Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evaluation of Cutting Tool Vibration and Surface Roughness in Hard Turning of AISI 52100 Steel: An Experimental and ANN Approach

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Vibration Engineering & Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Hardened steels are being extensively used in aerospace, automobile industries, bearing and die industries. High hardness of such steels makes it difficult to machine. During turning process of such materials, the cutting tool is subjected to heavy mechanical load and thus creates vibrations throughout machining process. It affects the surface quality of machined part and provokes higher rate of tool wear with lowering tool life. Therefore, measurement and prediction of vibration induced is of prime importance.

Objective

The aim of this paper is to evaluate vibration acceleration and surface roughness with varying machining parameters such as cutting speed, feed and depth of cut to develop predictive mathematical model.

Methods

The central composite rotatable design (CCRD) method is used in designing the experimental runs. The experimental results are further used to develop mathematical models using regression analysis. It is performed using Design Expert tool. The ANN model is developed using MATLAB tool and the predictions are obtained with acceptable deviations. The comparison of predictive model with experimentation is performed to report the deviation.

Results

The examination of the outcomes revealed that the cutting conditions are having prominent and mixed-type effect on vibration signals. The regression and ANN models have been found to be acceptable for prediction of vibration induced and the surface roughness. The coefficient of regression (\(R^{2}\)) is found to 0.92 which shows that the developed mathematical models have a good approximation in correlating the effect of cutting parameters on vibration of a cutting tool. The obtained correlations are verified by conformity test and have reported the close degree of agreement with respect to experimental values. It registered a lowest deviation of 3.3%. The ANN model is effective in reproducing experimental results through simplifying the complex machining process. The investigation reports predictions of ANN are more accurate than regression analysis. The surface roughness predictions agreed well with experimental results and registered the acceptable deviation of 4.33% using regression analysis and 1.37% using ANN approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chinchanikar S, Choudhury SK (2015) Machining of hardened steel—experimental investigations, performance modeling and cooling techniques: a review. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 89:95–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Teti R, Jemielniak K, O’Donnell G, Dornfeld D (2010) Advanced monitoring of machining operations. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 79:717–739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gonzalez-Laguna A, Barreiro J, Fernandez-Abia A, Alegre E, Gonzalez- Castro V (2015) Design of a TCM system based on vibration signal for metal turning processes. Procedia Eng 132:405–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Martini A, Troncossi M (2016) Upgrade of an automated line for plastic cap manufacture based on experimental vibration analysis. Case Stud Mech Syst Signal Process 3:28–33

    Google Scholar 

  5. Prasad BS, Babu MP (2017) Correlation between vibration amplitude and tool wear in turning: numerical and experimental analysis. Eng Sci Technol Int J 20:197–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Upadhyay V, Jain PK, Mehta NK (2013) In-process prediction of surface roughness in turning of Ti–6Al–4V alloy using cutting parameters and vibration signals. Measurement 46:154–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hessainia Z, Belbah A, Yallese MA, Mabrouki T, Rigal JF (2013) On the prediction of surface roughness in the hard turning based on cutting parameters and tool vibrations. Measurement 46:1671–1681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bhuiyan MSH, Choudhury IA (2015) Investigation of tool wear and surface finish by analyzing vibration signals in turning Assab-705 steel. Mach Sci Technol 19(2):236–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. D’Mello G, Srinivasa PP, Puneet NP, Ning F (2016) Surface roughness evaluation using cutting vibrations in high speed turning of Ti–6Al–4V—an experimental approach. Int J Mach Mach Mater 18(3):288–312

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ghorbani S, Kopilov VV, Polushin NI, Rogov VA (2018) Experimental and analytical research on relationship between tool life and vibration in cutting process. Arch Civil Mech Eng 18:844–862

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kataoka R, Shamoto E (2019) Influence of vibration in cutting on tool flank wear: fundamental study by conducting a cutting experiment with forced vibration in the depth-of-cut direction. Precision Eng 55:322–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Suyama DI, Diniz AE, Pederiva R (2017) Tool vibration in internal turning of hardened steel using cBN tool. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 88:2485–2495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Montgomery DC (2014) Design and analysis of experiments, 6th edn. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  14. Chen Y, Jin Y, Jiri G (2018) Predicting tool wear with multi-sensor data using deep belief networks. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 99:1917–1926

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sabzi S, Abbaspour-Gilandeh Y (2018) Using video processing to classify potato plant and three types of weed using hybrid of artificial neural network and particle swarm algorithm. Measurement 126:22–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Korkut I, Acir A, Boy M (2011) Application of regression and artificial neural network analysis in modelling of tool–chip interface temperature in machining. Expert Syst Appl 38:11651–11656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bouzid L, Yallese MA, Chaoui K, Mabrouki T, Boulanouar L (2015) Mathematical modeling for turning on AISI 420 stainless steel using surface response methodology. J Eng Manuf 229(1):45–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to University Research Cell, SP Pune University, India for providing research fund, Sanction no. OSD/BCUD/303/2016 and the Department of Mechanical Engineering, VIIT, Pune, India, for allowing laboratory facility to carry out the research work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nitin Ambhore.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ambhore, N., Kamble, D. & Chinchanikar, S. Evaluation of Cutting Tool Vibration and Surface Roughness in Hard Turning of AISI 52100 Steel: An Experimental and ANN Approach. J. Vib. Eng. Technol. 8, 455–462 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42417-019-00136-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42417-019-00136-x

Keywords

Navigation