A review of recent advances in learner and skill modeling in intelligent learning environments

• Aleven V., McLaren B.M., Roll I., Koedinger K.R. (2006) Toward meta-cognitive tutoring: a model of help seeking with a cognitive tutor. I. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 16(2): 101–128

  Google Scholar 

• Almond R.G., Mislevy R.J. (1999) Graphical models and computerized adaptive testing. Appl. Psychol. Meas. 23(3): 223–237

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Almond, R.G., Dibello, L., Jenkins F., Senturk, D., Mislevy, R., Steinberg, L., Yan, D.: Models for conditional probability tables in educational assessment. In: Proceedings of the 2001 Conference on AI and Statistics, Key West, FL, 3–6 January 2001

• Almond R.G., DiBello L.V., Moulder B., Zapata-Rivera J.-D. (2007) Modeling diagnostic assessments with Bayesian Networks. J. Educ. Meas. 44: 341–359. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.2007.00043.x

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Alrifai, M., Dolog, P., Nejdl, W.: Learner Profile Management for Collaborative Adaptive eLearning Application. In: APS’2006: Joint International Workshop on Adaptivity, Personalisation and the Semantic Web at the 17th ACM Hypertext’06 Conference, Odense, Denmark, 22–25 August 2006

• Aroyo L., Dolog P., Houben G.-J., Kravcik M., Naeve A., Nilsson M., Wild F. (2006) Interoperability in personalized adaptive learning. Educ. Technol. Soc. 9(2): 4–18

  Google Scholar 

• Arroyo, I., Ferguson, K., Johns, J., Dragon, T., Meheranian, H., Fisher, D., Barto, A.G., Mahadevan, S., Woolf, B.P.: Repairing disengagement with non-invasive interventions. In: Luckin, R., Koedinger, K.R., Greer, J.E. (eds.) Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, AIED 2007, Los Angeles, CA, USA, pp. 195–202, 9–13 July 2007

• Arroyo, I., Cooper, D.G., Burleson, W., Woolf, B.P., Muldner, K., Christopherson, R.: Emotion sensors go to school. In: Dimitrova, V., Mizoguchi, R., du Boulay, B., Graesser, A.C. (eds.) Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, AIED 2009, Brighton, UK, pp. 17–24, 6–10 July 2009

• Augustin T., Hockemeyer C., Kickmeier-Rust M., Albert D. (2011) Individualized skill assessment in educational games: basic definitions and mathematical formalism. IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol. 4: 138–148

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Baker, R.S.J.: Modeling and understanding students’ off-task behavior in intelligent tutoring systems. In: Rosson, M.B., Gilmore, D.J. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2007 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2007, San Jose, CA, USA, pp. 1059–1068, 28 April–3 May 2007

• Baker, R., Corbett, A.: More accurate student modeling through contextual estimation of slip and guess probabilities in Bayesian Knowledge Tracing. In: Proceedings of Ninth Intelligent Tutoring System Conference (ITS2008), pp. 406–415, Montreal, Canada, 24–27 June 2008. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-69132-7_44

• Baker, R.S.J., de Carvalho, A.M.J.B.: Labeling student behavior faster and more precisely with text replays. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Educational Data Mining, EDM 2008, pp. 38–47, Montreal, Canada, 20–21 June 2008

• Baker F.B., Kim S.-H. (2004) Item Response Theory, Parameter Estimation Techniques, 2nd edn. Marcel Dekker Inc, New York, NY

  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Baker, R.S., Corbett, A.T., Koedinger, K.R., Wagner, A.Z.: ‘Off-Task Behavior in the Cognitive Tutor Classroom: When Students “Game The System”’. In: Proceedings of ACM CHI 2004: Computer–Human Interaction, pp. 383–390, Vienna, Austria, 24–29 April 2004

• Baker, R.S.J., Corbett, A.T., Koedinger, K.R., Evenson, S., Roll, I., Wagner, A.Z., Naim, M., Raspat, J., Baker, D.J., Beck, J.E.: Adapting to when students game an intelligent tutoring system. In: Ikeda, M., Ashley, K.D., Chan, T.-W. (eds.) Intelligent Tutoring Systems, 8th International Conference, ITS 2006, Jhongli, Taiwan, 26–30 June 2006, Proceedings, Vol. 4053 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 392–401. Springer, Berlin (2006)

• Baker, R.S.J., Corbett, A.T., Aleven, V.: Improving contextual models of guessing and slipping with a truncated training set. In: Baker, R.S.J., Barnes, T., Beck, J.E. (eds.) Proceedings of EDM 2008, The 1st International Conference on Educational Data Mining, pp. 67–76 (2008a)

• Baker R.S.J., Corbett A.T., Roll I., Koedinger K.R. (2008b) Developing a generalizable detector of when students game the system. User Model. User-Adapt. Interact. 18(3): 287–314

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Baker, R.S.J., Mitrovic, A., Mathews, M.: Detecting gaming the system in constraint-based tutors. In: User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization, 18th International Conference, UMAP 2010, Big Island, HI, USA, 20–24 June 2010, Proceedings, pp. 267–278 (2010)

• Beal, C.R., Qu, L., Lee, H.: Classifying learner engagement through integration of multiple data sources. In: Proceedings of AAAI06, Boston, MA, 16–20 July 2006

• Beck, J.E.: Engagement tracing: using response times to model student disengagement. In: Looi, C.-K., McCalla, G.I., Bredeweg, B., Breuker, J. (eds.) Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, AIED 2005, 18–22 July 2005, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 88–95 (2005)

• Beck, J.E., Chang, K.-m., Mostow, J., Corbett, A.T.: Does help help? Introducing the Bayesian evaluation and assessment methodology. In: Proceedings of Intelligent Tutoring Systems, ITS 2008, Montreal, Canada, pp. 383–394, 23–27 June 2008

• Biswas G., Jeong H., Kinnebrew J., Sulcer B., Roscoe R. (2010) Measuring self-regulated learning skills through social interactions in a teachable agent environment. Res. Pract. Technology-Enhanced Learn. 5(2): 123–152

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Bloom B.S. (1984) The 2 sigma problem: the search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring. Educ. Res. 13(4): 4–16

  Google Scholar 

• Briggs D.C., Wilson M. (2003) An introduction to multidimensional measurement using Rasch models. J. Appl. Meas. 4: 87–100

  Google Scholar 

• Brusilovsky P. (2001) Adaptive hypermedia. User Model. User-Adapt. Interact. 11(1–2): 87–110

  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Brusilovsky P. (2003) Adaptive and intelligent web-based educational systems. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 13: 156–169

  Google Scholar 

• Brusilovsky P., Vassileva J. (2003) Course sequencing techniques for large-scale webbased education. Int. J. Cont. Eng. Lifelong Learn. 13: 75–94

  Google Scholar 

• Brusilovsky, P., Sosnovsky, S., Yudelson, M.: Ontology-based framework for user model interoperability in distributed learning environments. In: World Conference on E-Learning, E-Learn 2005, pp. 2851–2855, Vancouver, Canada (2005)

• Bull, S., Broady, E.: Spontaneous peer tutoring from sharing student models. In: Proceedings of the 8th World Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED97), pp. 143–150, Kobe, Japan, 19–23 August 1997

• Bull S., Kay J. (2007) Student models that invite the learner. In: The SMILI open learner modelling framework. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 17(2): 89–120

  Google Scholar 

• Bull S., Kay J. (2010) Open learner models. In: Nkambou R., Bourdeau R., Mizoguchi J. (eds) Advances in Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Springer, Berlin, pp 301–322

  Chapter  Google Scholar 

• Bull S., Pain H. (1995) Did I say what I think I said, and do you agree with me?: inspecting and questioning the student model. In: Greer J. (eds) Proceedings of World Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Education. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education, Charlottesville, pp 501–508

  Google Scholar 

• Carmona, C., Millán, E., de-la Cruz, J.-L.P., Trella, M., Conejo, R.: Introducing prerequisite relations in a multi-layered Bayesian student model. In: Ardissono, L., Brna, P., Mitrovic, A. (eds.) User Modeling 2005, 10th International Conference, UM 2005, pp. 347–356. Edinburgh, Scotland, UK, 24–29 July 2005

• Cen, H., Koedinger, K.R., Junker, B.: Learning factors analysis—a general method for cognitive model evaluation and improvement. In: Intelligent Tutoring Systems, 8th International Conference, ITS 2006, Jhongli, Taiwan, Proceedings, pp. 164–175, 26–30 June 2006

• Cetintas, S., Si, L., Xin, Y.P., Hord, C., Zhang, D.: Learning to identify students’ off-task behavior in intelligent tutoring systems. In: Dimitrova, V., Mizoguchi, R., du Boulay, B., Graesser, A.C. (eds.) Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, AIED 2009, Brighton, UK, pp. 701–703, 6–10 July 2009

• Chaouachi, M., Frasson, C.: Exploring the relationship between learner EEG mental engagement and affect. In: Aleven, V., Kay, J., Mostow, J. (eds.) Intelligent Tutoring Systems, 10th International Conference, ITS 2010, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, Proceedings, Part II. pp. 291–293, 14–18 June 2010

• Cohen J.A. (1960) A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 20(1): 37–46

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Cohen P.A., Kulik J.A., Kulik C.L.C. (1982) Educational outcomes of tutoring: a meta-analysis of findings. Am. Educ. Res. J. 19: 237–248

  Google Scholar 

• Cole D.A. (1987) Utility of confirmatory factor analysis in test validation research. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 55(4): 584–594

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Conati C., Maclaren H. (2009) Empirically building and evaluating a probabilistic model of user affect. User Model. User-Adapt. Interact. 19(3): 267–303

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Conati C., Gertner A., VanLehn K. (2002) Using Bayesian Networks to manage uncertainty in student modeling. User Model. User-Adapt. Interact. 12(4): 371–417

  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Conati, C., Chabbal, R., Maclaren, H.: A study on using biometric sensors for detecting user emotions in educational games. In: Proceedings of the Workshop “Assessing and Adapting to UserAttitude and Affects: Why, When and How? In Conjunction with User Modeling (UM-03), Pittsburg, PA”, 22–26 June 2003

• Conejo R., Guzman E., Millán E., Trella M., Pérez-de-la Cruz J.L., Rios A. (2004) SIETTE: a web-based tool for adaptive teaching. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 14: 29–61

  Google Scholar 

• Corbett A.T., Anderson J.R. (1995) Knowledge tracing: modeling the acquisition of procedural knowledge. User Model. User-Adapt. Interact. 4(4): 253–278

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Cumming G., Mcdougall A. (2000) Mainstreaming AIED into education?.   Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. (IJAIED) 11: 197–207

  Google Scholar 

• de Vicente A., Pain H. (2002) Informing the detection of the students’ motivational state: an empirical study. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 2363: 933–943

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Desmarais, M.C.: Performance comparison of item-to-item skills models with the IRT single latent trait model. In: User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization, UMAP 2011, pp. 75–86, Gerona, Spain, 11–15 July 2011

• Desmarais M.C., Maluf A., Liu J. (1996) User-expertise modeling with empirically derived probabilistic implication networks. User Model. User-Adapt. Interact. 5(3–4): 283–315

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Desmarais M.C., Meshkinfam P., Gagnon M. (2006) Learned student models with item to item knowledge structures. User Model. User-Adapt. Interact. 16(5): 403–434

  Article  Google Scholar 

• DiEugenio B., Glass M. (2004) The Kappa statistic: a second look. Comput. Linguist. 30(1): 95–101

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Dimitrova V. (2003) StyLE-OLM: interactive open learner modelling. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 13(1): 35–78

  Google Scholar 

• D’Mello, S.K., Taylor, R.S., Graesser, A.: Affective Trajectories during Complex Learning. In: Proceedings of the 29th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Austin, TX, pp. 203–208 (2007)

• D’Mello S.K., Craig S.D., Witherspoon A.M., McDaniel B., Graesser A.C. (2008) Automatic detection of learner’s affect from conversational cues. User Model. User-Adapt. Interact. 18(1–2): 45–80

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Doignon J.-P., Falmagne J.-C. (1985) Spaces for the assessment of knowledge. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 23: 175–196

  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Doignon J.-P., Falmagne J.-C. (1999) Knowledge Spaces. Springer, Berlin

  Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Dolog, P., Schäfer, M.: A framework for browsing, manipulating and maintaining interoperable learner profiles. In: Proceedings of UM’2005, pp. 397–401, Edinburgh, Scotland, 2005

• Dütsch I., Gediga G. (1995) Skills and knowledge structures. Br. J. Math. Stat. Psychol. 48: 9–27

