Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Positive Artificial Intelligence in Education (P-AIED): A Roadmap

  • ARTICLE
  • Published:
International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The unprecedented global movement of school education to find technological and intelligent solutions to keep the learning ecosystem working was not enough to recover the impacts of Covid-19, not only due to learning-related challenges but also due to the rise of negative emotions, such as frustration, anxiety, boredom, risk of burnout and the so-called “Covid fatigue”. Although this is not a new problem, it was deepened during the pandemic, and we need to face old and new challenges in different ways. Despite focusing only on the learning system’s inefficiencies and on the hegemony of solutions to tackle the learning gap, we also need to shed light on the strengths and the positive aspects of the learning process to promote wellbeing. As highlighted by John Self, an intelligent tutoring system would behave as if it genuinely cared about the student’s success. This note from John Self sheds light on the importance and reflection of what success means and for whom. This study presents a roadmap for positive psychology and artificial intelligence in education. It is intended to identify and understand how the intersection of Positive Psychology and Artificial Intelligence in Education can support the promotion of learning and wellbeing of students, teachers, and other educational stakeholders. As such, a bibliometric analysis of positive psychology and artificial intelligence in education was made as the so-called Positive Artificial Intelligence in Education (P-AIED). The search string was performed in 2021, and the total number of studies gathered was 10,777. After all the PRISMA steps, 256 studies were approved according to the inclusion criteria. The main conclusions were the high number of institutions and researchers with related publications indicate a new trend for the community of AIED; the high number of collaboration from different countries indicates a possible global movement toward P-AIED; Positive Emotion and Engagement were the main Positive Psychology constructs identified in the studies; the lack of well-grounded theories of Positive Psychology indicates an excellent research opportunity; Positive Learning Analytics (P-LA), Positive Educational Data Mining (P-EDM) and Positive Intelligent Tutoring Systems (P-ITS) are three hot topics for P-AIED.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Notes

  1. https://www.springer.com/journal/40593/aims-and-scope

References

*Systematic Mapping References

  • Albrecht, N. J., Albrecht, P. M., Cohen, M. (2012). Mindfully teaching in the classroom : a literature review. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 37(12), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2012v37n12.2

  • *Alzoubi, O., D’Mello, S., Calvo, R. (2012). Detecting naturalistic expressions of nonbasic affect using physiological signals. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 3(3), 298–310.https://doi.org/10.1109/T-AFFC.2012.4

  • Amaechi, U., Banerji, A., Wang, M. (2021). An Educational Calamity: Learning and Teaching During the Covid-19 Pandemic. Independently Published, URL https://books.google.com/books?id=Jn9bzgEACAAJ

  • *Andallaza, T., Rodrigo, M. (2013). Development of an affect-sensitive agent for aplusix. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 7926 LNAI, 575–578. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39112-5_62

  • Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Araka, E., Maina, E., Gitonga, R., Oboko, R. (2020). Research trends in measurement and intervention tools for self-regulated learning for e-learning environments—systematic review (2008–2018). RPTEL, 15(6).

  • *Ashoori, M., Miao, C., Cai, Y. (2007). Socializing pedagogical agents for personalization in virtual learning environments. Silicon Valley, CA, pp 346–349. https://doi.org/10.1109/WIIATW.2007.4427604

  • Bai, W., Cai, H., Liu, S., Chen, X., Sha, S., Cheung, T., Lin, J., Cui, X., Ng, C., YT, X. (2021). Anxiety and depressive symptoms in college students during the late stage of the covid-19 outbreak: a network approach. Translational Psychiatry, 11, 638.

  • *Balducci, F., Grana, C. (2017). Affective classification of gaming activities coming from rpg gaming sessions. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 10345 LNCS, 93–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65849-0_11

  • *Balmaceda, J., Schiaffino, S., Andrés Díaz-Pace, J. (2014). Using constraint satisfaction to aid group formation in cscl. Inteligencia Artificial, 17(53 SPEC. ISS.), 35–45.

  • Benoit, V., Gabola, P. (2021). Effects of positive psychology interventions on the well-being of young children: Systematic literature review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(22), 12,065. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182212065

  • *Bian, C., Zhang, Y., Wang, D., Liang, Y., Wu, B., Lu, W. (2018). An academic emotion database and the baseline evaluation. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., pp 378–383. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCSE.2018.8468792

  • Brunzell, T., Stokes, H., Waters, L. (2016). Trauma-informed positive education: Using positive psychology to strengthen vulnerable students. Contemporary School Psychology, 20.

  • *Cabada, R., Estrada, M., Bustillos, R. (2018). Mining of educational opinions with deep learning. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 24(11), 1604–1626.

  • *Challco, G., Bittencourt, I., Isotani, S. (2020). Can ontologies support the gamification of scripted collaborative learning sessions? Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 12163 LNAI, 79–91.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52237-7_7

  • Chen, L., Babar, M. A., Zhang, H. (2010a). Towards an evidence-based understanding of electronic data sources. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering, British Computer Society, Swinton, UK, EASE’10, pp 135–138.

  • *Chen, P. S., Lambert, A., Guidry, K. (2010b). Engaging online learners: The impact of web-based learning technology on college student engagement. Computers and Education, 54(4), 1222–1232.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.11.008

  • *Chen, C. M., Wang, J. Y., Yu, C. M. (2017a). Assessing the attention levels of students by using a novel attention aware system based on brainwave signals. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(2), 348–369.https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12359

  • *Choi, E., Sienkiewicz, T., Coleman, C., Wojcik, K. (2017). Investigating an intervention system to increase user engagements on an educational social q & a. Association for Computing Machinery, Inc, pp 561–566. https://doi.org/10.1145/3078072.3084325

  • Compton, W., Hoffman, E. (2019). Positive Psychology: The Science of Happiness and Flourishing. SAGE Publications, URL https://books.google.com/books?id=5hN7DwAAQBAJ

  • Crisp R. (2021). Well-being. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2021 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2021/entries/well-being/

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2001). Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. Book-of-th-Month-Club, URL https://books.google.com/books?id=I6kQAQAAIAAJ

  • *Dawood, A., Turner, S., Perepa, P. (2018). Affective computational model to extract natural affective states of students with asperger syndrome (as) in computer-based learning environment. IEEE Access, 6, 67,026–67,034. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2879619

  • Dermeval, D., Paiva, R., Bittencourt, I. I., Vassileva, J., & Borges, D. (2017). Authoring tools for designing intelligent tutoring systems: A systematic review of the literature. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 28(3), 336–384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-017-0157-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ding, W., Liang, P., Tang, A., & van Vliet, H. (2014). Knowledge-based approaches in software documentation: A systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology, 56(6), 545–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *D’Mello, S., Person, N., Lehman, B. (2009). Antecedent-consequent relationships and cyclical patterns between affective states and problem solving outcomes. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, 200(1), 57–64.https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-60750-028-5-57

  • *DMello, S., Graesser, A. (2012). Autotutor and affective autotutor: Learning by talking with cognitively and emotionally intelligent computers that talk back. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems, 2(4). https://doi.org/10.1145/2395123.2395128

  • *Dol, S., Singh, V., Sahu, N., Shalinie, M. (2018). Designing fdp for "active learning-think-pair-share and peer instructions" using online learning management system moodle. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., pp 190–193. https://doi.org/10.1109/T4E.2018.00049

  • Donaldson, S. I., Lee, J. Y., & Donaldson, S. I. (2019). Evaluating positive psychology interventions at work: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Applied Positive Psychology, 4, 113–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41042-019-00021-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • dos Santos, W. O., Bittencourt, I. I., Dermeval, D., Isotani, S., Marques, L. B., Silveira, I. F. (2018a) Flow theory to promote learning in educational systems: Is it really relevant? Revista Brasileira de Informática na Educação – RBIE, 26(2), 29–59. https://doi.org/10.5753/RBIE.2018.26.02.29

  • dos Santos, W. O., Bittencourt, I. I., Isotani, S., Dermeval, D., Marques, L. B., Silveira, I. F. (2018b) Flow theory to promote learning in educational systems: Is it really relevant? Revista Brasileira de Informática na Educação, 26(02), 29. https://doi.org/10.5753/rbie.2018.26.02.29

  • Du Boulay, B., Avramides, K., Luckin, R., Martnez-Mirón, E., Méndez, G. R., & Carr, A. (2010). Towards systems that care: A conceptual framework based on motivation, metacognition and affect. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 20(3), 197–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duckworth, A. L., Peterson, C., Matthews, M. D., & Kelly, D. R. (2007). Grit: Perseverance and passion for long-term goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(6), 1087–1101. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.1087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Dumdumaya, C. (2018). Modeling student persistence in a learning-by-teaching environment. Association for Computing Machinery, Inc, pp 349–352. https://doi.org/10.1145/3209219.3213596

  • Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95(2), 256–273. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.95.2.256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Emerson, A., Cloude, E., Azevedo, R., Lester. J. (2020a). Multimodal learning analytics for game-based learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(5), 1505–1526.https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12992

  • *Emerson, A., Henderson, N., Rowe, J., Min, W., Lee, S., Minogue, J., Lester, J. (2020b). Early prediction of visitor engagement in science museums with multimodal learning analytics. Association for Computing Machinery, Inc, pp 107–116. https://doi.org/10.1145/3382507.3418890

