Abstract
Purpose
This study aims to contribute to the field of computer systems for sustainability research. It proposes a framework for sustainability awareness using online social networks (OSNs) by analyzing major research streams of the current state of knowledge and different bibliometric variables, and identifies a future research agenda in the field.
Design/methodology/approach
The preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis (PRISMA) methodology, content analysis and bibliometric tools were employed to identify, select, collect, synthesize, analyze and evaluate all research published on sustainability awareness using OSNs to provide complete insight into this research area.
Findings
This study proposed a framework comprising four categories for sustainability awareness using OSNs. These four categories are: the key factors to success, analysis of existing tools, proposal of new methods, approaches and theoretical frameworks, and case examples. In addition, this study synthesized the future research challenges for each category of the proposed framework.
Originality/value
Fostering sustainability awareness and sustainable behavior using OSNs is a growing area of research that seeks cultural change in society to achieve sustainable development. Through OSNs, people can discover and become aware of the consequences of unsustainable practices and habits in society, and learn how to develop sustainable behavior.
Peer review
The peer review history for this article is available at https://publons.com/publon/10.1108/OIR
Keywords
Citation
Chalmeta, R. and Barbeito-Caamaño, A.M. (2024), "Framework for using online social networks for sustainability awareness", Online Information Review, Vol. 48 No. 2, pp. 334-353. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-03-2023-0116
Publisher
:Emerald Publishing Limited
Copyright © 2023, Ricardo Chalmeta, Adriana M. Barbeito-Caamaño
License
Published by Emerald Publishing Limited. This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) licence. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this licence may be seen at http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode
1. Introduction
The world is not only facing economic challenges but also social and environmental challenges. In 1987, members of the World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED) mentioned the concept of sustainable development in the Brundtland Report for the first time. It was defined as “one that meets the needs of present generations without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs” (Brundtland et al., 1987). To accomplish sustainable development, the United Nations (UN) launched the 2030 Agenda in 2015, comprising 17 sustainable development goals (SDGs). Therefore, over the next decade, an urgent transition is required for society models with economic, social, and environmental sustainability (Sierra and Suárez-Collado, 2021), which requires the participation of all actors in society: governments, the private sector and civil society.
Human behavior plays an important role in this transition because there is a link between human behavior and choices and sustainability (Allen, 2021). Therefore, a cultural change in people’s values, norms, beliefs and sense of responsibility is necessary to generate individual and collective concerns about sustainability and transform them into effective actions to achieve sustainable development (Keitumetse, 2013). As humans are social creatures that live in a community, many norms and behaviors are unconscious and established by society and people’s backgrounds. Therefore, sustainable community behavior boosts an individual’s sustainable behavior (Sorkun, 2018).
Online social networks (OSNs) are a type of computer system that allow the creation of online communities sharing interests and activities (Tang et al., 2023). Currently, OSNs are among the most important communication platforms (Pang et al., 2022) with a high socioeconomic value. They are used by billions of people and many companies for collaborating, disseminating content and opinion, making recommendations, interacting with scouting, alerting, professional and social networking, and fostering stakeholder engagement (Saraite-Sariene et al., 2022). OSNs such as Facebook, Twitter and YouTube provide users (people, companies, public administrations, etc.) with various opportunities to interact and share with people they have something in common (Wong et al., 2022). OSNs have democratized the production and dissemination of content, generating a revolution, both in communication and interaction and in access to information (Khatri, 2021).
OSNs can help promote cultural change toward human sustainability awareness and sustainable behavior because they affect how people see themselves and the world around them (Nguyen et al., 2023; Wang et al., 2021). Through OSNs, people can discover and become aware of the consequences of unsustainable practices and habits in society and of their inaction, thereby learning ways to develop sustainable behavior.
Additionally, people's sustainability awareness through OSNs encourages them to share, post or repost green messages on OSNs (Chang et al., 2023). Therefore, a green message becomes a chain message that reaches a larger audience and facilitates the implementation of new sustainable models. Some examples of changes toward sustainability that have been promoted through OSNs are local consumption that fosters the local economy and reduces environmental impact (Schubert et al., 2021; Lam et al., 2021); conscious consumption that promotes choosing products, not only in terms of price or quality but also in their environmental footprint (Gossling, 2021; Schubert et al., 2021; Song et al., 2021); and sustainable brands, companies that have made their products and processes more sustainable and use OSNs to showcase them, thus obtaining a strong positive reputation (Beyers and Leventon, 2021).
This awareness of sustainability can be the effect of both formally planned and executed initiatives carried out by different organizations, such as public administrations, NGOs and private companies (Yan et al., 2021), or deliberate or unintended access to information related to sustainability posted by individuals.
Two main research gaps must be filled to efficiently use OSNs for sustainability awareness and advance the state-of-the-art in this body of knowledge. First, in the literature, scholars have explored how different factors, tools and approaches affect the success of sustainability awareness through OSNs (Chou and Huang, 2021; Sysoieva and Osadcha, 2020); proposed new methods, theoretical frameworks and approaches (Vasseur et al., 2022; Al-Marghilani, 2022); and showed different case examples (Bellantuono et al., 2022; Hurajova et al., 2022). The contributions of these studies should be considered in designing and developing OSNs and sustainability initiatives using OSNs. However, the literature remains dispersed, and a comprehensive review of the primary contributions is currently lacking, making it difficult to keep track of the various findings. Therefore, it is necessary to combine and synthesize the main findings of these studies, as they could offer valuable knowledge for academics and practitioners (Post et al., 2020).
Second, it is necessary to discern important underexamined areas in this field (Lytras et al., 2018), providing a strategic platform for future scholarship. Therefore, academics and practitioners could develop novel and interesting research questions, ideas, theories and empirical studies (Linnenluecke et al., 2020).
To address the aforementioned research gaps, the study proposes three research objectives:
Analyze the current state-of-the-art in sustainability awareness using OSNs.
Define a framework that organizes the research developed by identifying significant common items and main findings and guides on how to use OSNs for sustainability awareness.
Proposing a future research agenda for the field.
The study hypothesizes that the current research on sustainability awareness through OSNs can systematize scientific knowledge of the phenomenon and set directions for future research.
The remainder of this study is organized as follows. Section 2 describes the research methods and tools used to perform the systematic literature review and category identification. Section 3 presents the findings of bibliographic and content analyses. Section 4 discusses the findings, and finally, Section 5 presents the conclusions along with future work and research limitations.
2. Research methodology
To answer these three research questions, we conducted a systematic literature review of articles published until June 2022. A systematic literature review is a research method that allows to identify, select, collect, synthesize and evaluate all studies published in a particular research area. The results are presented in Section 3.
This research was conducted according to the criteria of preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis (PRISMA) (Liberati et al., 2009). The PRISMA approach guarantees a replicable, scientific and transparent process to minimize bias and provides an audit trail of the reviewers’ decisions, procedures and conclusions. The following steps were followed: (1) eligibility criteria, (2) information sources, (3) search terms, (4) study selection, and (5) data collection and synthesis (see Figure 1 in the Supplementary Material).
2.1 Eligibility criteria
Studies were eligible for inclusion if they were research or review papers because they are regarded as true knowledge, directly relevant to sustainability awareness using OSNs, written in English and published in peer-reviewed journals until June 2022.
We excluded studies if they were not written in English; books, theses, congress papers and conference proceedings; papers that focused on other sustainability domains, such as the government sustainability approach; and papers that were not available in full text.
2.2 Information sources
We conducted an organized, systematic and comprehensive wide-ranging search of two online databases, Web of Science and Scopus. These two databases were selected because they combine a rigorous selection process and wide interdisciplinary coverage. Therefore, they are the main sources of bibliographic citations used in bibliometric analyses (Martínez-López et al., 2018).
2.3 Search terms
Papers were collected by selecting those that had specific keywords related to the research aims and questions in the title, abstract or keywords sections. The keywords used were learning, teaching, education, sustainability, corporate social responsibility and social networks. Logical operators were connected with different sets of keywords and designed as follows: (learn* OR teach* OR educat*) AND (sustainab* OR “corporate social responsibility”) AND (“social networks”).
2.4 Study selection
The study selection process attempted to analyze, evaluate and identify relevant articles based on the systematic review’s goals. This process was performed independently by the two co-authors of this study. First, records were identified from different information sources (online databases) using keywords. Second, once all records were obtained, they were excluded based on duplicate records. Third, once all duplicates were removed, records were screened based on “title, abstract and keywords.” Studies that did not meet eligibility criteria were excluded. Finally, “full-text” screening of all the studies was performed. A meeting was held to discuss and agree on the final studies included in this systematic review.
The search concentrated on research and review papers published until June 30, 2022. In the initial search, we found 991 papers (494 from the Web of Science and 497 from Scopus). There were 177 duplicate articles. After applying the eligibility criteria, we excluded papers that were not directly relevant to sustainability awareness using OSNs by screening titles, abstracts and keywords. Finally, we excluded studies that were not directly relevant to sustainability awareness using OSNs based on full-text screening. For example, papers that mentioned “social networks” in the abstract but did not refer to Internet-based social networks platforms, or papers that used the concept “sustainable” in a way different to the one shown in section 1. The final sample comprised 117 papers.
2.5 Data collection process and synthesis
We used Microsoft Excel 2016 to collect basic publication data, such as date, title, authors, publisher, DOI, URL, pages, volume, issues and keywords.
Once the final sample of papers had been defined, the analysis tools provided by Scopus and Web of Science were employed to determine the evolution in the number of papers published by year; analyze the number of papers published by author, country, institution and journal; analyze the indicators of relevance, impact and prestige of the ten journals with the most published articles on the list, and analyze the content of the ten most-cited articles on the sample.
The comparative method proposed by Collier (1998) was used to identify the categories. This method enabled the identification of common points shared by papers through content analysis so that the categories emerged. Content analysis allows the objective identification of content in a dataset, such as selected articles (Sandberg and Jafari, 2018).
The first category classification was performed considering the study’s aim and its contribution to the state-of-the-art. Then, the capacity of the category classification to arrange all papers was checked for each paper. If a paper did not fit into any category, the classification was redesigned to integrate incompatible papers. Category classification was reconsidered several times until all papers in the sample were properly distributed. Any disagreements between the co-authors were settled through consensus.
2.6 Finding analysis
First, the analysis of the collected data allowed the identification of the top contributing countries, authors, institutions and sources in the area of OSNs’ use for sustainability awareness.
Second, a framework composed of four categories was identified. Category 1: Key factors to success; Category 2: Analysis of existing tools; Category 3: Proposal of new methods, approaches and theoretical frameworks; and Category 4. Case examples. We also created qualitative and quantitative evidential narrative summaries of the main findings and future research challenges for each category.
3. Findings
3.1 Bibliometric analysis
3.1.1 Trends in paper publication
The first article identified in the systematic literature review dated back to 2005. Since then, the number of papers has evolved significantly, and a growing trend has been observed (Figure 1). The number of papers published in 2022 corresponds to the period between January and June. Therefore, the number of publications at the end of 2022 should exceed the number of publications in previous years.
3.1.2 Most influential authors, countries, institutions, papers and sources
In author analysis, one author (Kollech, N) stood out significantly with seven publications, and three authors (Henry, AD; Shen, L and Tan, Y) with two publications. The remaining authors published only one paper. This may be owing to the limited number of specialists in the area (see Table 1 in the Supplementary Material).
Regarding the most influential countries, the distribution by country shows the United States in the lead. It accounted for approximately 31% of the total number of publications related to the study area (Table 2 in Supplementary Material).
However, in institution analysis, there was no significant difference in the number of publications. Therefore, there is no institution with a higher level of specialization in the research area (see Table 3 in the Supplementary Material).
Regarding the most-cited papers, they have a total of 197 citations, which can be considered a high number for the total of 117 related articles. Table 4 in the Supplementary Material lists the ten articles with the highest number of citations.
Finally, the source analysis reveals that the journal with the most publications is sustainability with 31 articles. The following journals are the International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education with six articles, the European Journal of Sustainable Development, the Journal of Cleaner Production with four articles and the International Journal of Management Education with three articles. The ten journals with the most articles (see Table 5 in the Supplementary Material) published approximately 43% of the papers in the sample; therefore, it can be concluded that there is no specialized journal in the research area. Three impact indicators were used to determine the relevance of the sources: CiteScore, Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) and SCImago Journal Rank (SJR). Table 5 in the Supplementary Material shows the results of the journal evaluation according to these three indicators.
3.2 Framework to support using OSNs for sustainability awareness
A framework comprising four categories was developed. This framework integrates the fragmented literature on OSNs for sustainability awareness and offers recommendations to support the design and development of OSNs and sustainability initiatives. The four categories of the framework are the key factors for success, analysis of existing tools, proposal of new methods, approaches and theoretical frameworks, and case examples (see Figure 2).
Category 1: Key factors to success. This category identifies and analyzes the positive and negative effects of various factors on the success of using OSNs in sustainability awareness. The main conclusions drawn are as follows:
First, social networks are an appropriate means of carrying out actions to achieve sustainable behavior in different areas, such as reducing environmental degradation, designing sustainable landscapes, sustainably consuming financial products, using sustainable transport systems and promoting green entrepreneurship. These actions can be developed in formal and informal academic settings, even with higher learning achievements and skills than those acquired in normal classrooms or mass media campaigns. However, when they are not appropriately employed, OSNs can exhibit the opposite effect (Abbas et al., 2019).
Second, in the development of sustainability initiatives using OSNs, specialized strategies must be developed considering the demographic and socioeconomic characteristics (such as age, gender, income, education and number of family members) of the users who are going to use OSNs, as the learning process and future sustainable behavior of the users will depend on their characteristics (Delcea et al., 2020).
Third, the relationship between the users who are going to use the OSNs influences the results. Studies have shown that peer and family communication, as well as others’ advice, influence sustainable behavior. Simultaneously, it is important to note that the generation of sustainable behavior in others produces a sensation of well-being among sustainable behavior promoters. Therefore, it is necessary to encourage friends and families to share the same OSNs and enhance people’s connection in the network because strong cohesion among the members of the network has a positive influence on sustainable behavior and restores users’ motivation to overcome setbacks (Redman et al., 2021).
Fourth, formal OSNs must be created to facilitate the generation of ideas and sharing of knowledge on different issues related to sustainability, such as sustainable entrepreneurship (Padilla-Melendez et al., 2020).
Fifth, OSNs with more users have greater possibilities for achieving their objectives (Knoot and Rickenbach, 2011).
Sixth, Teamwork and participatory approaches provide creative sustainable solutions and enhance user engagement. Therefore, sustainability initiatives using OSNs should promote sustainability (Boyle et al., 2021).
Seventh, satisfaction and perceived enjoyment with OSNs have a great influence on determining users’ habit formation (Choi et al., 2021). Therefore, learning strategies, such as gamification, are effective tools for involving citizens in environmentally conscious mobility habits.
These seven conclusions were identified from the analysis of 27 studies that used different research methods (inferential statistics, qualitative studies, social network analysis, etc.) on different types of subjects (university students, consumers, managers, etc.). Table 6 in the Supplementary Materials lists these 27 studies. For each study, the author, year, people studied, research method, objective and findings were presented. The papers are listed in Table 6, from the most cited to the least cited.
Category 2: Analysis of existing tools. This category analyzes the results of using different tools for sustainability awareness using OSNs in 22 empirical studies. The main conclusions drawn are as follows:
Twitter helps teachers in promoting reflective writing in their students (Garcias et al., 2020) and enables inclusive education (Schuster and Kolleck, 2020).
YouTube favors both teachers by promoting a greater commitment to student learning (Trivino-Cabrera et al., 2021) and students who value YouTube videos as a key resource to improve their school performance, rating youtubers better than teachers (Gil-Quintana et al., 2020).
WhatsApp is the messaging application that is most widely used by young people for sharing academic and personal information because of convenience, lack of time or shyness (Fernandez-Martinez et al., 2017).
The use of collaborative tools such as Google + allow users to shape lifelong learning paths and personalize training according to their individual values and needs (Martinez-Nunez et al., 2016; Jirgensons and Kapenieks, 2018)
The use of visual tools in collaborative learning is important to achieve higher academic performance and greater student satisfaction, especially in blended studies (Martin-Garcia et al., 2020).
Informal OSNs promote transformative social learning and reflexivity at particular moments in the learning processes, beyond the formal mechanisms of organizational learning that foster instrumental learning (Pallett and Chilvers, 2013).
Twitter, Facebook and Instagram are good tools to give prominence and spread the awareness actions that take place in educational centers such as school gardens (Alvarez-Herrero et al., 2021) as a critical tool to involve and mobilize staff, the faculty and students toward sustainability (Chuvileva et al., 2017).
Social Web 2.0 used by school networks in divided societies, for example by political and economic inequalities due to ethnic and racial problems, change the way students relate with each other. They promote interactions and help to overcome systemic separation in these divided societies (de Kraker et al., 2013; Robinson et al., 2020).
OSNs generate learning dynamics that improve key skills of future teachers (Diaz-Pareja et al., 2021).
The training of the initiative executors in the OSNs is important. They generate strong links and deep interactions with users and must maintain a pedagogical focus (Coburn et al., 2012). However, their success may be conditioned by teachers’ digital skills (Sysoieva and Osadcha, 2020; Sackney and Walker, 2007) and awareness of the responsible management of social networks (Schulz et al., 2020).
Although OSNs offer several advantages in terms of sustainability awareness, they also have some limitations. The rapid migration to e-Learning during the lockdown posed numerous challenges that negatively affected the effectiveness and sustainability of awareness activities (Cavus et al., 2021). The benefits of attending seminars (Miller et al., 2021) should not be forgotten to avoid social distancing (Chuang and Liao, 2021) or other individual limitations (cognitive and emotional), social (privacy and ethics) and structural (Xanat and Toshimasa, 2019), which compromise the role of OSNs in generating awareness.
Category 3: Proposal of new methods, approaches and theoretical frameworks. This category includes 29 proposals for methods, frameworks or approaches that can be used for planning, designing and executing sustainability awareness initiatives using OSNs. These proposals are mainly conceptual/theoretical without any empirical application. Table 1 summarizes these proposals.
Category 4: Case examples. This category shows real initiatives for sustainability awareness in different areas. Table 2 summarizes these initiatives.
3.2.1 Future research agenda
Table 3 summarizes the future challenges in sustainability awareness through OSNs. Challenges were organized into categories.
4. Discussion
4.1 Contributions to the theory
The findings of this study contribute to the literature on sustainability awareness through OSNs as follows:
According to Paul et al. (2021), a systematic literature review should be conducted when there is a substantial body of work in the domain (at least 40 articles for review), and no systematic literature review has been conducted in the field in recent years (within the last five years). Therefore, this paper covers a gap in the domain of sustainability awareness using OSNs because this is the first systematic review in the field. Other systematic reviews related to sustainability and social networks focused on different subjects, such as the sustainability of health-focused community networks (Simpson et al., 2022), the use of OSNs for sustainability research (Bixler et al., 2019), and the development, dissemination, implementation and sustainability of health behavior interventions for adults (Shelton et al., 2019).
According to Linnenluecke et al. (2020), descriptive statistics (e.g. frequency tables) should be used to summarize basic information on the topic gathered over time in systematic reviews. This study used bibliometric statistical analysis techniques to show significant information in the research area of sustainability awareness through OSNs such as the top contributing countries, authors, institutions and sources.
According to Post et al. (2020), to make a theoretical contribution, it is not sufficient to merely report on the previous literature. Systematic literature reviews should focus on identifying new frameworks, promoting the objective discovery of knowledge clusters and identifying major research streams. Through content analysis, this study proposes a framework composed of four research categories that show different ways of contributing to the current knowledge on the topic. Category 1: Key factors to success; Category 2: Analysis of existing tools; Category 3: Proposal of new methods, approaches and theoretical frameworks; and Category 4: Case examples. Although other frameworks have been proposed in the fields of sustainability and OSN, they focused on other subjects. The frameworks by Lytras et al. (2018) and Poliakova et al. (2021) focused on technology-enhanced learning (TEL) and smart education; the framework by Bisaso (2016) attempted to integrate knowledge from various disciplines, such as sociology, management, economics, technology development, environment and health, for sustainability research using OSNs, and the framework by Reed et al. (2014) focused on strategies to advance sustainability using OSNs. Therefore, none of these frameworks considered in an integrated way key success factors, methods, frameworks, approaches, tools and case examples to support researchers and practitioners as the proposed framework does.
According to Post et al. (2020), systematic literature reviews can focus on identifying a research agenda to make theoretical contributions. However, this research agenda should follow and be accompanied by another form of synthesis, such as a taxonomy or framework. This study synthesizes future research challenges for each research category of the proposed classification framework, being the first study to do this.
4.2 Contributions to society
This study will make significant progress toward sustainability awareness in society because it will lead to an increase in the number of green and sustainability-conscious people with ethical and sustainable behavior, while also transforming business processes, products and services, making them more sustainable. This implies, among other benefits, the promotion of sustainable mobility and lifestyles, and the achievement of SDGs; fairer treatment of customers and employees; a reduction in the environmental impact of business activity to combat climate change; the production of goods and satisfaction of needs from a zero carbon emission perspective, and the cessation of biodiversity loss and the degradation of terrestrial and marine ecosystems.
4.3 Academic and practical implications
This study contributes to the different research domains involved in the field, such as computer engineering, communication, management, education and psychology, by integrating the fragmented literature on OSNs for sustainability awareness and proposing a future research agenda. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to do this. The classification into four research categories supports the future work of academics in this multidisciplinary research area because it establishes the common elements and patterns shared in each research category, synthesizes the main findings and shows aspects that have been less studied in each category and requires future research.
However, the categorization revealed that, regardless of the category and volume of research in the area, few studies address an integrated vision of sustainability. In some cases, sustainability refers to economic sustainability or something that lasts, while in others, sustainability has been addressed only from an environmental or ecological perspective. Therefore, there is an important cross-disciplinary challenge for academics to consider the three sustainability dimensions: economic, social and environmental.
Regarding practical implications, this study shows that OSNs can be used to boost sustainable behavior in society. The findings of this study offer several practical recommendations to support the design and development of both OSNs and sustainability initiatives using OSNs. These practical recommendations include positive and negative factors that influence project success; appropriate tools, pedagogical approaches, methods, and frameworks to be used in each case; and case examples that can be used as reference models. Organizations, such as public administrators, NGOs, private companies, and practitioners involved in the field interested in developing sustainability campaigns using OSNs, should follow these recommendations to minimize the risks in achieving their goals.
5. Conclusion
This study has allowed us to advance the state-of-the-art body of knowledge of OSNs for sustainability because it addresses two current research gaps in the field: the fragmented research that makes it difficult to keep track of the main findings and the necessity of providing a strategic platform for future scholarship.
Employing a systematic review of the literature, this study proposes a framework that classifies the current knowledge on sustainability awareness using OSNs into four research categories; analyzes major research findings in each category and bibliometric variables, such as citation numbers, leading authors, institutions, sources and countries; and identifies a future research agenda in the field.
The following conclusions were drawn from the results of this study. Regarding the proposed framework, several factors, such as specialized strategies, enhancing the connection between users, use of formal and large-scale OSNs, teamwork, satisfaction and enjoyment, have a positive effect on the success of using OSNs for sustainability awareness. In addition, existing OSNs such as Twitter, YouTube, WhatsApp and Google + have proven to be good tools for sustainability awareness. Additionally, OSNs can be used to boost sustainable behavior in different areas, such as tourism, urbanization, consumption, agriculture and waste reduction.
Regarding bibliometric analysis, the main conclusions are as follows. First, the number of published articles is low, although the trend has been increasing in recent years, both in the number of citations and in the publications per year. Second, the analysis of the influence of authors and institutions did not reveal any trends or patterns. Third, in terms of authors, Kolleck N, Henry AD, Shen L and Tan Y contributed the most, and the United States, Spain and Germany had the most publications, demonstrating their commitment to sustainability. Fourth, the publications with the highest number of articles were Sustainability, International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, and Journal of Cleaner Production.
The study had some limitations. (1) There was a language bias because the search was carried out only in English, (2) different keywords could have been used to produce other findings, and (3) Collier's (1998) comparative method was used. Other methods, such as network analysis, could have been used to identify research categories, leading to other classifications.
Figures
Figure 1
Trend in the publication of papers
Figure 2
The four categories of the proposed framework
Methods, frameworks, and approaches proposed
| Author | Proposal |
|---|---|
| Henry and Vollan (2014) | An approach for linking sustainability knowledge with action, in a way that enhances collective actions and promotes active social learning using OSNs |
| Bakht et al. (2018) | An approach that fosters the use of sustainable urban systems using OSNs |
| Gómez-Marín et al. (2022) | An approach that fosters the promotion of sustainable Research and Development Projects, efficient management of knowledge, resources and dynamics of the stakeholders, and implements a sustainable long-term plan using OSNs |
| Atstaja et al. (2022) | An approach to use OSNs to foster sustainable decision-making for raising finance, develop sharing economy, and create environment-friendly trends |
| Seo et al. (2017) | An approach to teach the central concepts of sustainable development using OSNs |
| Henry (2009) | An approach to achieve successful learning of sustainability using OSNs |
| Ungar and Strand (2012) | An approach for the co-production of biological and cultural knowledge for decision-making using OSNs |
| Vasseur et al. (2022) | An approach to examine the role of social capital to respond and adapt to climate change, especially when dealing with extreme weather events |
| Beyers and Leventon (2021) | An approach to assess a multi-stakeholder initiative to provide spaces for sustainability learning transformation |
| Henry (2020) | An approach to examine the effect of organizations’ different policies in sustainability learning |
| Wojcik et al. (2021) | An approach to analyze how environmental learning occurs |
| Lam et al. (2021) | An approach to foster fundamental societal change and increase the impact of local actors’ sustainability initiatives |
| Shaharudin et al. (2019) Garcia et al. (2020) | A method to establish strategies for sustainability initiatives in OSNs |
| Smith and Sharicz (2013) | A method to use OSNs to promote sustainability inside organizations |
| Baggio and Hillis (2018) | A method to assess the success of the sustainability initiatives in OSNs |
| Hamann (2009) Tan et al. (2020) Ballie (2012) | A method to allow companies to make a positive contribution to sustainable development using OSNs |
| Strasser et al. (2019) | A method for managing the role of leaders that act as agents to promote transformative changes for sustainability |
| Groce et al. (2019) | A method to use OSNs for environmental awareness |
| LaMendola (2019) | A method to use OSNs for sustainable community development |
| Bernarda et al. (2017) | A method to develop a strategy that fosters the construction and rehabilitation of social cohesion |
| Al-Marghilani (2022) | A method to develop an artificial intelligence-enabled cyberbullying-free OSN to encourage sustainability |
| Landau et al. (2021) | A method to use OSNs to prepare society to deal with future negative events |
| Poliakova et al. (2021) | A theoretical framework to use education to promote sustainability using OSNs |
| Bisaso (2016) | A framework to integrate knowledge from various disciplines, such as sociology, management, economics, technology development, environment, communication, religion and health for sustainability awareness using OSNs |
| Lytras et al. (2018) | A conceptual framework (maturity model) that integrates OSN research, the debate on TEL, and the emerging concept of smart education |
| Reed et al. (2014) | A framework to instill collective learning and action strategies across a multi-level, multi-partner network to advance in sustainability |
Source(s): Author's own, 2023
Case example of initiatives for sustainability awareness
Source(s): Author’s own, 2023
Future research challenges
| Categories | Future research lines |
|---|---|
| Category 1: Key factors to success |
|
| Category 2: Analysis of existing tools and pedagogical approaches |
|
| Category 3: Proposal of new methods and theoretical frameworks |
|
| Category 4: Case examples |
|
Source(s): Author’s own, 2023
The supplementary material for this article can be found online.
References
Abbas, J., Aman, J., Nurunnabi, M. and Bano, S. (2019), “The impact of social media on learning behavior for sustainable education: evidence of students from selected universities in Pakistan”, Sustainability, Vol. 11 No. 6, doi: 10.3390/su11061683.
Abid, M., Ngaruiya, G., Scheffran, J. and Zulfiqar, F. (2017), “The role of social networks in agricultural adaptation to climate change: implications for sustainable agriculture in Pakistan”, Climate, Vol. 5 No. 4, doi: 10.3390/cli5040085.
Akhtar, P., Khan, Z., Frynas, J.G., Tse, Y.K. and Rao-Nicholson, R. (2018), “Essential micro-foundations for contemporary business operations: top management tangible competencies, relationship-based business networks and environmental sustainability”, British Journal of Management, Vol. 29 No. 1, pp. 43-62, doi: 10.1111/1467-8551.12233.
Al-Marghilani, A. (2022), “Artificial intelligence-enabled cyberbullying-free online social networks in smart cities”, International Journal Of Computational Intelligence Systems, Vol. 15 No. 1, doi: 10.1007/s44196-022-00063-y.
Albanesi, M.G., Amadeo, R. and Vecchio, G. (2014), “Research on efficacy of using social networks in academic teaching metrics, experiments, and results”, European Journal Of Sustainable Development, Vol. 3 No. 3, pp. 25-34, doi: 10.14207/ejsd.2014.v3n3p25.
Allen, W. (2021), “Influencing practice change: an introduction to behaviour change models and strategies (Presentation)”, available at: https://learningforsustainability.net/pubs/practicechange-intro.pdf
Alvarez-Herrero, J.F., Urrea-Solano, M. and Martinez-Roig, R. (2021), “Sustainability and education through social networks. Presence and visibility of the school garden on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram”, Ijeri-International Journal of Educational Research and Innovation, Vol. 16, pp. 122-141, doi: 10.46661/ijeri.5940.
