Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Modeling and optimization of tool vibration and surface roughness in boring of steel using RSM, ANN and SVM

  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, statistical models were developed to investigate effect of cutting parameters on surface roughness and root mean square of work piece vibration in boring of stainless steel. A mixed level design of experiments was prepared with process variables of nose radius, cutting speed and feed rate. According to design of experiments, eighteen experiments were conducted on AISI 316 stainless steel with PVD coated carbide tools. Surface roughness, tool wear and vibration of work piece were measured in each experiment. A laser Doppler vibrometer was used to measure vibration of work piece in the form of acousto optic emission signals. These signals were processed and transformed in to different frequency zones using a fast Fourier transformer. Analysis of variance was used to identify significant cutting parameters on surface roughness and root mean square of work piece vibration. Predictive models like response surface methodology, artificial neural network and support vector machine were used to predict the surface roughness and root mean square of work piece vibration. Cutting parameters were optimized for minimum surface roughness and root mean square of work piece vibration using a multi response optimization technique.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adem, Ç., Turgay, K., & Ergün, E. (2015). Optimization of drilling parameters using Taguchi technique and response surface methodology (RSM) in drilling of AISI 304 steel with cryogenically treated HSS drills. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 26(2), 295–305.

  • Ali, H. N., & Nader, A. N. (2012). Time-delay feedback control of lathe cutting tools. Journal of Vibration and Control, 18, 1106–1115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amit Kumar, G. (2010). Predictive modelling of turning operations using response surface methodology, artificial neural networks and support vector regression. International Journal of Production Research, 48(3), 763–778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angelos, P. M., Dimitrios, E. M., & Nikolaos, M. V. (2008). Artificial neural network models for the prediction of surface roughness in electrical discharge machining. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 19(3), 283–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashvin, J. M., & Nanavati, J. I. (2013). Optimisation of machining parameters for turning operations based on response surface methodology. Measurement, 46(4), 1521–1529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azlan, M. Z., Habibollah, H., & Safian, S. (2012). Integrated ANN-GA for estimating the minimum value for machining performance. International Journal of Production Research, 50(1), 191–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhardwaj, B., Kumar, R., & Singh, P. K. (2014). Surface roughness (Ra) prediction model for turning of AISI 1019 steel using response surface methodology and Box-Cox transformation. Proceedings of Institute of Mechanical Engineering Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 228(2), 223–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, F. X. (2001). An experimental study of the impact of turning parameters on surface roughness. In Proceedings of the industrial engineering research conference, Paper no. 2036, GA.

  • Dai, L., & Wang, J. (2007). The effects of workpiece deflection and motor features on quality of machining process—nonlinear vibrations analysis. Journal of Vibration and Control, 13, 557–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Del Castillo, E., & Montgomery, D. C. (1993). A nonlinear programming solution to the dual response problem. Journal of Quality Technology, 25, 199–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derringer, G., & Suich, R. (1980). Simultaneous optimization of several response variables. Journal of Quality Technology, 12, 214–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosseini, S., & Al Khaled, A. (2014). A survey on the imperialist competitive algorithm metaheuristic: Implementation in engineering domain and directions for future research. Applied Soft Computing, 24, 1078–1094.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosseini, S., Barker, K., & Ramirez-Marquez, J. E. (2016). A review of definitions and measures of system resilience. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 145, 47–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ihsan, K., & Yilmaz, K. (2010). Experimental analysis of the deviation from circularity of bored hole based on the Taguchi method. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 56(5), 340–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ilhan, A., Mustafa, T., Hazim, E. M., & Levent, Ç. (2012). An intelligent system approach for surface roughness and vibrations prediction in cylindrical grinding. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 25(8), 750–759.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khaled, A. A., & Hosseini, S. (2015). Fuzzy adaptive imperialist competitive algorithm for global optimization. Neural Computing and Applications, 26(4), 813–825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kishan, M., Chilukuri, K. M., & Sanjay, R. (1997). Elements of artificial neural networks. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lingxuan, Z., Zhenyuan, J., Fuji, W., & Wei, L. (2010). A hybrid model using supporting vector machine and multi-objective genetic algorithm for processing parameters optimization in micro-EDM. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 51, 575–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marimuthu, P., & Chandrasekaran, K. (2011). Experimental study on stainless steel for optimal setting of machining parameters using Taguchi and neural network. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 6(10), 119–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moetakef-Imani, B., & Yussefin, N. Z. (2009). Dynamic simulation of boring process. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 49, 1096–1103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohammadnejad, M., Gholami, R., Ramezanzadeh, A., & Jalali, M. E. (2012). Prediction of blast-induced vibrations in limestone quarries using support vector machine. Journal of Vibration and Control, 18, 1322–1329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, D. C. (2001). Design and analysis of experiments (5th ed.). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mourad, L., Mustapha, B., Marc, T., & Mohamed, E. B. (2015). Chatter detection in milling machines by neural network classification and feature selection. Journal of Vibration and Control, 21, 1251–1266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murath, S., & Abdulkadir, G. (2014). Taguchi design and response surface methodology based analysis of machining parameters in CNC turning under MQL. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 604–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthukrishnan, N., & Paulo, D. J. (2009). Optimization of machining parameters of Al/SiC-MMC with ANOVA and ANN analysis. Journal of Material Processing Technology, 209(1), 225–232.

