Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content
Log in

Does Access to Finance and Investment Climate Enhance Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) Innovation in India?

  • Research
  • Published:
Operations Research Forum Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Innovation is a tool by which a firm can enhance, compete, and sustain in a dynamic world. Innovative firms are engines of total factor productivity and economic growth. However, financially constrained enterprises are less innovative in comparison to unconstrained firms in developing countries. The major aim of the study is to investigate the effects of access to finance and the investment climate condition on the innovation of SMEs in India using firm-level data on 6385 firms from the World Bank Enterprise Survey (WBES), 2022. The study employs two-stage least square-instrument variable (2SLS-IV) approach to examine the relationship. Post-estimation tests such as Cragg–Donald F-statistic and Stock and Yogo are applied to check the model’s strength and validity. In addition, the Sargan and Basmann test is applied to test for overidentification in the model. The study’s major findings suggest that long-term finance promotes innovation whereas investment climate condition such as bribes adversely affects it. Hence, in addition to expanding access to long-term finance, emphasis should be given on investment climate such as containing bribes while framing policies to promote innovation and support SMEs in India.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Notes

  1. in.pdf (wiphttps://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_pub_2000_2022/in.pdfo.int)

  2. https://hub.unido.org/sites/default/files/publications/Firm-level%20NMIS%20Report.pdf

References

  1. Aghion P, Howitt P, Brant-Collett M, García-Peñalosa C (1998) Endogenous growth theory. MIT press

    Google Scholar 

  2. Romer PM (1994) The origins of endogenous growth. J Econ Perspect 8(1):3–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Solow RM (1956) A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Q J Econ 70(1):65–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gupta R, Singh BP (2023) Financial Constraints, Investment Climate and Firm Productivity of Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) in India. Vision https://doi.org/10.1177/09722629231203934

  5. Brown JR, Petersen BC (2011) Cash holdings and R&D smoothing. J Corp Finan 17(3):694–709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chundakkadan R, Sasidharan S (2020a) Financial constraints, government support, and firm innovation: empirical evidence from developing economies. Innov Dev 10(3):279–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chundakkadan R, Sasidharan S (2020b) Financial constraints, government support, and firm innovation: empirical evidence from developing economies. Innov Dev 10(3):279–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bougheas S (2004) Internal vs external financing of R&D. Small Bus Econ 22:11–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jiang W (2015) Does environmental regulation affect R&D innovation of manufacturing firms in China? Empirical study based on micro data. J Financ Econ 41(2):76–87

    Google Scholar 

  10. Harhoff D (1998) Are there financing constraints for R&D and investment in German manufacturing firms? Ann Econ Stat:421–456

  11. Myers SC, Majluf NS (1984a) Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. J Financ Econ 13(2):187–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Myers SC, Majluf NS (1984b) Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. J Financ Econ 13(2):187–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. IMNIS (2020) IMNIS impact report 2020. Industry Mentoring Network in STEM. https://imnis.org.au

  14. World Intellectual Property Organization (2022) Global innovation index 2022: What is the future of innovationdriven growth? World Intellectual Property Organization. https://www.wipo.int/global_innovation_index/en/

  15. WBES (2022) Enterprise surveys. Retrieved January 10, 2023, from (http://www.enterprisesurveys.org). The World Bank.

  16. Lawson B, Samson D (2001) Developing innovation capability in organisations: a dynamic capabilities approach. Int J Innov Manag 5(03):377–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Anand N, Gardner HK, Morris T (2007) Knowledge-based innovation: emergence and embedding of new practice areas in management consulting firms. Acad Manag J 50(2):406–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Oecd E (2005) Oslo manual: guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data. Paris 2005. Sp 46:1–34

    Google Scholar 

  19. Schumpeter JA (1942) Socialism, capitalism and democracy. Harper and Brothers

    Google Scholar 

  20. Schumpeter JA (1952) The general economist. In: Wesley Clair Mitchell: The Economic Scientist. NBER, pp 321–340

    Google Scholar 

  21. Galbraith JK (1980) A theory of price control. Harvard University Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  22. Cohen WM (2010) Fifty years of empirical studies of innovative activity and performance. Handb Econ Innov 1:129–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Cohen WM, Klepper S (1996) Firm size and the nature of innovation within industries: the case of process and product R&D. Rev Econ Stat:232–243

  24. Hansen JA (1992) Innovation, firm size, and firm age. Small Bus Econ 4:37–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Balasubramanian N, Lee J (2008) Firm age and innovation. Ind Corp Chang 17(5):1019–1047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Moohammad AY, Nor’Aini Y, Kamal EM, (2014) Influences of firm size, age and sector on innovation behaviour of construction consultancy services organizations in developing countries. Bus Manag Dynam 4(4):1–9