Atstaja, D., Koval, V., Grasis, J., Kalina, I., Kryshtal, H. and Mikhno, I. (2022), “Sharing model in circular economy towards rational use in sustainable production”, Energies, Vol. 15 No. 3, doi: 10.3390/en15030939.
Baggio, J.A. and Hillis, V. (2018), “Managing ecological disturbances: learning and the structure of social-ecological networks”, Environmental Modelling and Software, Vol. 109, pp. 32-40, doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.08.002.
Bakht, M.N., El-Diraby, T.E. and Hossaini, M. (2018), “Game-based crowdsourcing to support collaborative customization of the definition of sustainability”, Advanced Engineering Informatics, Vol. 38, pp. 501-513, doi: 10.1016/j.aei.2018.08.019.
Ballie, J. (2012), “E-co-textile design: constructing a community of practice for textile design education”, Design Journal, Vol. 15 No. 2, pp. 219-236, doi: 10.2752/175630612X13258652805176.
Bellantuono, L., Monaco, A., Amoroso, N., Aquaro, V., Lombardi, A., Tangaro, S. and Bellotti, R. (2022), “Sustainable development goals: conceptualization, communication and achievement synergies in a complex network framework”, Applied Network Science, Vol. 7 No. 1, doi: 10.1007/s41109-022-00455-1.
Bernarda, J., Ferreira, A.M., Silva, C. and Queiroz, I. (2017), “Design as a process tool of collaborative and multidisciplinary learning in society”, Design Journal, Vol. 20 Sup 1, pp. S900-S914, doi: 10.1080/14606925.2017.1353035.
Beyers, F. and Leventon, J. (2021), “Learning spaces in multi-stakeholder initiatives: the German partnership for sustainable textiles as a platform for dialogue and learning?”, Earth System Governance, Vol. 9, doi: 10.1016/j.esg.2021.100113.
Bisaso, S.M. (2016), The Role of Women Professionals in Transformation of Higher Education for Sustainable Development, Springer.
Bixler, R.P., Atshan, S., Banner, J.L., Tremaine, D. and Mace, R.E. (2019), “Assessing integrated sustainability research: use of social network analysis to evaluate scientific integration and transdisciplinarity in research networks”, Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, Vol. 39, pp. 103-113, doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2019.08.001.
Boyle, E., Ó Gallachóir, B. and Mullally, G. (2021), “Participatory network mapping of an emergent social network for a regional transition to a low-carbon and just society on the Dingle Peninsula”, Local Environment, Vol. 27 No. 12, doi: 10.1080/13549839.2021.1936472.
Brundtland, G.H., Khalid, M., Agnelli, S., Al-Athel, S. and Chidzero, B.J.N.Y. (1987), Our Common Future: Brundtland Report, ONU, Ada, OH.
Cabezas-Gonzalez, M., Casillas-Martin, S. and Munoz-Repiso, A.G.V. (2021), “Basic education students' digital competence in the area of communication: the influence of online communication and the use of social networks”, Sustainability, Vol. 13 No. 8, doi: 10.3390/su13084442.
Cavus, N., Sani, A.S., Haruna, Y. and Lawan, A.A. (2021), “Efficacy of social networking sites for sustainable education in the era of COVID-19: a systematic review”, Sustainability, Vol. 13 No. 2, pp. 1-18, doi: 10.3390/su13020808.
Chang, H.H., Lu, Y.-Y. and Li, P.R. (2023), “The Yale model of green message sharing and environmental consciousness on social media platforms”, Online Information Review, Vol. 47 No. 2, pp. 333-355, doi: 10.1108/OIR-04-2021-0200.
Chiffoleau, Y. (2005), “Learning about innovation through networks: the development of environment-friendly viticulture”, Technovation, Vol. 25 No. 10, pp. 1193-1204, doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2004.04.003.
Choi, Y., Wen, H., Chen, M. and Yang, F. (2021), “Sustainable determinants influencing habit formation among mobile short-video platform users”, Sustainability, Vol. 13 No. 6, doi: 10.3390/su13063216.
Chou, R.-J. and Huang, F.-T. (2021), “Building community resilience via developing community capital toward sustainability: experiences from a Hakka settlement in Taiwan”, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol. 18 No. 17, doi: 10.3390/ijerph18179012.
Chuang, H.-M. and Liao, Y.D. (2021), “Sustainability of the benefits of social media on socializing and learning: an empirical case of facebook”, Sustainability, Vol. 13 No. 12, doi: 10.3390/su13126731.
Chuvileva, I.M., Reef, L., Wilt, G.E., Shriber, J., Aleman, M. and Smith, B. (2017), “Impact of a participatory analysis of a campus sustainability social network: a case study of emory university”, Sustainability, Vol. 10 No. 3, pp. 193-203, doi: 10.1089/sus.2017.29104.iec.
Coburn, C.E., Russell, J.L., Kaufman, J.H. and Stein, M.K. (2012), “Supporting sustainability: teachers' advice networks and ambitious instructional reform”, American Journal of Education, Vol. 119 No. 1, pp. 137-182, doi: 10.1086/667699.
Collier, D. (1998), “Comparative method in the 1990s”, in CP Newsletter of the Comparative Politics Organized Section of the American Political Science Association, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1757219.
Cui, R. and Wang, J. (2022), “Shaping sustainable development: external environmental pressure, exploratory green learning, and radical green innovation”, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, Vol. 29 No. 3, pp. 481-495, doi: 10.1002/csr.2213.
de Kraker, J., Corvers, R., Valkering, P., Hermans, M. and Rikers, J. (2013), “Learning for sustainable regional development: towards learning networks 2.0?”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 49, pp. 114-122, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.11.019.
de Sousa, L.O., Ferreira, M.D.P. and Mergenthaler, M. (2018), “Agri-food chain establishment as a means to increase sustainability in food systems: lessons from sunflower in Brazil”, Sustainability, Vol. 10 No. 7, doi: 10.3390/su10072215.
Delcea, C., Craciun, L., Ioanas, C., Ferruzzi, G. and Cotfas, L.A. (2020), “Determinants of individuals' E-waste recycling decision: a case study from Romania”, Sustainability, Vol. 12 No. 7, doi: 10.3390/su12072753.
Delgadillo, E., Graef, F., Schroter, B. and Halle, M.E. (2020), “Determining success factors for improving rural livelihood strategies: how can participatory social network mapping help?”, Journal of Development Effectiveness, Vol. 12 No. 3, pp. 255-271, doi: 10.1080/19439342.2020.1788118.
Diaz-Pareja, E.M., Llorent-Vaquero, M., Camara-Estrella, A.M. and Ortega-Tudela, J.M. (2021), “Sustainable education: using social networks in education for change”, Sustainability, Vol. 13 No. 18, doi: 10.3390/su131810368.
Evans, M.A. and Powell, A. (2007), “Conceptual and practical issues related to the design for and sustainability of communities of practice: the case of e-portfolio use in preservice teacher training”, Technology, Pedagogy and Education, Vol. 16 No. 2, pp. 199-214, doi: 10.1080/14759390701406810.
Fernandez-Martinez, E., Andina-Diaz, E., Fernandez-Pena, R., Garcia-Lopez, R., Fulgueiras-Carril, I. and Liebana-Presa, C. (2017), “Social networks, engagement and resilience in university students”, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol. 14 No. 12, doi: 10.3390/ijerph14121488.
Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P. and Norberg, J. (2005), “Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems”, Annual Review of Environment and Resources, Vol. 30, pp. 441-473, doi: 10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144511.
