Abstract
In this paper, we study a system of partial differential equations defined in a moving domain. This system is defined by a heat equation and a diffusion equation for a concentration of non-Fickian type whose diffusion coefficient depends on the temperature, completed with suitable initial and boundary conditions. The non-Fickian mass flux is established considering the viscoelastic properties of the medium where the strain depends on the temperature and on the concentration. The initial boundary value problem (IBVP) analyzed can be used to describe the drying of viscoelastic materials where the internal structure offers a resistance to the movement of the moisture molecules and a consequent delay in the moisture removal. Due to heat transference into the materials and moisture removal, shrinkage of the medium occurs. The stability of the IBVP defined in a moving domain is analyzed and its qualitative behavior is numerically studied.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albaloushi NS (2013) Rheological behavior of tomato fruits affected by various loads under storage conditions. Am J Eng Res 2(3):36–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/19476337.2010.522734
Augusto PED, Ibarz A, Cristianini M (2013) Effect of high pressure homogenization (hph) on the rheological properties of tomato juice: Viscoelastic properties and the cox-merz rule. J Food Eng 114:57–63. https://doi.org/10.1137/130930674
Azhdari E, Emami A (2019) Analytical and numerical study of drying of tomato in non-shrinkage and shrinkage model. Math Comput Simul 166:253–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matcom.2019.05.013
Azhdari E, Ferreira JA, de Oliveira P, da Silva PM (2015) Diffusion, viscoelasticity and erosion: analytical study and medical applications. J Comput Appl Math 275:489–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2014.01.025
Azhdari E, Ferreira JA, de Oliveira P, da Silva PM (2016) Numerical and analytical study of drug release from a biodegradable viscoelastic platform. Math Methods Appl Sci 29:4688–4699. https://doi.org/10.1002/mma.3375
Balaban M, Pigott GM (1988) Mathematical model of simultaneous heat and mass transfer in food with dimensional changes and variable transport parameters. J Food Sci 53(3):935–939. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1988.tb08990.x
Crank J (1984) Free and moving boundary problem. New York Clarendon-Oxford Science Publication
Ferreira J, Grassi M, de Oliveira P, Romanazzi G (2018) Drug release from viscoelastic swelling polymeric platforms. SIAM J Appl Math 78:1378–1401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2014.05.030
Ferreira JA, Grassi M, Gudino E, de Oliveira P (2014) A 3d model for mechanistic control drug release. SIAM J Appl Math (SIAP) 74:620–633. https://doi.org/10.1137/130930674
Ferreira JA, Grassi M, Gudino E, de Oliveira P (2015) A new look to non-fickian diffusion. Appl Math Model 39:194–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2014.05.030
Hubert O, Milhet X, Gadaud P, Tatat M, Renault PO et al (2015) Modeling of young’s modulus variations with temperature of ni and oxidized ni using a magnetomechanical approach. Mater Sci Eng A 633:76–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2015.03.014
Izadi M, Abdollahi J, Dubljevic SS (2015) Pde backstepping control of one-dimensional heat equation with time-varying domain. Automatica 54:41–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2015.01.024
Jason A (1958) A study of evaporation and diffusion process in the drying of fish muscle. In: Fundamental aspects of the dehydration of foodstuffs. Society of Chemical Industry, London
Jason A (1965) The effects of fat content on the diffusion of water in fish muscle. J Sci Food Agric 16(5):281–288. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740160508
Mahiuddin M, ImranHKhan M, Kumar C, Rahman MM, Karim MA (2018) Shrinkage of food materials during drying: current status and challenges. Comp Rev Food Sci Food Saf 5(17):1113–1126. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12375
Ruiz-López II, Córdova AV, Rodríguez-Jimenes GC, García-Alvarado MA (2004) Moisture and temperature evolution during food drying: effect of variable properties. J Food Eng 63(1):117–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0260-8774(03)00290-5
Shahari N, Jamil N, Rasmani K (2016a) Comparative study of shrinkage and non-shrinkage model of food drying. J Phys: Conf Ser 738(1):012087
Shahari N, Rasmani K, Jamil N (2016b) Comparison between analytical and numerical solution of mathematical drying model. AIP Conf Proc 1705:020043
Shahari NA, Hibberd S (2012) Mathematical modelling of shrinkage effect during drying of food. IEEE Colloquium on Humanities, Science and Engineering (CHUSER)
Shahari NA, Hibberd S (2013) Analysis of single phase moisture and heat model of food drying. In: 4th international conference of mathematical models in engineering and computer science, pp 137–142
Stommel JR, Abbott JA, Campbell TA, Francis D (2005) Inheritance of elastic and viscoelastic components of tomato firmness derived from intra- and interspecific genetic backgrounds. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 130(4):598–604. https://doi.org/10.21273/JASHS.130.4.598
Thussu S, Datta A (2011) Fundamentals-based quality prediction: texture development during drying and related processes. Proc Food Sci 1:1209–1215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profoo.2011.09.180
Verlent I, Hendickx M, Rovere P, Moldenaers P, Loey AV (2006) Rheological properties of tomato based products after thermal and high-pressure treatment. J Food Sci 71(3):5243–5248. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2006.tb15648.x
Wang N, Brennan JG (1995) A mathematical model of simultaneous heat and moisture transfer during drying of potato. J Food Eng 24:47–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/0260-8774(94)P1607-Y
Yang H, Sakai N, Watanabe M (2001) Drying model with non-isotropic shrinkage deformation undergoing simultaneous heat and mass transfer. Drying Technol Int J 19(7):1441–1460. https://doi.org/10.1081/DRT-100105299
Acknowledgements
J.A. Ferreira was partially supported by the project NEXT.parts—Next-generation of advanced hybrid parts, and by the Centre for Mathematics of the University of Coimbra—UID/MAT/00324/2019, funded by the Portuguese Government through FCT/MEC and co-funded by the European Regional Development Fund through the Partnership Agreement PT2020.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Apala Majumdar.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix: A moving discrete model
Appendix: A moving discrete model
The IBVP (43)–(50) is solved numerically using a finite difference discretization in the uniform meshes in [0, 1] and \([0,\tau _f]\) defined by
By \(g_i^j,f_i^j,\ell _j\) we represent the finite difference approximations for \(g(\xi _i,\tau _j), f(\xi _i,\tau _j)\) and \(\ell (\tau _j)\), respectively, defined by the IMEX (implicit–explicit) method presented in what follows. The finite difference approximation for (46) is the one proposed by Furzeland in Crank (1984)
for \(j=0,\dots ,M_\tau -1\). Equations (43)–(45) are discretized by
respectively, for \(i=1,\dots ,N-1\) and \(j=0,\dots ,M_\tau -1\), where
The initial condition (47) becomes
The boundary condition (48)–(50) are discretized using forward and backward finite differences for space derivatives, that is, by
respectively, for \(j=0,\dots ,M_\tau -1\).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Emami, A., Azhdari, E., Ferreira, J.A. et al. Drying viscoelastic materials: a non-Fickian approach. Comp. Appl. Math. 39, 125 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-020-1138-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-020-1138-4