  • Nakagawa, H., Kurita, Y., Ogawa, K., Sugiyama, Y., & Hasegawa, H. (2008). Experimental analysis of chatter vibration in end-milling using laser Doppler vibrometers. International Journal of Automation Technology, 2(6), 431–438.

  • Nilrudra, M., Doloi, B., & Mondal, B. (2013). Predictive modeling of surface roughness in high speed machining of AISI 4340 steel using yttria stabilized zirconia toughened alumina turning insert. International Journal of Refractory Metals and Hard Materials, 38, 40–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettersson, L., Hakansson, L., & Claessonans Sven Olsson, I. (2001). Active control of machine-tool vibration in a CNC lathe based on an active tool holder shank with embedded piezo ceramic actuators. In The 8thInternational congress on sound and vibration, Hong Kong SAR, China, 2–6 July 2001.

  • Prasad, B. S., Sarcar, M. M. M., & Satish, B. B. (2010). Development of a system for monitoring tool conditionusing acousto-optic emission signal in face turning-an experimental approach. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 51, 57–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajesh, K. B. (2013a). Optimization of cutting parameters for minimizing power consumption and maximizing tool life during machining of Al alloy SiC particle composites. Journal of Cleaner Production, 39, 242–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajesh, K. B. (2013b). Multiresponse optimization of al alloy-SiC composite machining parameters for minimum tool wear and maximum metal removal rate. ASME, Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering,. doi:10.1115/1.4023454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramesh, K., Alwarsamy, T., & Jayabal, S. (2015). Prediction of cutting process parameters in boring operations using artificial neural networks. Journal of Vibration and Control, 21, 1043–1054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulaş, Ç., & Sami, E. (2012). Support vector machines models for surface roughness prediction in CNC turning of AISI 304 austenitic stainless steel. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 23(3), 639–650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vadlamani, S., & Hosseini, S. (2014). A novel heuristic approach for solving aircraft landing problem with single runway. Journal of Air Transport Management, 40, 144–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vapnik, V. (1998). Statistical learning theory. New York: Wiley Interscience.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkata Rao, K., Murthy, B. S. N., & Mohan Rao, N. (2013). Cutting tool condition monitoring by analyzing surface roughness, work piece vibration and volume of metal removed for AISI 1040 steel in boring. Measurement, 46, 4075–4084.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkata Rao, K., Murthy, B. S. N., & Mohan Rao, N. (2014). Prediction of cutting tool wear, surface roughness and vibration of work piece in boring of AISI 316 steel with artificial neural network. Measurement, 51, 63–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yalcin, U., Aslan, D. K., & Ihsan, K. (1980). Optimization of cutting parameters in face milling with neural networks and Taguchi based on cutting force, surface roughness and temperatures. International Journal of Production Research, 18(5), 559–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yao-Wen, H., & Chan-Yun, Y. (2008). Prediction of tool breakage in face milling using support vector machine. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 37, 872–880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeh, Y., & Cummins, H. Z. (1964). Localized fluid flow measurements with a He–Ne laser spectrometer. Applied Physics Letters, 4, 176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, PBR VITS, Kavali, A.P., India

    K. Venkata Rao

  2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Vignan’s University, Vadlamudi, A.P., India

    P. B. G. S. N. Murthy

Authors
  1. K. Venkata Rao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. P. B. G. S. N. Murthy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Venkata Rao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Venkata Rao, K., Murthy, P.B.G.S.N. Modeling and optimization of tool vibration and surface roughness in boring of steel using RSM, ANN and SVM. J Intell Manuf 29, 1533–1543 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-016-1197-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-016-1197-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation