Technology in Support of Collaborative Learning

• Alavi, M. (1994). Computer-mediated collaborative learning: An empirical evaluation. MIS Quarterly, 18(2), 59–174.

  Google Scholar 

• Andriessen, J., Baker, M., & Suthers, D. (2003). Argumentation, computer support, and the educational context of confronting cognitions. In J. Andriessen, M. Baker, & D. Suthers (Eds.), Arguing to learn: Confronting cognitions in computer-supported collaborative learning environments (pp. 1–25). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

  Google Scholar 

• Bales, R. F. (1950). Interaction process analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Barab, S. A., Kling, R., & Gray, J. (Eds.) (2004). Designing for virtual communities in the service of learning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

• Barkley, E., Cross, K., & Major, C. (2005). Collaborative learning techniques: A handbook for college faculty. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

  Google Scholar 

• Bean, J. C. (1996). Engaging ideas: The professor’s guide to integrating writing, critical thinking, and active learning in the classroom. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

  Google Scholar 

• Benbunan-Fich, R., Hiltz, S. R., & Turoff, M. (2003). A comparative content analysis of face-to-face vs. asynchronous group decision making. Decision Support Systems, 34(4), 457–469.

  Google Scholar 

• Bereiter, C. (2002). Education and mind in the knowledge age. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

  Google Scholar 

• Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1989). Intentional learning as a goal of instruction. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 361–392). Hillsdale, NJ: Earlbaum.

  Google Scholar 

• Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1993). Surpassing ourselves: An inquiry into the nature and implications of expertise. Chicago, IL: Open Court.

  Google Scholar 

• Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Lou, Y., Borokhovski, E., Wade, A., Wozney, L., et al. (2004). How does distance education compare with classroom instruction? A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Review of Educational Research, 74(3), 379–439.

  Google Scholar 

• Biggs, J. B. (1989). Approaches to the enhancement of tertiary teaching. Higher Education Research and Development, 8(1), 7–25.

  Google Scholar 

• Blumenfeld, P. C., Marx, R. W., Soloway, E., & Krajcik, J. (1996). Learning with peers: From small group cooperation to collaborative communities. Educational Researcher, 25(8), 43–46.

  Google Scholar 

• Brandon, D. P., & Hollingshead, A. B. (1999). Collaborative learning and computer-supported groups. Communication Education, 48(2), 108–125.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Bransford, J. D., Sherwood, R. D., Hasselbring, T. S., Kinzer, C. K., & Williams, S. M. (1990). Anchored instruction: Why we need it and how technology can help. In D. Nix & R. Spiro (Eds.), Cognition, education, and multimedia: Exploring ideas in high technology (pp. 115–141). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

  Google Scholar 

• Brett, C. (2004). Off-line factors contributing to online engagement. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 13(1), 83–95.

  Google Scholar 

• Brown, A. L. (1997). Transforming schools into communities of thinking and learning about serious matters. American Psychologist, 52(4), 399–413.

  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (2000). The social life of information. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.

  Google Scholar 

• Business-Higher Education Forum (2003). Building a nation of learners: The need for changes in teaching and learning to meet global challenges. Washington, DC: Business-Higher Education Forum. Available: http://www.bhef.com/publications.

• Chan, C., Burtis, J., & Bereiter, C. (1997). Knowledge building as a mediator of conflict in conceptual change. Cognition and Instruction, 15(1), 1–40.

  Google Scholar 

• Chickering, A., & Ehrmann, S. C. (1996). Implementing the seven principles: Technology as lever. AAHE Bulletin. October, 3–6. Available: http://www.tltgroup.org/programs/seven.html.

• Clark, H. H., & Schaefer, E. F. (1989). Contributing to discourse. Cognitive Science, 13(2), 259–294.

  Google Scholar 

• Cockrell, K. S., Caplow, H., & Donaldson, J. F. (2000). A context for learning: Collaborative groups in the problem-solving learning environment. The Review of Higher Education, 23(3), 347–363.

  Google Scholar 

• Collis, B., & Moonen, J. (2001). Flexible learning in a digital world: Experiences and expectations. London, UK: Kogan Page.

  Google Scholar 

• Cranton, P. (1998). No one way: Teaching and learning in higher education. Toronto: Wall & Emerson.