Franquesa-Soler, M. and Sandoval-Rivera, J.C.A. (2019), “Mentoring program to achieve SDGs in local contexts: a case study in communities from southern Mexico”, Sustainability (United States), Vol. 12 No. 2, pp. 109-114, doi: 10.1089/sus.2018.0034.
Furman, C., Roncoli, C., Nelson, D.R. and Hoogenboom, G. (2014), “Growing food, growing a movement: climate adaptation and civic agriculture in the Southeastern United States”, Agriculture and Human Values, Vol. 31 No. 1, pp. 69-82, doi: 10.1007/s10460-013-9458-2.
Garcia, A.C., Gil-Mediavilla, M., Alvarez, I. and Casares, M.D. (2020), “The influence of social networks within educational and social fields: a comparative study between two generations of online students”, Sustainability, Vol. 12 No. 23, doi: 10.3390/su12239941.
Garcias, A.P., Tur, G., Mesquida, A.D. and Marin, V.I. (2020), “Reflexive skills in teacher education: a tweet a week”, Sustainability, Vol. 12 No. 8, doi: 10.3390/su12083161.
Gil-Quintana, J., Malvasi, V., Castillo-Abdul, B. and Romero-Rodriguez, L.M. (2020), “Learning leaders: teachers or youtubers? Participatory culture and STEM competencies in Italian secondary school students”, Sustainability, Vol. 12 No. 18, doi: 10.3390/su12187466.
Gómez-Marín, N., Cara-Jiménez, J., Bernardo-Sánchez, A., Álvarez-de-Prado, L. and Ortega-Fernández, F. (2022), “Sustainable knowledge management in academia and research organizations in the innovation context”, International Journal of Management Education, Vol. 20 No. 1, doi: 10.1016/j.ijme.2022.100601.
Goritz, A., Kolleck, N. and JörgensH (2019), “Education for sustainable development and climate change education: the potential of social network analysis based on Twitter data”, Sustainability, Vol. 11 No. 19, doi: 10.3390/su11195499.
Gossling, S. (2021), “Technology, ICT and tourism: from big data to the big picture”, Journal of Sustainable Tourism, Vol. 29 No. 5, pp. 849-858, doi: 10.1080/09669582.2020.1865387.
Groce, J.E., Farrelly, M.A., Jorgensen, B.S. and Cook, C.N. (2019), “Using social-network research to improve outcomes in natural resource management”, Conservation Biology, Vol. 33 No. 1, pp. 53-65, doi: 10.1111/cobi.13127.
Hamann, R. (2009), “An academic’s perspective on the role of academics in corporate responsibility”, in Idowu, S.O. and Filho, W.L. (Eds), Professionals’ Perspectives of Corporate Social Responsibility, pp. 347-361, doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-02630-0_19.
Hays, J.M., Pereseina, V., Ibrahim Alshuaibi, A.S. and Saha, J. (2020), “Lessons in sustainable process paradigm. A case study from Dubai”, International Journal of Management Education, Vol. 18 No. 1, doi: 10.1016/j.ijme.2020.100366.
Henry, A.D. (2009), “The challenge of learning for sustainability: a prolegomenon to theory”, Human Ecology Review, Vol. 16 No. 2, pp. 131-140.
Henry, A.D. (2020), “Meeting the challenge of learning for sustainability through policy networks”, Human Ecology Review, Vol. 26 No. 2, pp. 171-193, doi: 10.22459/HER.26.02.2020.08.
Henry, A.D. and Vollan, B. (2014), “Networks and the challenge of sustainable development”, Annual Review of Environment And Resources, Vol. 39 No. 39, pp. 583-610, doi: 10.1146/annurev-environ-101813-013246.
Hurajova, A., Kollarova, D. and Huraj, L. (2022), “Trends in education during the pandemic: modern online technologies as a tool for the sustainability of university education in the field of media and communication studies”, Heliyon, Vol. 8 No. 5, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09367.
Ishimura, T. (2013), “Quantitative analysis of the impacts that social networks exert on environmental activities in a local community”, Studies in Regional Science, Vol. 42 No. 4, pp. 947-961, doi: 10.2457/srs.42.947.
Jiang, P., Le, Z., Ding, J., Guo, Y. and Lee, C. (2019), “An empirical study on tacit knowledge sharing based on social network analysis”, Journal of Internet Technology, Vol. 20 No. 2, pp. 483-489, doi: 10.3966/160792642019032002016.
Jirgensons, M. and Kapenieks, J. (2018), “Blockchain and the future of digital learning credential assessment and management”, Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, Vol. 20 No. 1, pp. 145-156, doi: 10.2478/jtes-2018-0009.
Joshi, E.L.A., Redding, C. and Cannata, M. (2021), “In the nic of time: how sustainable are networked improvement communities?”, American Journal of Education, Vol. 127 No. 3, pp. 369-397, doi: 10.1086/713826.
Keitumetse, S. (2013), “Cultural resources as sustainability enablers: towards a community-based cultural heritage resources management (COBACHREM) model”, Sustainability, Vol. 6 No. 1, pp. 70-85, doi: 10.3390/su6010070.
Khatri, D. (2021), “Use of social media information sources: a systematic literature review”, Online Information Review, Vol. 45 No. 6, pp. 1039-1063, doi: 10.1108/OIR-04-2020-0152.
Kim, H.M., Oh, K.W. and Jung, H.J. (2020), “Socialization on sustainable networks: the case of eBay green's facebook”, Sustainability, Vol. 12 No. 8, doi: 10.3390/SU12083476.
Knoot, T.G. and Rickenbach, M. (2011), “Best management practices and timber harvesting: the role of social networks in shaping landowner decisions”, Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, Vol. 26 No. 2, pp. 171-182, doi: 10.1080/02827581.2010.545827.
Kolleck, N. (2019), “The emergence of a global innovation in education: diffusing education for sustainable development through social networks”, Environmental Education Research, Vol. 25 No. 11, pp. 1635-1653, doi: 10.1080/13504622.2019.1675593.
Kolleck, N. and Bormann, I. (2014), “Analyzing trust in innovation networks: combining quantitative and qualitative techniques of social network analysis”, Zeitschrift Fur Erziehungswissenschaft, Vol. 17, pp. 9-27, doi: 10.1007/s11618-014-0551-0.
Kolleck, N. and Yemini, M. (2020), “Environment-related education topics within global citizenship education scholarship focused on teachers: a natural language processing analysis”, Journal of Environmental Education, Vol. 51 No. 4, pp. 317-331, doi: 10.1080/00958964.2020.1724853.
Kolleck, N., de Haan, G. and Fischbach, R. (2011), “Social networks for path creation: education for sustainable development Matters”, Journal of Futures Studies, Vol. 15 No. 4, pp. 77-91.
Kolleck, N., Jorgens, H. and Well, M. (2017), “Levels of governance in policy innovation cycles in community education: the cases of education for sustainable development and climate change education”, Sustainability, Vol. 9 No. 11, doi: 10.3390/su9111966.
Kurland, N.B. (2011), “Evolution of a campus sustainability network: a case study in organizational change”, International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, Vol. 12 No. 4, pp. 395-429, doi: 10.1108/14676371111168304.
Lam, D.P.M., Martin-Lopez, B., Horcea-Milcu, A.I. and Lang, D.J. (2021), “A leverage points perspective on social networks to understand sustainability transformations: evidence from Southern Transylvania”, Sustainability Science, Vol. 16 No. 3, pp. 809-826, doi: 10.1007/s11625-020-00881-z.
LaMendola, W. (2019), “Social work, social technologies, and sustainable community development”, Journal of Technology in Human Services, Vol. 37, pp. 79-92, 44622, doi: 10.1080/15228835.2018.1552905.
