Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

I feel for you! The effect of empathy exercises on accessibility awareness

  • Long Paper
  • Published:
Universal Access in the Information Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Challenges related to adopting accessibility practices in the development process mainly revolve around a lack of accessibility awareness among practitioners, including designers, developers, and user experience professionals. Empathy exercises play a key role in sensitizing these practitioners to the importance of differences, thereby increasing their awareness of the diversity of users’ needs. This study explores the changes in prospective practitioners’ empathic advocacy regarding accessibility concerns. Participants simulated the roles of individuals with motor impairments using a keyboard and individuals with visual impairments relying on a screen reader to access and navigate digital content. Results showed that empathy exercises effectively raised accessibility awareness of participants and their user experience journey. Initially, participants were highly positive toward the websites they evaluated and did not consider accessibility issues on the websites. However, their attitudes toward the websites changed statistically significantly after completing keyboard and screen reader exercises.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. WAI Policy: Web Accessibility Laws & Policies. https://www.w3.org/WAI/policies/ Accessed December 2022

  2. Acosta-Vargas, P., Salvador-Ullauri, L.A., Luján-Mora, S.: A heuristic method to evaluate web accessibility for users with low vision. IEEE Access 7, 125634–125648 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2939068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Alim, S.: Web accessibility of the top research-intensive universities in the UK. SAGE Open (2021). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211056614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Domínguez Vila, T., Alén González, E., Darcy, S.: Accessibility of tourism websites: the level of countries’ commitment. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 19(2), 331–346 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-019-00643-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Inal, Y., Mishra, D., Torkildsby, A.B.: An analysis of web content accessibility of municipality websites for people with disabilities in Norway: Web accessibility of Norwegian municipality websites. In: Proceedings of the Nordic Human-Computer Interaction Conference, pp. 1–12, (2022). https://doi.org/10.1145/3546155.3547272

  6. Inal, Y., Torkildsby, A.B.: Web accessibility in higher education in Norway: to what extent are university websites accessible? In: Abdelnour Nocera, J., KristínLárusdóttir, M., Petrie, H., Piccinno, A., Winckler, M. (eds.) Human-computer interaction – INTERACT 2023 lecture notes in computer science. Springer, Cham (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-42280-5_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Ismailova, R., Inal, Y.: Web site accessibility and quality in use: a comparative study of government Web sites in Kyrgyzstan, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan and Turkey. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 16(4), 987–996 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-016-0490-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Karaim, N.A., Inal, Y.: Usability and accessibility evaluation of Libyan government websites. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 18(1), 207–216 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-017-0575-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Katsanos, C., Tsakoumis, A., Avouris, N.: Web accessibility: Design of an educational system to support guidelines learning. In: Proceedings of the 13th Pan-Hellenic Conference on Informatics (PCI), pp. 155–164, (2009)

  10. Alshayban A., Ahmed, I., Malek, S.: Accessibility issues in Android apps: State of affairs, sentiments, and ways forward. In: Proceedings of the 42nd International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE), pp. 1323–1334. IEEE, (2020)

  11. Antonelli, H.L., Rodrigues, S.S., Watanabe, W.M., de Mattos Fortes, R.P.: A survey on accessibility awareness of Brazilian web developers. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Software Development and Technologies for Enhancing Accessibility and Fighting Info-exclusion, pp. 71–79, (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3218585.3218598

  12. Inal, Y., Guribye, F., Rajanen, D., Rajanen, M., Rost, M.: Perspectives and practices of digital accessibility: A survey of user experience professionals in Nordic countries. In: Proceedings of the 11th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Shaping Experiences, Shaping Society, pp. 1–11, (2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3419249.3420119

  13. Inal, Y., Rızvanoğlu, K., Yesilada, Y.: Web accessibility in Turkey: awareness, understanding and practices of user experience professionals. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 18(2), 387–398 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-017-0603-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lazar, J., Dudley-Sponaugle, A., Greenidge, K.D.: Improving web accessibility: a study of webmaster perceptions. Comput. Hum. Behav. 20(2), 269–288 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2003.10.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Leite, M.V.R., Scatalon, L.P., Freire, A.P., Eler, M.M.: Accessibility in the mobile development industry in Brazil: awareness, knowledge, adoption, motivations and barriers. J. Syst. Softw. 177, 110942 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2021.110942

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Vollenwyder, B., Iten, G.H., Brühlmann, F., Opwis, K., Mekler, E.D.: Salient beliefs influencing the intention to consider web accessibility. Comput. Hum. Behav. 92, 352–360 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.11.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Inal, Y., Ismailova, R.: How do computer engineering students construe usability and accessibility? A comparative study between Turkey and Kyrgyzstan. Tehnički vjesnik 25(5), 1339–1347 (2018). https://doi.org/10.17559/TV-20170205083820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Putnam, C., Dahman, M., Rose, E., Cheng, J., Bradford, G.: Best practices for teaching accessibility in university classrooms: cultivating awareness, understanding, and appreciation for diverse users. ACM Trans. Access. Comput. (TACCESS) 8(4), 1–26 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1145/2831424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Guedes, L.S., Landoni, M.: How are we teaching and dealing with accessibility? A survey from Switzerland. In: 9th International Conference on Software Development and Technologies for Enhancing Accessibility and Fighting Info-exclusion, pp. 141–146, (2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3439231.3440610

