research-article

MultiFab: a machine vision assisted platform for multi-material 3D printing

Authors:

Pitchaya Sitthi-Amorn,

Javier E. Ramos,

Wojciech MatusikAuthors Info & Claims

ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), Volume 34, Issue 4

Article No.: 129, Pages 1 - 11

https://doi.org/10.1145/2766962

Published: 27 July 2015 Publication History

Abstract

We have developed a multi-material 3D printing platform that is high-resolution, low-cost, and extensible. The key part of our platform is an integrated machine vision system. This system allows for self-calibration of printheads, 3D scanning, and a closed-feedback loop to enable print corrections. The integration of machine vision with 3D printing simplifies the overall platform design and enables new applications such as 3D printing over auxiliary parts. Furthermore, our platform dramatically expands the range of parts that can be 3D printed by simultaneously supporting up to 10 different materials that can interact optically and mechanically. The platform achieves a resolution of at least 40 μm by utilizing piezoelectric inkjet printheads adapted for 3D printing. The hardware is low cost (less than $7,000) since it is built exclusively from off-the-shelf components. The architecture is extensible and modular -- adding, removing, and exchanging printing modules can be done quickly. We provide a detailed analysis of the system's performance. We also demonstrate a variety of fabricated multi-material objects.

Supplementary Material

ZIP File (a129-sitthi-amorn.zip)

Supplemental files

Download
50.67 MB

MP4 File (a129.mp4)

Download
22.55 MB

References

[1]

3D Systems. Projet 5500X http://www.3dsystems.com/3d-printers/professional/projet-5500x.

[2]

Bickel, B., Bächer, M., Otaduy, M. A., Lee, H. R., Pfister, H., Gross, M., and Matusik, W. 2010. Design and fabrication of materials with desired deformation behavior. ACM Trans. Graph. 29, 4 (July), 63:1--63:10.

Digital Library

[3]

Boykov, Y., and Kolmogorov, V. 2004. An experimental comparison of min-cut/max-flow algorithms for energy minimization in vision. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 26, 9 (Sept.), 1124--1137.

Digital Library

[4]

Burg, T., Cass, C. A. P., Groff, R., Pepper, M., and Burg, K. J. L. 2010. Building off-the-shelf tissue-engineered composites. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 368, 1839âĂŞ--1862.

[5]

Campbell, T. A., and Ivanova, O. S. 2013. 3D printing of multifunctional nanocomposites. Nano Today 8, 2, 119--120.

[6]

Chen, D., Levin, D. I. W., Didyk, P., Sitthi-Amorn, P., and Matusik, W. 2013. Spec2Fab: A reducer-tuner model for translating specifications to 3D prints. ACM Trans. Graph. 32, 4, 135:1--135:10.

Digital Library

[7]

Cho, W., Sachs, E. M., Patrikalakis, N. M., and Troxel, D. E. 2003. A dithering algorithm for local composition control with three-dimensional printing. Computer-aided design 35, 9, 851--867.

[8]

Choi, J.-W., Kim, H.-C., and Wicker, R. 2011. Multi-material stereolithography. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 211, 3, 318--328.

[9]

Dimas, L. S., Bratzel, G. H., Eylon, I., and Buehler, M. J. 2013. Tough composites inspired by mineralized natural materials: Computation, 3D printing, and testing. Advanced Functional Materials 23, 36, 4629--4638.

[10]

Dong, Y., Wang, J., Pellacini, F., Tong, X., and Guo, B. 2010. Fabricating spatially-varying subsurface scattering. ACM Trans. Graph. 29, 4, 62:1--62:10.

Digital Library

[11]

Dubois, A., Grieve, K., Moneron, G., Lecaque, R., Vabre, L., and Boccara, C. 2004. Ultrahigh-resolution full-field optical coherence tomography. Appl. Opt. 43, 14 (May), 2874--2883.

[12]

Fab@Home. http://www.fabathome.org/.

[13]

Fujifilm Dimatix. Dimatix materials printer dmp-2831.

[14]

GelSight. Gelsight benchtop scanner. http://http://www.gelsight.com/products/.

[15]

Han, L.-H., Suri, S., and Schmidt, C. E. 2010. Fabrication of three-dimensional scaffolds for heterogeneous tissue engineering. Biomed Microdevices 12, 721--725.

[16]

Hašan, M., Fuchs, M., Matusik, W., Pfister, H., and Rusinkiewicz, S. 2010. Physical reproduction of materials with specified subsurface scattering. ACM Trans. Graph. 29, 4, 61:1--61:10.

Digital Library

[17]

Hiller, J. D., and Lipson, H. 2012. Automatic design and manufacture of soft robots. IEEE Transactions on Robotics 28, 2, 457--466.

Digital Library

[18]

Inamdar, A., Magana, M., Medina, F., Grajeda, Y., and Wicker, R. 2006. Development of an automated multiple material stereolithography machine. In Proceedings of 17th Annual Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, Austin, TX, 624âĂŞ--635.

[19]

Khalil, S., Nam, J., and Sun, W. 2005. Multi-nozzle deposition for construction of 3d biopolymer tissue scaffolds. Rapid Prototyping Journal 11, 1, 9--17.

[20]

Kumar, P., Santosa, J. K., Beck, E., and Das, S. 2004. Direct-write deposition of fine powders through miniature hopper-nozzles for multi-material solid freeform fabrication. Rapid Prototyping Journal 10, 1, 14--23.

[21]

Kwan, J. Design of Electronics for a High-resolution, Multi-Material, and Modular 3D Printer. Master's thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

[22]

Lan, J. Design and Fabrication of a Modular Multi-Material 3D Printer. Master's thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

[23]

L. E. Weiss, R. Merz, F. P. G. N. P. P. L. S. K. R. 1997. Shape deposition manufacturing of heterogeneous structures. Journal of Manufacturing Systems 16, 4.

[24]

Lipton, J., Cohen, D., Heinz, M., Lobovsky, M., Parad, W., Bernstien, G., Li, T., Quartiere, J., Washington, K., Umaru, A., Masanoff, R., Granstein, J., Whitney, J., and Lipson, H. 2009. Fab@Home Model 2: Towards Ubiquitous Personal Fabrication Devices. In Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium (SFF'09), 70--81.

[25]

Makerbot. Replicator 2X http://www.makerbot.com/.

[26]

Maruo, S., Ikuta, K., and Ninagawa, T. 2001. Multi-polymer microstereolithography for hybrid opto-MEMS. In The 14th IEEE International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems, 151--154.

[27]

Oxman, N. 2011. Variable property rapid prototyping. Journal of Virtual and Physical Prototyping (VPP) 6, 1, 3--31.

[28]

Papas, M., Jarosz, W., Jakob, W., Rusinkiewicz, S., Matusik, W., and Weyrich, T. 2011. Goal-based caustics. Computer Graphics Forum (Proc. Eurographics) 30, 2 (Apr.).

[29]

Ramos, J. MultiFab: A Multi-material 3D Printing Platform. Master's thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

[30]

Sachs, E., Cima, M., and Cornie, J. 1990. Three-dimensional printing: Rapid tooling and prototypes directly from a cad model. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology 39, 1, 201--204.

[31]

Skouras, M., Thomaszewski, B., Coros, S., Bickel, B., and Gross, M. 2013. Computational design of actuated deformable characters. ACM Trans. Graph. 32, 4 (July).

Digital Library

[32]

Stratasys. Objet500 Connex Multi-Material 3D Printer http://www.stratasys.com/3D-Printers/design-series/precision/objet-connex500.

[33]

Szeliski, R. 2004. Image alignment and stitching: A tutorial. 89.

[34]

Tompkin, J., Heinzle, S., Kautz, J., and Matusik, W. 2013. Content-adaptive lenticular prints. ACM Trans. Graph. 32, 4 (July).

Digital Library

[35]

Vidimč E, K., Wang, S.-P., Ragan-Kelley, J., and Matusik, W. 2013. OpenFab: A programmable pipeline for multi-material fabrication. ACM Trans. Graph. 32, 4 (July).

Digital Library

[36]

Wang, L., Lau, J., Thomas, E. L., and Boyce, M. C. 2011. Co-continuous composite materials for stiffness, strength, and energy dissipation. Advanced Materials 23, 13, 1524--1529.

[37]

Wetzstein, G., Lanman, D., Heidrich, W., and Raskar, R. 2011. Layered 3d: tomographic image synthesis for attenuation-based light field and high dynamic range displays. ACM Trans. Graph. 30, 4, 95.

Digital Library

[38]

Willis, K. D. D., Brockmeyer, E., Hudson, S. E., and Poupyrev, I. 2012. Printed optics: 3D printing of embedded optical elements for interactive devices. In UIST.

Digital Library

[39]

Zhao, S., Hasan, M., Ramamoorthi, R., and Bala, K. 2013. Modular flux transfer: efficient rendering of high-resolution volumes with repeated structures. ACM Trans. Graph. 32, 4, 131.

Digital Library

[40]

Zhou, C., Chen, Y., Yang, Z., and Khoshnevis, B. 2013. Digital material fabrication using mask-image-projectionbased stereolithography. Rapid Prototyping Journal 19, 3, 153--165.

Cited By

Mehta PMujawar MLafrance SBernadin SEwing DBhansali S(2024)Editors’ Choice—Review—Sensor-Based and Computational Methods for Error Detection and Correction in 3D PrintingECS Sensors Plus10.1149/2754-2726/ad7a883:3(030602)Online publication date: 26-Sep-2024
https://doi.org/10.1149/2754-2726/ad7a88
Luci EPellacini FBabaei V(2024)Differentiable Modeling of Material Spreading in Inkjet Printing for Appearance PredictionSIGGRAPH Asia 2024 Conference Papers10.1145/3680528.3687598(1-10)Online publication date: 3-Dec-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3680528.3687598
Moyer IBourgault SFrost DJacobs J(2024)Don't Mesh Around: Streamlining Manual-Digital Fabrication Workflows with Domain-Specific 3D ScanningProceedings of the 37th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology10.1145/3654777.3676385(1-16)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3654777.3676385
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

MultiFab: a machine vision assisted platform for multi-material 3D printing
1. Applied computing
  1. Document management and text processing
    1. Document capture
      1. Graphics recognition and interpretation
2. Computing methodologies
  1. Computer graphics

Recommendations

Printed optics: 3D printing of embedded optical elements for interactive devices
UIST '12: Proceedings of the 25th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology

We present an approach to 3D printing custom optical elements for interactive devices labelled Printed Optics. Printed Optics enable sensing, display, and illumination elements to be directly embedded in the casing or mechanical structure of an ...
3D Printed 3D-Microfluidics: Recent Developments and Design Challenges

Multi-layer structures with functionalities, varying height channels, complex microfluidic structures like valves, mixers and high aspect ratio channels (hereby referred as 3D-Microfluidics) are very difficult to fabricate using conventional ...
Polyhedral voronoi diagrams for additive manufacturing

A critical advantage of additive manufacturing is its ability to fabricate complex small-scale structures. These microstructures can be understood as a metamaterial: they exist at a much smaller scale than the volume they fill, and are collectively ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Transactions on Graphics

ACM Transactions on Graphics Volume 34, Issue 4

August 2015

1307 pages

ISSN:0730-0301

EISSN:1557-7368

DOI:10.1145/2809654

Issue’s Table of Contents

Copyright © 2015 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 27 July 2015

Published in TOG Volume 34, Issue 4

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

158
Total Citations
View Citations
3,746
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)394
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)27

Reflects downloads up to 30 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Mehta PMujawar MLafrance SBernadin SEwing DBhansali S(2024)Editors’ Choice—Review—Sensor-Based and Computational Methods for Error Detection and Correction in 3D PrintingECS Sensors Plus10.1149/2754-2726/ad7a883:3(030602)Online publication date: 26-Sep-2024
https://doi.org/10.1149/2754-2726/ad7a88
Luci EPellacini FBabaei V(2024)Differentiable Modeling of Material Spreading in Inkjet Printing for Appearance PredictionSIGGRAPH Asia 2024 Conference Papers10.1145/3680528.3687598(1-10)Online publication date: 3-Dec-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3680528.3687598
Moyer IBourgault SFrost DJacobs J(2024)Don't Mesh Around: Streamlining Manual-Digital Fabrication Workflows with Domain-Specific 3D ScanningProceedings of the 37th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology10.1145/3654777.3676385(1-16)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3654777.3676385
Sumegi MQuan WBrooks HShark L(2024)Real-time Monitoring of 3D Printing Using Between-layer Structural Similarity (BLSS)Proceedings of the 2024 7th International Conference on Image and Graphics Processing10.1145/3647649.3647694(278-285)Online publication date: 19-Jan-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3647649.3647694
Jiang LWolf RAlharbi KQin H(2024)In Situ Monitoring and Recognition of Printing Quality in Electrohydrodynamic Inkjet Printing via Machine LearningJournal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering10.1115/1.4066124146:11Online publication date: 11-Sep-2024
https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4066124
Fang QXiong GZhou MTamir TYan CWu HShen ZWang F(2024)Process Monitoring, Diagnosis and Control of Additive ManufacturingIEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering10.1109/TASE.2022.321525821:1(1041-1067)Online publication date: Jan-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/TASE.2022.3215258
Cheng JYu SWang RGe Q(2024)Digital light processing based multimaterial 3D printing: challenges, solutions and perspectivesInternational Journal of Extreme Manufacturing10.1088/2631-7990/ad4a2c6:4(042006)Online publication date: 28-May-2024
https://doi.org/10.1088/2631-7990/ad4a2c
Tauqir MMohiuddin ASamson RArora PMertiny PNobes DQureshi A(2024)Assessing layer deviations and correction for robotic polymer 3D printing applicationsProcedia CIRP10.1016/j.procir.2024.10.042129(240-245)Online publication date: 2024
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2024.10.042
Zhang JZhu HLiu DLi YHuang C(2024)Piezoelectric inkjet printing: The principles, fluid dynamics challenges, and applicationsMaterials Today Communications10.1016/j.mtcomm.2024.11086641(110866)Online publication date: Dec-2024
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2024.110866
Yao YCheng LLi Z(2024)A comparative review of multi-axis 3D printingJournal of Manufacturing Processes10.1016/j.jmapro.2024.04.084120(1002-1022)Online publication date: Jun-2024
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2024.04.084
Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Article

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Issue’s Table of Contents