guarantees," in IEEE Infocom'98, San Francisco, March 1998.]]

Cited By

View all
  • (2010)Survey of deterministic and stochastic service curve models in the network calculusIEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials10.1109/SURV.2010.020110.0001912:1(59-86)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2010
  • (2008)Delay Bounds under Arbitrary Multiplexing: When Network Calculus Leaves You in the Lurch...IEEE INFOCOM 2008 - The 27th Conference on Computer Communications10.1109/INFOCOM.2008.228(1669-1677)Online publication date: Apr-2008

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
valuetools '06: Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Performance evaluation methodolgies and tools
October 2006
638 pages
ISBN:1595935045
DOI:10.1145/1190095
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 11 October 2006

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. aggregate scheduling
  2. differentiated services
  3. network calculus

Qualifiers

  • Article

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 90 of 196 submissions, 46%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 16 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2010)Survey of deterministic and stochastic service curve models in the network calculusIEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials10.1109/SURV.2010.020110.0001912:1(59-86)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2010
  • (2008)Delay Bounds under Arbitrary Multiplexing: When Network Calculus Leaves You in the Lurch...IEEE INFOCOM 2008 - The 27th Conference on Computer Communications10.1109/INFOCOM.2008.228(1669-1677)Online publication date: Apr-2008

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media