To see or not to see: analyzing difficulties in geometry from the perspective of visual perception

• Anderson, J. R. (1995). Cognitive psychology and its implications (4th ed.). New York: Freeman.

  Google Scholar 

• Bishop, A. (1983). Space and geometry. In R. Lesh & M. Landau (Eds.), Acquisition of mathematics concepts and processes (pp. 175–203). New York: Academic Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Boden, M. (2006). Mind as machine. A history of cognitive science. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Bryant, P. (1974). Perception and understanding in young children. New York: Basic Books.

  Google Scholar 

• Burger, W., & Shaughnessy, J. (1986). Characterizing the van Hiele levels of development in geometry. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 17, 31–48.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Carpenter, T., & Fennema, E. (1992). Cognitively guided instruction: Building on the knowledge of students and teachers. International Journal of Educational Research, 17(5), 457–469.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Cheng, Y. H., & Lin, F. L. (2005). One more step toward acceptable proof in geometry. Cyprus: Symposium Proposal EARLI.

  Google Scholar 

• Clements, D. H., & Battista, M. T. (1992). Geometry and spatial reasoning. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 420–464). New York: Macmillan.

  Google Scholar 

• Del Grande, J. (1990). Spatial sense. The Arithmetic Teacher, 37(6), 14–20.

  Google Scholar 

• Duval, R. (1998). Geometry from a cognitive point of view. In C. Mammana & V. Villani (Eds.), Perspectives on the teaching of geometry for the 21st century (pp. 37–52). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

  Google Scholar 

• Duval, R. (1999). Presentations, vision and visualization: Cognitive functioning in mathematical thinking. Proceedings of the North America chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 21st, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico.

• Fielker, D. S. (1979). Strategies for teaching geometry to younger children. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 10, 85–133.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Fischbein, E. (1993). The theory of figural concepts. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 24(2), 139–162.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Gal, H. (1998). What do they really think? What students think about the median and bisector of an angle in the triangle, what they say and what their teachers know about it. In: A. Olivier & K. Newstead (Eds.), Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 2, (pp 321–328). South Africa: Stellenbosch.

• Gal, H. (2005). Identifying problematic learning situations in geometry instruction, and handling them within the framework of teacher training. Thesis for a Doctor of Philosophy degree. Jerusalem: Hebrew University of Jerusalem (Hebrew).

• Gal, H., & Linchevski, L. (2000). When a learning situation becomes a problematic learning situation: The case of diagonals in the quadrangle. In: T. Nakahara & M. Koyama (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 2, (pp 297–304). Hiroshima, Japan.

• Gal, H., & Linchevski, L. (2002). Analyzing geometry problematic learning situations by theory of perception. In: A. Cockburn & E. Nardi (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 2, (pp 400–407). United Kingdom: Norwich.

• Gal, H., & Linchevski, L. (2009). Changes in teachers' ways of coping with problematic learning situations in geometry instruction. In R. Even & D. L. Ball (Eds.), The professional education and development of teachers of mathematics: The 15th ICMI Study. New ICMI Study Series, 11 (pp. 192–193). New York: Springer.

  Google Scholar 

• Gal, H., & Vinner, S. (1997). Perpendicular lines: What is the problem? Pre-service teachers’ lack of knowledge on how to cope with students’ difficulties. In: E. Pehkonen (Ed.), Proceedings of the 21st International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 2, (pp 281–288). Finland: Lahti.

• Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

  Google Scholar 

• Gutierrez, A. (1996). Visualization in 3-dimentional geometry: In search of a framework. In: L. Puig & A. Gutierrez (Eds.), Proceedings of the20th International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 1, (pp 3–19). Valencia, Spain

• von Helmholtz, H. (1909/1962). Treatise on physiological optics. New York: Dover.

  Google Scholar 

• Hershkowitz, R. (1987). The acquisition of concepts and misconcepts in basic geometry - Or when “a little learning is a dangerous thing.” In: J. Novak (Ed.), Proceedings of the Second International Seminar on Misconceptions and Educational Strategies in Science and Mathematics, 3, (pp 238–251).

• Hershkowitz, R. (1989a). Geometric concept images of students and teachers. Thesis submitted for a Doctor of Philosophy degree. Jerusalem: Hebrew University of Jerusalem (Hebrew).

• Hershkowitz, R. (1989b). Visualization in geometry: Two sides of the coin. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 11(1), 61–76.

  Google Scholar 

• Hershkowitz, R., Ben Haim, D., Holes, C., Lappan, G., Mitchelmore, M., & Vinner, S. (1990). Psychological aspects of learning geometry. In P. Nesher & J. Kilpatrick (Eds.), Mathematics and cognition: A research synthesis by the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 70–95). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Hoffer, A. (1977). Mathematics resource project: Geometry and visualization. Palo Alto: Creative Publication.

