Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Spatial partitioning of the regulatory landscape of the X-inactivation centre

Nature volume 485, pages 381–385 (2012)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

In eukaryotes transcriptional regulation often involves multiple long-range elements and is influenced by the genomic environment1. A prime example of this concerns the mouse X-inactivation centre (Xic), which orchestrates the initiation of X-chromosome inactivation (XCI) by controlling the expression of the non-protein-coding Xist transcript. The extent of Xic sequences required for the proper regulation of Xist remains unknown. Here we use chromosome conformation capture carbon-copy (5C)2 and super-resolution microscopy to analyse the spatial organization of a 4.5-megabases (Mb) region including Xist. We discover a series of discrete 200-kilobase to 1 Mb topologically associating domains (TADs), present both before and after cell differentiation and on the active and inactive X. TADs align with, but do not rely on, several domain-wide features of the epigenome, such as H3K27me3 or H3K9me2 blocks and lamina-associated domains. TADs also align with coordinately regulated gene clusters. Disruption of a TAD boundary causes ectopic chromosomal contacts and long-range transcriptional misregulation. The Xist/Tsix sense/antisense unit illustrates how TADs enable the spatial segregation of oppositely regulated chromosomal neighbourhoods, with the respective promoters of Xist and Tsix lying in adjacent TADs, each containing their known positive regulators. We identify a novel distal regulatory region of Tsix within its TAD, which produces a long intervening RNA, Linx. In addition to uncovering a new principle of cis-regulatory architecture of mammalian chromosomes, our study sets the stage for the full genetic dissection of the X-inactivation centre.

Access through your institution
Buy or subscribe

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Access through your institution

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Chromosome partitioning into topologically associating domains (TADs).
Figure 2: Determinants of topologically associating domains.
Figure 3: Dynamics of topologically associating domains during cell differentiation.
Figure 4: Transcriptional co-regulation within topologically associating domains.
Figure 5: 5C maps reveal new regulatory regions in the Xic.

Similar content being viewed by others

Accession codes

Primary accessions

Gene Expression Omnibus

Data deposits

High-throughput data are deposited in Gene ExpressionOmnibus under accession number GSE35721 for all 5C experiments and GSE34243 for expression microarrays.

References

  1. Kleinjan, D. A. & Lettice, L. A. Long-range gene control and genetic disease. Adv. Genet. 61, 339–388 (2008)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Dostie, J. et al. Chromosome conformation capture carbon copy (5C): a massively parallel solution for mapping interactions between genomic elements. Genome Res. 16, 1299–1309 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Rastan, S. Non-random X-chromosome inactivation in mouse X-autosome translocation embryos–location of the inactivation centre. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 78, 1–22 (1983)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rastan, S. & Robertson, E. J. X-chromosome deletions in embryo-derived (EK) cell lines associated with lack of X-chromosome inactivation. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 90, 379–388 (1985)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Augui, S., Nora, E. P. & Heard, E. Regulation of X-chromosome inactivation by the X-inactivation centre. Nature Rev. Genet. 12, 429–442 (2011)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Anguera, M. C. et al. Tsx produces a long noncoding RNA and has general functions in the germline, stem cells, and brain. PLoS Genet. 7, e1002248 (2011)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Heard, E., Mongelard, F., Arnaud, D. & Avner, P. Xist yeast artificial chromosome transgenes function as X-inactivation centers only in multicopy arrays and not as single copies. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 3156–3156 (1999)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lieberman-Aiden, E. et al. Comprehensive mapping of long-range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome. Science 326, 289–293 (2009)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Marks, H. et al. High-resolution analysis of epigenetic changes associated with X inactivation. Genome Res. 19, 1361–1373 (2009)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Pauler, F. M. et al. H3K27me3 forms BLOCs over silent genes and intergenic regions and specifies a histone banding pattern on a mouse autosomal chromosome. Genome Res. 19, 221–233 (2009)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Wen, B., Wu, H., Shinkai, Y., Irizarry, R. A. & Feinberg, A. P. Large histone H3 lysine 9 dimethylated chromatin blocks distinguish differentiated from embryonic stem cells. Nature Genet. 41, 246–250 (2009)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lienert, F. et al. Genomic prevalence of heterochromatic H3K9me2 and transcription do not discriminate pluripotent from terminally differentiated cells. PLoS Genet. 7, e1002090 (2011)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hawkins, R. D. et al. Distinct epigenomic landscapes of pluripotent and lineage-committed human cells. Cell Stem Cell 6, 479–491 (2010)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Rougeulle, C. et al. Differential histone H3 Lys-9 and Lys-27 methylation profiles on the X chromosome. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24, 5475–5484 (2004)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Montgomery, N. D. et al. The murine polycomb group protein Eed is required for global histone H3 lysine-27 methylation. Curr. Biol. 15, 942–947 (2005)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Monkhorst, K., Jonkers, I., Rentmeester, E., Grosveld, F. & Gribnau, J. X Inactivation counting and choice is a stochastic process: evidence for involvement of an X-linked activator. Cell 132, 410–421 (2008)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Spencer, R. J. et al. A boundary element between Tsix and Xist binds the chromatin insulator Ctcf and contributes to initiation of X chromosome inactivation. GeneticsCrossRef (2011)