Landau, L.F., Campbell, L.K., Svendsen, E.S. and Johnson, M.L. (2021), “Building adaptive capacity through civic environmental stewardship: responding to COVID-19 alongside compounding and concurrent crises”, Frontiers In Sustainable Cities, Vol. 3, doi: 10.3389/frsc.2021.705178.
Liberati, A., Altman, D.G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gatzsche, P.C., Ioannidis, J.P.A., Clarke, M., Deveraux, P.J., Kleijnen, J. and Moher, D. (2009), “The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration”, BMJ, Vol. 339, p. b2700, doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2700.
Linnenluecke, Mk., Marrone, M. and Singh, A. (2020), “Conducting systematic literature reviews and bibliometric analyses”, Australian Journal of Management, Vol. 45 No. 2, pp. 175-194.
Lytras, M.D., Visvizi, A., Daniela, L., Sarirete, A. and De Pablos, P.O. (2018), “Social networks research for sustainable smart education”, Sustainability, Vol. 10 No. 9, doi: 10.3390/su10092974.
Martínez-López, F.J., Merigó, J.M., Valenzuela-Fernández, L. and Nicolás, C. (2018), “Fifty years of the European Journal of Marketing: a bibliometric analysis”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 9, doi: 10.1108/EJM-11-2017-0853.
Martin-Garcia, R., Lopez-Martin, C. and Arguedas-Sanz, R. (2020), “Collaborative learning communities for sustainable employment through visual tools”, Sustainability, Vol. 12 No. 6, doi: 10.3390/su12062569.
Martinez-Nunez, M., Borras-Gene, O. and Fidalgo-Blanco, A. (2016), “Virtual learning communities in Google plus, implications, and sustainability in MOOCs”, Journal of Information Technology Research, Vol. 9 No. 3, pp. 18-36, doi: 10.4018/JITR.2016070102.
Maruyama, U., Issberner, L.R. and Prado, P. (2021), “Nurturing the seeds of sustainability education: information regime in Brazilian public HEI”, Administracao-Ensino E Pesquisa, Vol. 22 No. 2, p. 294, -+, doi: 10.13058/raep.2021.v22n2.1978.
Miller, H., Miller, B.R. and Spoelstra, J. (2021), “A sustainability internship program: strategies for creating student stewards for sustainability”, International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, Vol. 22 No. 5, pp. 1022-1037, doi: 10.1108/IJSHE-08-2020-0314.
Nguyen, C.H., Nguyen, H.V., Doan, T.K., Nguyen, M.H. and Le, M.T.T. (2023), “Viewing advertisements in social networks: the attitude-intention inconsistency revisited”, Online Information Review, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print, doi: 10.1108/OIR-10-2021-0563.
Pallett, H. and Chilvers, J. (2013), “A decade of learning about publics, participation, and climate change: institutionalising reflexivity?”, Environment and Planning A-Economy and Space, Vol. 45 No. 5, pp. 1162-1183, doi: 10.1068/a45252.
Padilla-Melendez, A., Del Aguila-Obra, A.R., Lockett, N. and Fuster, E. (2020), “Entrepreneurial universities and sustainable development. The network bricolage process of academic entrepreneurs”, Sustainability, Vol. 12 No. 4, doi: 10.3390/su12041403.
Pang, H., Qin, K. and Ji, M. (2022), “Can social network sites facilitate civic engagement? Assessing dynamic relationship between social media and civic activities among young people”, Online Information Review, Vol. 46 No. 1, pp. 79-94, doi: 10.1108/OIR-10-2020-0453.
Paul, J., Lim, W.M., O'Cass, A., Hao, A.W. and Bresciani, S. (2021), “Scientific procedures and rationales for systematic literature reviews (SPAR-4-SLR)”, International Journal of Consumer Studies, April 2022, doi: 10.1111/ijcs.12695.
Poliakova, O., Aleksandrova, M., Dehtiarova, H., Tkachov, V. and Tsyselska, O. (2021), “Problems and prospects of media education as a component of the sustainable development concept”, Alta-Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, Vol. 11 No. 2, pp. 97-103.
Post, C., Sarala, R., Gatrell, C. and Prescott, J.E. (2020), “Advancing theory with review articles”, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 57 No. 2, pp. 351-376.
Purcell, W.M. (2019), “A conceptual framework of leadership and governance in sustaining entrepreneurial universities illustrated with case material from a retrospective review of a university's strategic transformation: the enterprise university”, in Kliewe, T., Kesting, T., Plewa, C. and Baaken, T. (Eds), Developing Engaged and Entrepreneurial Universities, Springer, Singapore, doi: 10.1007/978-981-13-8130-0_13.
Redman, A., Rowe, D., Brundiers, K. and Brock, A. (2021), “What motivates students to Be sustainability change agents in the face of adversity?”, Sustainability and Climate Change, Vol. 14 No. 5, pp. 313-322, doi: 10.1089/scc.2021.0024.
Reed, M.G., Godmaire, H., Abernethy, P. and Guertin, M.A. (2014), “Building a community of practice for sustainability: strengthening learning and collective action of Canadian biosphere reserves through a national partnership”, Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 145, pp. 230-239, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.06.030.
Reeves, A. (2019), “Classroom collaborations: enabling sustainability education via student-community co-learning”, International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, Vol. 20 No. 8, pp. 1376-1392, doi: 10.1108/IJSHE-11-2018-0220.
Robinson, G., Gallagher, T., Duffy, G. and McAneney, H. (2020), “At the boundaries: school networks in divided societies”, Journal of Professional Capital and Community, Vol. 5 No. 2, pp. 183-197, doi: 10.1108/JPCC-11-2019-0033.
Sackney, L. and Walker, K. (2007), “Sustainable innovation in exemplary schools”, International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences, Vol. 1 No. 6, pp. 179-188, doi: 10.18848/1833-1882/CGP/v01i06/51849.
Sandberg, E. and Jafari, H. (2018), “Retail supply chain responsiveness. Towards a retail-specific framework and a future research agenda”, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Vol. 67 No. 9, pp. 1977-1993.
Saraite-Sariene, L., Galán-Valdivieso, F., Alonso-Cañadas, J. and García-Tabuyo, M. (2022), “The role of women's leadership in environmental NGOs' online accountability”, Online Information Review, Vol. 46 No. 4, pp. 660-677, doi: 10.1108/OIR-09-2020-0403.
Schubert, I., de Groot, J.I.M. and Newton, A.C. (2021), “Challenging the status quo through social influence: changes in sustainable consumption through the influence of social networks”, Sustainability, Vol. 13 No. 10, doi: 10.3390/su13105513.
Schulz, D., van der Woud, A. and Westhof, J. (2020), “The best indycaster project: analysing and understanding meaningful YouTube content, dialogue and commitment as part of responsible management education”, International Journal of Management Education, Vol. 18 No. 1, doi: 10.1016/j.ijme.2019.100335.
Schuster, J. and Kolleck, N. (2020), “The global diffusion of social innovations - an analysis of Twitter communication networks related to inclusive education”, Frontiers In Education, Vol. 5, doi: 10.3389/feduc.2020.492010.
Seo, H., Choi, Y. and Cho, B. (2017), “Network analysis on sustainable development research and its' implication”, Information (Japan), Vol. 20 No. 5, pp. 3123-3131.
Severo, E.A., De Guimarães, J.C.F., Dellarmelin, M.L. and Ribeiro, R.P. (2019), “The influence of social networks on environmental awareness and the social responsibility of generations”, Brazilian Business Review, Vol. 16 No. 5, pp. 500-518, doi: 10.15728/bbr.2019.16.5.5.