  Google Scholar 

• Dede, C. (1996). Emerging technologies and distributed learning. American Journal of Distance Education, 10(2), 4–36.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• De Wever, B., Schellens, T., Valcke, M., & Van Keer, H. (2006). Content analysis schemes to analyze transcripts of online asynchronous discussion groups: A review. Computers & Education, 46(1), 6–28.

  Google Scholar 

• Dillenbourg, P. (Ed.), (1999). Collaborative learning. Cognitive and computational approaches. Oxford: Elsevier.

• Dillenbourg, P. (2002). Overscripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design. In P. A. Kirschner (Ed.), Three worlds of CSCL. Can we support CSCL? (pp. 61–91). Heerlen: Open Universiteit Nederland.

  Google Scholar 

• Dillenbourg, P., Baker, M., Blaye, A., & O’Malley, C. (1996). The evolution of research on collaborative learning. In E. Spada & P. Reiman (Eds.), Learning in Humans and Machine: Towards an interdisciplinary learning science (pp. 189–211). Oxford: Elsevier.

  Google Scholar 

• Dirckinck-Holmfeld, L. (2002). Designing virtual learning environments based on problem oriented project pedagogy. In L. Dirckinck-Holmfeld & B. Fibiger (Eds.), Learning in virtual environments (pp. 31–54). Frederiksberg: Samfundslitteratur Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Duisburg, M., & Hoope, U. (1999). Computer supported interaction analysis of group problem solving. In C. Hoadley & J. Roschelle (Eds.), Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, CSCL-99 (pp. 398–405). Palo Alto, CA.

• Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki, Finland: Orienta-Konsultit.

  Google Scholar 

• Felder, R. M., Felder, G. N., Mauney, M., Hamrin, Jr., C. E., & Dietz, E. J. (1995). A longitudinal study of engineering student performance and retention. III. Gender differences in student performance and attitudes. Journal of Engineering Education, 84(2), 151–163.

  Google Scholar 

• Ferdig, R. E. (2006). Assessing technologies for teaching and learning: Understanding the importance of technological pedagogical content knowledge. British Journal of Educational Technology, 37(5)749–760.

  Google Scholar 

• Fishman, B., Marx, R. W., Blumenfeld, P., Krajcik, J., & Soloway, E. (2004). Creating a framework for research on systemic technology innovations. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 43–76.

  Google Scholar 

• Fjermestad, J. (2004). An analysis of communication mode in group support systems research. Decision Support Systems, 37(2), 239–263.

  Google Scholar 

• Francescato, D., Porcelli, R., Mebane, M., Cuddetta, M., Klobas, J., & Renzi, P. (2006). Evaluation of the efficacy of collaborative learning in face-to-face and computer-supported university contexts. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(2), 163–176.

  Google Scholar 

• Gaver, W. W. (1996). Situating action II: Affordances for interaction: The social is material for design. Ecological Psychology, 8(2), 111–129.

  Google Scholar 

• Gibson, J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

  Google Scholar 

• Gifford, B., & Enyedy, N. D. (1999). Activity centered design: Towards a theoretical framework for CSCL. In Proceedings of the third international conference on computer support for collaborative learning-99 (pp. 189–197). University of Stanford. Available: http://www.gseis.ucla.edu/faculty/enyedy/pubs/Giffcrd&Enyvedy_CSCL2000.pdf.

• Gokhale, A. A. (1995). Collaborative learning enhances critical thinking. Journal of Technology Education, 7(1), 22–30.

  Google Scholar 

• Goodlad, J., Soder, R., & Sirotnik, K. (1990). The moral dimensions of teaching. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

  Google Scholar 

• Guimond, S. (2001). Introduction to the special issue: The social psychology of academic achievement: Progress and prospects. Social Psychology of Education, 4(3–4), 215–217.

  Google Scholar 

• Gunawardena, C. N., Lowe, C. A., & Anderson, T. (1997). Analysis of a global online debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17(4), 397–431.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hakkarainen, K. (2006, August). Developing methods of studying knowledge practices. Paper presented at the Knowledge building Summer Institute, OISE/UT, Toronto.

• Harasim, L. M., Hiltz, S. R., Teles, L., & Turoff, M. (1995). Learning networks: A field guide to teaching and learning online. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Hewitt, J. (2002). From a focus on tasks to a focus on understanding: The cultural transformation of a Toronto classroom. In T. Koschmann, R. Hall, & N. Miyake (Eds.), Computer supported cooperative learning volume 2: Carrying forward the conversation (pp. 11–41). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

  Google Scholar 

• Hiltz, S. R., Dufner, D., Holmes, M., & Poole, S. (1991). Distributed group support systems: Social dynamics and design dilemmas. Journal of Organizational Computing, 2(1), 135–159.

  Google Scholar 

• Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235–266.

  Google Scholar 

• Holliman, R., & Scanlon, E. (2006). Investigating cooperation and collaboration in near synchronous computer mediated conferences. Computers & Education, 46(3), 322–335.

  Google Scholar 

• Howell-Richardson, C., & Mellar, H. (1996). A methodology for the analysis of patterns of participation within computer-mediated communication courses. Instructional Science, 24(1), 47–69.

  Google Scholar 

• Hübscher-Younger, T., & Narayanan, N. H. (2003). Authority and convergence in collaborative learning. Computers & Education, 41(4), 313–334.

  Google Scholar 

• Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  Google Scholar 

• IHEP (2001). Quality on the line: Benchmarks for success in Internet-based distance education. Institute for Higher Education Policy. Washington, DC: Institute for Higher Education Policy.

  Google Scholar 

• Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. (1989). Cooperation and competition: Theory and research. Edina, MN: Interaction.

  Google Scholar 

• Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1996). Cooperation and the use of technology. In D. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 785–812). London: MacMillan.

  Google Scholar 

• Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (1998a). Cooperative learning: Increasing college faculty instructional productivity, ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports, N. 4. Washington, DC: George Washington University.

• Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (1998b). Cooperative learning returns to college: What evidence is there that it works? Change, 30(4), 26–35.

  Google Scholar 

• Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R., Stanne, M., & Garibaldi, A. (1990). The impact of group processing on achievement in cooperative groups. Journal of Social Psychology, 130, 507–516.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Johnson, R., Johnson, D. W., Stanne, M., Smizak, B., & Avon, J. (1987). Effect of composition pairs at the word processor on quality of writing and ability to use the word processor. Minneapolis: Cooperative Learning Center, University of Minnesota.

  Google Scholar 

• Jonassen, D. (1994). Thinking technology: Toward a constructivist design model. Educational Technology, 34(4), 35–36.

  Google Scholar 

• Jones, C., Dirckinck-Holmfeld, L., & Lindström, B. (2006). A relational, indirect, meso-level approach to CSCL design in the next decade. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning ^, 1(1), 35–56.

  Google Scholar 

• Jones, A., Scanlon, E., & Blake, C. (2000). Conferencing in communities of learners: Examples from social history and science communication. Educational Technology and Society, 3(3), 215–226.

  Google Scholar 

• Kafai, Y. B., & Resnick, M. (Eds.), (1996). Constructionism in practice: Designing, thinking, and learning in a digital world. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

• Kirschner, P. A. (2001). Using integrated electronic environments for collaborative teaching/learning. Learning and Instruction, 10(Suppl. 1), 1–9.

  Google Scholar 

• Kirschner, P. A., Martens, R. L., & Strijbos, J. W. (2004). CSCL in higher education? A framework for designing multiple collaborative environments. In J. W., Strijbos, P. A., Kirschner, & R. L., Martens (Eds.), What we know about CSCL: And implementing it in higher education (pp. 3–30). Boston, MA: Kluwer.

  Google Scholar 

• Koschmann, T. (Ed.) (1996). CSCL: Theory and practice of an emerging paradigm. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

• Koschmann, T. (2002). Dewey’s contribution to the foundations of CSCL research. In Proceedings of Computer Support for Collaborative Learning 2002 (pp. 17–22). Boulder, CO.

• Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., & Jochems, W. (2003). Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computersupported collaborative learning environments: A review of the research. Computers in Human Behaviour, 19(3), 335–353.

  Google Scholar 

• Lai, M., & Law, N. (2005). Peer scaffolding of knowledge building through collaboration of groups with differential learning experiences. CSCL Proceedings. Taiwan.