  • Felder, R. M., & Silverman, L. K. (1988). Learning and teaching styles in engineering education. Engineering Education, 78(7), 674–681.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Feng, X., Wei, Y., Pan, X., Qiu, L., Ma, Y. (2020). Academic emotion classification and recognition method for large-scale online learning environment—based on a-cnn and lstm-att deep learning pipeline method. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17061941

  • Fredrickson, B. L. (2004). The broaden–and–build theory of positive emotions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series b: Biological Sciences, 359(1449), 1367–1377. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2004.1512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, M. W., Lopez, S. J., & Preacher, K. J. (2009). The hierarchical structure of well-being. Journal of Personality, 77(4), 1025–1050. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2009.00573.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Gao, L., Zhao, Z., Qi, L., Liang, Y., Du, J. (2019). Modeling the effort and learning ability of students in moocs. IEEE Access, 7, 128,035–128,042. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2937985

  • *Halawa, M., Shehab, M., Hamed, E. (2015). Predicting student personality based on a data-driven model from student behavior on lms and social networks. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., pp 294–299. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDIPC.2015.7323044

  • *Hallifax, S., Lavoué, E., Serna, A. (2020). To tailor or not to tailor gamification? an analysis of the impact of tailored game elements on learners’ behaviours and motivation. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 12163 LNAI, 216–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52237-7_18

  • *Harsley, R., Fossati, D., Di Eugenio, B., Green, N. (2017), Interactions of individual and pair programmers with an intelligent tutoring system for computer science. Association for Computing Machinery, pp 285–290. https://doi.org/10.1145/3017680.3017786

  • Harzer, C. (2016). The eudaimonics of human strengths: The relations between character strengths and well-being. In Handbook of Eudaimonic Well-Being. Springer International Publishing, pp 307–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42445-3_20

  • Hernandes, E. M., Zamboni, A., Fabbri, S., Thommazo, A. D. (2012). Using gqm and tam to evaluate start - a tool that supports systematic review. CLEI Electronic Journal, 15(1).

  • *Hew, K., Hu, X., Qiao, C., Tang, Y. (2020). What predicts student satisfaction with moocs: A gradient boosting trees supervised machine learning and sentiment analysis approach. Computers and Education, 145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103724

  • *Jang, J., Park, J., Yi, M. (2015). Gamification of online learning. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 9112, 646–649.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19773-9_82

  • Jensen, B., Hunter, A., Sonnemann, J., Burns, T., Molyneux, K., Silcox, B. (2012). Catching Up: Learning from the Best School Systems in East Asia. Summary Report. Grattan Institute report, Grattan Institute. URL https://books.google.com/books?id=nGDNnQEACAAJ

  • Jithendran, A., Pranav Karthik, P., Santhosh, S., & Naren, J. (2020). Emotion recognition on e-learning community to improve the learning outcomes using machine learning concepts: A pilot study. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, 141, 521–530. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8406-6_50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jogo, D. A., Chalco, G., Bittencourt, I. I., Reis, M., Laíza, R., Isotani, S. (2022). Investigating how gamified syllabic literacy impacts learning, flow and inappropriate behaviors: A single-subject study design. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 33.

  • Kay, J., & McCalla, G. I. (2003). The careful double vision of self. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 13(1), 11–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keele, S., et al. (2007) Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. Tech. rep., Technical report, ver. 2.3 ebse technical report. Ebse.

  • Kern, M. L., & Wehmeyer, M. L. (2021). The Palgrave Handbook of Positive Education. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64537-3

  • *Kirsal Ever, Y., Dimililer, K. (2018). The effectiveness of a new classification system in higher education as a new e-learning tool. Quality and Quantity, 52, 573–582.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0636-y

  • Kitchenham, B., Charters, S. (2007a). Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. Tech. Rep. EBSE 2007a–001, Keele University and Durham University Joint Report.

  • *Kizilcec, R., Goldfarb, D. (2019). Growth mindset predicts student achievement and behavior in mobile learning. Association for Computing Machinery, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1145/3330430.3333632

  • *Lins Rodrigues, R., Luis Cavalcanti Ramos, J., Carlos Sedraz Silva, J., Sandro Gomes, A. (2016). Discovery engagement patterns moocs through cluster analysis. IEEE Latin America Transactions, 14(9), 4129–4135.https://doi.org/10.1109/TLA.2016.7785943

  • *Liu, B., Xing, W., Zeng, Y., Wu, Y. (2021). Quantifying the influence of achievement emotions for student learning in moocs. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59(3), 429–452.https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633120967318

  • Mahdavi-Hezavehi, S., Galster, M., Avgeriou, P. (2013). Variability in quality attributes of service-based software systems: A systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology, 55(2), 320–343. special Section: Component-Based Software Engineering (CBSE), 2011.

  • *Mandalapu, V., Gong, J. (2018). Towards better affect detectors: Detecting changes rather than states. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 10948 LNAI, 199–203. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93846-2_36

  • *Martens, T., Niemann, M., Dick, U. (2020). Sensor measures of affective leaning. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00379

  • *Mian, S., Goswami, M., Mostow, J. (2019). What’s most broken? design and evaluation of a tool to guide improvement of an intelligent tutor. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 11625 LNAI, 283–295. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23204-7_24

  • *Morales, M., De La Roca, M., Barchino, R., Hernandez, R., Amado-Salvatierra, H. (2019). Applying a digital learning ecosystem to increase the effectiveness of a massive open online course. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., pp 69–74. https://doi.org/10.1109/LWMOOCS47620.2019.8939636

  • Morgan, B., Simmons, L. (2021). A ‘PERMA’ response to the pandemic: An online positive education programme to promote wellbeing in university students. Frontiers in Education, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.642632

  • *Nam, S., Frishkoff, G., Collins-Thompson, K. (2018). Predicting students’ disengaged behaviors in an online meaning-generation task. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 11(3), 362–375.https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2017.2720738

  • NEES. (2022). Sumarize - perform systematic literature reviews and meta-analyzes. URL https://sumarize.evidencias.nees.com.br/

  • *Nkambou, R. (2006). Managing student emotions in intelligent tutoring systems. Melbourne Beach, FL, vol 2006, pp 389–394.

  • Noble, T., Helen, M. (2015). Prosper: A new framework for positive education. Psychology of Well-Being, (2), 105,450. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13612-015-0030-2

  • *Nygren, E., Blignaut, A., Leendertz, V., Sutinen, E. (2019). Quantitizing affective data as project evaluation on the use of a mathematics mobile game and intelligent tutoring system. Informatics in Education, 18(2), 375–402.https://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2019.18

  • Oades, L. G., Mossman, L. (2017). The science of wellbeing and positive psychology. In Wellbeing, Recovery and Mental Health. Cambridge University Press, pp 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316339275.003

  • *Paquette, L., Baker, R., Sao Pedro, M., Gobert, J., Rossi, L., Nakama, A., Kauffman-Rogoff, Z. (2014). Sensor-free affect detection for a simulation-based science inquiry learning environment. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 8474 LNCS, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07221-0_1

  • Park, N., Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. (2004). Strengths of character and well-being. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23(5), 603–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Pastushenko, O., Oliveira, W., Isotani, S., Hruška, T. (2020). A methodology for multimodal learning analytics and flow experience identification within gamified assignments. Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3334480.3383060

  • *Ray, A., Chakrabarti, A. (2012). Design and implementation of affective e-learning strategy based on facial emotion recognition. Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing, 132 AISC, 613–622. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27443-5_71

  • Reimers, F. M. (2020). Audacious Education Purposes. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41882-3

  • Reimers, F. M. (2022). Primary and Secondary Education During Covid-19. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81500-4

  • Reimers, F. M., Amaechi, U., Banerji, A., Wang, M. (2022). Education in crisis. transforming schools for a post-covid-19 renaissance. In Education to Build Back Better. Springer International Publishing, pp 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93951-9_1

  • *Retnanto, A., Fadlelmula, M., Alyafei, N., Sheharyar, A. (2019). Active student engagement in learning - using virtual reality technology to develop professional skills for petroleum engineering education. Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), vol 2019-September. https://doi.org/10.2118/195922-ms

  • *Rongtao, D., Xinhao, J., Linting, Z., Wei, R. (2008). Study of the learning model based on improved id3 algorithm. Adelaide, pp 391–395. https://doi.org/10.1109/WKDD.2008.68

  • *Rowe. J., Shores, L., Mott, B., Lester, J. (2011). Integrating learning, problem solving, and engagement in narrative-centered learning environments. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 21(1-2), 115–133.https://doi.org/10.3233/JAI-2011-019

  • Ryan, R., Deci, E. (2017). Self-Determination Theory: Basic Psychological Needs in Motivation, Development, and Wellness. Guilford Publications, URL https://books.google.com/books?id=GF0ODQAAQBAJ

  • *Sanz-Martínez, L., Martínez-Monés, A., Bote-Lorenzo, M., Muñoz-Cristóbal, J., Dimitriadis, Y. (2017). Automatic group formation in a mooc based on students’ activity criteria. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 10474 LNCS, 179–193. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66610-5_14

  • *Sawyer, R., Rowe, J., Lester, J. (2017). Balancing learning and engagement in game-based learning environments with multi-objective reinforcement learning. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 10331 LNAI, 323–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61425-0_27

  • Schiavon, C. C., Teixeira, L. P., Gonçalves Gurgel, L., Magalhaes, C. R., Reppold, C. T. (2020). Positive education: Innovation in educational interventions based on positive psychology. School and Developmental Psychology, 36.