    Google Scholar 

  27. Howells J (2005) Innovation and regional economic development: a matter of perspective? Res Policy 34(8):1220–1234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ayyagari M, Demirgüç-Kunt A, Maksimovic V (2010) Formal versus informal finance: evidence from China. Rev Financ Stud 23(8):3048–3097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Aghion P, Fally T, Scarpetta S (2007) Credit constraints as a barrier to the entry and post-entry growth of firms. Econ Policy 22(52):732–779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Hewa Wellalage N, Locke S, Samujh H (2020) Firm bribery and credit access: evidence from Indian SMEs. Small Bus Econ 55:283–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Berger AN, Udell GF (2006) A more complete conceptual framework for SME finance. J Bank Financ 30(11):2945–2966

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ayyagari M, Demirgüç-Kunt A, Maksimovic V (2008) How important are financing constraints? The role of finance in the business environment. World Bank Econ Rev 22(3):483–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Beck T, Demirgüç-Kunt ASLI, Maksimovic V (2005) Financial and legal constraints to growth: does firm size matter? J Financ 60(1):137–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. La Porta R, Shleifer A (2014) Informality and development. J Econ Perspect 28(3):109–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Beck T, Demirgüç-Kunt A, Maksimovic V (2008) Financing patterns around the world: are small firms different? J Financ Econ 89(3):467–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Chava S, Oettl A, Subramanian A, Subramanian KV (2013) Banking deregulation and innovation. J Financ Econ 109(3):759–774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Cornaggia J, Mao Y, Tian X, Wolfe B (2015) Does banking competition affect innovation? J Financ Econ 115(1):189–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Adeyeye AD, Jegede OO, Akinwale YO (2013) The impact of technology innovation and R&D on firms’ performance: an empirical analysis of Nigeria’s service sector. Int J Technol Learn Innov Dev 6(4):374–395

    Google Scholar 

  39. Oyelaran-Oyeyinka B (2006) Systems of innovation and underdevelopment: an institutional perspective. Sci Technol Soc 11(2):239–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Rajamani K, Jan NA, Subramani AK, Raj AN (2022) Access to finance: challenges faced by micro, small, and medium enterprises in India. Eng Econ 33(1):73–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Hubbard RG (1997) Capital-market imperfections and investment

    Book  Google Scholar 

  42. Hall BH, Lerner J (2010) The financing of R&D and innovation. In: Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, vol 1, North-Holland, pp 609–639

  43. Lee N, Sameen H, Cowling M (2015) Access to finance for innovative SMEs since the financial crisis. Res Policy 44(2):370–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Fombang MS, Adjasi CK (2018) Access to finance and firm innovation. J Financ Econ Policy 10(1):73–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Kaur P, Kaur N, Kanojia P (2022) Firm innovation and access to finance: firm-level evidence from India. J Financ Econ Policy 14(1):93–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Véganzonès-Varoudakis MA, Plane P (2019) Innovation, exports, productivity and investment climate; a study based on Indian manufacturing firm-level data. Appl Econ 51(41):4455–4476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Volchek D, Jantunen A, Saarenketo S (2013) The institutional environment for international entrepreneurship in Russia: reflections on growth decisions and performance in SMEs. J Int Entrep 11:320–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. North DC (1991) Institutions. J Econ Perspect 5(1):97–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. OECD. (2013). Agricultural innovation systems: a framework for analysing the role of the government.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  50. World Bank (2004) World development report 2005: a better investment climate for everyone. The World Bank

    Book  Google Scholar 

  51. Escribano A, Guasch JL, De Orte M, Pena J (2009) Investment climate assessment in Indonesia, Malaysia, The Philippines and Thailand: results from pooling firm-level data. Singap Econ Rev 54(03):335–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Basant R, Fikkert B (1996) The effects of R&D, foreign technology purchase, and domestic and international spillovers on productivity in Indian firms. Rev Econ Stat:187–199

  53. Siddharthan NS, Krishnan Narayanan (eds) (2016) Technology: Corporate and social dimensions. Springer

  54. Hasan R (2002) The impact of imported and domestic technologies on the productivity of firms: panel data evidence from Indian manufacturing firms. J Dev Econ 69(1):23–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Kumar N, Saqib M (1996) Firm size, opportunities for adaptation and in-house R & D activity in developing countries: the case of Indian manufacturing. Res Policy 25(5):713–722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Raut LK (1995) R & D spillover and productivity growth: evidence from Indian private firms. J Dev Econ 48(1):1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Sharma C (2012a) R&D and firm performance: evidence from the Indian pharmaceutical industry. J Asia Pac Econ 17(2):332–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Sharma C (2012b) R&D and firm performance: evidence from the Indian pharmaceutical industry. J Asia Pac Econ 17(2):332–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Sharma C, Mishra RK (2011) Does export and productivity growth linkage exist? Evidence from the Indian manufacturing industry. Int Rev Appl Econ 25(6):633–652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Seenaiah K, Rath BN (2018) Determinants of innovation in selected manufacturing firms in India: role of R&D and exports. Sci Technol Soc 23(1):65–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Kaur N, Kaur P (2021) What drives innovation in micro, small, and medium enterprises? J Public Aff 21(2):e2336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Narayanan K, Bhat S (2009) Technology sourcing and its determinants: a study of basic chemical industry in India. Technovation 29(8):562–573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Wang C, Kafouros MI (2009) What factors determine innovation performance in emerging economies? Evidence from China. Int Bus Rev 18(6):606–616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Yang CH, Chen YH (2012) R&D, productivity, and exports: plant-level evidence from Indonesia. Econ Model 29(2):208–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. De Waldemar FS (2012) New products and corruption: evidence from Indian firms. Dev Econ 50(3):268–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Dutta N, Kar S, Beladi H (2022) Innovation and perceived corruption: a firm-level analysis for India. Bus Polit 24(2):151–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Mohammad S, Husted BW (2021) Innovation, new ventures, and corruption: evidence from India. J Bus Ventur Insights 16:e00256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Allcott H, Collard-Wexler A, O’Connell SD (2016) How do electricity shortages affect industry? Evidence from India. Am Econ Rev 106(3):587–624