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Efrong B., Gong G. (1983) A leisurely look at the bootstrap, the jackknife, and cross-validation. Am. Stat. 37: 36–48

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ekman P., Friesen W.V., O’Sullivan M., Chan A., Diacoyanni-Tarlatzi I., Heider K., Krause R., Lecompte W.A., Pitcairn T., Picci-Bitti P.E., Sherer K., Tomita M., Tzavaras A. (1987) Universal and cultural differences in the judgment of facial expression and emotion. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 53: 712–717

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Falmagne J.-C., Cosyn E., Doignon J.-P., Thiéry N. (2006) The assessment of knowledge, in theory and in practice. In: Missaoui R., Schmid J. (eds) ICFCA, Vol. 3874 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, Berlin, pp 61–79

  Google Scholar 

• Feng, M., Heffernan, N.T., Koedinger, K.R.: Addressing the testing challenge with a web-based e-assessment system that tutors as it assesses. In: Carr, L., Roure, D.D., Iyengar, A., Goble, C.A., Dahlin, M. (eds.) Proceedings of the 15th international conference on World Wide Web, WWW 2006, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK, pp. 307–316, 23–26 May 2006

• Fogarty, J., Baker, R.S., Hudson, S.E.: Case studies in the use of ROC curve analysis for sensor-based estimates in human computer interaction. In: Inkpen, K., van de Panne, M. (eds.) Proceedings of the Graphics Interface 2005 Conference, Victoria, BC, Canada, pp. 129–136, 9–11 May 2005

• Forbes-Riley, K., Litman, D.J.: Predicting emotion in spoken dialogue from multiple knowledge sources. In: HLT-NAACL, pp. 201–208, Boston, MA, 2–7 May 2004

• Friesen N. (2005) Interoperability and learning objects: an overview of e-learning standardization. Interdiscip. J. Knowl. Learn. Objects 1: 23–31

  Google Scholar 

• Gong, Y., Beck, J.E., Heffernan, N.T.: Using multiple Dirichlet distributions to improve parameter plausibility. In: Baker, R.S.J.d., Merceron, A.M., Pavlik, P.I., Jr. (eds.) Educational Data Mining 2010 (EDM2010), pp. 61–70, Pittsburgh, PA, 11–13 June 2010

• Greer, J.E., McCalla, G.I.: A computational framework for granularity and its application to educational diagnosis. In: IJCAI, pp. 477–482, Detroit, MI (1989)

• Guzmán E., Conejo R., Pérez-de-la Cruz J.-L. (2007) Adaptive testing for hierarchical student models. User Model. User-Adapt. Interact. 17: 119–157

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hacker D.J. (1999) Definitions and empirical foundations. In: Hacker D.J., Dunlosky J., Graesser A.C. (eds) Metacognition in Educational Theory and Practice. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey, pp 1–24

  Google Scholar 

• Haertel E.H. (1989) Using restricted latent class models to map the skill structure of achievement items. J. Educ. Meas. 26: 301–321. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.1989.tb00336.x

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hanley J.A., McNeil B.J. (1982) The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 143: 29–36

  Google Scholar 

• Hastie T., Tibshirani R., Friedman J.H. (2001) The elements of statistical learning. Springer, New York

  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Hatala, M., Richards, G., Eap, T., Willms, J.: Interoperability of learning object repositories and services: standards, implementations and lessons learned. In: The Proceedings of the 13th World Wide Web Conference, New York, NY (2004)

• Heller J., Steiner C., Hockemeyer C., Albert D. (2006) Competence-based knowledge structures for personalised learning. Int. J. E-Learn. 5(1): 75–88

  Google Scholar 

• Hockemeyer, C., Held, T., Albert, D.: RATH—a relational adaptive tutoring hypertext WWW–environment based on knowledge space theory. In: Alvegård (ed.) Proceedings of 4th International Conference on Computer Aided Learning and Instruction in Science and Engineering, Proceedings of the CALISCE’98, pp. 417–423, Göteborg, Sweden (1997)

• Jameson A. (1995) Numerical uncertainty management in user and student modeling: an overview of systems and issues. User Model. User-Adapt. Interact. 5(3–4): 193–251

  Google Scholar 

• Johns, J., Woolf, B.P.: A dynamic mixture model to detect student motivation and proficiency. In: Proceedings of AAAI2006, Boston, MA (2006)