  • Schleicher, A. (2018). World Class. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264300002-en

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Schoor, C., Bannert, M. (2012). Exploring regulatory processes during a computer-supported collaborative learning task using process mining. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(4), 1321–1331.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.02.016

  • *Scotti, S., Mauri, M., Barbieri, R., Jawad, B., Cerutti, S., Mainardi, L., Brown, E., Villamira, M. (2006). Automatic quantitative evaluation of emotions in e-learning applications. New York, NY, pp 1359–1362. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMBS.2006.260601

  • Seligman, M. (2018). PERMA and the building blocks of well-being. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 13(4), 333–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2018.1437466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, M., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55(1), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, M. E. P. (1998). Building human strength: Psychologys forgotten mission.https://doi.org/10.1037/e529932010-003

  • Seligman, M. E. P., Ernst, R. M., Gillham, J., Reivich, K., & Linkins, M. (2009). Positive education: Positive psychology and classroom interventions. Oxford Review of Education, 35(3), 293–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054980902934563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Semerci, Y., Goularas, D. (2021). Evaluation of students’ flow state in an e-learning environment through activity and performance using deep learning techniques. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59(5), 960–987.https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633120979836

  • *Sharma, K., Giannakos, M., Dillenbourg, P. (2020). Eye-tracking and artificial intelligence to enhance motivation and learning. Smart Learning Environments, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-020-00122-x

  • Shute, V. J., Psotka, J. (1994). Intelligent tutoring systems: Past, present, and future. Tech. rep., DTIC Document.

  • Sleeman, D., & Brown, J. S. (1982). Intelligent tutoring systems. Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, C., Lopez, S. (2001). Handbook of Positive Psychology. Oxford University Press, URL https://books.google.com/books?id=2Cr5rP8jOnsC

  • Snyder, C., Lopez, S., Pedrotti, J. (2010). Positive Psychology: The Scientific and Practical Explorations of Human Strengths. SAGE Publications, URL https://books.google.com/books?id=T3aW7gWMgpQC

  • Snyder, C. R. (2002). TARGET ARTICLE: Hope theory: Rainbows in the mind. Psychological Inquiry, 13(4), 249–275. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli1304_01

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sottilare, R., Graesser, A., Hu, X., Holden, H. (2013). Design Recommendations for Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Army Research Laboratory.

  • Sottilare, R., Graesser, A., Hu, X., Brawner, K. (2015). Design Recommendations for Intelligent Tutoring Systems: Authoring Tools and Expert Modeling Techniques. Robert Sottilare.

  • Sparks, J. R., Lehman, B., Zapata-Rivera, D. (2022). ‘caring’ assessments: An approach to support personalized learning. URL https://news.ets.org/stories/caring-assessments-an-approach-to-support-personalized-learnin

  • Stefanovic, D., Havzi, S., Nikolic, D., Dakic, D., Lolic, T. (2021). Analysis of the tools to support systematic literature review in software engineering. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 1163(1), 012,013. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/1163/1/012013

  • *Sultana, J., Sultana, N., Yadav, K., Alfayez, F. (2018). Prediction of sentiment analysis on educational data based on deep learning approach. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.. https://doi.org/10.1109/NCG.2018.8593108

  • *Sun, J. Y., Yu, S. J., Chao, C. H. (2019). Effects of intelligent feedback on online learners’ engagement and cognitive load: the case of research ethics education. Educational Psychology, 39(10), 1293–1310.https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2018.1527291

  • *Tao, Y., Coltey, E., Wang, T., Alonso, M., Shyu, M. L., Chen, S. C., Alhaffar, H., Elias, A., Bogosian, B., Vassigh, S. (2020b). Confidence estimation using machine learning in immersive learning environments. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., pp 247–252. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIPR49039.2020.00058

  • *Tegos, S., Demetriadis, S., Karakostas, A. (2014). Leveraging conversational agents and concept maps to scaffold students’ productive talk. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., pp 176–183. https://doi.org/10.1109/INCoS.2014.66

  • *Teo, H. (2014). Social motif analytics: Network building blocks for assessing participation in an online engineering community. American Society for Engineering Education.

  • *Ting, L. Y., Teng, S. Y., Chuang, K. T., Lim, E. P. (2020). Learning personal conscientiousness from footprints in e-learning systems. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., vol 2020-November, pp 1292–1297. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDM50108.2020.00166

  • *Upadhyay, H., Kamat, Y., Phansekar, S., Hole, V. (2021). User engagement recognition using transfer learning and multi-task classification. Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies, 57, 411–420.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-9509-7_34

  • *Valdez, M., Merelo, J. J., Aguila, A., Soto, A. (2019). Mining of keystroke and mouse dynamics to increase the engagement of students with programming assignments. Studies in Computational Intelligence, 829, 41–61.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16469-0_3

  • *Walkington, C., Bernacki, M. (2019). Personalizing algebra to students’ individual interests in an intelligent tutoring system: Moderators of impact. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 29(1), 58–88.https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-018-0168-1

  • *Wang, Y., Kotha, A., Hong, P. H., Qiu, M. (2020). Automated student engagement monitoring and evaluation during learning in the wild. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., pp 270–275. https://doi.org/10.1109/CSCloud-EdgeCom49738.2020.00054

  • Waters, L. (2012). A review of school-based positive psychology interventions. The Educational and Developmental Psychologist, 28(2), 75–90. https://doi.org/10.1375/aedp.28.2.75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waters, L., Loton, D. (2019). Search: A meta-framework and review of the field of positive education. International Journal of Applied Positive Psychology, 4.

  • *Wen, M., Yang, D., Rosé, C. (2014). Linguistic reflections of student engagement in massive open online courses. The AAAI Press, pp 525–534.

  • *Whitehill, J., Serpell, Z., Foster, A., Lin, Y. C., Pearson, B., Bartlett, M., Movellan, J. (2011). Towards an optimal affect-sensitive instructional system of cognitive skills (pp 20–25). IEEE Computer Society. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPRW.2011.5981778

  • Williams, N., Horrell, L., Edmiston, D., Brady, M. (2018). The impact of positive psychology on higher education. The William & Mary Educational Review, 5(1).

  • Wohlin, C., Runeson, P., Höst, M., Ohlsson, M. C., Regnell, B., Wesslén, A. (2012). Experimentation in software engineering. Springer Science and Business Media.

  • World Development Report 2018: Learning to Realize Educations Promise. (2017). World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1096-1

  • *Woolf, B., Dragon, T., Arroyo, I., Cooper, D., Burleson, W., Muldner, K. (2009). Recognizing and responding to student affect. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 5612 LNCS(PART 3), 713–722. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02580-8_78

  • Yadegaridehkordi, E., Noor, N. F. B. M., Ayub, M. N. B., Affal, H. B., Hussin, N. B. (2019). Affective computing in education: A systematic review and future research. Computers & Education, 142, 103,649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103649, URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360131519302027

  • *Yan, J., Li, L., Yin, J., Nie, Y. (2018). A comparison of flipped and traditional classroom learning: A case study in mechanical engineering. International Journal of Engineering Education, 34(6), 1876–1887.

  • *Yuan, Y. (2021). Vocational students’ academic self-efficacy improvement based on generative pad teaching mode. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 1283, 593–600.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62746-1_87

  • Zapata-Rivera, D. (2017). Toward caring assessment systems. In: Adjunct Publication of the 25th Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization, pp 97–100.

  • Zapata-Rivera, D., Forsyth, C. M. (2022). Learner modeling in conversation-based assessment. In: Adaptive Instructional Systems, Springer International Publishing, pp 73–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05887-5_6

  • Zapata-Rivera, D., Lehman, B., Sparks, J. R. (2020). Learner modeling in the context of caring assessments. In: Adaptive Instructional Systems, Springer International Publishing, pp 422–431. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50788-6_31

  • *Zhang, X., Meng, Y., Ordóñez de Pablos, P., Sun, Y. (2019). Learning analytics in collaborative learning supported by slack: From the perspective of engagement. Computers in Human Behavior, 92, 625–633.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.08.012

  • Zhang, T., Park, D., Ungar, L. H., Tsukayama, E., Luo, L., & Duckworth, A. L. (2022). The development of grit and growth mindset in chinese children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 221(105), 450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2022.105450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Zhu, B., Lan, X., Guo, X., Barner, K., Boncelet, C. (2020). Multi-rate attention based gru model for engagement prediction. Association for Computing Machinery, Inc, pp 841–848. https://doi.org/10.1145/3382507.3417965

  • *Zou, W., Hu, X., Pan, Z., Li, C., Cai, Y., Liu, M. (2021). Exploring the relationship between social presence and learners’ prestige in mooc discussion forums using automated content analysis and social network analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106582

Further Reading

  • *Abdi, S., Khosravi, H., Sadiq, S., Gasevic, D. (2020). Complementing educational recommender systems with open learner models. Association for Computing Machinery, 360–365. https://doi.org/10.1145/3375462.3375520

  • Achimugu, P., Selamat, A., Ibrahim, R., & Mahrin, M. N. (2014). A systematic literature review of software requirements prioritization research. Information and Software Technology, 56(6), 568–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adler, A. (2016). Teaching well-being increases academic performance: Evidence from Bhutan, Mexico, and Peru. PhD dissertation, Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania.

  • *Aji, C., Javed Khan, M., Tameru, A. (2020). Innovative learning strategies to engage students cognitively. American Society for Engineering Education, 2020-June.

  • *Al-Shabandar, R., Hussain, A., Liatsis, P., Keight, R. (2018). Analyzing learners behavior in moocs: An examination of performance and motivation using a data-driven approach. IEEE Access, 6:73, 669–73,685. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2876755

  • *Al-Tameemi, G., Xue, J. (2019). Towards an intelligent system to improve student engagement and retention. Elsevier B.V., vol 151, pp 1120–1127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.04.159

  • *Al-Tarabily, M., Abdel-Kader, R., Abdel Azeem, G., Marie, M. (2018). Optimizing dynamic multi-agent performance in e-learning environment. IEEE Access, 6, 35,631–35,645. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2847334

  • Aleven, V., Mclaren, B. M., Sewall, J., & Koedinger, K. R. (2009). A new paradigm for intelligent tutoring systems: Example-tracing tutors. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 19(2), 105–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Antonaci, A., Klemke, R., Stracke, C., Specht, M. (2017). Towards implementing gamification in moocs. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 10653 LNCS, 115–125. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71940-5_11

  • *Antoniou, P., Arfaras, G., Pandria, N., Athanasiou, A., Ntakakis, G., Babatsikos, E., Nigdelis, V., Bamidis, P. (2020). Biosensor real-time affective analytics in virtual and mixed reality medical education serious games: Cohort study. JMIR Serious Games, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.2196/17823

  • *Arroyo, I., Wixon, N., Allessio, D., Woolf, B., Muldner, K., Burleson, W. (2017). Collaboration improves student interest in online tutoring. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 10331 LNAI, 28–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61425-0_3

  • *Ashwin, T., Guddeti, R. (2019). Unobtrusive behavioral analysis of students in classroom environment using non-verbal cues. IEEE Access, 7, 150,693–150,709. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2947519

  • *Aslan, S., Alyuz, N., Tanriover, C., Mete, S., Okur, E., D’Mello, S., Esme, A. (2019). Investigating the impact of a real-time, multimodal student engagement analytics technology in authentic classrooms. Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300534

  • Baker, R. S. (2016). Stupid tutoring systems, intelligent humans. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26(2), 600–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Beal, C., Qu, L., Lee, H. (2006). Classifying learner engagement through integration of multiple data sources. Boston, MA, vol 1, pp 151–157.

  • Beck, J., Stern, M., & Haugsjaa, E. (1996). Applications of ai in education. Crossroads, 3(1), 11–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Bendou, A., Abrache, M. A., Cherkaoui, C. (2018). Contribution of pedagogical agents to motivate learners in online learning environments: The case of the paole agent. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 37, 344–356.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74500-8_32

  • *Bhattacharya, S., Chowdhury, S., Roy, S. (2017). Enhancing quality of learning experience through intelligent agent in e-learning. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowlege-Based Systems, 25(1), 31–52.https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218488517500027

  • Bian, H. X. (2016). Application of virtual reality in music teaching system. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 11(11), 21–25. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v11i11.6247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Binh, H., Trung, N., Nguyen, H. A., Duy, B. (2019). Detecting student engagement in classrooms for intelligent tutoring systems. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., pp 145–149. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSEC47112.2019.8974739

  • *Boff, E., Reategui, E. (2012). Mining social-affective data to recommend student tutors. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 7637 LNAI, 672–681. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34654-5_68

  • *Bosch, N., D’Mello, S., Mills, C. (2013). What emotions do novices experience during their first computer programming learning session? Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 7926 LNAI, 11–20.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39112-5_2

  • *Boticario, J., Santos, O., Cabestrero, R., Quirós, P., Salmerón-Majadas, S., Uria-Rivas, R., Saneiro, M., Arevalillo-Herráez, M., Ferri, F. (2017). Big-aff: Exploring low cost and low intrusive infrastructures for affective computing in secondary schools. Association for Computing Machinery, Inc, pp 287–292. https://doi.org/10.1145/3099023.3099084

  • *Bouchet, F., Harley, J., Azevedo, R. (2013). Impact of different pedagogical agents’ adaptive self-regulated prompting strategies on learning with metatutor. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 7926 LNAI, 815–819. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39112-5_120

  • *Brown, L., Howard, A. (2014a). Assessment of engagement for intelligent educational agents: A pilot study with middle school students. Computers in Education Journal, 5(4), 96–106.

  • *Brown, L., Howard, A. (2014b). A real- time model to assess student engagement during interaction with intelligent educational agents. American Society for Engineering Education.

  • *Burga, R., Leblanc, J., Rezania, D. (2017). Analysing the effects of teaching approach on engagement, satisfaction and future time perspective among students in a course on csr. International Journal of Management Education, 15(2), 306–317.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2017.02.003

  • *Cabestrero, R., Quirós, P., Santos, O., Salmeron-Majadas, S., Uria-Rivas, R., Boticario, J., Arnau, D., Arevalillo-Herráez, M., Ferri, F. (2018). Some insights into the impact of affective information when delivering feedback to students. Behaviour and Information Technology, 37(12), 1252–1263.https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2018.1499803

  • *Camacho, V., Guia, E., Olivares, T., Julia Flores, M., Orozco-Barbosa, L. (2020). Data capture and multimodal learning analytics focused on engagement with a new wearable iot approach. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 13(4), 704–717.https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2020.2999787

  • Carney, S. (2022). Reimagining our futures together: a new social contract for education. Comparative Education, 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2022.2102326

  • *Cassano, F., Piccinno, A., Roselli, T., Rossano, V. (2019). Gamification and learning analytics to improve engagement in university courses. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing , 04, 156–163.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98872-6_19

  • *Castillo, L. (2016). A virtual laboratory for multiagent systems: Joining efficacy, learning analytics and student satisfaction. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.. https://doi.org/10.1109/SIIE.2016.7751820

  • *Challco, G., Mizoguchi, R., Bittencourt, I., Isotani, S. (2015). Steps towards the gamification of collaborative learning scenarios supported by ontologies. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 9112, 554–557.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19773-9_60

  • *Chaouachi, M., Jraidi, I., Frasson, C, (2015). Mentor: A physiologically controlled tutoring system. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 9146, 56–67.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20267-9_5

  • *Chen, Z. H. (2012). We care about you: Incorporating pet characteristics with educational agents through reciprocal caring approach. Computers and Education, 59(4), 1081–1088. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.05.015

  • *Chen, G. S., Lee, M. F. (2012). Detecting emotion model in e-learning system. Xian, Shaanxi, vol 5, pp 1686–1691.https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMLC.2012.6359628

  • *Chen, H., Dai, Y., Feng, Y., Jiang, B., Xiao, J., You, B. (2017b). Construction of affective education in mobile learning: The study based on learner’s interest and emotion recognition. Computer Science and Information Systems, 14(3), 685–702.https://doi.org/10.2298/CSIS170110023C

  • *Chen, G., Lang, D., Ferreira, R., Gasevic, D. (2019a). Predictors of student satisfaction: A large-scale study of human-human online tutorial dialogues. International Educational Data Mining Society, pp 19–28.

  • *Chen, M. R., Hwang, G. J., Chang, Y. Y. (2019b). A reflective thinking-promoting approach to enhancing graduate students’ flipped learning engagement, participation behaviors, reflective thinking and project learning outcomes. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(5), 2288–2307.https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12823

  • *Cocea, M., Weibelzahl, S. (2007). Cross-system validation of engagement prediction from log files. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 4753 LNCS, 14–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75195-3_2

  • *Cocea, M., Weibelzahl, S. (2009). Log file analysis for disengagement detection in e-learning environments. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 19(4), 341–385.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11257-009-9065-5

  • *Conradie, P. (2013). Applying system theory to develop a mobile learning pedagogical framework. Academic Conferences Limited, pp 82–90.

  • *Crown, S., Fuentes, A., Jones, R., Nambiar, R., Crown, D. (2011). Anne g. neering: Interactive chatbot to engage and motivate engineering students. Computers in Education Journal, 21(2), 24–34.

  • *Daghestani, L., Ibrahim, L., Al-Towirgi, R., Salman, H. (2020) Adapting gamified learning systems using educational data mining techniques. Computer Applications in Engineering Education 28(3):568–589https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22227

  • *Debnath, B., Deb, S., Kumari, P. (2020). Mobile supported interaction modeling to find engagement of acolyte in live classroom. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 1192 CCIS, 74–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3666-3_7

  • Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M. (2006). Hedonia, eudaimonia, and well-being: an introduction. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9(1), 1–11.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-006-9018-1

  • *DeFalco, J., Baker, R. (2013). Detection and transition analysis of engagement and affect in a simulation-based combat medic training environment. CEUR-WS, vol 1009, pp 88–94.

  • *Dempsey, K., Jackson, G., Brunelle, J., Rowe, M., McNamara, D. (2010). Miboard: A digital game from a physical world. Daytona Beach, FL, pp 498–503.

  • Dermeval, D., Vilela, J., Bittencourt, II, Castro, J., Isotani, S., Brito, P., Silva, A. (2015). Applications of ontologies in requirements engineering: a systematic review of the literature. Requirements Engineering, 1–33.

