Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T20:35:57.144Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - ‘Communities of practice’ in higher education: useful heuristic or educational model?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 November 2009

Mary R. Lea
Affiliation:
Lecturer in Teaching and Learning, Institute of Educational Technology, Open University
David Barton
Affiliation:
Lancaster University
Karin Tusting
Affiliation:
Lancaster University
Get access

Summary

BACKGROUND

Global higher education is in a state of change. Its expansion at the end of the twentieth century has led to a burgeoning of new programmes, modules and courses. These include not just the development of interdisciplinary and new subject areas in mainstream academic departments but also those based less on traditional knowledge bases within academic disciplines and more upon vocational and professional bodies of knowledge and their practice-based concerns. At the same time, the concept of lifelong learning means that the learner is no longer regarded as the eighteen-year-old fresh from school, but now includes those entering and re-entering the university – conceived in its broadest terms – at many different points throughout the lifecourse. The university is no longer confined within its own buildings; courses are delivered in outreach colleges, in the workplace and on-line. With these profound changes have come new words associated with learning: ‘distributed’, ‘flexible’ and ‘blended’. In short, the university is no longer the traditional bastion of knowledge, defined by either its disciplinary boundaries or its physical campus, colleges and buildings. It is against this backdrop that researchers in the field of teaching and learning in higher education are drawing upon the concept of communities of practice in order to inform practitioners, both university lecturers and staff developers, about new ways of understanding their students' learning.

Type
Chapter
Information
Beyond Communities of Practice
Language Power and Social Context
, pp. 180 - 197
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baynham, M. (1995) Literacy Practices. London: LongmanGoogle Scholar
Creme, P. (2000) Report on New Forms of Writing in Social Anthropology. Department of Social Anthropology, University of Sussex, unpublished
Evenbeck, S. and Kahn, S. (2001) Enhancing learning assessment and accountability through communities of practice. Change 25–26 (May/June) 43–49Google Scholar
Francis, B., Robson, J. and Read, B. (2001) An analysis of undergraduate writing styles in the context of gender and achievement. Studies in Higher Education 26(3) 313–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gee, J. (2000) The new literacy studies: from ‘socially situated’ to the work of the social. In Barton, D., Hamilton, M. and Ivanič, R. (eds), Situated Literacies: Reading and Writing in Context. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Hildreth, P., C. Kimble and P. Wright (1998) Computer mediated communication and international communities of practice. In Proceedings of Ethicomp' 98, March 1998, Erasmus University, The Netherlands, 275–268
Ivanič, R. (1998) Writing and Identity: The Discoursal Construction of Identity in Academic Writing. Amsterdam: John BenjaminsCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jonassen, D., Davidson, M., Collins, M., Campbell, J. and Haag, B. B. (1995) Constructivism and computer-mediated communication in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education 9 (2) 7–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, C., Turner, J. and Street, B. (eds) (1999) Students Writing in the University: Cultural and Epistemological Issues. Amsterdam: John BenjaminsGoogle Scholar
Kahn, B. H. (1997) Web-Based Instruction. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology PublicationsGoogle Scholar
Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991) Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lea, M. (1994) “I thought I could write until I came here”: student writing in higher education. In Gibbs, G. (ed), Improving Student Learning: Theory and Practice. Oxford: Oxford Centre for Staff Development, 216–226Google Scholar
Lea, M. (1998) Academic literacies and learning in higher education: constructing knowledge through texts and experience. Studies in the Education of Adults 30 (2), 156–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lea, M. (2001) Computer conferencing and assessment: new ways of writing in higher education. Studies in Higher Education 26 (2) 163–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lea, M. (2004) New literacy studies, ICTs and learning in higher education. In Snyder, I. and Beavis, C. (eds), Doing Literacy Online: Teaching, Learning and Playing in an Electronic World. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton PressGoogle Scholar
Lea, M. and Street, B. (1998) Student writing in higher education: an academic literacies approach. Studies in Higher Education 23 (2) 157–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lea, M. R. (2000). Computer conferencing: New possibilities for writing and learning in Higher Education. In Lea, M. R. and Stierer, B. (eds), Student Writing in Higher Education: New Contexts. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education/Open University Press, 69–85Google Scholar
Lea, M. R. and Stierer, B. (2000) Student Writing in Higher Education: New Contexts. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education/Open University PressGoogle Scholar
Lillis, T. (1997) New voices in academia? The regulative nature of academic writing conventions. Language and Education 11(3) 182–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lillis, T. (2001) Student Writing: Access, Regulation and Desire. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Marton, F., Hounsell, D. and Entwhistle, N. (eds) (1997) The Experience of Learning (2nd ed). Edinburgh: Scottish Academic PressGoogle Scholar
Pardoe, S. (1994) Writing in another culture: The value of students' KAL in writing pedagogy. In Graddol, D. and Swann, J. (eds), Evaluating Language. Clevedon: British Association for Applied Linguistics/Multilingual MattersGoogle Scholar
Putz, P. and Arnold, P. (2001) Communities of practice guidelines for the design of online seminars in higher education. Education, Communication and Information 1 (2) 181–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Read, B., Francis, B. and Robson, J. (2001) ‘Playing safe’: undergraduate essay writing and the presentation of the student ‘voice’. British Journal of Sociology of Education 22 (3) 387–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, J. (2000) Communities of practice: A framework for fostering coherence in virtual learning communities. Educational Technology and Society 3 (3) 384–392Google Scholar
Scott, M. (2000) Writing in postgraduate teacher training: a question of identity. In Lea, M. R. and Stierer, B. (eds), Student Writing in Higher Education: New Contexts. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education/Open University Press, 112–124Google Scholar
Stierer, B. (1997) Mastering Education: A Preliminary Analysis of Academic Literacy Practices Within Master-Level Courses. Milton Keynes: Centre for Language and Communications, School of Education, Open UniversityGoogle Scholar
Thesen, L. (1994) Voices in Discourse: Re-thinking Shared Meaning in Academic Writing. Unpublished Masters Dissertation, University of Cape Town
Thesen, L. (2001) Modes, literacies and power: A university case study. Language and Education 5 (2&3) 132–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorpe, M. (2002) From independent to collaborative learning: new communities of practice in open, distance and distributed learning. In Lea, M. and Nicoll, K. (eds), Distributed Learning: Social and Cultural Approaches to Practice. London: The Open University/Routledge Falmer, 131–151Google Scholar
Wegerif, R. (1998) The social dimension of asynchronous learning networks. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 2 (1) 34–49Google Scholar
Wenger, E. (1998) Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenger, E., McDermott, R. A. and Snyder, W. (eds) (2002) Cultivating Communities of Practice: A Guide to Managing Knowledge. Boston: Harvard Business School PressGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×