• Landauer, T. K., Foltz, P. W., & Laham, D. (1998). Introduction to latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes, 25(2–3), 259–284.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Laurillard, D. (2001). Rethinking university teaching: A conversational framework for the effective use of educational technology. London: Routledge.

  Google Scholar 

• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Levine, J. M., Resnick, L. B., & Higgins, E. T. (1993). Social foundations of cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 44(1), 585–603.

  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Lim, J. (2003). A conceptual framework on the adoption of negotiation support systems. Information and Software Technology, 45(8), 469–477.

  Google Scholar 

• Lim, J., & Liu, Y. (2006). The role of cultural diversity and leadership in computer-supported collaborative learning: A content analysis. Information and Software Technology, 48(3), 142–153.

  Google Scholar 

• Lipponen, L. (2000). Towards knowledge building: From facts to explanations in primary students’ computer mediated discourse. Learning Environments Research, 3(2), 179–199.

  Google Scholar 

• Lipponen, L. (2002). Exploring foundations for computer-supported collaborative learning. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Computer support for collaborative learning: Foundations for a CSCL community. Proceedings of the Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 2002 Conference (pp. 72–81). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

  Google Scholar 

• Lipponen, L., Hakkarainen, K., & Paavola, S. (2004). Practices and orientations of CSCL. In J. W. Strijbos, P. A. Kirschner, & R. L. Martens (Eds.), What we know about CSCL in higher education (pp. 31–51). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

  Google Scholar 

• Littleton, K., & Whitelock, D. (2005). The negotiation and co-construction of meaning and understanding within a postgraduate online learning community. Learning, Media and Technology, 30(2), 147–164.

  Google Scholar 

• Lockyer, L., Patterson, J., & Harper, B. (2001). ICT in higher education: Evaluating outcomes for health education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 17(3), 275–283.

  Google Scholar 

• Lonchamp, J. (2006). Supporting synchronous collaborative learning: A generic, multi-dimensional model. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1(2), 246–276.

  Google Scholar 

• Lou, Y., Abrami, P. C., & d’Apollonia, S. (2001). Small group and individual learning with technology: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 71(3), 449–521.

  Google Scholar 

• Mason, R., & Romiszowski, A. (1996). Computer-mediated communication. In D. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 438–456). New York: Macmillan.

  Google Scholar 

• McAllister, S., Ravenscroft, A., & Scanlon, E. (2004). Combining interaction and context design to support collaborative argumentation using a tool for synchronous CMC. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20(3), 194–204.

  Google Scholar 

• McCain, T., & Jukes, I. (2001). Windows in the future: Education in the age of technology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.

  Google Scholar 

• McManus, M., & Aiken, R. (1995). Monitoring computer-based problem solving. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 6(4), 307–336.

  Google Scholar 

• Monteil, J. M., & Huguet, P. (1999). Social context and cognitive performance: Towards a social psychology of cognition. Hove, East Sussex: Psychology.

  Google Scholar 

• Murphy, E. (2004). Recognizing and promoting collaboration in online asynchronous discussions. British Journal of Educational Technology, 35(4), 421–431.

  Google Scholar 

• Oblinger, D. G., & Oblinger, J. L. (Eds.). (2005). Educating the Net generation. Washington, DC: Educause. Available: http://www.educause.edu/educatingthenetgen.

• Ocker, R. J., & Yaverbaum, G. L. (2001). Collaborative learning environments: Exploring student attitudes and satisfaction in face-to-face and asynchronous computer conferencing settings. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 12(4), 427–448.

  Google Scholar 

• Palmieri, P. (1997). Technology in education ... Do we need it? ARIS Bulletin, 8(2), 1–5.

  Google Scholar 

• Panitz, T. (1996). A definition of collaborative versus cooperative learning. Deliberations [Online]. Available: http://www.londonmet.ac.uk/deliberations/collaborative-learning/panitz-paper.cfm.

• Pea, R. D. (1994). Seeing what we build together: Distributed multimedia learning environments for transformative communications. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(3), 219–225.

  Google Scholar 

• Pea, R. D. (2004). The social and technological dimensions of scaffolding and related theoretical concepts for learning, education and human activity. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 423–451.

  Google Scholar 

• Pea, R. D., Edelson, D. C., & Gomez, L. M. (1994, February). Distributed collaborative science learning using scientific visualization and wideband telecommunications. Paper presented at the 160th Meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, in the symposium: “Multimedia information systems for science and engineering education: Harnessing technologies », Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.