• Junker B., Sijtsma K. (2001) Cognitive assessment models with few assumptions, and connections with nonparametric item response theory. Appl. Psychol. Meas. 25(3): 258–272

  Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• Kay J., Maisonneuve N., Yacef K., Reimann P. (2006) The big five and visualisations of team work activity. In: Ikeda M., Ashley K., Chan T.-W. (eds) Proceedings of Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS06). Springer, Berlin, pp 197–206

  Chapter  Google Scholar 

• Khalid, M.N.: IRT model fit from different perspectives. Ph.D. thesis, University of Twente (2009)

• Koedinger K.R., Anderson J.R., Hadley W.H., Mark M.A. (1997) Intelligent tutoring goes to school in the big city. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 8: 30–43

  Google Scholar 

• Koedinger, K.R., Corbett, A.T., Perfetti, C.: The Knowledge–Learning–Instruction (KLI) framework: toward bridging the science-practice chasm to enhance robust student learning. Technical report, Carnegie-Mellon University, Human Computer Interaction Institute, Pittsburgh (2011)

• Koper E.J.R., Giesbers B., Van Rosmalen P., Sloep P., Van Bruggen J., Tattersall C., Vogten H., Brouns F. (2005) A design model for lifelong learning networks. Interact. Learn. Environ. 1–2: 71–92

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kumar, R., Rosé, C.P., Wang, Y.C., Joshi, M., Robinson, A.: Tutorial dialogue as adaptive collaborative learning support. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED 2007), Marina Del Rey, CA, 9–13 July 2007

• Lajoie S. (2005) Extending the scaffolding metaphor. Instr. Sci. 33: 541–557

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Lepper, M.R., Woolverton, M., Mumme, D.L., Gurtner, J.L.: Motivational techniques of expert human tutors: lessons for the design of computer-based tutors. In: Lajoie, S.P., Derry, S.J. (eds). Computers as Cognitive tools. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale (1991)

• Ley T., Kump B., Albert D. (2010) A methodology for eliciting, modelling, and evaluating expert knowledge for an adaptive work-integrated learning system. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 68(4): 185–208

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Liu C.-L. (2009) . Behaviormetrikasimulation-based experience in learning structures of Bayesian networks to represent how students learn composite concepts 36(1): 1–25

  Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• Mabbott, A., Bull, S.: Student preferences for editing, persuading and negotiating the open learner model. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS 2006), pp. 481–490, Jhongli, Taiwan, 26–30 June 2006

• Mayo M., Mitrovic A. (2001) Optimising ITS behaviour with Bayesian Networks and decision theory. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 12: 124–153

  Google Scholar 

• McCalla G. (2004) The ecological approach to the design of e-learning environments: purpose-based capture and use of information about learners. J. Interact. Media Educ. 7: 1–23

  Google Scholar 

• McCalla, G.I., Peachey, D.R., Ward, B.: An architecture for the design of large-scale intelligent teaching systems. In: Cercone, N., McCalla, G. (eds.) Proceedings of the 4th National Conference of the CSCSI, pp. 85–91 (1982)

• McCalla G., Greer J., Barrie B., Pospisil P. (1992) Granularity hierarchies. Comput. Math. Appl. 23(2–5): 363–375

  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Mierswa, I., Wurst, M., Klinkenberg, R., Scholz, M., Euler, T.: YALE: rapid prototyping for complex data mining tasks. In: Proceedings of the 12th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD 2006), pp. 935–940, Philadelphia, PA, 20–23 August 2006

• Millán E., Pérez-de-la-Cruz J.L. (2002) A Bayesian diagnostic algorithm for student modeling and its evaluation. User Model. User-Adapt. Interact. 12(2–3): 281–330

  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Mislevy R.J., Gitomer D. (1995) The role of probability-based inference in an intelligent tutoring system. User Model. User-Adapt. Interact. 42(5): 253–282

  Google Scholar 

• Mislevy, R.J., Almond, R.G., Yan, D., Steinberg L.S.: Bayes nets in educational assessment: where the numbers come from. In: Laskey, K.B., Prade, H. (eds.) Proceedings of the 15th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI-99). San Francisco, CA, pp. 437–446, 30 July– 1 Aug 1999