  • *De Silva, P., Madurapperuma, A., Marasinghe, A., Osano, M. (2006). Integrating animated pedagogical agent as motivational supporter into interactive system. IEEE Computer Society, vol 2006, pp 34–41.https://doi.org/10.1109/CRV.2006.43

  • *Dewan, M., Lin, F., Wen, D., Murshed, M., Uddin, Z. (2018). A deep learning approach to detecting engagement of online learners. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., pp 1895–1902. https://doi.org/10.1109/SmartWorld.2018.00318

  • *D’Mello, S., Graesser, A. (2011). The half-life of cognitive-affective states during complex learning. Cognition and Emotion, 25(7), 1299–1308.https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2011.613668

  • *Duffy, M., Azevedo, R. (2015). Motivation matters: Interactions between achievement goals and agent scaffolding for self-regulated learning within an intelligent tutoring system. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 338–348.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.05.041

  • du Boulay, B. (2016). Recent meta-reviews and meta–analyses of aied systems. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26(1), 536–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyba, T., Dingsøyr, T. (2008). Empirical studies of agile software development: A systematic review. Information and Software Technology, 50(9-10), 833 – 859.

  • Easterbrook, S., Singer, J., Storey, M. A., Damian, D. (2008). Selecting empirical methods for software engineering research. In: Shull, F., Singer, J., Sjøberg, D. (Eds.) Guide to Advanced Empirical Software Engineering. Springer. pp 285–311.

  • *Elia, G., Solazzo, G., Lorenzo, G., Passiante, G. (2019). Assessing learners’ satisfaction in collaborative online courses through a big data approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 92, 589–599.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.04.033

  • *Elizabeth Owen, V., Roy, M. H., Thai, K., Burnett, V., Jacobs, D., Keylor, E., Baker, R. (2019). Detecting wheel-spinning and productive persistence in educational games. International Educational Data Mining Society, pp 378–383.

  • *Farrell, B., Jennings, B., Ward, N., Marks, P., Kennie, N., Dolovich, L., Jorgenson, D., Jones, C., Gubbels, A. (2013). Evaluation of a pilot e-learning primary health care skills training program for pharmacists. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 5(6), 580–592.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2013.07.005

  • *Farzaneh, A., Kim, Y., Zhou, M., Qi, X. (2019). Developing a deep learning-based affect recognition system for young children. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 11626 LNAI, 73–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23207-8_14

  • *Fatahi, S., Moradi, H., Zonoz, A. (2015). A computational model to determine desirability of events based on personality for performance motivational orientation learners. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 9192, 227–237.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20609-7_22

  • *Fatahi, S. (2016). A computational model of emotion and personality in e-learning environments. CEUR-WS, vol 1618.

  • Fatahi, S., & Moradi, H. (2016). A fuzzy cognitive map model to calculate a user’s desirability based on personality in e-learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 272–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Feidakis, M., Kasnesis, P., Giatraki, E., Giannousis, C., Patrikakis, C., Monachelis, P. (2019). Building pedagogical conversational agents, affectively correct. SciTePress, vol 1, pp 100–107.https://doi.org/10.5220/0007771001000107

  • *Fu, S., Gu, H., Yang, B. (2020). The affordances of ai-enabled automatic scoring applications on learners’ continuous learning intention: An empirical study in china. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(5), 1674–1692.https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12995

  • Gale, C. R., Booth, T., Mõttus, R., Kuh, D., & Deary, I. J. (2013). Neuroticism and extraversion in youth predict mental wellbeing and life satisfaction 40 years later. Journal of Research in Personality, 47(6), 687–697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2013.06.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *García, Iruela M., Fonseca, M., Hijón Neira, R., Chambel, T. (2019). Analysis of gamification elements. a case study in a computer science course. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 11626 LNAI, 89–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23207-8_17

  • Garg, A. X., Hackam, D., & Tonelli, M. (2008). Systematic review and meta-analysis: When one study is just not enough. Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 3(1), 253–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Ghali, R., Chaouachi, M., Derbali, L., Frasson, C. (2014). Motivational strategies to support engagement of learners in serious games. SciTePress, vol 1, pp 518–525.https://doi.org/10.5220/0004823305180525

  • *Ghergulescu, I., Muntean, C. (2016). Totcompute: A novel eeg-based timeontask threshold computation mechanism for engagement modelling and monitoring. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26(3), 821–854.https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-016-0111-2

  • *Gkontzis, A., Karachristos, C., Panagiotakopoulos, C., Stavropoulos, E., Verykios, V. (2017). Sentiment analysis to track emotion and polarity in student fora. Association for Computing Machinery, vol Part F132523. https://doi.org/10.1145/3139367.3139389

  • *Gong, L., Liu, Y. (2019). Design and application of intervention model based on learning analytics under blended learning environment. Association for Computing Machinery, vol Part F148391, pp 225–229.https://doi.org/10.1145/3323771.3323825

  • *Goswami, M., Mian, S., Mostow, J. (2019). What’s most broken? a tool to assist data-driven iterative improvement of an intelligent tutoring system. AAAI Press, pp 9941–9942.

  • *Govaerts, S., Verbert, K., Duval, E. (2011). Evaluating the student activity meter: Two case studies. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 7048 LNCS, 188–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25813-8_20

  • *Grafsgaard, J., Boyer, K., Wiebe, E., Lester, J. (2012). Analyzing posture and affect in task-oriented tutoring. Marco Island, FL, pp 438–443.

  • *Grafsgaard, J., Wiggins, J., Boyer, K., Wiebe, E., Lester, J. (2013). Embodied affect in tutorial dialogue: Student gesture and posture. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 7926 LNAI, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39112-5_1

  • *Grawemeyer, B., Mavrikis, M., Holmes, W., Gutiérrez-Santos, S., Wiedmann, M., Rummel, N. (2017). Affective learning: improving engagement and enhancing learning with affect-aware feedback. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 27(1), 119–158.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11257-017-9188-z

  • *Griol, D., Molina, J., Callejas, Z. (2014). An approach to develop intelligent learning environments by means of immersive virtual worlds. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Smart Environments, 6(2), 237–255.https://doi.org/10.3233/AIS-140255

  • *Harley, J., Azevedo, R. (2014). Toward a feature-driven understanding of students’ emotions during interactions with agent-based learning environments: A selective review. International Journal of Gaming and Computer-Mediated Simulations, 6(3), 17–34.https://doi.org/10.4018/ijgcms.2014070102

  • *Hassouneh, A., Mutawa, A., Murugappan, M. (2020). Development of a real-time emotion recognition system using facial expressions and eeg based on machine learning and deep neural network methods. Informatics in Medicine Unlocked, 20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imu.2020.100372

  • *Hatziapostolou, T., Gellci, J., Dranidis, D., Ntika, M. (2016). Quantifying and evaluating student participation and engagement in an academic facebook group. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 583, 486–503.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29585-5_28

  • *Hayati, H., Khalidi Idrissi, M., Bennani, S. (2020). Automatic classification for cognitive engagement in online discussion forums: Text mining and machine learning approach. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 12164 LNAI, 114–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52240-7_21

  • *Hlioui, F., Aloui, N., Gargouri, F. (2020). Understanding learner engagement in a virtual learning environment. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 941, 709–719.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16660-1_69

  • *Howard, S., Ma, J., Yang, J. (2016). Student rules: Exploring patterns of students’ computer-efficacy and engagement with digital technologies in learning. Computers and Education, 101, 29–42.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.05.008

  • *Howard, E., Meehan, M., Parnell, A. (2019). Quantifying participation in, and the effectiveness of, remediating assessment in a university mathematics module. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(1), 97–110.https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1476670

  • *Huang, T., Mei, Y., Zhang, H., Liu, S., Yang, H. (2019). Fine-grained engagement recognition in online learning environment. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., pp 338–341. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEIEC.2019.8784559

  • Huppert, F. A., & So, T. T. C. (2011). Flourishing across europe: Application of a new conceptual framework for defining well-being. Social Indicators Research, 110(3), 837–861. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-011-9966-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Hussain, A., Abbasi, A., Afzulpurkar, N. (2012). Detecting & interpreting self-manipulating hand movements for student’s affect prediction. Human-centric Computing and Information Sciences, 2(1), 1–18.https://doi.org/10.1186/2192-1962-2-14

  • *Hussain, M., Zhu, W., Zhang, W., Abidi, S. (2018). Student engagement predictions in an e-learning system and their impact on student course assessment scores. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6347186

  • *Hussain, M., Zhu, W., Zhang, W., Ni, J., Khan, Z., Hussain, S. (2019). Identifying beneficial sessions in an e-learning system using machine learning techniques. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., pp 123–128. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICBDAA.2018.8629697

  • *Huynh, D., Zuo, L., Iida, H. (2016). Analyzing gamification of “duolingo” with focus on its course structure. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 10056 LNCS, 268–277. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50182-6_24

  • *Ismail, A. (2011). Developing & evaluating collaborative medical physics module for the first year medical students at college of medicine & medical sciences, arabian gulf university kingdom of bahrain. Arab Gulf Journal of Scientific Research, 29(1-2), 30–50.