  20. Waller, A., Hanson, V.L., Sloan, D.: Including accessibility within and beyond undergraduate computing courses. In: Proceedings of the 11th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, pp. 155–162, (2009). https://doi.org/10.1145/1639642.1639670

  21. Hengstberger, B., Miesenberger, K., Batusic, M., Chelbat, N., Rodríguez García, A.: Joint study programme on accessible web design. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Computers for Handicapped Persons, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 182–189, (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70540-6_26

  22. Gay, G.: Teaching accessibility awareness with games. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Web for All Conference, pp. 1–3, (2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/3430263.3452438

  23. Kletenik, D. Adler, R.F.: Let's play: Increasing accessibility awareness and empathy through games. In: Proceedings of the 53rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, pp. 182–188, (2022). https://doi.org/10.1145/3478431.3499277

  24. Spyridonis, F., Daylamani-Zad, D.: A serious game for raising designer awareness of web accessibility guidelines. In: Proceedings of the IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, Springer, Cham, pp. 3–12, (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29381-9_1

  25. Wright, P., McCarthy, J.: Empathy and experience in HCI. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 637–646, (2008). https://doi.org/10.1145/1357054.1357156

  26. Burgstahler, S., Doe, T.: Disability-related simulations: If, when, and how to use them in professional development. Rev. Disabil. Stud. Int. J., 1(2), (2004)

  27. Silverman, A.M., Gwinn, J.D., Van Boven, L.: Stumbling in their shoes: Disability simulations reduce judged capabilities of disabled people. Soc. Psychol. Personal. Sci. 6(4), 464–471 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550614559650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Laugwitz, B., Held, T., Schrepp, M.: Construction and evaluation of a user experience questionnaire. In: Symposium of the Austrian HCI and usability engineering group, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 63–76, (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89350-9_6

  29. Brooke, J.: SUS: a quick and dirty usability. Usabil. Eval. Ind. 189(3), 4–7 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Reichheld, F.F.: The one number you need to grow. Harv. Bus. Rev. 81(12), 46–55 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Reichheld, F.F., Markey, R.: The ultimate question 2.0 (revised and expanded edition): how net promoter companies thrive in a customer-driven world, p. 224. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Braun, V., Clarke, V.: Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. 3(2), 77–101 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. WebAim.: Keyboard Accessibility, (2022). https://webaim.org/techniques/keyboard/#testing

  34. Schrepp, M., Hinderks, A., Thomaschewski, J.: Construction of a benchmark for the user experience questionnaire (UEQ). Int. J. Interact. Multimed. Artif. Intell. 4(4), 40–44 (2017). https://doi.org/10.9781/ijimai.2017.445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Putnam, C., Wozniak, K., Zefeldt, M.J., Cheng, J., Caputo, M., Duffield, C.: How do professionals who create computing technologies consider accessibility?. In: Proceedings of the 14th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, pp. 87–94, (2012). https://doi.org/10.1145/2384916.2384932

  36. UN Sustainable Development Group (UNSDG): Universal values principle two: leave no one behind. https://unsdg.un.org/2030-agenda/universal-values/leave-no-one-behind Accessed 30 August 2023

  37. Petrie, H., Kheir, O.: The relationship between accessibility and usability of websites. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 397–406, (2007). https://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240688

  38. Yesilada, Y., Brajnik, G., Vigo, M., Harper, S.: Exploring perceptions of web accessibility: a survey approach. Behav. Inf. Technol. 34(2), 119–134 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2013.848238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Chandrashekar, S. Benedyk, R.: Accessibility vs. Usability - where is the dividing line? Contemporary Ergonomics, Editor Philip D Bust (publication of the Ergonomic Society Annual Conference, April 1–4, 2006) Taylor & Francis Ltd: London, U.K., pp. 231–235, (2006)

  40. Mbipom, G., Harper, S.: The interplay between web aesthetics and accessibility. In: Proceedings of the 13th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, pp. 147–154, (2011). https://doi.org/10.1145/2049536.2049564

  41. Regan, B.: Accessibility and design: A failure of the imagination. In: Proceedings of the 2004 International Cross-disciplinary Workshop on Web Accessibility (W4A), pp. 29–37, (2004). https://doi.org/10.1145/990657.990663

  42. Leporini, B., Paternò, F.: Applying web usability criteria for vision-impaired users: does it really improve task performance? Int. J. Human-Comput. Int. 24(1), 17–47 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/10447310701771472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Cao, S., Loiacono, E.: The state of the awareness of web accessibility guidelines of student website and app developers. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 32–42, (2019). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21902-4_3

Download references

Funding

No funding was received for conducting this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Design, Faculty of Architecture and Design, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Gjøvik, Norway

    Yavuz Inal

Authors
  1. Yavuz Inal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

YI designed the research, collected data, analyzed, and reported it.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yavuz Inal.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author has no financial or proprietary interests in any material discussed in this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Inal, Y. I feel for you! The effect of empathy exercises on accessibility awareness. Univ Access Inf Soc (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-023-01081-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-023-01081-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation