Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T08:57:35.674Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Supporting Creativity with Virtual Reality Technology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2019

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This contribution includes the development and validation of a Virtual Reality (VR) supported creativity technique: “Sensory Stimulus Environment Technique”. Key elements of this technique are the creativity process, a VR tool and the support of the tool (Virtual Creative Environments). The creativity process consists of phases for individual and group-based work. The VR tool “Virtual Creativity” includes functions to support the preparation of Virtual Creative Environments (VCE), the generation and evaluation of new ideas. For the generation of VCE, the tool possesses an environment configurator. Users of this function are supported by Design Rules for VCE.

For the validation of the creativity technique, it was used in a product engineering project. The project members procedure two phases of the creativity process (Preparation and Individual Idea Generation) and used “Virtual Creativity” to generate VCEs and ideas to solve their tasks. By questionnaires, functions of “Virtual Creativity” were assessed for generating VCEs and ideas.

Type
Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2019

References

Albers, A., Maul, L., Bursac, N. and Heismann, R. (2015), “Connected Creativity – A human centered Community Platform for Innovation Impulses”, The Third International Conference on Design Creativity (3rd ICDC), 12th-14th January 2015, Bangalore, India.Google Scholar
Albers, A. Bursac, N., Walter, B., Hahn, C. and Schröder, J. (2016), “ProVIL – Produktentwicklung im virtuellen Ideenlabor”, Entwerfen Entwickeln Erleben 2016, Dresden.Google Scholar
Alahuhta, P., Nordbäck, E., Sivunen, A. and Surakka, T. (2014), “Fostering Team Creativity in Virtual Worlds”, Journal of Virtual Worlds Research Volume 7, Number 3, Lantern (2), September, 2014.Google Scholar
Amabile, T. M. (1996), “Creativity and innovation in organizations”. Harvard Business SchoolGoogle Scholar
Bhagwatwar, A., Massey, A.P. and Dennis, A.R. (2013), “Creative Virtual Environments: Effect of Supraliminal Priming on Team Brainstorming”, 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.Google Scholar
Burdea, G. and Coiffet, P. (2003), “Virtual reality technology”, 2nd ed., Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.Google Scholar
Eppler, M. J. and Pfister, R. A. (2012), “Paths to Success: A Sketch-based Creativity Technique for Individuals and Teams”, 16th International Conference on Information Visualisation, Washington, D.C., USA.Google Scholar
Gabriel, A., Monticolo, D., Camargo, M. and Bourgault, M. (2017), “Conceptual Framework of an Intelligent System to Support Creative Workshops”, Springer International Publishing AG 261 Cavallucci, D. (ed.), TRIZ – The Theory of Inventive Problem Solving.Google Scholar
Graessler, I., Taplick, P. and Pottebaum, J. (2017), “Enhancing Innovation Processes by Disruptive Technologies”, in: SCIFI-IT 2017, S. 19–26, 2017 EUROSIS, EUROSIS-ETI.Google Scholar
Graessler, I. and Taplick, P. (2018), “Virtual Reality unterstützte Kreativitätstechnik: Vergleich mit klassischen Techniken”, in: Krause, D., Paetzold, K. and Wartzack, S. (Hrsg.) Design for X - Beiträge zum 29. DfX-Symposium, S. pp. 215226, Sep. 2018.Google Scholar
Graessler, I. and Taplick, P. (2019), “Architecture of a Virtual Reality-based Tool for the Support of Creativity”, in: SCIFI-IT 2019, EUROSIS.Google Scholar
Guegan, J., Buisine, S., Mantelet, F., Maranzana, N. and Segonds, F. (2016), “Avatar-mediated creativity: When embodying inventors makes engineers more creative”, in Computers in Human Behavior 61 pp. 165175.Google Scholar
Lau, K. W. and Lee, P. Y. (2012), “The use of virtual reality for creating unusual environmental stimulation to motivate students to explore creative ideas”, in Interactive Learning Environments, 2015, Vol. 23 No. 1, pp. 318.Google Scholar
Rickards, T. and DeCock, C. (2012), “Understanding organizational creativity: Toward a multiparadigmatic approach”, in Runco, M. A. (Ed.), Creativity Research Handbook (Vol. 2, pp. 132), Hampton Press, Cresskill, NJ.Google Scholar
Runco, M. A. and Jaeger, G. J. (2012), “The Standard Definition of Creativity”, Creativity Research Journal Vol. 24, pp. 9296.Google Scholar
Soler, J. L., Ferreira, J., Contero, M. and Alcañiz, M. (2017), “The Power of Sight: Using Eye Tracking to assess Learning Experience (LX) in Virtual Reality Environments”, Proceedings of the 11th International Technology, Education and Development Conference 2017.Google Scholar
Stroebe, W. and Diehl, M (1994), “Why groups are less effective than their members: on productivity losses in idea-generating groups”, European review of social psychology, 1994, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 271303.Google Scholar
Valacich, J. S., Jessup, L. M., Dennis, A. R. and Nunamaker, J. F. (1992), “A conceptual framework of anonymity in group support systems”, Group Decision and Negotiation, Vol. 1 No. 3, pp. 219241, 1992.Google Scholar
Voigt, M. and Bergener, K. (2013), “Enhancing Creativity in Groups – Proposition of an Integrated Framework for Designing Group Creativity Support Systems”, 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.Google Scholar
Wang, K. and Nickerson, J.V. (2017), “A literature review on individual creativity support systems”, in Computers in Human Behavior Vol. 74 pp. 139151.Google Scholar