• Mitrovic, A.: Fifteen years of constraint-based tutors: what we have achived and where we are going. User Model. User-Adapt. Interact. 22 (this issue, 2012)

• Mitrovic, A., Koedinger, K.R., Martin, B.: A comparative analysis of cognitive tutoring and constraint-based modeling. In: User Modeling 2003, 9th International Conference, UM 2003, Johnstown, PA, USA, pp. 313–322, 22–26 June 2003

• Montalvo, O., Baker, R.S.J., Sao Pedro, M.A., Nakama, A., Gobert, J.D.: Identifying student’ inquiry planning using machine learning. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Educational Data Mining, pp. 141–150, Pittsburgh, PA, 11–13 June 2010

• Mota, S., Picard, R.: Automated posture analysis for detecting learner’s interest level. In: Workshop Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition for Human Computer Interaction, in Conjunction with CVPR 2003, Madison, WI, June 2003

• Muldner, K., Burleson, W., van de Sande, B., VanLehn, K.: An analysis of gaming behaviors in an intelligent tutoring system. In: Aleven, V., Kay, J., Mostow, J. (eds.) Intelligent Tutoring Systems, 10th International Conference, ITS 2010, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 14–18 June 2010, Proceedings, Part I, Vol. 6094 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 184–193. Springer, Berlin (2010)

• Neapolitan R.E. (2004) Learning Bayesian Networks. Prentice Hall, New Jersey

  Google Scholar 

• Nkambou, R., Bourdeau, J., Mizoguchi, R. (eds) (2010) Advances in Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Springer, Berlin

  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Ortony A., Clore G.L., Collins A. (1988) The Cognitive Structure of Emotions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Pardos, Z.A., Heffernan, N.: Navigation the parameter space of Bayesian Knowledge Tracing models: visualizations of the convergence of the expectation maximization algorithm. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Educational Data Mining Conference 2010, pp. 161–170, Pittsburgh, PA, 11–13 June 2010a

• Pardos Z.A., Heffernan N.T.: Modeling individualization in a Bayesian networks implementation of knowledge tracing. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on User Modeling Adaptation and Personalization, Big Island of Hawai, USA, 20–24 June 2010b

• Pardos, Z., Heffernan, N.: KT-IDEM: Introducing item difficulty to the knowledge tracing model. In: User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization, 19th International Conference, UMAP 2011, Gerona, Spain, pp. 243–254, 11–15 July 2011

• Pavlik, P.I., Cen, H., Koedinger, K.R.: Learning factors transfer analysis: using learning curve analysis to automatically generate domain models. In: Barnes, T., Desmarais, M.C., Romero, C., Ventura, S. (eds.) 2nd International Conference on Educational Data Mining—EDM2009, pp. 121–130, Cordoba, Spain, 1–3 July 2009a

• Pavlik, P.I., Cen, H., Koedinger, K.R.: Performance factors analysis—a new alternative to knowledge tracing. In: Proceeding of the 2009 conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 531–538 (2009b)

• Peachey D.R., McCalla G.I. (1986) Using planning techniques in intelligent tutoring systems. Int. J. Man-Mach. Stud. 24(1): 77–98

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Perera D., Kay J., Koprinska I., Yacef K., Zaïane O.R. (2009) Clustering and sequential pattern mining of online collaborative learning data. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 21(6): 759–772

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Prata, D.N., Baker, R.S.J.d., Costa, E., Rosé, C.P., Cui, Y., de Carvalho, A.M.J.B.: Detecting and understanding the impact of cognitive and interpersonal conflict in computer supported collaborative learning environments. In: Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on Educational Data Mining—EDM2009, pp. 131–140, Cordoba, Spain, 1–3 July 2009

• Raftery A.E. (1995) Bayesian model selection in social research (with discussion). Sociol. Methodol. 25: 111–193

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Rebolledo-Mendez, G., du Boulay, B., Luckin, R.: Motivating the learner: an empirical evaluation. In: 8th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS2006), pp. 545–554, Jhongli, Taiwan, 26–30 June 2006

• Reckase M.D., McKinley R.L. (1991) The discriminating power of items that measure more than one dimension. Appl. Psychol. Meas. 15(4): 361–373

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Reye J. (2004) Student modelling based on belief networks. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 14: 63–96