  • *Jalal, A., Mahmood, M. (2019). Students’ behavior mining in e-learning environment using cognitive processes with information technologies. Education and Information Technologies, 24(5), 2797–2821.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09892-5

  • *James, I., Ramasubramanian, P., Angeline, D. (2018). Improved learning with emotional intelligence and analysis using neural networks. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCIC.2017.8524206

  • *Jeong, H. Y., Choi, C. R., Song, Y. J. (2012). Personalized learning course planner with e-learning dss using user profile. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(3), 2567–2577.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.08.109

  • *John, D., Man, C., Yusuf, K. (2020). Challenge-based assessments in a gamified learning environment: A case study on linguistics students. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(16), 710–716.https://doi.org/10.31838/jcr.07.16.83

  • *Joksimović, S., Gašević, D., Kovanović, V., Riecke, B., Hatala, M. (2015). Social presence in online discussions as a process predictor of academic performance. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 31(6), 638–654.https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12107

  • *Jraidi, I., Frasson, C. (2013). Student’s uncertainty modeling through a multimodal sensor-based approach. Educational Technology and Society, 16(1), 219–230.

  • *Kashive, N., Powale, L., Kashive, K. (2021). Understanding user perception toward artificial intelligence (ai) enabled e-learning. International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 38(1), 1–19.https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-05-2020-0090

  • *Kaur, A. (2018). Attention network for engagement prediction in the wild. Association for Computing Machinery, Inc, pp 516–519. https://doi.org/10.1145/3242969.3264972

  • *Kaur, A., Mustafa, A., Mehta, L., Dhall, A. (2019a). Prediction and localization of student engagement in the wild. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.. https://doi.org/10.1109/DICTA.2018.8615851

  • *Kaur, P., Malhotra, J., Arora, M. (2019b). Role of perseverance and persistence for retaining and stimulating mooc learners. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 1075, 249–259.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0108-1_24

  • Keyes, C. L. M. (1998). Social well-being. Social Psychology Quarterly, 61(2), 121. https://doi.org/10.2307/2787065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keyes, C. L. M., Shmotkin, D., & Ryff, C. D. (2002). Optimizing well-being: The empirical encounter of two traditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 1007–1022. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.1007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Khalil, M., Ebner, M., Admiraal, W. (2017). How can gamification improve mooc student engagement? Academic Conferences and Publishing International Limited, pp 819–828.

  • Kitchenham, B., Charters, S. (2007b) Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering.

  • *Kizilcec, R., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., Maldonado, J. (2017). Self-regulated learning strategies predict learner behavior and goal attainment in massive open online courses. Computers and Education, 04:18–33.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.10.001

  • *Kizilcec, R., Reich, J., Yeomans, M., Dann, C., Brunskill, E., Lopez, G., Turkay, S., Williams, J., Tingley, D. (2020). Scaling up behavioral science interventions in online education. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 117(26), 14,900–14,905. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1921417117

  • Koedinger, K. R., & Aleven, V. (2007). Exploring the assistance dilemma in experiments with cognitive tutors. Educational Psychology Review, 19(3), 239–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koedinger, K. R., Corbett, A. T., & Perfetti, C. (2012). The knowledge-learning-instruction framework: Bridging the science-practice chasm to enhance robust student learning. Cognitive Science, 36(5), 757–798. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2012.01245.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kong, S., & Song, Y. (2015). An experience of personalized learning hub initiative embedding byod for reflective engagement in higher education. Computers and Education, 88, 227–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.06.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Kotsakis, R., Dimoulas, C., Kalliris, G., Veglis, A. (2014). Emotional descriptors and quality of experience (qoe) metrics in evaluating mediated learning. IEEE Computer Society, pp 232–237. https://doi.org/10.1109/IISA.2014.6878744

  • *Krishna. R., Lee, D., Li, F. F., Bernstein, M. (2018). Engagement learning: Expanding visual knowledge by engaging online participants. Association for Computing Machinery, Inc, pp 87–89. https://doi.org/10.1145/3266037.3266110

  • Kulik, J. A., & Fletcher, J. (2016). Effectiveness of intelligent tutoring systems: A meta-analytic review. Review of Educational Research, 86(1), 42–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Kumari, P., Deb, S., De, K. (2020). Statistical proving of enhanced interaction and augmentative discourse for byod supported classroom. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCCNT49239.2020.9225517

  • *Labarthe, H., Bouchet, F., Bachelet, R., Yacef, K. (2016). Does a peer recommender foster students’ engagement in moocs? International Educational Data Mining Society, pp 418–423.

  • *Lai, H., Wang, M., Wang, H. (2009). Apply ati to support adaptive e-learning. Academic Conferences Limited, vol 2009-January, pp 268–277.

  • *Lam, R. (2014). Designing collaborative learning activities for two outcomes: Deep structural knowledge and idea generation. Proceedings of International Conference of the Learning Sciences, ICLS 3(January):1667–1668.

  • *Lan, A., Brinton, C., Yang, T. Y., Chiang, M. (2017). Behavior-based latent variable model for learner engagement. International Educational Data Mining Society, pp 64–71.

  • LAPES. (2014). Start - state of the art through systematic review tool. Available in http://lapes.dc.ufscar.br/tools/start_tool, accessed on October, 2013.

  • *Lefebvre, O., Luo, J. (2020). An authentic learning approach to engage solid waste engineering students. Elsevier B.V., vol 172, pp 748–759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.05.107

  • *Li, X., Zhao, Q., Liu, L., Peng, H., Qi, Y., Mao, C., Fang, Z., Liu, Q., Hu, B. (2010). Improve affective learning with eeg approach. Computing and Informatics, 29(4), 557–570.

  • *Li, H., Cheng, Q., Yu, Q., Graesser, A. (2015). The role of peer agent’s learning competency in trialogue-based reading intelligent systems. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 9112, 694–697.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19773-9_94

  • *Li, S., Yu, C., Hu, J., Zhong, Y. (2017). Exploring the effect of behavioral engagement on learning achievement in online learning environment: Learning analytics of non-degree online learning data. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., pp 246–250. https://doi.org/10.1109/EITT.2016.56

  • *Li, C. (2019). Gamification of an asynchronous html5-related competency-based guided learning system. Institute of Physics Publishing, vol 658. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/658/1/012004

  • *Li, Z., Zhan, Z. (2020). Integrated infrared imaging techniques and multi-model information via convolution neural network for learning engagement evaluation. Infrared Physics and Technology, 109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infrared.2020.103430

  • *Liang, Y. (2017). Social friendship-aware courses arrangement on moocs. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 10179 LNCS, 417–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55705-2_34

  • *Liao, J., Liang, Y., Pan, J. (2021). Deep facial spatiotemporal network for engagement prediction in online learning. Applied Intelligence, 51(10), 6609–6621.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-020-02139-8

  • Long, Y., Aleven, V. (2014). Gamification of joint student/system control over problem selection in a linear equation tutor. In: International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Springer, pp 378–387.

  • *Lu, O., Huang, J., Huang, A., Yang, S. (2017). Applying learning analytics for improving students engagement and learning outcomes in an moocs enabled collaborative programming course. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(2), 220–234.https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2016.1278391

  • Ma, W., Adesope, O. O., Nesbit, J. C., Liu, Q. (2014). Intelligent tutoring systems and learning outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 901–918.

  • *MacRitchie, J., Breaden, M., Milne, A., McIntyre, S. (2020). Cognitive, motor and social factors of music instrument training programs for older adults’ improved wellbeing. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02868

  • *Magdalene Delighta Angeline, D., Ramasubramanian, P., James, L. (2018). Predicting academic performance in teaching learning scheme using data mining practice. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCIC.2017.8524585

  • *Madathil, K., Frady, K., Hartley, R., Bertrand, J., Alfred, M., Gramopadhye, A. (2017). An empirical study investigating the effectiveness of integrating virtual reality-based case studies into an online asynchronous learning environment. Computers in Education Journal, 8(3).

  • *Martínez-Abad, F., Gamazo, A., Rodríguez-Conde, M. (2018). Big data in education: Detection of ict factors associated with school effectiveness with data mining techniques. Association for Computing Machinery, pp 145–150. https://doi.org/10.1145/3284179.3284206

  • *Martins, R., Berge, E., Milrad, M., Masiello, I. (2019). Visual learning analytics of multidimensional student behavior in self-regulated learning. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 11722 LNCS, 737–741. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29736-7_78

  • *Matsuda, N., Yarzebinski, E., Keiser, V., Raizada, R., Stylianides, G., Koedinger, K. (2013). Studying the effect of a competitive game show in a learning by teaching environment. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 23(1-4), 1–21.https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-013-0009-1

  • *McLaren, B., Deleeuw, K., Mayer, R. (2011). Polite web-based intelligent tutors: Can they improve learning in classrooms? Computers and Education, 56(3), 574–584.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.09.019

  • *Megahed, M., Mohammed, A. (2020). Modeling adaptive e-learning environment using facial expressions and fuzzy logic. Expert Systems with Applications, 157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113460

  • *Membrillo-Hernández, J., Muñoz-Soto, R., Rodríguez-Sánchez, A., Díaz-Quiñonez, J., Villegas, P., Castillo-Reyna, J., Ramírez-Medrano, A. (2019). Student engagement outside the classroom: Analysis of a challenge-based learning strategy in biotechnology engineering. IEEE Computer Society, vol April-2019, pp 617–621. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2019.8725246

  • Mitri, D. D., Scheffel, M., Drachsler, H., Börner, D., Ternier, S., Specht, M. (2017). Learning pulse. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3027385.3027447