  18. Kagey, M. H. et al. Mediator and cohesin connect gene expression and chromatin architecture. Nature 467, 430–435 (2010)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Peric-Hupkes, D. et al. Molecular maps of the reorganization of genome-nuclear lamina interactions during differentiation. Mol. Cell 38, 603–613 (2010)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Splinter, E. et al. The inactive X chromosome adopts a unique three-dimensional conformation that is dependent on Xist RNA. Genes Dev. 25, 1371–1383 (2011)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Caron, H. et al. The human transcriptome map: clustering of highly expressed genes in chromosomal domains. Science 291, 1289–1292 (2001)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Tsai, C.-L., Rowntree, R. K., Cohen, D. E. & Lee, J. T. Higher order chromatin structure at the X-inactivation center via looping DNA. Dev. Biol. 319, 416–425 (2008)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Heard, E. et al. Transgenic mice carrying an Xist-containing YAC. Hum. Mol. Genet. 5, 441–450 (1996)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Guttman, M. et al. Chromatin signature reveals over a thousand highly conserved large non-coding RNAs in mammals. Nature 458, 223–227 (2009)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Khalil, A. M. et al. Many human large intergenic noncoding RNAs associate with chromatin-modifying complexes and affect gene expression. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 11667–11672 (2009)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Seidl, C. I. M., Stricker, S. H. & Barlow, D. P. The imprinted Air ncRNA is an atypical RNAPII transcript that evades splicing and escapes nuclear export. EMBO J. 25, 3565–3575 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Ruf, S. et al. Large-scale analysis of the regulatory architecture of the mouse genome with a transposon-associated sensor. Nature Genet. 43, 379–386 (2011)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kikuta, H. et al. Genomic regulatory blocks encompass multiple neighboring genes and maintain conserved synteny in vertebrates. Genome Res. 17, 545–555 (2007)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Dixon, J. R. et al. Topological domains in mammalian genomes identified by analysis of chromatin interactions. Nature 10.1038/nature11082 (this issue)

  30. Sexton, T. et al. Three-dimensional folding and functional organization principles of the Drosophila genome. Cell 148, 458–472 (2012)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Mercier, R. et al. The MatP/matS site-specific system organizes the terminus region of the E. coli chromosome into a macrodomain. Cell 135, 475–485 (2008)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank T. Pollex and T. Forné for experimental help; the imaging facility PICTIBiSA@BDD for technical assistance, D. Gentien and C. Hego for microarray hybridizations. We thank K. Bernhard, F. Stewart and A. Smith for protocols and material for 2i culture and EpiSC differentiation. We are grateful to members of the E.H. laboratory for critical input. This work was funded by grants from the Ministère de la Recherche et de l’Enseignement Supérieur and the ARC (to E.P.N.); a HFSP Long term fellowship (LT000597/2010-L) (to E.G.S.). EU EpiGeneSys FP7 Network of Excellence no. 257082, the Fondation pour la Recherche Medicale, ANR, ERC Advanced Investigator award no. 250367 and EU FP7 SYBOSS grant no. 242129 (to E.H.). N.B. was supported by BMBF (FORSYS) and EMBO (fellowship ASTF 307-2011). J.D., B.R.L. and N.L.v.B. were supported by NIH (R01 HG003143) and a W. M. Keck Foundation Distinguished Young Scholar Award.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Bryan R. Lajoie, Edda G. Schulz and Luca Giorgetti: These authors contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut Curie, 26 rue d'Ulm, Paris F-75248, France ,

    Elphège P. Nora, Edda G. Schulz, Luca Giorgetti, Ikuhiro Okamoto, Nicolas Servant, Tristan Piolot, Emmanuel Barillot & Edith Heard

  2. CNRS UMR3215, Paris F-75248, France ,

    Elphège P. Nora, Edda G. Schulz, Luca Giorgetti, Ikuhiro Okamoto, Tristan Piolot & Edith Heard

  3. INSERM U934, Paris F-75248, France ,

    Elphège P. Nora, Edda G. Schulz, Luca Giorgetti, Ikuhiro Okamoto, Tristan Piolot & Edith Heard

  4. Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Programs in Systems Biology and Gene Function and Expression, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, 01605-0103, USA

    Bryan R. Lajoie, Nynke L. van Berkum & Job Dekker

  5. INSERM U900, Paris, F-75248 France ,

    Nicolas Servant & Emmanuel Barillot

  6. Mines ParisTech, Fontainebleau, F-77300 France ,

    Nicolas Servant & Emmanuel Barillot

  7. Institute of Pathology, Charité–Universitätsmedizin, 10117 Berlin, and Institute of Theoretical Biology Humboldt Universität, 10115 Berlin, Germany ,

    Johannes Meisig & Nils Blüthgen

  8. Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, 94158-2517, California, USA

    John Sedat

  9. Department of Reproduction and Development, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands,

    Joost Gribnau

Authors
  1. Elphège P. Nora
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bryan R. Lajoie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Edda G. Schulz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Luca Giorgetti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ikuhiro Okamoto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Nicolas Servant
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Tristan Piolot
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Nynke L. van Berkum
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Johannes Meisig
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. John Sedat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Joost Gribnau
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Emmanuel Barillot
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Nils Blüthgen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Job Dekker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Edith Heard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

E.P.N. performed and analysed 3C, 5C, (RT–)qPCR, immunofluorescence, RNA and DNA FISH. B.R.L. and N.L.v.B. helped in the design and/or the analysis of 3C and 5C. L.G. performed 3C, FISH and 5C analysis. E.G.S. generated the time-course transcriptomic data, which was analysed by J.M. and N.B.; I.O. performed FISH on pre-implantation embryos. J.G. donated the XTX mouse ESC line. N.S. and E.B. helped in the epigenomic and 5C analyses. J.S. and T.P. set up OMX microscopy and analysis and T.P. performed structured illumination microscopy and image analysis. The manuscript was written by E.P.N., J.D. and E.H. with contribution from E.G.S. and input from all authors.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Job Dekker or Edith Heard.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

This file contains Supplementary Figures 1-15, Supplementary Methods and additional references. (PDF 10774 kb)

Supplementary Data 1

This file contains mapped 5C counts. (ZIP 8192 kb)

Supplementary Data 2

This file contains intraTAD 5C peaks. (ZIP 510 kb)

Supplementary Table 1

This file contains 5C Oligos and restriction Fragment. (XLS 562 kb)

Supplementary Table 2

This file contains cDNA microarrays. (XLS 382 kb)

Supplementary Table 3

This file contains the sequencing log. (XLS 57 kb)

Supplementary Table 4

This file contains qPCR Primers. (XLS 12 kb)

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nora, E., Lajoie, B., Schulz, E. et al. Spatial partitioning of the regulatory landscape of the X-inactivation centre. Nature 485, 381–385 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11049

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11049

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing: Translational Research

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Translational Research newsletter — top stories in biotechnology, drug discovery and pharma.

Get what matters in translational research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Translational Research