  Google Scholar 

• Roll, I., Aleven, V., Mclaren, B.M., Koedinger, K.R.: Can help seeking be tutored? Searching for the secret sauce of metacognitive tutoring. In: Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED 2007), pp. 203–210 (2009)

• Roussos L.A., Templin J.L., Henson R.A. (2007) Skills diagnosis using IRT-based latent class models. J. Educ. Meas. 44: 293–311

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Self, J.: Bypassing the intractable problem of student modelling. In: Proceedings of Intelligent Tutoring Systems, ITS’88, pp. 18–24, Montreal, Canada (1988)

• Shih, B., Koedinger, K.R., Scheines, R.: A response time model for bottom-out hints as worked examples. In: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Educational Data Mining, EDM2008, pp. 117–126, Montreal, Canada, 20–21 June 2008

• Stout W. (2007) Skills diagnosis using IRT-based continuous latent trait models. J. Educ. Meas. 44: 313–324. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.2007.00041.x

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Tatsuoka K.K. (1983) Rule space: an approach for dealing with misconceptions based on item response theory. J. Educ. Meas. 20: 345–354

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Thai-Nghe, N., Horváth, T., Schmidt-Thieme, L.: Factorization Models for forecasting student performance. In: Conati, C., Ventura, S., Pechenizkiy, M., Calders, T. (eds.) Proceedings of EDM 2011, The 4th International Conference on Educational Data Mining, pp. 11–20, Eindhoven, Netherlands, 6–8 July 2011

• VanLehn, K., Niu, Z., Siler, S., Gertner, A.S.: Student modeling from conventional test data: a Bayesian approach without priors. In: ITS’98: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, London, UK, pp. 434–443 (1998)

• Vanlehn K., Lynch C., Schulze K., Shapiro J.A., Shelby R., Taylor L., Treacy D., Weinstein A., Wintersgill M. (2005) The Andes physics tutoring system: lessons learned. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 15(3): 147–204

  Google Scholar 

• Vassileva, J.: Dynamic courseware generation: at the cross point of CAL, ITS and authoring. In: Proceedings International Conference on Computers in Education (ICCE’95), pp. 290–297, Singapore (1995)

• Vassileva J., McCalla G., Greer J. (2003) Multi-agent multi-user modeling in I-help. User Model. User-Adapt. Interact. 13: 179–210

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Villano, M.: Probabilistic student models: Bayesian belief networks and knowledge space theory. In: Frasson, C. e. a. (ed.) Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, pp. 492–498, Montréal, Canada, 10–12 June 1992

• Vomlel J. (2004) Bayesian networks in educational testing. Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzziness Knowl. Based Syst. 12: 83–100

  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Vygotsky L.S. (1978) Mind in Society: Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

  Google Scholar 

• Walker, E., Walker, S., Rummel, N., Koedinger, K.: Using problem-solving context to assess help quality in computer-mediated peer tutoring. In: 10th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS2010), Pittsburgh, PA, 14–18 June 2010

• Walonoski, J.A., Heffernan, N.T.: Detection and analysis of off-task gaming behavior in intelligent tutoring systems. In: Ikeda, M., Ashley, K.D., Chan, T.-W. (eds.) Intelligent Tutoring Systems, 8th International Conference, ITS 2006, Jhongli, Taiwan, Proceedings, , 26–30 June 2006, Vol. 4053 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 382–391. Springer, Berlin (2006)

• Woolf B.P. (2009) Building Intelligent Interactive Tutors Student-Centered Strategies for Revolutionizing e-Learning. Elsevier, Amsterdam

  Google Scholar 

• Xu, Y., Mostow J.: Using logistic regression to trace multiple subskills in a dynamic Bayes Net. In: Conati, C., Ventura, S., Pechenizkiy, M., Calders, T. (eds.) Proceedings of EDM 2011, The 4th International Conference on Educational Data Mining, pp. 241–246, Eindhoven, Netherlands, 6–8 July 2011

• Yudelson, M., Pavlik, P.I., Koedinger, K.R.: User modeling—a notoriously black art. In: User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization, 19th International Conference, UMAP 2011, Gerona, Spain, pp. 317–328, 11–15 July 2011

• Zapata-Rivera J.-D., Greer J. (2004) Inspectable Bayesian student modeling servers in multi-agent tutoring systems. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 61(4): 535–563

  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references