Collaboration, multi-tasking and problem solving performance in shared virtual spaces

• Alavi, M., & Dufner, D. (2005). Technology-mediated collaborative learning: A research perspective. In S. R. Hiltz & R. Goldman (Eds.), Learning together online: Research on asynchronous learning networks (pp. 191–213). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

  Google Scholar 

• Amthauer, R., Brocke, B., Liepmann, D., & Beauducel, A. (2001). Intelligenz-Struktur-Test 2000 R (p. 2). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

  Google Scholar 

• Andrade, J. (2010). What does doodling do? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24, 100–106.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Barron, B. (2000). Achieving coordination in collaborative problem-solving groups. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(4), 403–436.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Bernard, H. R., Killworth, P., Kronenfeld, D., & Sailor, L. (1984). The problem of informant accuracy: The validity of retrospective data. Annual Review of Anthropology, 13, 495–517.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Bluedorn, A. C., Kalliath, T. J., Strube, M. J., & Martin, G. D. (1999). Polychronicity and the Inventory of Polychronic Values (IPV): The development of an instrument to measure a fundamental dimension of organizational culture. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 14, 205–230.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Bruffee, K. A. (1999). Collaborative learning: Higher education, interdependence, and the authority of knowledge. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Burgess, P. W. (2000). Real-world multitasking from a cognitive neuroscience perspective. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII (pp. 465–472). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Chalifour, C. L., & Powers, D. E. (1989). The relationship of content characteristics of GRE analytical reasoning items to their difficulties and discriminations. Journal of Educational Measurement, 26(2), 120–132.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Chickering, A., & Ehrmann, S. C. (1996). Implementing the seven principles: Technology as lever. AAHE Bulletin. 3–6 October. Last retrieved on July 31, 2015 at http://www.tltgroup.org/programs/seven.html.

• Collis, B., & Moonen, J. (2001). Flexible learning in a digital world: Experiences and expectations. London, UK: Kogan Page.

  Google Scholar 

• Conte, J. M., & Jacobs, R. R. (2003). Validity evidence linking polychronicity and big five personality dimensions to absence, lateness, and supervisory performance ratings. Human Performance, 16(2), 107–129.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Cross, R., Rebele, R., & Grant, A. (2016). Collaborative overload. Harvard Business Review. 2016: January-February issue. https://hbr.org/2016/01/collaborative-overload.

• Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by “collaborative learning”? In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches (pp. 1–16). Amsterdam, NL: Pergamon, Elsevier Science.

  Google Scholar 

• Foehr, U. G. (2006). Media multitasking among American youth: Prevalence, predictors, and pairings. Menlo Park, CA: Kaiser Family Foundation.

  Google Scholar 

• Gokhale, A. A. (1995). Collaborative learning enhances critical thinking. Journal of Technology Education, 7(1), 22–30.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Gurvich, I., & Van Mieghem, J. A. (2015). Collaboration and multitasking in networks: Architectures, bottlenecks, and capacity. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 17(1), 16–33. doi:10.1287/msom.2014.0498.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hembrooke, H., & Gay, G. (2003). The Laptop and the lecture: The effects of multitasking in learning environments. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 15, 46.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ifenthaler, D., Lin, L., Mills, L., Bellin-Mularski, N., & Mah, D. (2016). A longitudinal perspective on multitasking and collaborative problem-solving. Paper accepted to the American Educational Research Association (AERA) conference. Washington, DC.

• Ifenthaler, D., Masduki, I., & Seel, N. M. (2011). The mystery of cognitive structure and how we can detect it: tracking the development of cognitive structures over time. Instructional Science, 39(1), 41–61.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ifenthaler, D., & Seel, N. M. (2005). The measurement of change: Learning-dependent progression of mental models. Technology Instruction Cognition and Learning, 2(4), 317.

  Google Scholar 

• Ifenthaler, D., & Seel, N. M. (2013). Model-based reasoning. Computers & Education, 64, 131–142. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.11.014.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2003). Cooperation and the use of technology. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology: A project of the association for educational communications and technology (2nd ed., pp. 785–811). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

  Google Scholar 

• Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Toward a design theory of problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(4), 63–85.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Jonassen, D. H., Davidson, M., Collins, M., Campbell, J., & Hagg, B. B. (1995). Constructivism and computer-mediated communication in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 9(2), 7–26.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Just, M., Carpenter, P., Keller, T., Emery, L., Zajac, H., & Thulborn, K. (2001). Interdependence of nonoverlapping cortical systems in dual cognitive tasks. Neuro Image, 14, 417–426.

  Google Scholar 

• Kaufman, S. B. et al. (2001). A cognitive model of analytical reasoning using GRE problems. Last retrieved on July 31, 2015 from http://scottbarrykaufman.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Kaufman-Etal-2001-GRE-Problems.pdf.

• Kaye, A. R. (Ed.). (2012). Collaborative learning through computer conferencing: The Najaden papers (Vol. 90). New York: Springer.

  Google Scholar 

• Kolfschoten, G. L., & Brazier, F. M. (2013). Cognitive load in collaboration: Convergence. Group Decision and Negotiation, 22(5), 975–996.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Lenhart, A., Ling, R., Campbell, S., & Purcell, K. (2010). Teens and mobile phones. Retrieved from the Pew Internet & American Life Project website: http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2010/Teens-and-MobileYoung-Phones.aspx.

• Lin, L. (2009). Breadth-biased versus focused cognitive control in media multitasking behaviors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) USA, 106, 15521–15522.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Lin, L. (2013). Multiple dimensions of multitasking phenomenon. International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction, 9(1), 37–49.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Lin, L., Lee, J., & Robertson, T. (2011). Reading while watching video: The effect of video content on reading comprehension and media multitasking ability. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 45(2), 183–201.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Lin, L., Mills, L., & Ifenthaler, D. (2015). Collaborative problem solving in shared space. In Proceedings of IADIS international conference on cognition and exploratory learning in digital age (CELDA) (pp. 233–239).

• Lin, L., Robertson, T., & Lee, J. (2009). Reading performances between novices and experts in different media multitasking environments. Computers in the Schools, 26(3), 169–186.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Meyer, D. E., & Kieras, D. E. (1997). A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 1 basic mechanisms. Psychological Review, 104, 229–233.

  Google Scholar 

• Mills, L. A., Knezek, G., & Khaddage, F. (2014). Information seeking, information sharing, and going mobile: Three bridges to informal learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 32, 324–334.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Mills, L. A., Knezek, G. A., & Wakefield, J. S. (2013). Understanding information seeking behavior in technology pervasive learning environments of the 21st century. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 12(4), 200–208.

  Google Scholar 

• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school Mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

  Google Scholar 

• National Research Council. (1996). The national science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Ophir, E., Nass, C. I., & Wagner, A. D. (2009). Cognitive control in media multitaskers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 106, 15583–15587.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Pea, R., Nass, C., Meheula, L., Rance, M., Kumar, A., Bamford, H., et al. (2012). Media use, face-to-face communication, media multitasking, and social well-being among 8- to 12-year-old girls. Developmental Psychology © 2012 American Psychological Association, 48(2), 327–336.

  Google Scholar 

• Poldrack, R. A., & Foerde, K. (2007). Category learning and the memory systems debate. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 32, 197–205.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Resta, P., & Laferrière, T. (2007). Technology in support of collaborative learning. Educational Psychology Review, 19(1), 65–83.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Rideout, V. (2013). Zero to eight: Children’s media use in America 2013. http://www.commonsensemedia.org.

• Rideout, V. J. (2015). The common sense census: Media use by tweens and teens. http://www.commonsensemedia.org.

• Rideout, V. J., Foehr, U. G., & Roberts, D. F. (2010). Generation M2: Media in the lives of 8–18 year olds. Retrieved from Kaiser Family Foundation website: http://www.kff.org/entmedia/mh012010pkg.cfm.

• Roschelle, J., & Teasley, S. D. (1995). The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. In C. E. O’Malley (Ed.), Computer supported collaborative learning (pp. 69–97). Berlin: Springer.

  Chapter  Google Scholar 

• Rosen, L. D., et al. (2013). Facebook and texting made me do it: Media-induced task-switching while studying. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 948–958.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Rummel, N., & Spada, H. (2005). Learning to collaborate: An instructional approach to promoting collaborative problem solving in computer-mediated settings. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(2), 201–241.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Salomon, G. (1993). No distribution without individual’s cognition: A dynamic interactional view. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 111–138). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Scardamali, M., & Bereiter, C. (1994). Computer support for knowledge building communities. The Journal of the Learning Sciences., 3(3), 265–283.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Stone, A. A., Turkkan, J. S., Bachrach, C. A., Jobe, J. B., Kurtsman, H. S., & Cain, V. S. (Eds.). (2000). The science of self-report: Implications for research and practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

  Google Scholar 

• Totten, S. (1991). Cooperative learning: A guide to research. New York: Garland.

  Google Scholar 

• Wegerif, R. (2006). Towards a dialogic understanding of the relationship between teaching thinking and CSCL. International Journal of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, 1(1), 143–157.

  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references