  • *Modafferi, S., Boniface, M., Crowle, S., Star, K., Middleton, L. (2016). Creating opportunities to learn social skills at school using digital games. Dechema e.V., vol 2016-January, pp 461–469

  • *Moon, J., Ke, F., Sokolikj, Z. (2020). Automatic assessment of cognitive and emotional states in virtual reality-based flexibility training for four adolescents with autism. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(5), 1766–1784.https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13005

  • *Moridis, C., Economides, A. (2012). Affective learning: Empathetic agents with emotional facial and tone of voice expressions. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 3(3):260–272.https://doi.org/10.1109/T-AFFC.2012.6

  • *Morrison, A., Rozak, S., Gold, A., Kay, J. (2020). Quantifying student engagement in learning about climate change using galvanic hand sensors in a controlled educational setting. Climatic Change, 159(1), 17–36.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-019-02576-6

  • *Mulqueeny, K., Mingle, L., Kostyuk, V., Baker, R., Ocumpaugh, J. (2015). Improving engagement in an e-learning environment. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 9112, 730–733.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19773-9_103

  • *Muñoz, K., Kevitt, P., Lunney, T., Noguez, J., Neri, L. (2010). Playphysics: An emotional games learning environment for teaching physics. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 6291 LNAI, 400–411. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15280-1_37

  • *Muñoz, K., Kevitt, P., Lunney, T., Noguez, J., Neri, L. (2011). An emotional student model for game-play adaptation. Entertainment Computing, 2(2), 133–141.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcom.2010.12.006

  • *Muñoz-Merino, P., Ruipérez-Valiente, J., Delgado Kloos, C., Auger, M., Briz, S., de Castro, V., Santalla, S. (2017). Flipping the classroom to improve learning with moocs technology. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 25(1), 15–25.https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.21774

  • *Munshi, A., Mishra, S., Zhang, N., Paquette, L., Ocumpaugh, J., Baker, R., Biswas, G. (2020). Modeling the relationships between basic and achievement emotions in computer-based learning environments. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 12163 LNAI, 411–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52237-7_33

  • Murray, T. (1999). Authoring intelligent tutoring systems: An analysis of the state of the art. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education (IJAIED), 10, 98–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, T. (2003). An overview of intelligent tutoring system authoring tools: Updated analysis of the state of the art. In Authoring tools for advanced technology learning environments. Springer, pp 491–544.

  • *Murrell, S., Wang, F., Aldrich, E., Xu, X. (2020). Meteorologyar: A mobile ar app to increase student engagement and promote active learning in a large lecture class. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., pp 849–850. https://doi.org/10.1109/VRW50115.2020.00275

  • *Murshed, M., Dewan, M., Lin, F., Wen, D. (2019). Engagement detection in e-learning environments using convolutional neural networks. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., pp 80–86. https://doi.org/10.1109/DASC/PiCom/CBDCom/CyberSciTech.2019.00028

  • *Mustafa, H., Badran, S., Al-Hamadi, A., Al-Somani, T. (2011). On mathematical modeling of cooperative e-learning performance during face to face tutoring sessions (ant colony system approach). Amman, pp 338–346. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2011.5773158

  • *Naik, V., Kamat, V. (2019). Analyzing engagement in an on-line session. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 11626 LNAI, 359–364. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23207-8_66

  • *Naghizadeh, M., Moradi, H. (2015). A model for motivation assessment in intelligent tutoring systems. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.. https://doi.org/10.1109/IKT.2015.7288774

  • *Neves, J., Ferraz, F., Dias, A., Capita, A., Ávidos, L., Maia, N., Machado, J., Alves, V., Ribeiro, J., Vicente, H. (2019). Assessing individuals learning’s impairments from a social entropic perspective. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 11431 LNAI, 62–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14799-0_6

  • *Nizam Ismail, S., Hamid, S., Chiroma, H. (2019). The utilization of learning analytics to develop student engagement model in learning management system. Institute of Physics Publishing, vol 1339. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1339/1/012096

  • *O’Brien, M., Walsh, J., Costin, Y. (2020). Intentional content: Usage and engagement in a f-l-i-p classroom environment. Academic Conferences and Publishing International Limited, vol 2020-October, pp 388–396. https://doi.org/10.34190/EEL.20.078

  • *Ogan, A., Aleven, V., Kim, J., Jones, C. (2010). Developing interpersonal relationships with virtual agents through social instructional dialog. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 6356 LNAI, 236–249. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15892-6_25

  • *Oliva Córdova, L., Amado-Salvatierra, H., Villalba Condori, K. (2019). An experience making use of learning analytics techniques in discussion forums to improve the interaction in learning ecosystems. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 11590 LNCS, 64–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21814-0_6

  • *Papamitsiou, Z., Economides, A. (2014). The effect of personality traits on students’ performance during computer-based testing: A study of the big five inventory with temporal learning analytics. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., pp 378–382. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2014.113

  • *Papoušek, J., Pelánek, R. (2015). Impact of adaptive educational system behaviour on student motivation. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 9112, 348–357.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19773-9_35

  • *Park, Y. M., Lee, G. M., Yang, H. S. (2019). Deep feature based efficient regularised ensemble for engagement recognition. Electronics Letters, 55(24), 1281–1283.https://doi.org/10.1049/el.2019.2783

  • *Pascual, R., Hammar Andersson, P. (2015). A flow based approach to authentic learning in social oriented teaching. European Society for Engineering Education (SEFI).

  • Peng, S., Ohira, S., & Nagao, K. (2020). Reading students’ multiple mental states in conversation from facial and heart rate cues. SciTePress, 1, 68–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pereira, A. M. F., Fernandes, S. C. S., Bittencourt, I. I., Félix, A. (2022). Flow theory and learning in the brazilian context: a systematic literature review. Educ Pesqui 48.

  • *Pérez, P., Ortega, F., García, J., De Diego, I. (2019). Combining machine learning and symbolic representation of time series for classification of behavioural patterns. Association for Computing Machinery, pp 93–97. https://doi.org/10.1145/3312714.3312726

  • Petersen, K., Feldt, R., Mujtaba, S., Mattsson, M. (2008). Systematic mapping studies in software engineering. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering, EASE’08. British Computer Society pp 68–77.

  • *Pezzullo, L., Wiggins, J., Frankosky, M., Min, W., Boyer, K., Mott, B., Wiebe, E., Lester, J. (2017). “thanks alisha, keep in touch”: Gender effects and engagement with virtual learning companions. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 10331 LNAI, 299–310. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61425-0_25

  • *Pham, P., Wang, J. (2018). Predicting learners’ emotions in mobile mooc learning via a multimodal intelligent tutor. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 10858 LNCS, 150–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91464-0_15

  • *Poorna, S., Anjana, S., Varma, P., Sajeev, A., Arya, K., Renjith, S., Nair, G. (2019). Facial emotion recognition using dwt based similarity and difference features. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., pp 524–527. https://doi.org/10.1109/I-SMAC.2018.8653742

  • *Quesnel, D., Di Paola, S., Riecke, B. (2017). Deep learning for classification of peak emotions within virtual reality systems. International Ambient Media Association (iAMEA), vol 2017, pp 6–11.

  • *Rambe, P. (2012). Constructive disruptions for effective collaborative learning: Navigating the affordances of social media for meaningful engagement. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 10(1), 132–146.

  • Reivich, K., Shatté, A. (2003). The Resilience Factor: 7 Keys to Finding Your Inner Strength and Overcoming Life’s Hurdles. Broadway Books. URL https://books.google.com/books?id=NyKUAWBdr4AC

  • *Rienties, B., Lewis, T., McFarlane, R., Nguyen, Q., Toetenel, L. (2018). Analytics in online and offline language learning environments: the role of learning design to understand student online engagement. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(3), 273–293.https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1401548

  • *Riaz, S., Mushtaq, A., Kaur, M. (2019) Intelligent tutoring for informed feedback in interactive learning environments. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASET.2019.8714555

  • *Robinson, C., Yeomans, M., Reich, J., Hulleman, C., Gehlbach, H. (2016). Forecasting student achievement in moocs with natural language processing. Association for Computing Machinery, vol 25–29-April-2016, pp 383–387. https://doi.org/10.1145/2883851.2883932

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 141–166. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Sabourin, J., Mott, B., Lester, J. (2012). Early prediction of student self-regulation strategies by combining multiple models. www.educationaldatamining.org

  • *Sabourin, J., Mott, B., Lester, J. (2013). Utilizing dynamic bayes nets to improve early prediction models of self-regulated learning. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 7899 LNCS, 228–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38844-6_19

  • *Sahid, D., Efendi, R., Putra, E. (2020). Rough set and machine learning approach for identifying flow experience in e-learning. Institute of Physics Publishing, vol 732. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/732/1/012047

  • *Samuel Peter James, I., Ramasubramanian, P., Magdalene Delighta Angeline, D. (2018). Student learning context analysis by emotional intelligence with data mining tools. International Journal of Intelligent Engineering and Systems, 11(2), 173–183.https://doi.org/10.22266/IJIES2018.0430.19

  • *Samuelsen, J., Khalil, M. (2020). Study effort and student success: A mooc case study. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 916, 215–226.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11932-4_22

  • *San Pedro, M., Baker, R., Heffernan, N. (2017). An integrated look at middle school engagement and learning in digital environments as precursors to college attendance. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 22(3), 243–270.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-017-9318-z

  • Self, J. A. (1990) Theoretical foundations of intelligent tutoring systems. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 3–14.

