Abstract
The intelligent transportation system is necessary for smart connection among vehicles and roadways equipment. Vehicular Ad-hoc Network (VANET) where vehicles are linked together through a wireless link is an emerging research area and gaining attention for this smart connection where each vehicle is a node in the ad-hoc network consists of groups of stationary or moving vehicles. This dynamic system of VANET provides an infrastructure that builds new solution for safety and comfort but this implementation presents a hurdle in the selection and designing of a routing protocol which is capable of providing reliable and efficient transportation of packets. The prior objective of this research is to select and suggest reliable routing protocol and gives a performance assessment of the topology based protocol’s properties in terms of high-density dynamic systems of vehicles i.e., Ad Hoc on-Demand Distance Vector (AODV), Optimized Link State Routing Protocol, Dynamic Source Routing (DSR), and Destination-Sequenced Distance-Vector on the grounds of simulation parameters (packet delivery ratio (PDR), overhead (OH), throughput ratio (TR)). The performance is evaluated using network simulator and mobility simulator the Simulation of Urban Mobility. The result shows that in case of TR and OH, protocol DSR outperforms but in case of PDR, protocol AODV outperforms. From the above, conclusion is that this research will assist the researchers in selecting the better routing protocol in the implementation of dynamic system of VANET infrastructure.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
Abbreviations
- V-2-V:
-
Vehicle-to-vehicle
- V-2-I:
-
Vehicle-to-infrastructure
- OBU:
-
On-board unit
- KPI:
-
Key performance indicators
- RSU:
-
Road side units
- DSRC:
-
Dedicated short range communication
- QoS:
-
Quality of service
- MAC:
-
Media access control
- PDR:
-
Packet delivery ratio
- EED:
-
End-to-end delay
- OH:
-
Overhead
- TR:
-
Throughput ratio
- SUMO:
-
Simulation of urban mobility
- NS-2:
-
Network simulator-2
- NS-3:
-
Network simulator-3
- TCL:
-
Tool command language
- GUI:
-
Graphic user interface
- OLSR:
-
Optimized link state routing protocol
- DSDV:
-
Destination-sequenced distance-vector
- AODV:
-
Ad hoc on-demand distance vector
- DSR:
-
Dynamic source routing
- VANET:
-
Vehicle ad-hoc network
- DTN:
-
Delay tolerant network
- GPS:
-
Global positioning system
- MANET:
-
Mobile ad-hoc network
- XML:
-
Extensible markup language
- ITS:
-
Intelligent transportation systems
- IoT:
-
Internet of things
References
Raissi, K., & Ben Gouissem, B. (2021). Hybrid communication architecture in VANETs via named data network. International Journal of Communication Systems, 34(11), e4848.
Sharma, S., Kaul, A., Ahmed, S., & Sharma, S. (2021). A detailed tutorial survey on VANETs: Emerging architectures, applications, security issues, and solutions. International Journal of Communication Systems, 34(14), e4905.
Hasrouny, H., Samhat, A. E., Bassil, C., & Laouiti, A. (2017). VANet security challenges and solutions: A survey. Vehicular Communications, 7, 7–20.
Bhoi, S. K., & Khilar, P. M. (2014). Vehicular communication: A survey. IET Networks, 3(3), 204–217.
Altayeb, M., & Mahgoub, I. (2013). A survey of vehicular ad hoc networks routing protocols. International Journal of Innovation and Applied Studies, 3(3), 829–846.
Singh, G. (2022). Performance evaluation for ad hoc routing protocol in vehicular ad hoc network (VANET). Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology. 22(17).
Awang, A., Husain, K., Kamel, N., & Aissa, S. (2017). Routing in vehicular ad-hoc networks: A survey on single-and cross-layer design techniques, and perspectives. IEEE Access, 5, 9497–9517.
Qureshi, K. N., & Abdullah, H. (2013). Topology based routing protocols for vanet and their comparison with manet. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 58(3), 707–715.
Gadkari, M. Y., & Sambre, N. B. (2012). VANET: Routing protocols, security issues and simulation tools. IOSR Journal of Computer Engineering, 3(3), 28–38.
Boussoufa-Lahlah, S., Semchedine, F., & Bouallouche-Medjkoune, L. (2018). Geographic routing protocols for Vehicular Ad hoc NETworks (VANETs): A survey. Vehicular Communications, 11, 20–31.
Abdeen, M. A., Beg, A., Mostafa, S. M., AbdulGhaffar, A., Sheltami, T. R., & Yasar, A. (2022). Performance Evaluation of VANET Routing Protocols in Madinah City. Electronics, 11(5), 777.
Singh, S., & Agrawal, S. (2014). VANET routing protocols: Issues and challenges. In: 2014 Recent Advances in Engineering and Computational Sciences (RAECS) (pp. 1–5). IEEE.
Cooper, C., Franklin, D., Ros, M., Safaei, F., & Abolhasan, M. (2016). A comparative survey of VANET clustering techniques. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 19(1), 657–681.
