Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/1152215.1152254acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobilehciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Usability evaluation for mobile device: a comparison of laboratory and field tests

Published: 12 September 2006 Publication History

Abstract

Usability testing of mobile devices is an emerging area of research in the field of Human-Computer Interaction. Guidelines had been established as to how usability tests should be conducted. However, there are limitations to the effectiveness of conventional usability tests, especially for mobile devices. Mobile devices typically are used in different situations, but current evaluation method cannot uncover problems in all type of situations. Hence, this study evaluates the effectiveness of conventional laboratory usability tests. It investigated the differences between usability tests on mobile phones conducted in laboratory and real life situation. Significant differences were found, including the frequency and severity of usability problems encountered, the users' behavior, and subjective responses to the device and the interaction.

References

[1]
Channelnewsasia report on Mobile Phone Usage in Singapore, 2004. Retrieved from: http://www.channelnewsasia.com/stories/singaporelocalnews/print/65398/1/.html
[2]
Condos C., James A., Every P., and Simpson T. Ten Usability Principles for the Development of effective WAP and M-commerce services. Aslib Proceedings: New Information Perspectives, 54, 6, 2002, 345--355.
[3]
Dumas J. S., and Redish J. C. A Practical Guide to Usability Testing. Intellect, Exeter. 1999.
[4]
Gorlenko L., and Merrick R. No Wires Attached: Usability Challenges in the Connected Mobile World. IBM Systems Journal, 42, 4, 2003, 639--651.
[5]
Kjeldskov J., Graham C. A Review of MobileHCI Research Methods. Proceedings of the 5th International Mobile HCI 2003 conference, 2003, 317--335.
[6]
Kjeldskov J., Stage J. New Techniques for Usability Evaluation of Mobile Systems. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 60, 2004, 599--620.
[7]
Kjeldskov J., Graham C., Pedell S., Vetere F., Howard S., Balbo S. and Davies J. Evaluating the Usability of a Mobile Guide: the Influence of Location, Participants and Resources. Behavior & information Technology, 24, 2005, 51--65.
[8]
Krippendorff K. Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA. 2004.
[9]
LTA (Land Transport Authority) Annual Report. 2004. Retrieved from: http://www.smrt.com.sg/annualreport2004/pdf/connectivity/rail-operation.pdf
[10]
Molich R. (2000). Usable Web Design. Ingeni ren|b ger. (In Danish).
[11]
Monk A., Fellas E. and Ley E. Hearing only one side of Normal and Mobile Phone Conversation. Behavior & information Technology, 23, 2004, 301--305.
[12]
Nielsen J. Usability Engineering. Academic Press, San Diego. CA.1993.
[13]
NTU's Student IT Background Survey. 2003. Retrieved from: http://www.ntu.edu.sg/CITS/Home/What+is+New/student+it+background+survey+2003.htm
[14]
Nunes L. and Recarte M. A. Cognitive Demands of Hands-free Phone Conversation while Driving. From the 3rd International Conference on Traffic & Transport Psychology, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behavior, 5, 2002, 133--144.
[15]
Pascoe J., Ryan N., Morse D. Using While Moving: Human-Computer Interaction Issues in Fieldwork Environments. Annual Conference Meeting Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 7, 3, 2000, 417--437.
[16]
Ramsay M. Mildly Irritating: a WAP usability study. Aslib Proceedings: New Information Perspectives, 53, 2001, 141--158.
[17]
Rubin J. Handbook of Usability Testing. Wiley, New York. 1994.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Observations and Considerations for Implementing Vibration Signals as an Input Technique for Mobile DevicesMultimodal Technologies and Interaction10.3390/mti80900768:9(76)Online publication date: 2-Sep-2024
  • (2024)Usability Evaluation Ecological Validity: Is More Always Better?Healthcare10.3390/healthcare1214141712:14(1417)Online publication date: 16-Jul-2024
  • (2024)Usability Testing of Mobile Applications: A Methodological FrameworkApplied Sciences10.3390/app1405179214:5(1792)Online publication date: 22-Feb-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Usability evaluation for mobile device: a comparison of laboratory and field tests

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    MobileHCI '06: Proceedings of the 8th conference on Human-computer interaction with mobile devices and services
    September 2006
    320 pages
    ISBN:1595933905
    DOI:10.1145/1152215
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    In-Cooperation

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 12 September 2006

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. dynamics environment
    2. mobile devices
    3. usability

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Conference

    MobileHCI06

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 202 of 906 submissions, 22%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)92
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)12
    Reflects downloads up to 09 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Observations and Considerations for Implementing Vibration Signals as an Input Technique for Mobile DevicesMultimodal Technologies and Interaction10.3390/mti80900768:9(76)Online publication date: 2-Sep-2024
    • (2024)Usability Evaluation Ecological Validity: Is More Always Better?Healthcare10.3390/healthcare1214141712:14(1417)Online publication date: 16-Jul-2024
    • (2024)Usability Testing of Mobile Applications: A Methodological FrameworkApplied Sciences10.3390/app1405179214:5(1792)Online publication date: 22-Feb-2024
    • (2024)Usability, Acceptability, and Preliminary Effectiveness of a Peer-Delivered and Technology-Supported Mental Health Intervention for Family Caregivers of People With Dementia: Field Usability StudyJMIR Human Factors10.2196/4120211(e41202)Online publication date: 27-May-2024
    • (2024)Pimp My Lab? The Impact of Context-Specific Usability Laboratory Environments in Public TransportHCI in Mobility, Transport, and Automotive Systems10.1007/978-3-031-60480-5_11(183-194)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2024
    • (2023)Predictors of Usability of a Mobile Intelligent Agent Information Provider for College StudentsInternational Journal of Mobile Human Computer Interaction10.4018/IJMHCI.32245715:1(1-19)Online publication date: 9-May-2023
    • (2023)Virtual Urban Field Studies: Evaluating Urban Interaction Design Using Context-Based Interface PrototypesMultimodal Technologies and Interaction10.3390/mti70800827:8(82)Online publication date: 18-Aug-2023
    • (2023)Designing for Educational Resilience to Reduce School Dropout: A Case Study of Namibian San LearnersACM Journal on Computing and Sustainable Societies10.1145/36163891:2(1-21)Online publication date: 6-Dec-2023
    • (2022)Exploration of the usability quality attributes of mobile government services: a literature reviewPeerJ Computer Science10.7717/peerj-cs.10268(e1026)Online publication date: 28-Jul-2022
    • (2022)Usability Issues in Evidence-Based Psychosocial Interventions and Implementation Strategies: Cross-project AnalysisJournal of Medical Internet Research10.2196/3758524:6(e37585)Online publication date: 14-Jun-2022
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media