  • Self, J. A. (1998). The defining characteristics of intelligent tutoring systems research: Itss care, precisely. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education (IJAIED), 10, 350–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Snow, E., Jackson, G., Varner, L., McNamara, D. (2013). Investigating the effects of off-task personalization on in-system performance and attitudes within a game-based environment. International Educational Data Mining Society

  • *Srivastava, A., Yammiyavar, P. (2019). Automating engineering educational practical electronics laboratories for designing engaging learning experiences. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, 544, 85–102.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05297-3_6

  • Steenbergen-Hu, S., & Cooper, H. (2013). A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of intelligent tutoring systems on k–12 students’ mathematical learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(4), 970.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steenbergen-Hu, S., & Cooper, H. (2014). A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of intelligent tutoring systems (its) on college students’ academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106, 331–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Su, Y. N., Hsu, C. C., Chen, H. C., Huang, K. K., Huang, Y. M. (2014). Developing a sensor-based learning concentration detection system. Engineering Computations (Swansea, Wales), 31(2), 216–230.https://doi.org/10.1108/EC-01-2013-0010

  • *Sun, C., Xia, F., Wang, Y., Liu, Y., Qian, W., Zhou, A. (2018).A deep learning model for automatic evaluation of academic engagement. Association for Computing Machinery, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1145/3231644.3231689

  • *Sung, H. Y., Hwang, G. J., Lin, C. J., Hong, T. W. (2017). Experiencing the analects of confucius: An experiential game-based learning approach to promoting students’ motivation and conception of learning. Computers and Education, 110, 143–153.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.03.014

  • *Tamil Selvi, P., Vyshnavi, P., Jagadish, R., Srikumar, S., Veni, S. (2017). Emotion recognition from videos using facial expressions. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 517, 565–576.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3174-8_47

  • *Tao, X., Liu, S., Chen, X. (2020a). Dual flow framework on bimodality emotion recognition based on facial expression and eye movement. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., pp 127–133. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAIE50891.2020.00037

  • *Taub, M., Sawyer, R., Lester, J., Azevedo, R. (2020). The impact of contextualized emotions on self-regulated learning and scientific reasoning during learning with a game-based learning environment. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 30(1), 97–120.https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-019-00191-1

  • *Tenório, K., Chalco Challco, G., Dermeval, D., Lemos, B., Nascimento, P., Santos, R., Pedro da Silva, A. (2020). Helping teachers assist their students in gamified adaptive educational systems: Towards a gamification analytics tool. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 12164 LNAI, 312–317. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52240-7_57

  • *Tian, F., Gao, P., Li, L., Zhang, W., Liang, H., Qian, Y., Zhao, R. (2014). Recognizing and regulating e-learners’ emotions based on interactive chinese texts in e-learning systems. Knowledge-Based Systems, 55, 148–164.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2013.10.019

  • *Ting, C. Y., Cheah, W. N., Ho, C. (2013). Student engagement modeling using bayesian networks. Manchester, pp 2939–2944. https://doi.org/10.1109/SMC.2013.501

  • *Tlili, A., Denden, M., Essalmi, F., Jemni, M., Chang, M., Kinshuk, Chen, N. S. (2019). Automatic modeling learner’s personality using learning analytics approach in an intelligent moodle learning platform. Interactive Learning Environmentshttps://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1636084

  • *Uria-rivas, R., Rodriguez-sanchez, M., Santos, O., Vaquero, J., Boticario, J. (2019). Impact of physiological signals acquisition in the emotional support provided in learning scenarios. Sensors (Switzerland), 19(20). https://doi.org/10.3390/s19204520

  • Vanlehn, K. (2006). The behavior of tutoring systems. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 16(3), 227–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • VanLehn, K. (2011). The relative effectiveness of human tutoring, intelligent tutoring systems, and other tutoring systems. Educational Psychologist, 46(4), 197–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Vega. B., Feng, S., Lehman, B., Graesser, A., D’Mello, S. (2013). Reading into the text: Investigating the influence of text complexity on cognitive engagement. International Educational Data Mining Society

  • *Villanueva, I., Campbell, B., Raikes, A., Jones, S., Putney, L. (2018). A multimodal exploration of engineering students’ emotions and electrodermal activity in design activities. Journal of Engineering Education, 107(3), 414–441.https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20225

  • *Wang, W., Li, R. (2014). Emotion recognition model based on rbf neural network in e-learning. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 277, 567–576.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54924-3_54

  • *Wiggins, J., Grafsgaard, J., Boyer, K., Wiebe, E., Lester, J. (2017). Do you think you can? the influence of student self-efficacy on the effectiveness of tutorial dialogue for computer science. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 27(1), 130–153.https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-015-0091-7

  • *Wiggins, J., Kulkarni, M., Min, W., Mott, B., Boyer, K., Wiebe, E., Lester, J. (2018). Affect-based early prediction of player mental demand and engagement for educational games. AAAI Press, pp 243–249.

  • *Willans, F., Fonolahi, A., Buadromo, R., Bryce, T., Prasad, R., Kumari, S. (2019). Fostering and evaluating learner engagement with academic literacy support: Making the most of moodle. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 16(4).

  • Woolf, B. P. (2010). Building intelligent interactive tutors: Student-centered strategies for revolutionizing e-learning. Morgan Kaufmann

  • *Worsley, M., Blikstein, P. (2014). Deciphering the practices and affordances of different reasoning strategies through multimodal learning analytics. Association for Computing Machinery, pp 21–27. https://doi.org/10.1145/2666633.2666637

  • *Wu, Y., Yang, X., Li, Y., Li, H., Yang, W. (2018). Brainwave analysis in virtual reality based emotional regulation training. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., pp 691–696. https://doi.org/10.1109/CSCI46756.2018.00139

  • *Wulan, S., Supangkat, S. (2018). Semi-supervised learning self-training for indonesian motivational messages classification. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., vol 2018-January, pp 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTSS.2017.8288888

  • *Yan, W., Welsh, S., Dowell, N., Choi, H., Holman, C., Brooks, C. (2019). Exploring learner engagement patterns in teach-outs. Association for Computing Machinery, pp 180–184. https://doi.org/10.1145/3303772.3303836

  • *Yang, Q., Zheng, S., Huang, J., Li, J. (2008). A design to promote group learning in e-learning by naive bayesian. IEEE Computer Society, vol 2, pp 379–382.https://doi.org/10.1109/iscid.2008.154

  • *Yang, T. Y., Baker, R., Studer, C., Heffernan, N., Lan, A. (2019). Active learning for student affect detection. International Educational Data Mining Society, pp 208–217.

  • *Yousuf, B., Conlan, O. (2018). Supporting student engagement through explorable visual narratives. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 11(3), 307–320.https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2017.2722416

  • *Yuan, B., Wang, M., Kushniruk, A., Peng, J. (2017). Deep learning towards expertise development in a visualization-based learning environment. Educational Technology and Society, 20(4), 233–246.

  • *Zatarain-Cabada, R., Barrón-Estrada, M., González-Hernández, F., Oramas-Bustillos, R., Alor-Hernández, G., Reyes-García, C. (2017a). Building a corpus and a local binary pattern recognizer for learning-centered emotions. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 10062 LNAI, 524–535. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62428-0_43

  • *Zatarain-Cabada, R., Barrón-Estrada, M., Ríos-Félix, J. (2017b). Affective learning system for algorithmic logic applying gamification. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 10062 LNAI, 536–547. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62428-0_44

  • *Zatarain Cabada, R., Barrón Estrada, M., Ríos Félix, J., Alor Hernández, G. (2020). A virtual environment for learning computer coding using gamification and emotion recognition. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(8), 1048–1063.https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1558256

  • *Zhang, L. (2013). Contextual and active learning-based affect-sensing from virtual drama improvisation. ACM Transactions on Speech and Language Processing, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.1145/2407736.2407738

  • *Zhou, Y., Xu, T., Cai, Y., Wu, X., Dong, B. (2017). Monitoring cognitive workload in online videos learning through an eeg-based brain-computer interface. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 10295 LNCS, 64–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58509-3_7

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ig Ibert Bittencourt.

Ethics declarations

Funding and/or Conflicts of Interests/Competing Interests

The authors have no conflict of interest, and this work has been supported by the Brazilian institutions: Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) and Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES).

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Tables of Bibliometric Analysis

Tables

Table 6 Clusters of co-occurrence analysis in the keywords-plus of AI-PE and PP-AI and their corresponding relationship with keywords-plus of P-AIED

6,

Table 7 Co-occurrence analysis of research outcomes (based on search string)

7,

Table 8 Clusters of thematic map in P-AIED

8,

Table 9 Clusters of the thematic map in AI-PE

9,

Table 10 Clusters of the thematic map in PP-AI

10,

Table 11 Authors’ collaboration network

11,

Table 12 Institutions’ collaboration network

12

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bittencourt, I.I., Chalco, G., Santos, J. et al. Positive Artificial Intelligence in Education (P-AIED): A Roadmap. Int J Artif Intell Educ 34, 732–792 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-023-00357-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-023-00357-y

Keywords

Navigation