  Google Scholar 

• Hoffer, A. (1983). Van Hiele-based research. In R. Lesh & M. Landau (Eds.), Acquisition of mathematics concepts and processes (7th ed., pp. 205–227). New York: Academic Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Klahr, D., Chase, W., & Lovelace, E. (1983). Structure and process in alphabetic retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 462–477.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kouba, V., Brown, C., Carpenter, T., Lindquist, M., Silver, E., & Swafford, J. (1988). Results of the fourth NAEP assessment of mathematics: Measurement, geometry, data interpretation, attitudes and other topics. Arithmetic Teacher, 35(9), 10–16.

  Google Scholar 

• Kosslyn, S. M. (1973). Scanning visual images: Some structural implications. Perception & Psychophysics, 14, 90–94.

  Google Scholar 

• Lehrer, R., Jenkins, M., & Osana, H. (1998). Longitudinal study of children’s reasoning about space and geometry. In R. Lehrer & D. Chazan (Eds.), Designing learning environments for developing understanding of geometry and space (pp. 137–167). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

  Google Scholar 

• Lin, F. L. (2005). Modeling students’ learning on mathematical proof and refutation. In: H. Chick & J. Vincent (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 1, (pp 3–18) Melbourne, Australia.

• Marr, D. (1982). Vision. A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman and Company.

  Google Scholar 

• Metzler, J., & Shepard, R. N. (1974). Transformational studies of the internal representations of three dimensional objects. In R. L. Solso (Ed.), Theories of cognitive psychology: The Loyola symposium. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

  Google Scholar 

• Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive psychology. New York: Appleton.

  Google Scholar 

• Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Paivio, A. (2007). Mind and its evolution. A dual coding theoretical approach. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

  Google Scholar 

• Palmer, S. E. & Rock, I. (1994). Rethinking perceptual organization: the role of uniform connectedness. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 1(1).

• Peterson, M., & Enns, J. (2005). The edge complex: Implicit memory for figure assignment in shape perception. Perception and Psychophysics, 67(4), 727–740.

  Google Scholar 

• Peterson, M. & Grant, E. (2003). Memory and learning in figure-ground perception. In: B. Ross & D. Irwin (Eds.) Cognitive vision: Psychology of learning and motivation, 42, (pp 1-34).

• Presmeg, N. (1986). Visualization and mathematical giftedness. Educational studies in mathematics, 17, 297–311.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Presmeg, N. (1992). Prototypes, metaphors, metonymies and imaginative rationality in high school methematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 23, 595–610.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Presmeg, N. (1997). Generalization using imagery in mathematics. In L. English (Ed.), Mathematical reasoning—analogies, metaphors and images (pp. 299–313). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

  Google Scholar 

• Pylyshyn, Z. W. (2003). Seeing and visualizing—It's not what you think. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Reed, S. (1974). Structural descriptions and the limitations of visual images. Memory and Cognition, 2, 329–336.

  Google Scholar 

• Roland, P. E., & Friberg, L. (1985). Localization of cortical areas activated by thinking. Journal of Neurophysiology, 53, 1219–1243.

  Google Scholar 

• Rubin, E. (1915/1958). Figure and ground. In D. Beardslee & M. Wertheimer (Eds.), Readings in perception (pp. 194–203). Princeton: D. van Nostrand Company, Inc.

  Google Scholar 

• Santa, J. L. (1977). Spatial transformations of words and pictures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 3, 418–427.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Sinnett, S., Spence, C., & Soto-Faraco, S. (2007). Visual dominance and attention: The Colavita effect revisited. Perception & Psychophysics, 69(5), 673–686.

  Google Scholar 

• Shepard, R. N., & Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science, 171, 701–703.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Tall, D., & Vinner, S. (1981). Concept image and concept definition in mathematics with particular reference to limits and continuity. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12(2), 151–169.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• TIMSS (1999). The trends in international mathematics and science study (TIMSS) and the progress in international reading literacy study (PIRLS) international study center. http://timss.bc.edu/

• Wallrabenstein, H. (1973). Development and signification of a geometry test. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 5, 81–89.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Wertheimer, M. (1958). Principles of perceptual organization. In D. Beardslee & M. Wertheimer (Eds.), Readings in perception (pp. 115–135). Princeton: D. van Nostrand Company, Inc.

  Google Scholar 

• Wolfe, J., Butcher, S., Lee, C., & Hyle, M. (2003). Changing your mind: On the contributions of top-down and bottom-up guidance in visual search for feature singletons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29(2), 483–502.

  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references