• Pearson, J. (2006). Investigating ICT using problem-based learning in face-to-face and online learning environments. Computers & Education, 47(1), 56–73.

  Google Scholar 

• Reeder, K., Macfadyen, L. P., Roche, J., & Chase, M. (2004). Negotiating cultures in cyberspace: Participation patterns and problematics. Language Learning and Technology, 8(2), 88–105.

  Google Scholar 

• Rick, J., & Gudzial, M. (2006). Situating CoWeb: A scholarship of application. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1(1), 89–115.

  Google Scholar 

• Rimmershaw, R. (1999). Using conferencing to support a culture of collaborative study. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 15(3), 189–200.

  Google Scholar 

• Roschelle, J. (1992). Learning by collaboration: Convergent conceptual change. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(3), 235–276.

  Google Scholar 

• Roschelle, J., & Teasley, S. (1995). The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. In C. E. O’Malley (Ed.), Computer supported collaborative learning (pp. 69–197). Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer.

  Google Scholar 

• Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing social presence in asynchronous text-based computer conferencing. Journal of Distance Education, 14(2), 51–70.

  Google Scholar 

• Rovai, A. (2002). A preliminary look at the structural differences of higher education classroom communities in traditional and ALN courses. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 6(1), 41–56.

  Google Scholar 

• Rummel, N., & Spada, H. (2005). Learning to collaborate: An instructional approach to promoting collaborative problem solving in computer-mediated settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(2), 201–241.

  Google Scholar 

• Salomon, G. (Ed.) (1993). Distributed cognition: Psychological and educational considerations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

• Salomon, G., & Perkins, D. N. (1998). Individual and social aspects of learning. In Pearson, P. D. & Iran-Nejad, A. (Eds.), Review of Research in Education, 23 (pp.1–24). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

  Google Scholar 

• Scardamalia, M. (2002). Collective responsibility for the advancement of knowledge. In B. Smith (Ed.), Liberal Education in a Knowledge Society (pp. 67–98). Chicago, IL: Open Court.

  Google Scholar 

• Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1994). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(3), 265–283.

  Google Scholar 

• Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1996). Engaging student in a knowledge society. Educational Leadership, 54(3), 6–10.

  Google Scholar 

• Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2003). Knowledge building. In J. W. Guthrie (Ed.), Encyclopedia of education (2nd ed. pp. 1370–1373). New York: Macmillan.

  Google Scholar 

• Schellens, T., & Valcke, M. (2006). Fostering knowledge construction in university students through asynchronous discussion groups. Computers & Education, 46(4), 349–370.

  Google Scholar 

• Schlager, M., & Fusco, J. (2004). Teacher professional development, technology, and communities of practice: Are we putting the cart before the horse? In S. Barab, R. Kling, & J. Gray (Eds.), Designing for virtual communities in the service of learning (pp. 120–153). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Schlager, M. S., & Schank, P. (1997). Tapped in: A new online community concept for the next generation of Internet technology. In R. Hall, N. Miyake, & N. Enyedy (Eds.), Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning. (pp. 231–240). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

  Google Scholar 

• Schrage, M. (1990). Shared minds: The new technologies of collaboration. New York: Random House.

  Google Scholar 

• Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4–13.

  Google Scholar 

• Slavin, R. E. (1996). Research for the future: Research on cooperative learning and achievement: What we know, what we need to know. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21(1), 43–69.

  Google Scholar 

• Slavin, R. E. (1997). Educational psychology: Theory and practice (5th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

  Google Scholar 

• Smith, K. A. (1996). Cooperative learning: Making “group work” work. In T. E. Sutherland & C. C. Bonwell (Eds.), Using active learning in college classes: A range of options for faculty (pp. 71–82). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

  Google Scholar 

• Spiro, R. J., Coulson, R. L., Feltovich, P. J., & Anderson, D. K. (1988). Cognitive flexibility theory: Advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains. In The Tenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

• Springer, L., Stanne, M., & Donovan, S. (1998). Effects of cooperative learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 69(1), 21–51.

  Google Scholar 

• Stahl, G. (2004). Building collaborative knowing: Elements of a social theory of CSCL. In J.-W. Strijbos, P. Kirschner, & R. Martens (Eds.), What we know about CSCL: And implementing it in higher education (pp. 53–86). Boston, MA: Kluwer.

  Google Scholar 

• Stahl, G. (2006). Group cognition: Computer support for building collaborative knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Steinkuehler, C. A., Derry, S. J., Hmelo-Silver, C., & DelMarcelle, M. (2002). Cracking the resource nut with distributed problem-based learning in secondary teacher education. Journal of Distance Education, 23(1), 23–29.

  Google Scholar 

• Stone-Wiske, M. (2002). New technologies to support teaching for understanding. International Journal of Educational Research, 35(5), 483–501.

  Google Scholar 

• Strijbos, J. W., Kirschner, P. A., & Martens, R. L. (Eds.) (2004). What we know about CSCL: And implementing it in higher education. Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer.

• Strijbos, J. W., Martens, R. L., & Jochems, W. M. G. (2004). Designing for interaction: Six steps to designing computer-supported group-based learning. Computers & Education, 42(4), 403–424.

  Google Scholar 

• Strijbos, J. W., Martens, R. L., Jochems, W. M. G., & Broers, N. (2004). The effect of functional roles on group efficiency. Using multilevel modeling and content analysis to investigate computer supported collaboration in small groups. Small Group Research, 35(2), 195–229.

  Google Scholar 

• Strijbos, J. W., Martens, R. L., Prins, F. J., & Jochems, W. M. G. (2006). Content analysis: What are they talking about? Computers & Education, 46(1), 29–48.

  Google Scholar 

• Suthers, D., Weiner, A., Connelly, J., & Paolucci, M. (1995). Belvedere: Engaging students in critical discussion of science and public policy issues. In J. Greer (Ed.), Proceedings of AI-ED 95: World Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (pp. 266–273). Washington, DC: AACE.

  Google Scholar 

• Tapscott, D. (1998). Growing up digital: The rise of the net generation. New York: McGraw-Hill.

  Google Scholar 

• Teasley, S. D., & Roschelle, J. (1993). Constructing a joint problem space: The computer as a tool for sharing knowledge. In S. P. Lajoie & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Computers as Cognitive Tools (pp. 229–258). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

  Google Scholar 

• UNESCO (2005). Towards knowledge societies: Unesco World report (WSIS) [Online]. Available: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0014/001418/141843e.pdf.

• Valcke, M., & Martens, R. (2006). The problem arena of researching computer supported collaborative learning: Introduction to the special section. Computers & Education, 46(1), 1–5.

  Google Scholar 

• van Aalst, I., & Chan, C., (2001). Beyond sitting next to each other: A design experiment on knowledge building in teacher education. In P. Dillenbourg, A. Eurelings, & K. Hakkarainen (Eds.), Proceedings of the First European Conference on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (pp. 20–28). Maastricht: University of Maastrich.

  Google Scholar 

• Veerman, A. L., & Treasure-Jones, T. (1999). Software for problem solving through collaborative argumentation. In P. Poirier & J. Andriessen (Eds.), Foundations of argumentative test processing (pp. 203–230). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Wallace, R. (2003). Online learning in higher education: A review of research on interactions among teachers and students. Education, Communication & Information, 3(2), 241–280.

  Google Scholar 

• Warschauer, M. (1997). Computer-mediated collaborative learning: Theory and practice. The Modern Language Journal, 81(4), 470–481.

  Google Scholar 

• WASC (2000). Guidelines for Distance Education: Principles of Good Practice. Alameda, CA: Western Association of Schools and Colleges.

  Google Scholar 

• Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Webb, N. M., & Palincsar, A. S. (1996). Group processes in the classroom. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 841–873). New York: Simon & Schuster.

  Google Scholar 

• Wegerif, R. (2006). Towards a dialogic understanding of the relationship between teaching thinking and CSCL. International Journal of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, 1(1), 143–157.

  Google Scholar 

• Weinberger, A., Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2002). Fostering computer supported collaborative learning with cooperation scripts and scaffolds. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Computer support for collaborative learning: foundations for a CSCL community (pp. 573–574). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

  Google Scholar 

• Wilson, E. (2000). Student characteristics and computer-mediated communication. Computers and Education, 34(2), 67–76.

  Google Scholar 

Download references