Shaharudin, M.S., Fernando, Y., Chiappetta Jabbour, C.J., Sroufe, R. and JasmiM, F.A. (2019), “Past, present, and future low carbon supply chain management: a content review using social network analysis”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 218, pp. 629-643, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.016.
Shelton, R.C., Lee, M., Brotzman, L.E., Crookes, D.M., Jandorf, L., Erwin, D. and Gage-Bouchard, E.A. (2019), “Use of social network analysis in the development, dissemination, implementation, and sustainability of health behavior interventions for adults: a systematic review”, Social Science and Medicine, Vol. 220, pp. 81-101, doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.10.013.
Sierra, J. and Suárez-Collado, Á. (2021), “Understanding economic, social, and environmental sustainability challenges in the Global South”, Sustainability, Vol. 13 No. 13, p. 7201, doi: 10.3390/su13137201.
Simpson, V.L., Hass, Z.J., Panchal, J. and McGowan, B. (2022), “Understanding the development, evaluation, and sustainability of community health networks using social network analysis: a scoping review”, American Journal of Health Promotion, Vol. 36 No. 2, pp. 318-327, doi: 10.1177/08901171211045984.
Smith, P.A.C. and Sharicz, C.A.(2013), “The bi-modal organization Balancing autopoiesis and fluid social networks for sustainability”, Learning Organization, Vol. 20 No. 2, p. 134, -+, doi: 10.1108/09696471311303773.
Song, S., Hossin, M.A., Yin, X. and Hosain, M.S. (2021), “Accelerating green innovation performance from the relations of network potential, absorptive capacity, and environmental turbulence”, Sustainability, Vol. 13 No. 14, doi: 10.3390/su13147765.
Sorkun, M.F. (2018), “How do social norms influence recycling behaviour in a collectivistic society? a case study from Turkey”, Waste Management, Elsevier, New York, Vol. 80, pp. 359-370, doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2018.09.026.
Srebotnjak, T. and Norgaard, L.M. (2017), “Mapping sustainability efforts at the Claremont colleges”, International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, Vol. 18 No. 7, pp. 1230-1243, doi: 10.1108/IJSHE-12-2015-0206.
Strasser, T., de Kraker, J. and Kemp, R. (2019), “Developing the transformative capacity of social innovation through learning: a conceptual framework and research agenda for the roles of network leadership”, Sustainability, Vol. 11 No. 5, doi: 10.3390/su11051304.
Sysoieva, S.O. and Osadcha, K.P. (2020), “Formation of the tutor ict-competence in the process of future teachers' professional training”, Information Technologies and Learning Tools, Vol. 80 No. 6, pp. 207-221, doi: 10.33407/itlt.v80i6.4182.
Tan, Y., Xu, H., Jiao, L., Ochoa, J.J. and Shen, L. (2017), “A study of best practices in promoting sustainable urbanization in China”, Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 193, pp. 8-18, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.01.058.
Tan, Y., Shuai, C., Shen, L., Hou, L. and Zhang, G. (2020), “A study of sustainable practices in the sustainability leadership of international contractors”, Sustainable Development, Vol. 28 No. 4, pp. 697-710, doi: 10.1002/sd.2020.
Tang, M.-C., Jung, Y.-E. and Li, Y. (2023), “Exploring the sociotechnical system of Chinese internet literature online forums: a social network analytical approach”, Online Information Review, Vol. 47 No. 3, pp. 505-521, doi: 10.1108/OIR-11-2021-0596.
Trivino-Cabrera, L., Chaves-Guerrero, E.I. and Alejo-Lozano, L. (2021), “The figure of the teacher-prosumer for the development of an innovative, sustainable, and committed education in times of COVID-19”, Sustainability, Vol. 13 No. 3, doi: 10.3390/su13031128.
Ungar, P. and Strand, R. (2012), “Inclusive protected area management in the amazon: the importance of social networks over ecological knowledge”, Sustainability, Vol. 4 No. 12, pp. 3260-3278, doi: 10.3390/su4123260.
Vargas, V.R., Lawthom, R., Prowse, A., Randles, S. and Tzoulas, K. (2019), “Sustainable development stakeholder networks for organisational change in higher education institutions: a case study from the UK”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 208, pp. 470-478, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.078.
Vasseur, L., Thornbush, M.J. and Plante, S. (2022), “Engaging communities in adaptation to climate change by understanding the dimensions of social capital in atlantic Canada”, Sustainability, Vol. 14 No. 9, doi: 10.3390/su14095250.
Wang, W., Lam, E.T.H., Chiu, D.K.W., Lung, M.M. and Ho, K.K.W. (2021), “Supporting higher education with social networks: trust and privacy vs perceived effectiveness”, Online Information Review, Vol. 45 No. 1, pp. 207-219, doi: 10.1108/OIR-02-2020-0042.
Westoby, P. and Lyons, K. (2017), “The place of social learning and social movement in transformative learning: a case study of sustainability schools in Uganda”, Journal of Transformative Education, Vol. 15 No. 3, pp. 223-240, doi: 10.1177/1541344617696970.
Winkler, K.J., Bennett, E. and Chestnutt, H.R. (2022), “Mapping social structures for sustainability transformation at McGill University, Canada”, International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, Vol. 23 No. 6, pp. 1209-1228, doi: 10.1108/IJSHE-04-2021-0164.
Wojcik, D.J., Ardoin, N.M. and Gould, R.K. (2021), “Using social network analysis to explore and expand our understanding of a robust environmental learning landscape”, Environmental Education Research, Vol. 27 No. 9, pp. 1263-1283, doi: 10.1080/13504622.2021.1905779.
Wong, J., Ho, K.K.W., Leung, T.N. and Chiu, D.K.W. (2022), “Exploring the associations of youth Facebook addiction with social capital perceptions”, Online Information Review, Vol. 47 No. 2, doi: 10.1108/OIR-06-2021-0300.
Xanat, V.M. and Toshimasa, Y. (2019), “A video recommendation system for complex topic learning based on a sustainable design approach”, Vietnam Journal Of Computer Science, Vol. 6 No. 3, pp. 329-342, doi: 10.1142/S2196888819500179.
Yan, W., Liu, Q., Chen, R. and Zhang, M. (2021), “Favoritism or equality: difference analysis of users' utilization of academic social networks for top research corporations”, Online Information Review, Vol. 45 No. 1, pp. 240-260, doi: 10.1108/OIR-12-2019-0389.
Zhang, L.H. and Zhang, J.Y. (2018), “Perception of small tourism enterprises in Lao PDR regarding social sustainability under the influence of social network”, Tourism Management, Vol. 69, pp. 109-120, doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2018.05.012.
Further reading
Chen, Q., Cheng, J.Q. and Wu, Z.Q. (2019), “Evolution of the cultural trade network in the belt and road region: implication for global cultural sustainability”, Sustainability, Vol. 11 No. 10, doi: 10.3390/su11102744.
de Marcos-Ortega, L., Garcia-Cabot, A., Garcia-Lopez, E., Ramirez-Velarde, R., Teixeira, A. and Martínez-Herráiz, J.J. (2020), “Gamifying massive online courses: effects on the social networks and course completion rates”, Applied Sciences, Vol. 10 No. 20, p. 7065, doi: 10.3390/app10207065.
Samper-Escalante, L.D., Loyola-González, O., Monroy, R. and Medina-Pérez, M.A. (2021), “Bot datasets on twitter: analysis and challenges”, Applied Sciences, Vol. 11 No. 9, p. 4105, doi: 10.3390/app11094105.