Elhoseny, M., & Shankar, K. (2020). Energy efficient optimal routing for communication in VANETs via clustering model. In M. Elhoseny & A. E. Hassanien (Eds.), Emerging technologies for connected internet of vehicles and intelligent transportation system networks: Emerging technologies for connected and smart vehicles (pp. 1–14). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22773-9_1
Mokhayeri, S., & Kheirabadi, M. T. (2021). Zone selection strategy in Geocast routing algorithms in VANET: A review. The Journal of Supercomputing, 77(11), 12953–12986.
Allal, S., & Boudjit, S. (2013). Geocast routing protocols for VANETs: Survey and geometry-driven scheme proposal. Journal of Internet Services and Information Security, 3(1/2), 20–36.
Liu, X. T., Hu, B. J., Wei, Z. H., & Zhu, Z. X. (2017). A congestion-aware GPCR routing protocol for vehicular ad-hoc network in urban scenarios. In: 2017 IEEE 9th international conference on communication software and networks (ICCSN) (pp. 166–170). IEEE.
Malik, R. F., Nurfatih, M. S., Ubaya, H., Zulfahmi, R., & Sodikin, E. (2017). Evaluation of greedy perimeter stateless routing protocol on vehicular ad hoc network in palembang city. In: 2017 International conference on data and software engineering (ICoDSE) (pp. 1–5). IEEE.
Liu, L., Chen, C., Ren, Z., Qiu, T., & Yang, K. (2018). A delay-aware and backbone-based geographic routing for urban VANETs. In: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC) (pp. 1–6). IEEE.
Ardakani, S. P. (2018). ACR: A Cluster-based routing protocol for VANET. International Journal of Wireless & Mobile Networks (IJWMN) Vol, 10.
Daud, S., Gilani, S. M. M., Riaz, M. S., & Kabir, A. (2019). DSDV and AODV protocols performance in Internet of Things environment. In: 2019 IEEE 11th International Conference on Communication Software and Networks (ICCSN) (pp. 466–470). IEEE.
Kim, B. C., Lee, H. S., & Ma, J. (2005). Enhanced ad hoc on-demand distance vector (eaodv) routing protocol with route distribution. In: 62nd IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, VTC 2005 (pp. 314–318). IEEE.
Hasan, M., & Sarker, O. (2020). Routing protocol selection for intelligent transport system (ITS) of VANET in high mobility areas of Bangladesh. In: Proceedings of international joint conference on computational intelligence (pp. 123–135). Springer, Singapore.
Malik, S., & Sahu, P. K. (2019). A comparative study on routing protocols for VANETs. Heliyon, 5(8), e02340.
Mahdi, H. F., Abood, M. S., & Hamdi, M. M. (2021). Performance evaluation for vehicular ad-hoc networks-based routing protocols. Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics, 10(2), 1080–1091.
Waseem, R. M., Khan, F. Z., Ahmad, M., Naseem, A., Jhanjhi, N. Z., & Ghosh, U. (2021). Performance Evaluation of AOMDV on Realistic and Efficient VANet Simulations. Wireless Personal Communications, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-021-08358-7
Oliveira, R., Montez, C., Boukerche, A., & Wangham, M. S. (2017). Reliable data dissemination protocol for VANET traffic safety applications. Ad Hoc Networks, 63, 30–44.
Oubbati, O. S., Lakas, A., Zhou, F., Güneş, M., Lagraa, N., & Yagoubi, M. B. (2017). Intelligent UAV-assisted routing protocol for urban VANETs. Computer communications, 107, 93–111.
Rajput, U., Abbas, F., Eun, H., & Oh, H. (2017). A hybrid approach for efficient privacy-preserving authentication in VANET. IEEE Access, 5, 12014–12030.
Lim, K. G., Lee, C. H., Chin, R. K. Y., Yeo, K. B., & Teo, K. T. K. (2017, October). SUMO enhancement for vehicular ad hoc network (VANET) simulation. In: 2017 IEEE 2nd international conference on automatic control and intelligent systems (I2CACIS) (pp. 86–91). IEEE.
Azevedo, C. L., Deshmukh, N. M., Marimuthu, B., Oh, S., Marczuk, K., Soh, H., & Ben-Akiva, M. E. (2017). Simmobility short-term: An integrated microscopic mobility simulator. Transportation Research Record, 2622(1), 13–23.
Carneiro, G. (2010). NS-3: Network simulator 3. In: UTM Lab Meeting April (Vol. 20, pp. 4–5).
Weber, J. S., Neves, M., & Ferreto, T. (2021). VANET simulators: An updated review. Journal of the Brazilian Computer Society, 27(1), 1–31.
Korkalainen, M., Sallinen, M., Kärkkäinen, N., & Tukeva, P. (2009). Survey of wireless sensor networks simulation tools for demanding applications. In: 2009 Fifth international conference on networking and services (pp. 102–106). IEEE.
Issariyakul, T., & Hossain, E. (2009). Introduction to network simulator 2 (NS2). In Introduction to network simulator NS2 (pp. 1–18). Springer, Boston, MA.
Funding
The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Sehrawat, P., Chawla, M. Interpretation and Investigations of Topology Based Routing Protocols Applied in Dynamic System of VANET. Wireless Pers Commun 128, 2259–2285 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-022-10042-3
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-022-10042-3