    Google Scholar 

  69. Shekar KC (2021) Role of informal sector competition on innovation in urban formal manufacturing enterprises in India. Asian J Innov Pol 10(1):1–38

    Google Scholar 

  70. Schumpeter J (1934) The theory of economic development. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

  71. Bhandari DR, Subedi DP (2024) Determinants of investment decisions of mutual fund in Nepal. Res CAB: A J Res Dev 3(1):76–95 https://doi.org/10.1007/s43069-024-00381-1

  72. North D (1990) Institutions and their consequences for economic performance. The limits of rationality 383–401

  73. Benzecri JP (1973) Data analysis: The correspondence analysis

    Google Scholar 

  74. Booysen F, Van Der Berg S, Burger R, Von Maltitz M, Du Rand G (2008) Using an asset index to assess trends in poverty in seven Sub-Saharan African countries. World Dev 36(6):1113–1130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Van Kerm P (1998) Simple and multiple correspondence analysis in Stata. Stata Tech Bull 7(42)

  76. Khandker SR, Samad HA, Ali R, Barnes DF (2012) Who benefits most from rural electrification? Evidence in India. Evidence in India (June 1, 2012). World Bank Policy Research Working Paper (6095)

  77. Stock J, Yogo M (2005) Asymptotic distributions of instrumental variables statistics with many instruments. Identification and inference for econometric models: Essays in honor of Thomas Rothenberg 6:109–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Cragg JG, Donald SG (1993) Testing identifiability and specification in instrumental variable models. Econometric Theory 9(2):222–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Janzen SA, Carter MR (2013) The impact of microinsurance on asset accumulation and human capital investments: Evidence from a drought in Kenya. ILO Microinsurance Innovation Facility

  80. Oudgou M (2021) Financial and non-financial obstacles to innovation: empirical evidence at the firm level in the MENA region. J Open Innov: Technol Mark Complex 7(1):28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Aidoo AW (2019) The impact of access to credit on process innovation. Herit Sustain Dev 1(2):48–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Detthamrong U, Chansanam W (2023) Do the trade credit influence firm performance in agro-industry? Evidence from Thailand. Heliyon 9(3)

  83. Fakih A, Ghazalian P, Ghazzawi N (2020) The effects of power outages on the performance of manufacturing firms in the MENA region. Rev Middle East Econ Financ 16(3)

  84. Nguyen TN (2020) The effect of bribery on firm innovation: an analysis of small and medium firms in Vietnam. J Asian Financ Econ Bus 7(5):259–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Błach J, Wieczorek-Kosmala M, Trzęsiok J (2020) Innovation in SMEs and financing mix. J Risk Financ Manag 13(9):206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Barasa L, Vermeulen P, Knoben J, Kinyanjui B, Kimuyu P (2018) Innovation inputs and efficiency: manufacturing firms in Sub-Saharan Africa. Eur J Innov Manag

  87. Gallego-Álvarez I, Segura L, Martínez-Ferrero J (2015) Carbon emission reduction: The impact on the financial and operational performance of international companies. J Clean Prod 103:149–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Lerner J (2009) The empirical impact of intellectual property rights on innovation: Puzzles and clues. Am Econ Rev 99(2):343–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Florida RL, Kenney M (1988) Venture capital-financed innovation and technological change in the USA. Res Policy 17(3):119–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Bruton G, Ahlstrom D, Yeh KS (2004) Understanding venture capital in East Asia: The impact of institutions on the industry today and tomorrow. J World Bus 39(1):72–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Code Availability

Not applicable

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

RG: data collection, methodology, software, analyzing results. BPS: conceptualization, supervision, writing—review and editing

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bhanu Pratap Singh.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

Not applicable

Consent to Participate

Not applicable

Consent for Publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Appendix

Appendix

Tables 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12 represent post-estimation tests with the 2SLS-IV models

Table 6 First-stage regression test—overdraft facility
Table 7 First-stage regression test—trade credit
Table 8 First-stage regression test—fixed asset
Table 9 First-stage regression test—informal competition
Table 10 First-stage regression test—power outage
Table 11 First-stage regression test—capacity utilization
Table 12 First-stage regression test—bribe

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gupta, R., Singh, B.P. Does Access to Finance and Investment Climate Enhance Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) Innovation in India?. Oper. Res. Forum 5, 95 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43069-024-00381-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43069-024-00381-1

Keywords

Navigation